Bayshire Rancho Mirage is a continuing-care retirement community in Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, California — state license #331881086, licensed for 135 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 24 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Bayshire Rancho Mirage

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 135 residents · Rancho Mirage, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331881086, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
72201 Country Club Drive · Rancho Mirage, Riverside County
Phone
(760) 340-5999
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 135 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 135 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 24 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 3, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the April 29, 2026 visit
119 of 135 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2021 to April 29, 2026. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 24 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate meals to residents in care Residents are not provided sufficient activities Staff did not update resident's care plan Staff did not provide timely assistance to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Michael Maeda, Resident Service Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation involved interviews with staff and residents and review of records. On February 4, 2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegations. It was alleged that staff did not provide adequate meals to residents in care. Information received indicated that quality of facility food served has gone down with the current food service manager. LPA conducted interviews with nine (9) residents. Five (5) residents interviewed stated that the food service has been good. Four (4) residents interviewed stated that the food service has been about average. Continued on LIC9099-C.... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250204093310
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Questionable Death

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Michael Maeda, Resident Service Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation included interviews with staff and records review. On March 6, 2026, The Department received a complaint report alleging a questionable death. According to the information received, Resident #1 (R1) passed away on March 3, 2026. A Relevant Party (RP) visited R1 on the same day without knowing that R1 had passed away. Staff did not provide any information regarding R1 when RP learned of the passing. During an interview, RP stated they were unaware that R1 had been receiving hospice services. RP also stated that no staff members provided any information about R1’s passing when RP inquired. Continued on LIC9099-C.... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260306144310
Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs Staff allowed resident to be outside without supervision, resulting in a fall Resident was left on the ground outside for an extended period of time

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Jimmy Stewart, Executive Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews with staff and residents and review of records. On 10-09-2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegation. It was alleged that staff are not meeting resident’s hygiene needs. According to the information received, Resident #1 (R1) was found to be dirty, unkempt with bruising and ants crawling all over when emergency personnels arrived for R1’s fall incident. LPA reviewed R1’s resident file which revealed R1’s cognitive condition. Continued on LIC9099-C.... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2026 · control 18-AS-20251009094043
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended at an off-site location

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Armando Perez and Ivashia Wright, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Jimmy Stewart, and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. On March 11, 2026, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility staff left a resident unattended at an off-site location. It was reported that on March 11, Resident 1 (R1) arrived at what they believed was a scheduled medical appointment and was left without confirmation or supervision by facility staff. An interview with the Additional Witness could not be conducted, as the report was submitted anonymously and no contact information was provided to obtain further information. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260311114143
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident eloping from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with the Assistant Resident Services Director, Valentina Murrell, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/30/22, LPA Stephanie Torres conducted the initial investigation and interviewed staff and resident, reviewed records, and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. On 7/8/24, LPA Kathleen Banrasavong made a follow-up visit and requested additional documents. During the visit today, LPA Chan interviewed three (3) staff and three (3) residents. (Continue on LIC9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221228121355
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to meet resident's medical needs Staff neglected resident while in care Staff failed to respond to residents' call assistance buttons in a timely manner Staff failed to meet resident's needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Jimmy Stewart and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA’s complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, observations, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to meet resident's medical needs”, Record review of R1’s “Resident Assessment” dated 06/10/2021 reveals R1 was scored on a Level 1 care and was independent, ambulatory, required no assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and had the capabilities to administer their own medication. Interview with eight (8) residents reported staff would contact emergency services to send to the hospital when needed based on previous experiences or speculation. Interview with six (6) staff members deny ignoring residents’ medicalthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220315104748
Jun 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not assist resident with transfers. Facility staff are not meeting resident's care needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kathleen Banrasavong, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegation(s) listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator in Training, Rob McFarlane and informed him of the purpose of the LPA’s visit. The LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted a review of records, obtained, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. The Administrator in Training, Rob McFarlane provided the LPA with the roster for the facility. A review of the resident roster and face sheet indicted that the resident has only been admitted to the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Department of Social Service, Community Care Licensing (CCL) does not have jurisdiction over the SNF. Therefore, this complaint is unfounded. A cross report will be made to the appropriate departments who have jurisdiction. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Facility staff do not assist resident with trthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240403150931
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident roughly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegation. The LPA me with Michael Maeda, Resident Services Director (RSD), and informed him of the purpose for her visit. A report was received by the Department alleging Staff One (S1), on December 03, 2022, was rough with Resident One (R1). The investigation included staff/resident interviews, records review, and records collection. It was alleged S1 grabbed a wheelchair, roughly put R1 in it, took the resident's arms and pulled them behind their body, before throwing the resident on their bed and roughly pulling off their clothes to change the resident. R1 was interviewed and did not provide a statement regarding the matter; R1 is diagnosed with a condition which can affect their ability to recall. S1 was interviewed; the staff confirmed an incident did take place involving R1 in which the resident did become aggressive andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2023 · control 18-AS-20221209144911
Sep 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202645020252212024440202356120225512021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 340-5999

Is Bayshire Rancho Mirage licensed?

Yes — Bayshire Rancho Mirage is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Rancho Mirage (Riverside County): California license #331881086, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 135 residents. State records list 24 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Bayshire Rancho Mirage care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Bayshire Rancho Mirage with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 135 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Bayshire Rancho Mirage cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Bayshire Rancho Mirage's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Bayshire Rancho Mirage accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Bayshire Rancho Mirage through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

119 of 135 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on April 29, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Bayshire Rancho Mirage?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 24 dated documents since 2021 for Bayshire Rancho Mirage; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 29, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate meals to residents in care Residents are not provided sufficient activities Staff did not update resident's care plan Staff did not provide timely assistance to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Michael Maeda, Resident Service Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation involved interviews with staff and residents and review of records. On February 4, 2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegations. It was alleged that staff did not provide adequate meals to residents in care. Information received indicated that quality of facility food served has gone down with the current food service manager. LPA conducted interviews with nine (9) residents. Five (5) residents interviewed stated that the food service has been good. Four (4) residents interviewed stated that the food service has been about average. Continued on LIC9099-C.... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250204093310
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable Death
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Michael Maeda, Resident Service Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation included interviews with staff and records review. On March 6, 2026, The Department received a complaint report alleging a questionable death. According to the information received, Resident #1 (R1) passed away on March 3, 2026. A Relevant Party (RP) visited R1 on the same day without knowing that R1 had passed away. Staff did not provide any information regarding R1 when RP learned of the passing. During an interview, RP stated they were unaware that R1 had been receiving hospice services. RP also stated that no staff members provided any information about R1’s passing when RP inquired. Continued on LIC9099-C.... UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260306144310
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs Staff allowed resident to be outside without supervision, resulting in a fall Resident was left on the ground outside for an extended period of time
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Seo Jeon conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Jimmy Stewart, Executive Director and informed them of the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews with staff and residents and review of records. On 10-09-2025, Community Care Licensing (The Department) received a complaint report with the following allegation. It was alleged that staff are not meeting resident’s hygiene needs. According to the information received, Resident #1 (R1) was found to be dirty, unkempt with bruising and ants crawling all over when emergency personnels arrived for R1’s fall incident. LPA reviewed R1’s resident file which revealed R1’s cognitive condition. Continued on LIC9099-C.... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 2, 2026 · control 18-AS-20251009094043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident unattended at an off-site location
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Armando Perez and Ivashia Wright, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Jimmy Stewart, and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. On March 11, 2026, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility staff left a resident unattended at an off-site location. It was reported that on March 11, Resident 1 (R1) arrived at what they believed was a scheduled medical appointment and was left without confirmation or supervision by facility staff. An interview with the Additional Witness could not be conducted, as the report was submitted anonymously and no contact information was provided to obtain further information. Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260311114143

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident eloping from the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with the Assistant Resident Services Director, Valentina Murrell, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/30/22, LPA Stephanie Torres conducted the initial investigation and interviewed staff and resident, reviewed records, and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. On 7/8/24, LPA Kathleen Banrasavong made a follow-up visit and requested additional documents. During the visit today, LPA Chan interviewed three (3) staff and three (3) residents. (Continue on LIC9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221228121355

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to meet resident's medical needs Staff neglected resident while in care Staff failed to respond to residents' call assistance buttons in a timely manner Staff failed to meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Jimmy Stewart and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA’s complaint investigation consisted of a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, observations, interviews with staff and residents, and records review of requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to meet resident's medical needs”, Record review of R1’s “Resident Assessment” dated 06/10/2021 reveals R1 was scored on a Level 1 care and was independent, ambulatory, required no assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and had the capabilities to administer their own medication. Interview with eight (8) residents reported staff would contact emergency services to send to the hospital when needed based on previous experiences or speculation. Interview with six (6) staff members deny ignoring residents’ medicalCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220315104748
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not assist resident with transfers. Facility staff are not meeting resident's care needs.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kathleen Banrasavong, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegation(s) listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator in Training, Rob McFarlane and informed him of the purpose of the LPA’s visit. The LPA conducted a tour of the interior/exterior areas of the facility, conducted a review of records, obtained, and requested copies of pertinent documentation. The Administrator in Training, Rob McFarlane provided the LPA with the roster for the facility. A review of the resident roster and face sheet indicted that the resident has only been admitted to the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Department of Social Service, Community Care Licensing (CCL) does not have jurisdiction over the SNF. Therefore, this complaint is unfounded. A cross report will be made to the appropriate departments who have jurisdiction. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Facility staff do not assist resident with trCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240403150931

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 340-5999
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Bayshire Rancho Mirage? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.