Royalty Senior Living

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ta’Neisha Riley and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff is not allowing resident to return to facility for re-entry. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 informed LPA that on January 21,2025 Resident #1 was taken to the hospital due to a witness fall. Staff #1 further indicated that Resident #1 was later transported to the hospital via ambulance due to abnormal vitals. Staff #1 informed LPA that while Resident #1 was at hospital the hospital had discovered that Resident #1 was having an irregular heart rhythm which prompted the hospital to admit Resident #1. Staff #1 informed LPA that Resident #1 was admitted on January 22,2025 for further evaluation. Staff #1 informed LPA that while R#1 was at the hoRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, April 18, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250124141042

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings for allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley and explained the purpose of the visit. On 08/15/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging that a resident was being sexually assaulted by another resident in care. The Department investigation consisted of reviews of facility files and other records, observations, and interviews with pertinent individuals. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was sexually assaulted by Resident #2 (R2) at facility on 08/13/2023, sometime late at night. Department staff interviewed R1 pertaining to the allegation of sexual assault and R1 denied that the allegation occurred. Based on observations and interviews, the department was unable to determine if sexual assault did or did not occur. UnsubstantiatedRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, February 20, 2026 · control 56-AS-20230815164705

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Prieto met with Facility-Administrator-Ta'neisha Riley and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegation #1 - Administrator Riley (S1) explained to LPA the facility phone is available for all residents in the home. Facility phone is a handheld phone capable of receiving and making calls. This phone does not have the capability of blocking calls. LPA spoke resident #1 (R1) who state she receives calls from family members on the facility and capable of making and declining calls on her own. R1 states staff has never denied her incoming calls to the facility. LPA observed facility phone call list which indicate calls made to this phone. None of the numbers listed indicate that they were block. These numbers were obtained for this complaint during this investigation. *** continued on LIC 9099C*** UnsubstantiatedRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251201131529

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation for the above-named allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley to discuss the elements of the complaint. Regarding the allegation, Staff intervened with resident's representative's right to participate in decision-making regarding the care and services to be provided to the resident; interview with resident #1 (R1), in question, reveals the authorized representative was present during a doctor's visit with R1. R1 did stated that the authorized representative, as well as the facility administrator were included during a medical evaluation. Interview with Administrator Riley also revealed that all parties were physically present during the resident evaluation as well as confirming appointment dates and locations prior to evaluations. Documentation was obtained confirming the date and location of R1's medical evaluation. Based on the information obtained there is not enouRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, May 4, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230501085745

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA Prieto met with administrator Ta'Neisha Riley and toured facility to address resident door locks. MS Riley demonstrated, to LPA Prieto, how doors are opened and found to be operational and function properly. LPA interviewed client (C1) in question, who stated when the door to the bedroom is locked, it is done so by her own accord for privacy and also states the staff can request entry and staff is able to do so by easily unlocking the door with a staff key. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that the resident's door locks poses a risk while in case. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. UnsubstantiatedRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230109125239

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA Prieto met with administrator Ta'Neisha Riley who states that records were requested for client #1 (C1) by C1's responsible party and their designee. Riley states that there request was received, but there was a delay in filling the request. Riley understands that the timeframe of such request was not met. Riley is still in the process of filling the request to provide resident records, Based on LPA observations, interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division & Chapter number) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D). SubstantiatedRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230111170820