Desert Hills Memory Care Center is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet, Riverside County, California — state license #331880722, licensed for 58 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated January 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Desert Hills Memory Care Center

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 58 residents · Hemet, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331880722, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
25818 Columbia St · Hemet, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 652-1837
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 58 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 18 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 58 NON AMBULATORY, 18 OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14 REMAIN APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS, 2 PER ROOM. ROOMS 9 AND 22 APPROVED TO ACCOMEDATE 3 RES IDENTS EACH. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 37 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 12, 2026
Occupancy at the December 4, 2025 visit
32 of 58 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 22, 2021 to December 4, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility management retaliated against staff member Facility is not following their plan of operation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/30/24 LPA Ross conducted initial investigation visit. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores requested pertaining documents. On 12/3/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews with 6 residents and 6 staff. On 12/4/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility management retaliated against staff #1(S1). It is alleged licensee retaliated against staff for bringing up concerns. . Interviews with residents revealed residents did not have concerns about the staff. Interviews with 6 staff revealed 6 out of 6 staff stated management has not retaliated against the staff. 1 out of the 6 stated there was a staff in management before that was difficult to communicate with and 1 out of the 6 staff mentioned they raththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240126082906
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing an outbreak of scabies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/10/24 LPAs Martinez and V. Flores conducted initial investigation visit. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested pertaining documents and attempted to contact Riverside Department of Public Health (RDPH). On 12/1/25 and 12/2/25 LPA Flores attempted to contact RDPH. LPA On 12/3/25 LPA Flores interviewed 6 residents and 6 staff, and reviewed 6 resident files. On 12/4/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff are not addressing an outbreak of scabies. It is alleged residents at the facility have scabies. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240702131513
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep facility free of pests

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/20/24 LPAs Jeon, Castillo and Sabarias conducted an initial complaint investigation, conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed 3 staff and 2 residents, and requested pertaining documents. On 10/25/24 LPA Jeon conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed 7 residents. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores requested pertaining documents for resident #1(R1). On 12/3/25 LPA Flores conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed 6 staff, and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not keep facility free of pest. It is alleged facility has bedbug infestation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240812155053
Dec 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks in the facility Staff do not ensure sufficient supplies are available Staff are drinking on the facility premises

*This is a corrected version and supersedes report dated: 11/19/25 to correct finding noted on report from Needs Further to Unsubstantiated.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/22/23 LPA Martinez conducted an initial complaint investigation visit and requested the pertinent documents. On 12/18/23 LPA Martinez conducted a subsequent complaint visit. On 1/23/24 LPA Martinez conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed residents. On 11/7/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested physician’s reports, face sheets, incident reports for 9 residents. On 11/8/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 staff over the phone. On 11/10/25 LPA Flores contacted Riverside Department of Public Health. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230814115217
Jun 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries while in care Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff are overdosing resident Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings

On May 06, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Licensee, Shannon Moore. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. On March 21, 2022, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging, Resident sustained injuries while in care,Staff handled resident in a rough manner, Staff are overdosing resident, Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time, and staff did not safeguarded residents personal belongings. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations. Regarding the allegation Resident sustained injuries while in care, it was reported R1 sustained a serious knee injury. It was also reported that R1’s knee was swollen and R1 was unable to move it. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director, Chantelle Hudson advised R1 had no falls and injuries reported during placement. Executive Directorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220321154449
May 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are being met. Resident's room is in disrepair. Staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Shannon Moore, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged that “Staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility.” It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had legally revoked their Power of Attorney (POA) and became self- responsible on 01/16/2024. It was alleged that R1 was not allowed to leave the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240122095107
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent an unknown individual access to the facility resulting in a resident being physically attacked while in care.

On 04/24/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)s Abdoualye Zerbo and Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Lavina Dubose, Memory Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and record review. On 04/16/25 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent an unknown individual access to the facility resulting in a resident being physically attacked while in care. Per interview with Executive Director Shannon Moore, there has not been any incidences as alleged to have occurred with individuals outside of the facility being granted access to the facility and attacking any residents in care. Per a file review the facility is a secured perimeter and requires a door code to be granted entry to each buidling on the premises. Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250416103400
Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility retaining residents who need a higher level of care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Stephanie Martinez and Ferrer Sabarias, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegation. The LPAs met with Administrator, Shannon Moore Wilkerson, and informed her of the purpose of the visit. A report was received by the Department alleging the licensee admits residents into the facility who have a mental disorder requiring a higher level of care than can be met by the facility. The investigation included staff interviews, review of records and collection of relevant documentation. An interview with a witness revealed there are at least two residents in care who do have a mental disorder requiring a higher level of care. LPA Martinez reviewed the medical assessments (Physicians Report for Residential Care Facility for The Elderly) for both residents identified, Resident One (R1) and Resident Two (R2). Neither report noted either R1 or R2 were diagnosed with a mental disorder as allthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240131082100
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff giving residents injections

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegations. The LPA met with Shannon Wilkerson, Administrator, and informed her of the purpose for the visit. A report was received alleging residents in care are receiving injections from unqualified staff. According to Administrator Wilkerson, there has only been two residents in care, in the last four (4) months, who have required injections. She reported it is only the staff who have a LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) license, or herself, who will administer injections to residents in care. Staff interviews and records refuted the Administrator’s statement. Two out of four staff interviews revealed medication technicians, who are not considered appropriately skilled professionals, have been observed to administer injections to residents in care. In addition, Resident One's (R1's) and Resident Two's (R2's) Medication Administration Records, rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240131082100
Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Inappropriate interactions between resident's in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Shannon Moore informed them of the purpose of this visit. During this investigation LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents; obtained supportive documentation for review to assist with determining the findings for the above noted allegation. The following was determined. Allegation #1 – Inappropriate actions between residents in care. The allegation stated that Resident One (#R1) was involved in a physical altercation with Resident Two (#R2). Allegedly, R1 threw a punch, and struck R2. When R1 punched R2, R2 bit R1 on the hand, causing a minor breakage of the skin. Staff interview revealed that both Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211213172614
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file37typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202581302024551202333120225732021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 652-1837

Is Desert Hills Memory Care Center licensed?

Yes — Desert Hills Memory Care Center is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet (Riverside County): California license #331880722, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 58 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Desert Hills Memory Care Center care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Desert Hills Memory Care Center with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 58 NON AMBULATORY, 18 OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14 REMAIN APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS, 2 PER ROOM. ROOMS 9 AND 22 APPROVED TO ACCOMEDATE 3 RES IDENTS EACH. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS.

How much does Desert Hills Memory Care Center cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Desert Hills Memory Care Center's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Desert Hills Memory Care Center accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Desert Hills Memory Care Center is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

32 of 58 beds occupied (55%) when the state visited on December 4, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Desert Hills Memory Care Center?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 37 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2021 for Desert Hills Memory Care Center; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 4, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility management retaliated against staff member Facility is not following their plan of operation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/30/24 LPA Ross conducted initial investigation visit. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores requested pertaining documents. On 12/3/25 LPA Flores conducted interviews with 6 residents and 6 staff. On 12/4/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility management retaliated against staff #1(S1). It is alleged licensee retaliated against staff for bringing up concerns. . Interviews with residents revealed residents did not have concerns about the staff. Interviews with 6 staff revealed 6 out of 6 staff stated management has not retaliated against the staff. 1 out of the 6 stated there was a staff in management before that was difficult to communicate with and 1 out of the 6 staff mentioned they rathCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240126082906
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not addressing an outbreak of scabies
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/10/24 LPAs Martinez and V. Flores conducted initial investigation visit. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested pertaining documents and attempted to contact Riverside Department of Public Health (RDPH). On 12/1/25 and 12/2/25 LPA Flores attempted to contact RDPH. LPA On 12/3/25 LPA Flores interviewed 6 residents and 6 staff, and reviewed 6 resident files. On 12/4/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff are not addressing an outbreak of scabies. It is alleged residents at the facility have scabies. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240702131513
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep facility free of pests
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/20/24 LPAs Jeon, Castillo and Sabarias conducted an initial complaint investigation, conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed 3 staff and 2 residents, and requested pertaining documents. On 10/25/24 LPA Jeon conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed 7 residents. On 12/1/25 LPA Flores requested pertaining documents for resident #1(R1). On 12/3/25 LPA Flores conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed 6 staff, and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not keep facility free of pest. It is alleged facility has bedbug infestation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240812155053
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks in the facility Staff do not ensure sufficient supplies are available Staff are drinking on the facility premises
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*This is a corrected version and supersedes report dated: 11/19/25 to correct finding noted on report from Needs Further to Unsubstantiated.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Shannon Moore and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/22/23 LPA Martinez conducted an initial complaint investigation visit and requested the pertinent documents. On 12/18/23 LPA Martinez conducted a subsequent complaint visit. On 1/23/24 LPA Martinez conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed residents. On 11/7/25 LPA Flores contacted administrator and requested physician’s reports, face sheets, incident reports for 9 residents. On 11/8/25 LPA Flores interviewed 3 staff over the phone. On 11/10/25 LPA Flores contacted Riverside Department of Public Health. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 21, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230814115217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries while in care Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff are overdosing resident Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On May 06, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Licensee, Shannon Moore. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. On March 21, 2022, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging, Resident sustained injuries while in care,Staff handled resident in a rough manner, Staff are overdosing resident, Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time, and staff did not safeguarded residents personal belongings. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and made observations. Regarding the allegation Resident sustained injuries while in care, it was reported R1 sustained a serious knee injury. It was also reported that R1’s knee was swollen and R1 was unable to move it. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director, Chantelle Hudson advised R1 had no falls and injuries reported during placement. Executive DirectorCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220321154449
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are being met. Resident's room is in disrepair. Staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Shannon Moore, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented conducted a walk through, and conducted records review. It was alleged that “Staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility.” It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had legally revoked their Power of Attorney (POA) and became self- responsible on 01/16/2024. It was alleged that R1 was not allowed to leave the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2025 · control 18-AS-20240122095107
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent an unknown individual access to the facility resulting in a resident being physically attacked while in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 04/24/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)s Abdoualye Zerbo and Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Lavina Dubose, Memory Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and record review. On 04/16/25 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging staff did not prevent an unknown individual access to the facility resulting in a resident being physically attacked while in care. Per interview with Executive Director Shannon Moore, there has not been any incidences as alleged to have occurred with individuals outside of the facility being granted access to the facility and attacking any residents in care. Per a file review the facility is a secured perimeter and requires a door code to be granted entry to each buidling on the premises. InterviewCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250416103400

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility retaining residents who need a higher level of care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Stephanie Martinez and Ferrer Sabarias, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the investigation into the above allegation. The LPAs met with Administrator, Shannon Moore Wilkerson, and informed her of the purpose of the visit. A report was received by the Department alleging the licensee admits residents into the facility who have a mental disorder requiring a higher level of care than can be met by the facility. The investigation included staff interviews, review of records and collection of relevant documentation. An interview with a witness revealed there are at least two residents in care who do have a mental disorder requiring a higher level of care. LPA Martinez reviewed the medical assessments (Physicians Report for Residential Care Facility for The Elderly) for both residents identified, Resident One (R1) and Resident Two (R2). Neither report noted either R1 or R2 were diagnosed with a mental disorder as allCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240131082100
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff giving residents injections
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegations. The LPA met with Shannon Wilkerson, Administrator, and informed her of the purpose for the visit. A report was received alleging residents in care are receiving injections from unqualified staff. According to Administrator Wilkerson, there has only been two residents in care, in the last four (4) months, who have required injections. She reported it is only the staff who have a LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) license, or herself, who will administer injections to residents in care. Staff interviews and records refuted the Administrator’s statement. Two out of four staff interviews revealed medication technicians, who are not considered appropriately skilled professionals, have been observed to administer injections to residents in care. In addition, Resident One's (R1's) and Resident Two's (R2's) Medication Administration Records, reCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240131082100
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInappropriate interactions between resident's in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Shannon Moore informed them of the purpose of this visit. During this investigation LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents; obtained supportive documentation for review to assist with determining the findings for the above noted allegation. The following was determined. Allegation #1 – Inappropriate actions between residents in care. The allegation stated that Resident One (#R1) was involved in a physical altercation with Resident Two (#R2). Allegedly, R1 threw a punch, and struck R2. When R1 punched R2, R2 bit R1 on the hand, causing a minor breakage of the skin. Staff interview revealed that both UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211213172614

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow resident to receive phone calls
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Shannon Moore Executive Director and Wellness Director Nathaly Ledesma, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegation listed above. The allegation of staff did not allow resident to receive phone calls was investigated. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and record review. Regarding the allegation staff did not allow resident to receive phone calls. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on February 27, 2023. R1 has a Power of Attorney (POA) that has indicated on the resident's release of medical information as to who the facility can and cannot give R1's healthcare information out to, as well as to take R1 out of the facility for off grounds visitation. Per the Executive Director Shannon Moore, facility staff did state that R1 was not available to the caCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230421150207
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff mismanaged residents medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unanounced in order to initiate an investigation of a complaint with the above allegation(s). LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation(s) with Wellness Director Nathaly Ledsema. Below is a summary of the complaint investigation findings: Regarding allegation "Facility staff mismanaged residents medication.": LPA Colvin reviewed a small sample of medications for residents at the facility, and observed that one resident (R1) had not received their morning medication yet, and it was over 1.5 hours passed medication pass at 8am. LPA Colvin addtionally observed another resident (R2) had not received their medication for the previous day (1/31/), but it was marked as Administered according to staff. Therefore, based on these two residents, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because theCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230124123252

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 37 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
37
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 652-1837
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Desert Hills Memory Care Center? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.