Citrus Gardens is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet, Riverside County, California — state license #336426759, licensed for 64 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 45 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Citrus Gardens

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 64 residents · Hemet, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #336426759, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
25911 Stanford St · Hemet, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 925-7107
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 64 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 5 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
64 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 105, 202, 205, 206, AND 209 ONLY. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 56 times and filed 45 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 27, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 3, 2026
Occupancy at the October 23, 2025 visit
51 of 59 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 12, 2021 to October 23, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 32 of 45 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 9 documents
Apr 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 14 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident had adequate sleeping accommodations. Facility’s Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and Business Office Manager Judine Ramirez, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On June 4, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not ensure resident had adequate sleeping accommodation and Facility’s Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours. In response to concerns regarding inadequate sleeping accommodation, it was reported that a resident had been observed sleeping on a broken bed and staff failed to take corrective action.Interview with ED stated that no reports of a broken bed had been brought to their attention. Cpntinued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250604100237
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are abusive to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, witnesses and file reviews. On April 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility staff are abusive to resident in care. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was being mistreated by staff and experiencing abusive behavior due to nonpayment of rent. Interview with Executive Director, Valeria Garcia, revealed that R1 was unable to pay their rent, but eviction proceedings had not been initiated. It was also stated that R1 had not made any allegations to management of staff abuse. Interview with 2 of 2 staff corroborated that they neither heard R1 report any abuse by staff nor witnessed any stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250410091938
Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's care needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and file reviews. On May 05, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's care needs. It was alleged that facility only has 3 caregiver staff to supervise five villas, resulting in two villas not staffed and unable to provide proper care and supervision for. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director Valeria Garcia stated that the facility made recent staffing adjustments that are sufficient to meet the care needs of residents. ED noted the facility has increased night shift coverage from three to four caregivers between 10:00the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250505091658
Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents Staff did not respond to resident's calls for assistance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and Administrator Liliana Moreno where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses, and file reviews. On August 08, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents and staff did not respond to residents’ calls for assistance. It was alleged that on August 1, 2025, Resident 1 (R1) was involved in a physical altercation with R2 and staff failed to respond to verbal and telephone calls for intervention and assistance. Interview with Additional Witness 1 (AW1) disclosed that R1 observed R2 in the incorrect room and asked R2 to exit the room. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250808101937
Aug 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent resident to resident altercations while in care. Staff did not properly report incidents involving the residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director (ED), Valeria Garcia and Administrator Liliana Moreno where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses, and file reviews. On March 04, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not properly report incidents involving residents and staff do not prevent resident to resident altercations while in care. It was alleged that between January and March 2025, multiple resident on resident altercations were not reported to Long Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCO), in accordance with the guidelines outlined in California Assembly Bill 1411 and Title 22 regulations. Additionally it was noted that staff was not preventing resident to resident altercatithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250304094204
Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer prescribed medications to residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and file reviews. On May 05, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not administer prescribed medications to residents in care. It was alleged that occasionally on the weekends, the facility would not staff a Medical Technician (MedTech) to be scheduled. The inability to cover the shift resulted in medication not being dispensed to residents. In regards to the allegation, LPA, in collaboration with Executive Director (ED) Valeria Garcia and two of two staff members responsible for employee scheduling, conducted interviews and reviewed documentation including electronic Medication Administhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250505105846
Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff not regularly providing observations to residents physical changes.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation of and deliver findings to the above mentioned complaint. LPA was greeted and granted entrance into the facility by Jessenia Rubalcaba, Activity Director. Jessenia informed the Administrator of my arrival. LPA later met with Administrator, Valeria Garcia who was informed of the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, and review of records. The investigation revealed that on September 15, 2022, Witness three (W3) conducted a physical examination of Resident 1(R1) and noted an acute stage 2 ulcer on the sacral area. The ulcer had been present for 11/12 weeks. The patient care plan was to turn every 2 hours or as needed, change diaper often, continue air mattress, home health for wound care, continue applying skin protectant, and zinc ointment twice a day and as needed, apply nonadherent dressing to area and change twice a daythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221223121913
Jul 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed a Stage 3 pressure injury due to neglect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Liliana Moreno, Med-Tech Supervisor/ Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and document review. Evidence shows that on 9/15/2022 a nurse came to the facility to assess R1’s wound on the coccyx which was assessed as a stage 2. The nurse recommended home health care for the wound and the plan was to keep the wound clean, reposition every 2 hours, apply ointment, and dress. On 10/5/2022 the first visit was made by Home Health Registered Nurse (RN1) for wound care and nurse observed the wound was not dressed when R1’s wet diaper was changed, and the nurse documented the wound as a stage 3 open wound with no drainage. The LVN checked on R1 3 times a day but did not always look at the wound. Instead, she checked to make sure the caregivethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221223121913
Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Armando Perez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. The investigation included observations, interviews with staff members and residents, and a review of records. On February 14, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that a staff member threatened a resident in care. It was reported that Staff 1 (S1) verbally threatened Client 1 (C1) and Client 2 (C2), stating that the facility was their home and the clients would be evicted if they did not follow the rules. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director, (ED) Valeria Garcia stated that she was made aware of the incident and conducted an internal investigation with the alleged staff and residents involved. ED stated the investigation did not find evidence that S1 made the allethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250214110735
Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility doesn't have a qualified administrator.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Javina George and Ferrer Sabarias made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Administrator Valeria Garcia where LPAs explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of allegation. The Allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews, records review. On 11/06/2024 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that the facility doesn't have a qualified administrator, as they do not possess a valid administrator certificate. Per an interview conducted with Valeria Garcia, whom confirmed that she has been the Administrator since 10/30/24, administrator certificate number 6022084740, which expires 12/12/24. This was verfied by a records review of the personnel record and criminal record transfer request form. Upon conducting a tour of the interior of the physical plant LPAs observed for there to be a valid administrator certificate posted in the entryway. In athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241106142616
Jul 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not ensuring that resident has access to a phone while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude and deliver findings to an investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Buisness Office Manager Ashlee Theus. The allegation was investigated and consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not ensuring that resident has access to a phone while in care”, it was alleged a telephone is not accessible to Resident One (R1) who is bedridden. LPA conducted an interview with Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus regarding residents’ accessibility to a telephone at the facility. Theus stated there is a telephone accessible to every resident in each villa at the facility. Residents who do not have a cellphone with an ambulatory status of bedridden can request to use the administrative staffs’ cellphone while on duty to make outgoing calls or receive calls. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 18-AS-20231219181442
20233 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents fell while in care. Resident sustained pressure ulcers while in care. Resident sustained unexplained bruisinig while in care. Staff did not provide water to residents. Staff did not provided resident with their own hygiene supplies. Staff not meeting residents needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas met with Executive Director Diana Molina-Ramirez and Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus in the Riverside/San Bernardino Regional Office to deliver findings on the above allegations. Department staff investigated the above allegations, and LPA Nickolas also conducted facility tours, file reviews, and additional interviews pertinent to this investigation. Allegation #1 “Residents fell while in care”. The allegation alleged that client #1 (C1), a month before this allegation, was made fell with no injuries. The allegation alleged that client #2 (C2) also fell, and their health has declined since their fall. Department staff interview with the reporting party (RP) revealed that they were advised of the fall by other facility staff members, but there is no evidence that the fall occurred on the date(s) advised. The RP also discusses other falls with another client (client #3 [C3]) that was not originally reported. Department staff interviethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200820153416
Sep 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Hazardous items accessible to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Ashlee Theus and explained the purpose of the visit. The Executive Director Diana Molina Ramirez, later arrived at the faciliy. Department staff investigated the above allegation, and LPA Nickolas also conducted facility tours, file reviews, and additional interviews pertinent to this investigation. The allegation alleged that cleaning products are left out for residents to access. On August 7, 2023, LPA Nickolas conducted a facility tour with staff #1 (S1) and discovered a bottle of cleaning solution in an unsecured credenza located in Villa 2. LPA Nickolas questioned S1 about the cleaning solution. S1 stated they did not know why the solution was not placed in the secured cabinet. S1 questioned an unidentified member of the facility staff working in that building, and that staff stated that it was there when they arrived. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200820154620
Sep 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple falls at the facility while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus and explained the purpose of the visit. The Exective Director Diana Molina-Ramirez, later arrived at the facility.The investigation included facility tours, file reviews, and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that client #1 (C1) has had three (3) falls within a six (6) months span of time while residing at the facility. LPA Nickolas's interview with staff #1 (S1) revealed that they were familiar with C1 but unfamiliar with C1's three (3) falls within a six (6) months period. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #2 (S2) revealed that they could not provide any information about C1's falls within six (6) months. S2 stated that C1 would rock back and forth while in bed. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #3 (S3) revealed that S3 was an assigned caregiver to C1. S3 stated that C1 liked to dothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220503163805
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee failed to supervise resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA Nickolas met with Wellness Coordinator Monica Quinones and explained the purpose of the visit. The Executive Director, Diana Molina Ramirez, would arrive at the facility later. The investigation included file reviews, a tour of the facility, and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that on September 7, 2022, client #1 (C1) jumped out of the window and eloped from the facility. The allegation alleged that during a routine check at the facility, staff #1 (S1) was notified by another client that C1 jumped out of the window. LPA Nickolas’ interview with staff #2 (S2) and staff #3 (S3) revealed that they were not present when the incident occurred. LPA Nickolas’ interview with C1 revealed that C1 could not participate in the interview process. LPA Nickolas’ file reviews revealed that the facility had sufficient staff working the night ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220908145705
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations9typical 1
Substantiated complaints14typical 2
Total complaints32typical 7
State visits on file56typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202659020251214620244402023811220224412021670
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 925-7107

Is Citrus Gardens licensed?

Yes — Citrus Gardens is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Hemet (Riverside County): California license #336426759, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 64 residents. State records list 45 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 27, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Citrus Gardens care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Citrus Gardens with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record64 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 105, 202, 205, 206, AND 209 ONLY. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Citrus Gardens cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Citrus Gardens's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Citrus Gardens accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Citrus Gardens through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

51 of 59 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on October 23, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Citrus Gardens?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 56 state visits and 45 dated documents since 2021 for Citrus Gardens; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 23, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident had adequate sleeping accommodations. Facility’s Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and Business Office Manager Judine Ramirez, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses and file reviews. On June 4, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not ensure resident had adequate sleeping accommodation and Facility’s Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours. In response to concerns regarding inadequate sleeping accommodation, it was reported that a resident had been observed sleeping on a broken bed and staff failed to take corrective action.Interview with ED stated that no reports of a broken bed had been brought to their attention. Cpntinued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250604100237
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are abusive to resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, witnesses and file reviews. On April 10, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility staff are abusive to resident in care. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was being mistreated by staff and experiencing abusive behavior due to nonpayment of rent. Interview with Executive Director, Valeria Garcia, revealed that R1 was unable to pay their rent, but eviction proceedings had not been initiated. It was also stated that R1 had not made any allegations to management of staff abuse. Interview with 2 of 2 staff corroborated that they neither heard R1 report any abuse by staff nor witnessed any staCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250410091938
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's care needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and file reviews. On May 05, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's care needs. It was alleged that facility only has 3 caregiver staff to supervise five villas, resulting in two villas not staffed and unable to provide proper care and supervision for. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director Valeria Garcia stated that the facility made recent staffing adjustments that are sufficient to meet the care needs of residents. ED noted the facility has increased night shift coverage from three to four caregivers between 10:00CDSS inspection report, October 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250505091658
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents Staff did not respond to resident's calls for assistance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and Administrator Liliana Moreno where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses, and file reviews. On August 08, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents and staff did not respond to residents’ calls for assistance. It was alleged that on August 1, 2025, Resident 1 (R1) was involved in a physical altercation with R2 and staff failed to respond to verbal and telephone calls for intervention and assistance. Interview with Additional Witness 1 (AW1) disclosed that R1 observed R2 in the incorrect room and asked R2 to exit the room. Continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250808101937
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not prevent resident to resident altercations while in care. Staff did not properly report incidents involving the residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Perez met with Executive Director (ED), Valeria Garcia and Administrator Liliana Moreno where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and witnesses, and file reviews. On March 04, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not properly report incidents involving residents and staff do not prevent resident to resident altercations while in care. It was alleged that between January and March 2025, multiple resident on resident altercations were not reported to Long Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCO), in accordance with the guidelines outlined in California Assembly Bill 1411 and Title 22 regulations. Additionally it was noted that staff was not preventing resident to resident altercatiCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250304094204
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer prescribed medications to residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia, where the LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and file reviews. On May 05, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that staff did not administer prescribed medications to residents in care. It was alleged that occasionally on the weekends, the facility would not staff a Medical Technician (MedTech) to be scheduled. The inability to cover the shift resulted in medication not being dispensed to residents. In regards to the allegation, LPA, in collaboration with Executive Director (ED) Valeria Garcia and two of two staff members responsible for employee scheduling, conducted interviews and reviewed documentation including electronic Medication AdminisCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250505105846
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not regularly providing observations to residents physical changes.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation of and deliver findings to the above mentioned complaint. LPA was greeted and granted entrance into the facility by Jessenia Rubalcaba, Activity Director. Jessenia informed the Administrator of my arrival. LPA later met with Administrator, Valeria Garcia who was informed of the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, and review of records. The investigation revealed that on September 15, 2022, Witness three (W3) conducted a physical examination of Resident 1(R1) and noted an acute stage 2 ulcer on the sacral area. The ulcer had been present for 11/12 weeks. The patient care plan was to turn every 2 hours or as needed, change diaper often, continue air mattress, home health for wound care, continue applying skin protectant, and zinc ointment twice a day and as needed, apply nonadherent dressing to area and change twice a dayCDSS inspection report, July 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221223121913
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed a Stage 3 pressure injury due to neglect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Liliana Moreno, Med-Tech Supervisor/ Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and document review. Evidence shows that on 9/15/2022 a nurse came to the facility to assess R1’s wound on the coccyx which was assessed as a stage 2. The nurse recommended home health care for the wound and the plan was to keep the wound clean, reposition every 2 hours, apply ointment, and dress. On 10/5/2022 the first visit was made by Home Health Registered Nurse (RN1) for wound care and nurse observed the wound was not dressed when R1’s wet diaper was changed, and the nurse documented the wound as a stage 3 open wound with no drainage. The LVN checked on R1 3 times a day but did not always look at the wound. Instead, she checked to make sure the caregiveCDSS inspection report, April 18, 2025 · control 18-AS-20221223121913
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff threatened resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Armando Perez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Valeria Garcia and explained the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. The investigation included observations, interviews with staff members and residents, and a review of records. On February 14, 2025, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that a staff member threatened a resident in care. It was reported that Staff 1 (S1) verbally threatened Client 1 (C1) and Client 2 (C2), stating that the facility was their home and the clients would be evicted if they did not follow the rules. Information obtained from interview with Executive Director, (ED) Valeria Garcia stated that she was made aware of the incident and conducted an internal investigation with the alleged staff and residents involved. ED stated the investigation did not find evidence that S1 made the alleCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250214110735

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility doesn't have a qualified administrator.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Javina George and Ferrer Sabarias made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Administrator Valeria Garcia where LPAs explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of allegation. The Allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observations, interviews, records review. On 11/06/2024 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that the facility doesn't have a qualified administrator, as they do not possess a valid administrator certificate. Per an interview conducted with Valeria Garcia, whom confirmed that she has been the Administrator since 10/30/24, administrator certificate number 6022084740, which expires 12/12/24. This was verfied by a records review of the personnel record and criminal record transfer request form. Upon conducting a tour of the interior of the physical plant LPAs observed for there to be a valid administrator certificate posted in the entryway. In aCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241106142616
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not ensuring that resident has access to a phone while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude and deliver findings to an investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Buisness Office Manager Ashlee Theus. The allegation was investigated and consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not ensuring that resident has access to a phone while in care”, it was alleged a telephone is not accessible to Resident One (R1) who is bedridden. LPA conducted an interview with Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus regarding residents’ accessibility to a telephone at the facility. Theus stated there is a telephone accessible to every resident in each villa at the facility. Residents who do not have a cellphone with an ambulatory status of bedridden can request to use the administrative staffs’ cellphone while on duty to make outgoing calls or receive calls. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 18-AS-20231219181442

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents fell while in care. Resident sustained pressure ulcers while in care. Resident sustained unexplained bruisinig while in care. Staff did not provide water to residents. Staff did not provided resident with their own hygiene supplies. Staff not meeting residents needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas met with Executive Director Diana Molina-Ramirez and Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus in the Riverside/San Bernardino Regional Office to deliver findings on the above allegations. Department staff investigated the above allegations, and LPA Nickolas also conducted facility tours, file reviews, and additional interviews pertinent to this investigation. Allegation #1 “Residents fell while in care”. The allegation alleged that client #1 (C1), a month before this allegation, was made fell with no injuries. The allegation alleged that client #2 (C2) also fell, and their health has declined since their fall. Department staff interview with the reporting party (RP) revealed that they were advised of the fall by other facility staff members, but there is no evidence that the fall occurred on the date(s) advised. The RP also discusses other falls with another client (client #3 [C3]) that was not originally reported. Department staff intervieCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200820153416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedHazardous items accessible to residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Ashlee Theus and explained the purpose of the visit. The Executive Director Diana Molina Ramirez, later arrived at the faciliy. Department staff investigated the above allegation, and LPA Nickolas also conducted facility tours, file reviews, and additional interviews pertinent to this investigation. The allegation alleged that cleaning products are left out for residents to access. On August 7, 2023, LPA Nickolas conducted a facility tour with staff #1 (S1) and discovered a bottle of cleaning solution in an unsecured credenza located in Villa 2. LPA Nickolas questioned S1 about the cleaning solution. S1 stated they did not know why the solution was not placed in the secured cabinet. S1 questioned an unidentified member of the facility staff working in that building, and that staff stated that it was there when they arrived. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200820154620
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple falls at the facility while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Business Office Manager Ashlee Theus and explained the purpose of the visit. The Exective Director Diana Molina-Ramirez, later arrived at the facility.The investigation included facility tours, file reviews, and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that client #1 (C1) has had three (3) falls within a six (6) months span of time while residing at the facility. LPA Nickolas's interview with staff #1 (S1) revealed that they were familiar with C1 but unfamiliar with C1's three (3) falls within a six (6) months period. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #2 (S2) revealed that they could not provide any information about C1's falls within six (6) months. S2 stated that C1 would rock back and forth while in bed. LPA Nickolas' interview with staff #3 (S3) revealed that S3 was an assigned caregiver to C1. S3 stated that C1 liked to doCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220503163805
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee failed to supervise resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA Nickolas met with Wellness Coordinator Monica Quinones and explained the purpose of the visit. The Executive Director, Diana Molina Ramirez, would arrive at the facility later. The investigation included file reviews, a tour of the facility, and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that on September 7, 2022, client #1 (C1) jumped out of the window and eloped from the facility. The allegation alleged that during a routine check at the facility, staff #1 (S1) was notified by another client that C1 jumped out of the window. LPA Nickolas’ interview with staff #2 (S2) and staff #3 (S3) revealed that they were not present when the incident occurred. LPA Nickolas’ interview with C1 revealed that C1 could not participate in the interview process. LPA Nickolas’ file reviews revealed that the facility had sufficient staff working the night ofCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220908145705
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify authorized representative of resident's room change
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator, Diana Ramirez, and informed her of the purpose of her visit. The investigation included staff/resident interviews, records review, and records collection. The Department received a report alleging staff moved Resident One (R1) to another bedroom on or before December 25, 2023, and did not notify their authorized representative. A Face Sheet revealed two contacts, for R1, available for notification, one of which was identified as the Responsible Party and the other as the Alternate Contact. Staff interviews and resident daily notes revealed R1 contracted a contagious illness on December 23, 2022. Interviews revealed R1's illness required isolation from other residents. A staff interview revealed R1's authorized representative was contacted on December 24, 2023, of R1 being isolated in another bedroom. HoCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230117080632
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident wandered away from the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner arrived a the facility and met with Receptionist Alyssa Rodriguez and Activities Director Reina Celaya. LPA Gardner made Ms. Rodriguez aware of the above allegation. The above allegation was in reference to a complaint generated due to a resident (R1) getting out of the facility on dates 10/12/21, and 10/15/21. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed the door adjacent to R1's bedroom was able to be unlocked and did not have an auditory device to alert staff that the door was open or could be opened. At the conclusion of interviews, it was determined that R1 was able to exit the facility without detection by staff. During the inspection, LPA Gardner observed the door to be absent of an auditory device or other staff alert feature that would alert staff if door was left open or opened. Based on interviews and and observstions made on 10/21/2021, this allegation was deemed to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATECDSS inspection report, May 23, 2023 · control 18-AS-20211018132918

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 56 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
32
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
56
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 925-7107
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Citrus Gardens? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.