Small home · Licensed for 6 · Winchester
Mercy Home 3
36427 Pistachio Drive, Winchester, CA 92596Licensed since 2017
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Mercy Home 3: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,850a month to start
Likely $4,000–$6,000
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,850likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,850likely $4,000–$6,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,150
- $4,850
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,350
- $7,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,200 to $5,500
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,250–$5,000.
- New Hope Residential Elder Care IIIWinchester · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home AthenaWinchester · 0.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home TavelWinchester · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Concord Estates Assisted LivingMurrieta · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Grace Home Bachelor PeakWinchester · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Senior Haven of MurrietaMurrieta · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Murrieta Manor: Senior LivingMurrieta · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel's Haven Care Assisted LivingMurrieta · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
36427 Pistachio Drive, Winchester, CA 92596Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of MurrietaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #331800087 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to have visitors at the facility.
On 8/19/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence the complaint investigation and deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa. The investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with the reporting party and staff as well as observation. Allegation: Staff does not ensure resident is allowed to have visitors at the facility. LPA did not find evidence showing facility staff restricted or prevented visitation. Interviews confirm visitation challenges were due to family disagreements and not facility action. Staff allowed RP to visit R1 during the investigation without issue. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the allegations mentioned above is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260615082319
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents . Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also verified (3) resident's medications, along with (3) Hospice files. LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screening. During record review, LPA Rico observed (2) staff had an expire CPR/1st aid Certificate and observed the facility last emergency drill was conducted on March 20,2025. Futhermore, LPA recommoned Licensee to organize and label residents Pre-admission assessment and Reappraisals/Care Plan. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, (2) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Along with two technical violations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D)Appeal Rights was discussed and provided to Administrator Mercilina Ajunwaand.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/25/2025 at 02:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct the required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were one (1) staff present, and four (4) residents present. Licensee/Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa was contacted and informed of the visit. Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa arrived during the visit. LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The facility has 6 bedrooms, in which five (5) bedrooms are designated for residents, and one (1) bedroom's designated for staff, 3 and 1/2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining area, backyard, laundry room and attached garage. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) resident may be bedridden. The current census is four (4) residents. The facility has approved hospice waiver for four (4) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Staff #2 (S2) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). The buildings and grounds were free from hazards. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperature in the residents/staffs shared bathroom to be at 105.2 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Postings such as the facility license, personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, ombudsman poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside the medication closet ***Continuation in LIC809C*** near the kitchen inaccessible to residents. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable and two (2) days perishable food supply observed at the facility. LPA observed the facility have emergency supplies, food and water. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and a night staff, awake and on duty at night for facility with dementia residents. Record Review: The facility has updated Liability Insurance and Infection Control Plan maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals, centrally stored medications list, needs and services plans. LPA Brown observed that Resident #2 (R2) Admission Agreement does not have the Licensee/Facility Representative Signature and no signature date. Deficiency will be issued. LPA reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings with tuberculosis (TB) test results. LPA observed Staff #2 (S2) working at the facility with criminal background clearance but S2's criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility prior to employment on 11/2024. Deficiency will be issued and civil penalty of $500.00 will be assessed today, and will continue to be assessed of $100.00/day until corrected. Medications/MARs records were audited for two (2) residents and appeared to be dispensed and logged appropriately. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC421BG and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident out of bed. Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed. The facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs. Staff scolded resident. Staffs do not allow resident to wear their own clothes.
On 02/13/2025 at 04:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance to the facility by Licensee/Administrator Mercilina Ajunwa. LPA Brown explained the purpose of today's visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The investigation was conducted by LPA Brown. The investigation consisted of file review, observations and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates staff do not assist resident out of bed. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are assisting them out of bed. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are assisting their residents out of their bed. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) staffs revealed that Resident #1 (R1)'s two (2) persons assist and they are always assisting R1 out of bed. ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director shared that the hospice care team did not report any incident that the staffs at the facility are not assisting R1 out of bed. In addition, R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director reported that the hospice care team did not report any neglect by a staff at the facility to R1 or other residents. Also, R1 Hospice Care Nurse Director indicated that R1 skin's dry, fragile, and R1 does not have enough nutrition which makes R1 high risk and prone for skin breakdown at any time and not from poor care of the staffs at the facility. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed staff assisting their residents out of bed. The second allegation indicates that staffs do not administer medications as prescribed. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs are giving their medications daily and administering their medications as prescribed by their physician. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are giving their residents medications per their doctor's order. Staff #1 (S1) reported to LPA Brown that there's no incident that happened at the facility that they placed two (2) medication patches on R1 and R1's family member cancelled the prescription. Interview with Hospice Care Nurse Director indicated that the hospice care team did not report staffs at the facility are not administering R1's medication as prescribed. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown noted that staffs at the facility are utilizing Medication Administration Record (MAR) to ensure that they are administering their residents medications as prescribed by their doctor. Moreover, LPA Brown audited two (2) residents medications on 12/03/2024 and observed that staffs at the facility are administering their residents medications as prescribed by their doctors. The third allegation indicates that the facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that the facility's providing them adequate meals to meet their needs and they can get second serving of food if they prefer. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interviewed reported that they are serving their residents adequate meals everyday and there's no incident that they did not provide adequate meals to their residents and they did not meet their needs. Two (2) staffs interviewed shared that they are providing adequate meals for R1. Hospice Care Nurse Director informed LPA Brown that the hospice care team did not report an incident that the facility's not providing adequate meals to R1 and not meeting R1's needs. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that the facility's serving adequate and nutritious meals to their residents to meet their needs. The fourth allegation indicates that staff scolded resident. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** that there's no incident at the facility that a staff scolded and yelled at them. Two (2) of two (2) staffs interview reported that they never scolded R1 or their residents and they did not yell at R1 or their residents. Hospice Care Nurse Director stated that the hospice care team did not report an incident at the facility that a staff scolded or yelled at R1 or their other residents. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that staffs at the facility are providing care and supervision to their residents and they are not scolding or yelling at their residents. The fifth allegation indicates staff do not allow resident to wear their own clothes. Interview with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that they are wearing their own clothing that they prefer to wear and there's no incident at the facility that a staff did not allow them to wear their own clothes. Two (2) of two staff interviewed reported that their residents are wearing their own clothing. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) staffs revealed that they never restricted R1 or their residents to wear their own clothing. Hospice Care Director reported that the hospice care team did not report any incident that staffs at the facility are not allowing R1 or their residents to wear their own clothing. During the facility visit on 07/22/2024, 12/03/2024 and 12/17/2024, LPA Brown observed that residents at the facility are wearing their own clothes and staffs at the facility did not prohibit them from wearing their own clothes. Based on interviews and records review, the allegation that Staff do not assist resident out of bed (Allegation #1), Staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed (Allegation #2), The facility does not provide adequate meals to meet residents needs (Allegation #3), Staff scolded resident (Allegation #4), Staffs do allow resident to wear their own clothes (Allegation #5) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercilina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240206100424
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident.
On 12/17/2024 at 01:40 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance to the facility by a staff. Licensee/Administrator Mercelina Ajunwa was contacted and arrived during the visit and met with LPA Brown. LPA Brown explained the purpose of today's visit to Licensee/Administrator Ajunwa. The investigation was conducted by LPA Brown. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. During the investigation, LPA Brown did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that they all seek timely medical attention for their residents if needed. Three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that on 07/13/2024, no incident happened to Resident #1 (R1) that R1 needs timely medical attention. Staff #1 (S1) informed LPA Brown that S1's Licensed ***Continuation in LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated Professional and S1 reported to LPA Brown that S1 assessed R1 on 07/13/2024 after S1 observed R1's blinking R1's eyes for two (2) or three (3) seconds but it did not continue. S1 indicated that S1 did not observed any changes on R1 that will require immediate medical attention. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are seeking timely medication for them. LPA Brown unable to interview three (3) residents at the facility as one (1) resident is not oriented, one (1) resident with family, and one (1) resident was sleeping. The second allegation indicates staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident. Interview with three (3) of three (3) staff indicated that they are properly reporting all incidents involving a resident at the facility to their family, physician and Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). S1 reported to LPA Brown that there's no incident that happened to R1 on 07/13/2024 that needs to be reported as no changes was observed to R1. S1 added that after R1's family visit on 07/13/2024, that same day, as a courtesy, S1 called R1's family/Power of Attorney(POA) and Fiduciary and S1 provided updates on R1's family visit to R1. R1 Family member/POA reported to LPA Brown that they are in close contact with S1 and all issues involving R1 were properly reported to them. Interviews with two (2) of two (2) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are reporting all incidents that are happening at the facility to their family. LPA Brown unable to interview three (3) residents at the facility as one (1) resident is not oriented, one (1) resident with family, and one (1) resident was sleeping. Based on interviews and records review, the allegations staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident (Allegation #1) and staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident (Allegation #2) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Mercelina Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240715160448
Jul 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 07/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a case management visit. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance by a staff. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Nicole Ajunwa. At the time of the visit, there were six (6) residents, and two (2) staffs present. During today's visit, LPA Brown observed that Resident #3 (R3) has full bed rail and staff interview and records review indicated that R3's not on hospice and no exception report was submitted and approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) Regional Office. Deficiency will be issued. Moreover, during the tour of the facility, LPA Brown observed Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #4 (R4), with half bed rails but staff interviews and document review indicated that there are no written order from their physician indicating the need for half bed rail for mobility. Deficiency will be issued. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to NIcole Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(5)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 23, 2024
87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do...(5) Under no circumstances shall postural supports include tying, depriving, or limiting the use of a resident's hands or feet. (B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having a full bed rail for Resident #3 (R3) and R3's not on hospice and no exception was submitted and approved to CCLD which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to remove R3's full bed rail and submit proof to LPA Brown on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 5, 2024
87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individuals preadmission appraisal....(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the residents record. The licensing agency... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #4 (R4), with half bed rails with no written order from their physician indicating the need for the postural support for mobility which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee stated to submit written order from R2 and R4 physician indicating the need for the postural support for mobility and submit proof to LPA Brown on plan of correction (POC) due date.
Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Caregiver Margaret Muchangi and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) resident may be bedridden. The current census is five (5) residents. LPA was accompanied by Caregiver to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to interior and exterior passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility has three (3) residents (R2, R4, and R5) in care with a condition that requires auditory alarms on exterior exits. The facility does not have auditory alarms on the main entry door, the exterior sliding door leading into the backyard, and the exterior door in Resident R1’s bedroom. The facility will be issued a deficiency for not having auditory alarms on the facility exit doors. LPA measured and observed the water temperature in the bathrooms to be at 105 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Postings such as the facility license, personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident and staff files. Medications are kept inside the hallway cabinet inaccessible to residents. Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for the residents in care. Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. LPA reviewed five (5) residents files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, and LIC811 were discussed and provided to Caregiver Margaret Muchangi, along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 3 documents
20221 state visit · 1 document
Feb 8, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jennifer Semin arrived at the facility unannounced after completing a COVID-19 Risk Assessment Screening for the facility via telephone. LPA met with licensee/administrator Mercillna Ajunwa and advised her of the purpose of the visit, and that the Annual Inspection will be limited to Infection Control only. LPA went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with Ms. Ajunwa who is successfully incorporating the facility's Mitigation Plan. Residents have hand sanitizer available to them and the bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels. LPA observed the facility to have multiple postings throughout the facility for cough etiquette, proper hand washing procedure, social distancing, and emergency contact information for local fire department has been updated. LPA requested to inspect the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply, which was located at the central entry point for convenience. Ms. Ajunwa has a supply of PPE items such as gloves, face shields, gowns, surgical masks, N95 masks, disinfectant and hand sanitizer supply and is inaccessible to residents. A Technical Assistance Advisory note is being issued as licensees need to procure additional PPE. LPA and Ms. Libed discussed creating a box, or similar, to have a supply of PPE ready that would be dedicated for isolation room, along with a trash can to put inside and outside of an isolation room. LPA inquired as to if staff have been fit tested for N95 masks, and Ms. Libed stated their staff have been fit tested. Additionally, all residents and staff have been vaccinated and are practicing other COVID-19 precautions, which minimize the risk of them contracting COVID-19. An exit interview was conducted, and this report and LIC9102 TA Advisory Note was discussed and provided to Ms. Libed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2022
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 7, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff deprived resident of oxygen
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Brown met with facility Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of Resident 1 (R1) medical records and facility file. Due to R1s passing, LPA Brown was unable to interview R1. The allegation states staff deprived resident of oxygen. LPA Brown reviewed medical records and interview with R1’s Primary Physician indicated that R1 was on oxygen therapy upon admission but R1 is capable of administering own oxygen without assistance and R1 has total control of when and how often R1 will use the oxygen. Per review of facility’s Worker Training and Instruction Record, it indicates that all facility staff were trained on how to use oxygen and cpap machine in case R1 will need assistance. Per review of Incident Report, it indicated that R1 has low oxygen saturation. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) indicated that R1 was not deprived of oxygen. Unsubstantiated S1 reported that after the EMT left on the first 911 call, R1 removed oxygen that time while talking to S1. S1 added that while calling R1’s family, they noticed saliva coming out of R1’s mouth and S1 reported that R1’s oxygen was on and later found out that R1’s family called 911 when the EMT arrived at the facility. EMT noticed that the oxygen tube was not connected to the oxygen equipment. In this situation where R1 often removed oxygen and uses it when needed, it indicated that R1 accidentally disconnected the tube. Interview with S1 revealed that staff accordingly called 911 during the reported medical emergency and S1 reported that R1 was relocated after hospitalization to another facility to address higher need of care. Based upon the above stated information, the allegation that staff deprived resident of oxygen is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An UNSUBSTANTIATED allegation means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Ms. Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200921163904
Sep 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to facility to conduct an annual inspection, with emphasis on infection control. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance by caregiver Deborah Akintola and explained the purpose of today's visit. Caregiver Akintola accompanied LPA Brown on a tour of the inside and outside of the facility. Administrator Mercillina Ajunwa was contacted and arrived towards the end of the inspection. During today’s visit, LPA Brown made observation pertaining to the facility’s current infection control measures. LPA Brown observed a screening area, proper Covid-19 signage throughout the facility, sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning supplies, and a sufficient supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, cleaning and disinfection are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in overall infection control. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing guidelines for when and how long to test staff and clients for COVID-19, when and how to isolate/quarantine clients, and when to schedule cleaning and disinfection times of high traffic and frequently touched areas/surfaces. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor clients regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the client’s physician and to notify all emergency agencies in the event of any COVID-19 related and/or suspected illnesses. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Ajunwa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 19, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Ajunwa, Mercillina, licensed since 2017.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 10
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Mercy Home 3
Is Mercy Home 3 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Mercy Home 3 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Mercy Home 3 been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Mercy Home 3 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Mercy Home 3 cost?
$4,850 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 165 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 165 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Mercy Home 3 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Ajunwa, Mercillina, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Murrieta is 4.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Mercy Home 3 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Mercy Home 3 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MERCY HOME 3”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #331800087. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Ajunwa, Mercillina, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Riverside County