Senior Care Villa Of Loomis is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loomis, Placer County, California — state license #315003016, licensed for 35 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Senior Care Villa Of Loomis

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 35 residents · Loomis, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315003016, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3400 Chisom Trail · Loomis, Placer County
Phone
(916) 652-8000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 3 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE SIXTY(60) AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF THIRTY FIVE(35) OF WHICH THIRTY TWO(32) ARE NON-AMBULATORY AND THREE(3) NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TEN(10) CLIENTS. SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED.NEW MGT NORTHSTAR SNR LVG MGT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 24 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 29, 2026
Occupancy at the May 5, 2026 visit
21 of 35 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 11, 2024 to May 5, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infection control practices

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday May 5, 2026 unannounced to conclude a complaint which was received by the Department on 4/24/2026. LPA met with acting Executive Director Heidi and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the acting Administrator, staff, and home health regarding the allegation. LPA learned the following: North Star Senior Living, the management company for this facility, has an infection control policy and procedure for staff to follow. Per staff, this was not being followed. Specifically, staff did not immediately contact primary physicians regarding scabies exposure, bagging and sealing clothes for 14 days, and cleaning/disinfecting furniture. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Exit interview. Copy ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424101341
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not report scabies outbreak to health department Medication error Insufficient staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday May 5, 2026 unannounced to deliver findings for a complaint received on 2/26/2026. LPA met with acting Executive Director Heidi and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed home health providers, staff, and administration regarding the allegations. The result of the investigation is as follows: Although the first case of diagnosed occurred in September 2025, Placer County Public Health was not notified March 3, 2026. Once notified, the facility was provided with scabies management and prevention guidance. LPA reviewed R1’s medication administration record. R1 was diagnosed with scabies and prescribed treatment. Per R1’s MAR, hydroxyzine HCL 25 mg tablet was prescribed on February 10, 2026, and to be given at 4am, 10am, 4pm and 10pm. Per February 2026’s MAR, only one 4am tablet was given Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260226151044
Mar 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Tuesday March 17, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 10/6/2025. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. The following timeline of events is as follows: on 10/3/2025 at approximately 3:00 am, R1 entered the apartment of R2. R2 attempted to escort R1 out of their apartment when an unwitnessed altercation occurred. R1 was transported to the hospital and diagnosed with an acute chronic left front subdural hematoma, right lateral clavicle fracture, and multiple right-sided rib fractures. R2 was also transported to the hospital and diagnosed with a laceration to their hand and leg. Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251006123021
Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are serving undercooked food to residents in care. Staff did not keep facility free of vermin. Staff did not treat residents scabies infection.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday February 11, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 1/26/2026. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator, cook, and staff regarding meals which were served to the residents. No interviews stated that food was undercooked. Additionally, no interviews acknowledged residents becoming sick after eating meals. LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff who stated that there was no current diagnosis of scabies. Per staff, R1-R4 had/were experiencing skin irritation. Staff followed up with care for those residents and received the following diagnosis: R1 had dermatitis, R2 had hyperglycemia , R3 had an allergic reaction and shingles, and R4 had dermatitis. LPA did not review any documentation where scabies was tested for and confirmed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260126154603
20256 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff pushed resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday November 13, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 11/12/2025. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Resident Care Director, and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1 and S2's facility file. LPA reviewed staff statements from the incident. LPA learned the following: On 11/11/2025, R1 moved into the facility. R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia. R1 was experiencing behaviors such as agitation and wandering. At the beginning of NOC shift, S1 was on the phone with the Resident Care Director, obtaining additional information about R1. S1 witnessed the following: R1 hit S2 on their chest. As R1 began to walk away, S2 slapped R1 on their back, using both hands. RCD heard the interaction and immediately came to the facility. S2 was then suspended. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251112131435
Aug 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident's death Staff did not ensure a resident was properly fed while in care Staff did not report incidents involving a resident

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Christina Brown to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250623154126
May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff cut resident’s hair without consent from authorized representative.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 05/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/07/2024. LPAs met with Executive Director, Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241007123249
May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed a pressure injury due to staff not repositioning resident Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 05/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/07/2024. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator Christina Brown and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241120142205
Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's care needs were met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 02/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/14/2024. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including face sheet, physicians report, and care plan. The result of the investigation is as follows: Based on the investigation, it was determined that staff acted within appropriate care protocols. According to care plans for R1, wound care of this nature must be performed by a licensed skilled professional. Evidence collected during the investigation, including staff interviews and documentation review, confirmed that staff were instructed not to replace the patch because doing so falls outside their scope of practice. Further, it was confirmed that the licensed staff responsible for wound care were promptly notified to address the issue whthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241014103928
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to seek medical attention in a timely manner Facility staff failed to assist resident in distress. Facility staff interfering with hospice agency agent

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday August 1, 2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 7/23/2024. LPA met with Administrator Ilona and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including face sheet, physicians report, and care plan. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA interviewed the Administrator who stated that they worked on NOC shift on Friday July 19th. She performed frequent rounds and had no instances of R1 falling or being on the floor. LPA interviewed all morning staff who worked on Saturday July 20th who stated that when they started their shift, R1 was in bed. Interviews acknowledged that around breakfast time, R1 began to exhibit behaviors and threw their food on the floor. R1 then lowered themselves to the ground. Staff attempted multiple times to assist R1 back into bed, but they refused.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240722164103
Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is free of pests Staff does not ensure kitchen is clean and sanitized

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday July 11, 2024, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 6/18/2024. LPA met with Administrator Ilona and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegations. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the following: evidence of pests in pest glue traps and baby pests on kitchen shelf. Food particles were observed on the floor and kitchen shelves. The kitchen floor was observed to be dirty. Kitchen refrigerator shelves were observed to be dirty. LPA photographed the items detailed above. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegations to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. Exit interview conducted. A copythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240619163711
Mar 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file24typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026453202567220244412023440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 652-8000

Is Senior Care Villa Of Loomis licensed?

Yes — Senior Care Villa Of Loomis is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loomis (Placer County): California license #315003016, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 35 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Senior Care Villa Of Loomis care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Senior Care Villa Of Loomis with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE SIXTY(60) AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF THIRTY FIVE(35) OF WHICH THIRTY TWO(32) ARE NON-AMBULATORY AND THREE(3) NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TEN(10) CLIENTS. SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED.NEW MGT NORTHSTAR SNR LVG MGT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26

How much does Senior Care Villa Of Loomis cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Senior Care Villa Of Loomis's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Senior Care Villa Of Loomis accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Senior Care Villa Of Loomis is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

21 of 35 beds occupied (60%) when the state visited on May 5, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Senior Care Villa Of Loomis?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 24 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2023 for Senior Care Villa Of Loomis; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow infection control practices
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday May 5, 2026 unannounced to conclude a complaint which was received by the Department on 4/24/2026. LPA met with acting Executive Director Heidi and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the acting Administrator, staff, and home health regarding the allegation. LPA learned the following: North Star Senior Living, the management company for this facility, has an infection control policy and procedure for staff to follow. Per staff, this was not being followed. Specifically, staff did not immediately contact primary physicians regarding scabies exposure, bagging and sealing clothes for 14 days, and cleaning/disinfecting furniture. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Exit interview. Copy ofCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424101341
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not report scabies outbreak to health department Medication error Insufficient staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Tuesday May 5, 2026 unannounced to deliver findings for a complaint received on 2/26/2026. LPA met with acting Executive Director Heidi and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed home health providers, staff, and administration regarding the allegations. The result of the investigation is as follows: Although the first case of diagnosed occurred in September 2025, Placer County Public Health was not notified March 3, 2026. Once notified, the facility was provided with scabies management and prevention guidance. LPA reviewed R1’s medication administration record. R1 was diagnosed with scabies and prescribed treatment. Per R1’s MAR, hydroxyzine HCL 25 mg tablet was prescribed on February 10, 2026, and to be given at 4am, 10am, 4pm and 10pm. Per February 2026’s MAR, only one 4am tablet was given SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260226151044
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Care and Supervision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Tuesday March 17, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 10/6/2025. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. The following timeline of events is as follows: on 10/3/2025 at approximately 3:00 am, R1 entered the apartment of R2. R2 attempted to escort R1 out of their apartment when an unwitnessed altercation occurred. R1 was transported to the hospital and diagnosed with an acute chronic left front subdural hematoma, right lateral clavicle fracture, and multiple right-sided rib fractures. R2 was also transported to the hospital and diagnosed with a laceration to their hand and leg. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251006123021
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are serving undercooked food to residents in care. Staff did not keep facility free of vermin. Staff did not treat residents scabies infection.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday February 11, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 1/26/2026. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator, cook, and staff regarding meals which were served to the residents. No interviews stated that food was undercooked. Additionally, no interviews acknowledged residents becoming sick after eating meals. LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff who stated that there was no current diagnosis of scabies. Per staff, R1-R4 had/were experiencing skin irritation. Staff followed up with care for those residents and received the following diagnosis: R1 had dermatitis, R2 had hyperglycemia , R3 had an allergic reaction and shingles, and R4 had dermatitis. LPA did not review any documentation where scabies was tested for and confirmed. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 11, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260126154603

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff pushed resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday November 13, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 11/12/2025. LPA met with Administrator Shreetika and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Resident Care Director, and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1 and S2's facility file. LPA reviewed staff statements from the incident. LPA learned the following: On 11/11/2025, R1 moved into the facility. R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia. R1 was experiencing behaviors such as agitation and wandering. At the beginning of NOC shift, S1 was on the phone with the Resident Care Director, obtaining additional information about R1. S1 witnessed the following: R1 hit S2 on their chest. As R1 began to walk away, S2 slapped R1 on their back, using both hands. RCD heard the interaction and immediately came to the facility. S2 was then suspended. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251112131435
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident's death Staff did not ensure a resident was properly fed while in care Staff did not report incidents involving a resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Christina Brown to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250623154126
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff cut resident’s hair without consent from authorized representative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 05/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/07/2024. LPAs met with Executive Director, Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241007123249
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed a pressure injury due to staff not repositioning resident Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 05/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/07/2024. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator Christina Brown and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241120142205
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's care needs were met
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 02/12/2025 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 10/14/2024. LPA met with Executive Director Ilona Corpus and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including face sheet, physicians report, and care plan. The result of the investigation is as follows: Based on the investigation, it was determined that staff acted within appropriate care protocols. According to care plans for R1, wound care of this nature must be performed by a licensed skilled professional. Evidence collected during the investigation, including staff interviews and documentation review, confirmed that staff were instructed not to replace the patch because doing so falls outside their scope of practice. Further, it was confirmed that the licensed staff responsible for wound care were promptly notified to address the issue whCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2025 · control 59-AS-20241014103928

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to seek medical attention in a timely manner Facility staff failed to assist resident in distress. Facility staff interfering with hospice agency agent
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday August 1, 2024 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 7/23/2024. LPA met with Administrator Ilona and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file including face sheet, physicians report, and care plan. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA interviewed the Administrator who stated that they worked on NOC shift on Friday July 19th. She performed frequent rounds and had no instances of R1 falling or being on the floor. LPA interviewed all morning staff who worked on Saturday July 20th who stated that when they started their shift, R1 was in bed. Interviews acknowledged that around breakfast time, R1 began to exhibit behaviors and threw their food on the floor. R1 then lowered themselves to the ground. Staff attempted multiple times to assist R1 back into bed, but they refused.CDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240722164103
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility is free of pests Staff does not ensure kitchen is clean and sanitized
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday July 11, 2024, to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 6/18/2024. LPA met with Administrator Ilona and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegations. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the following: evidence of pests in pest glue traps and baby pests on kitchen shelf. Food particles were observed on the floor and kitchen shelves. The kitchen floor was observed to be dirty. Kitchen refrigerator shelves were observed to be dirty. LPA photographed the items detailed above. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegations to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. Exit interview conducted. A copyCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240619163711

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 24 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
24
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 652-8000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Senior Care Villa Of Loomis? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.