Loomis Home Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loomis, Placer County, California — state license #315002096, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, agency initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Loomis Home Care

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Agency Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Loomis, CA · Placer County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #315002096, held since 2008 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7964 Rasmussen Rd. · Loomis, Placer County
Phone
(916) 705-3318
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR DEMENTIA CARE.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 4, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 4, 2026
Occupancy at the April 29, 2026 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 1, 2022 to April 29, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 7 documents
May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Financial Abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 29, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 4/24/2026. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that Petre obtained R1’s credit card in October of 2025. The licensee charged R1’s credit card approximately 62 times in October 2025; 9 times in November 2025; 22 times in December 2025 and 5 times between January and March 2026 for a total of $10,189.22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424095140
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff will not allow resident to be readmitted to the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday February 12, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 12/1/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and POA for R1. Per both parties, R1 was sent to the hospital due to behaviors and a suspected UTI. Once R1 was medically cleared to return to the facility, the Administrator refused to let R1 return. Per R1’s POA, the hospital agreed to let R1 stay admitted until new placement was secured. The Administrator did not follow eviction procedures per Title 22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251201141816
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity/respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday September 17, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 9/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1's facility file. LPA learned the following: R1 moved into the facility in May 2025. On September 14, 2025, R1 requested for the Administrator to give them a pill to die. The Administrator explained that he will reach out to R1's primary physician for psychiatry referral the following day (Monday). Then R1 stated 'why do you hate me'. The Administrator explained that he does not hate them, but now it is time for their routine toileting.R1 declined. The Administrator then attempted to give R1 a glass of water and take their dinner plate, at which time, R1 scratched the Administrator's arm. The Administrator became upset and usedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250916084932
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file17typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2008.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202667220252212024110202311020222202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Loomis Home Care licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Loomis Home Care in Loomis (Placer County), California license #315002096, as “Closed, Agency Initiated, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 4, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Loomis Home Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Loomis Home Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, AGES 60 AND ABOVE. APPROVED FOR DEMENTIA CARE.

How much does Loomis Home Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Loomis Home Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Loomis Home Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Loomis Home Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on April 29, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Loomis Home Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Loomis Home Care; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 29, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFinancial Abuse
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 29, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 4/24/2026. LPA met with Licensee Petre and explained the purpose of the visit. The result of the investigation is as follows: LPA learned that Petre obtained R1’s credit card in October of 2025. The licensee charged R1’s credit card approximately 62 times in October 2025; 9 times in November 2025; 22 times in December 2025 and 5 times between January and March 2026 for a total of $10,189.22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260424095140
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff will not allow resident to be readmitted to the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Thursday February 12, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 12/1/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed the Administrator and POA for R1. Per both parties, R1 was sent to the hospital due to behaviors and a suspected UTI. Once R1 was medically cleared to return to the facility, the Administrator refused to let R1 return. Per R1’s POA, the hospital agreed to let R1 stay admitted until new placement was secured. The Administrator did not follow eviction procedures per Title 22. Based on the information detailed above, LPA finds the allegation to be substantiated. A finding that the allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on 9099-D. Appeal rights were given. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251201141816

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity/respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday September 17, 2025 to conduct a visit regarding a complaint received on 9/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator Peter and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator and staff regarding the allegation. LPA reviewed R1's facility file. LPA learned the following: R1 moved into the facility in May 2025. On September 14, 2025, R1 requested for the Administrator to give them a pill to die. The Administrator explained that he will reach out to R1's primary physician for psychiatry referral the following day (Monday). Then R1 stated 'why do you hate me'. The Administrator explained that he does not hate them, but now it is time for their routine toileting.R1 declined. The Administrator then attempted to give R1 a glass of water and take their dinner plate, at which time, R1 scratched the Administrator's arm. The Administrator became upset and usedCDSS inspection report, September 17, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250916084932

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed- Resident not allowed to converse with other residents. - Facility is witholding personal property. - Staff did not allow resident to receive occupational therapy services.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 03/01/2022 to deliver a complaint finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 09/30/2021. LPA met with Licensee, Petre Mile, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA completed a facility risk assessment at the facility. LPA ensured the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn Surgical Mask. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the allegation listed above.The Department had requested the facility to submit staff roster, resident roster, resident’s (R1’s) LIC 624 Physician’s report, admission agreement and medical documents. Allegation: Resident not allowed to converse witCDSS inspection report, March 1, 2022 · control 25-AS-20210930162233

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 705-3318
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Loomis Home Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.