Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Silvana Senior Care 4License #312701026 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareSilvana Senior Care 4License #312701026 · 4738 Robin Ct, Rocklin, CA · (916) 586-4713Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Placer County/Rocklin/Silvana Senior Care 4
Map · 4738 Robin Ct

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,300/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 586-4713

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

SS

Call Silvana Senior Care 4

Rocklin · Licensed for 6

(916) 586-4713

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Rocklin

Silvana Senior Care 4

4738 Robin Ct, Rocklin, CA 95677 · Licensed since 2021

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Silvana Senior Care 4

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,300 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 3 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Silvana Senior Care 4: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,350–$6,500

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,300likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,650
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,100–$9,850
$7,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes13 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,800

$3,500$6,800

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$6,500.

  • Placer StarcareRocklin · 0.8 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Par Place Senior LivingRocklin · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Splendor Oaks Senior Living 2Roseville · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Aunt Dottie's PlaceRoseville · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Granite Bay CountryhouseGranite Bay · 3.1 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,595Listed on its own website · companion room, starting rate · seen October 27, 2026
  • Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
  • Oasis for Seniors at Heaven's GardenRocklin · 3.5 mi · Small home
    $3,600Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Roseberry CareRoseville · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Vista Hills Senior Care 2Roseville · 3.7 mi · Small home
    $5,200Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Dad's Place LoomisLoomis · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on its own website · our pricing is all inclusive, · seen October 27, 2026
  • Broadway Senior LivingRoseville · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Angels Assisted LivingRoseville · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

4738 Robin Ct, Rocklin, CA 95677Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Sutter Roseville Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #312701026 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 10 of 20 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”, 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.

20264 state visits · 5 documents

Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not adequately manage resident’s fall risk Staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 22, 2026, to deliver findings for a complaint received on 1/26/2026. LPA met with Administrator Karcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Additionally, LPA spoke with Licensee Krisztina on the phone and explained the findings and citations. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. The result of the investigation is as follows: R1’s facility care plan indicated that they required 24-hour supervision and assistance with all activities of daily living. Per interviews, R1 would refuse to sleep in their bed and would sleep in their recliner instead. Multiple documents indicated that R1 was a fall risk including their appraisal dated 10/21/2025. R1’s plan of care stated they have a history of multiple falls with head injury. R1’s medical assessment dated 10/23/2025 stated R1 has a history of multiple falls. Additionally, hospital records dated 10/17/2025 and 1/2/2026 showed R1 was seen due to multiple falls. S1 and S2 were interviewed and indicated that R1 was a fall risk. The Licensee was interviewed and acknowledged that R1 was a fall risk. However, the investigation determined that there Substantiated were no fall preventative measures in place during the nighttime. S3 was live-in staff and could not provide any information about the care R1 required during the daytime or nighttime. S3 denied checking on residents during the nighttime. On 1/23/2026, at approximately 1500 hours, staff called 911 for R1 because they were complaining of left hip pain. R1 was admitted to Sutter Roseville Medical Center and diagnosed with a left hip fracture. The hospital contacted facility staff to determine how R1 may have sustained the fractured hip and there were no records of any recent falls. However, there was a text message from S3 to the facility group chat that indicated S3 found R1 on the floor on 1/23/2026 at 0400 hours. S3 placed R1 back in their bed. It was unknown how long R1 was on their bedroom floor prior to S3 finding them. Staff interviews indicated that protocol for unwitnessed falls is to call 911. Based on interviews conducted and documentation obtained, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. As a result of the resident's serious bodily injury, an immediate civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1548 in the amount of $500 is being assessed for a violation that the Department determines resulted in the injury or illness of a person in care. An additional civil penalty assessment is under review and determination is pending. LPA will return on a future date to assess an additional civil penalty if warranted. See 9099-D for citations Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights provided. Based on LPA's interviews, the department has found the complaint allegation to be unsubstantiated,meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260126132637

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026

87468.2(a)(4) 87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents . . . (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents . .(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: R1 being documented as a fall risk and not providing adequate supervision which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to submit a plan regarding how the facility will manage resident's supervision during the day and nightime. Included in the plan will be the facility's staffing when resident's are identified as a fall risk.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 having an unwitnessed fall and staff not calling 911 for transport and evaluation which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to submit training for all staff regarding emergency and 911 protocol.

Apr 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced on Wednesday April 22, 2026, to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Karcia and explained the purpose of the visit. Additionally, LPA spoke with Licensee Krisztina on the phone and explained the case management visit and citation. During a complaint investigation (CONTROL NUMBER 59-AS-20260126132637), the Department determined that R1 had a fall on 1/2/2026 and was sent to Sutter Roseville Medical Center. R1 was diagnosed with a ground-level fall, scalp hematoma, and head trauma. An incident report was not completed or provided to the Regional office. Deficiency cited today on 809-D. Exit interview conducted and appeal rights and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: May 6, 2026

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports. . . (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days . . .(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, . . .This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 sustaining a fall and being sent to the hospital and the facility did not submit the required LIC624. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to: submit a statement of understanding regarding the reporting requirement.

Apr 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Thursday April 16, 2026, to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA reviewed resident (6) and staff (2) files. All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA and Administrator Karcia toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The following areas were inspected: resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, laundry room, garage and backyard. Facility was current on fire drills. All required postings were observed. All chemicals and knives were kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Fire extinguisher had a current inspection tag. LPA requested a copy of current liability insurance by 4/30/2026.. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies cited. A copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Bethany Mirlohi, Kevin Mknelly, and Melissa Parks, and Licensing Program Managers Troy Ordonez and Laura Munoz met licensee Krisztina Ivascu in person for an office visit. This meeting was initiated by licensee to discuss the following topics: Night supervision Staff supervision for dementia residents Live in staff Annual Fees Refund for hospice residents During today’s office meeting no deficiencies cited. Copy of report provided to licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On Tuesday February 10, 2026, at 9:00 AM, an informal conference was conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams Meeting. Present in the meeting was Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Maribeth Senty, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks, LPA Bethany Mirlohi, and Licensee representative Krisztina Ivascu. License was informed that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The purpose of today’s meeting was to discuss solvency, plan of corrections, and facility administrators. Topic discussed: - Solvency - Past due annual fees - Plan of Corrections - Facility Administrators At this time, the Department agreed to monitor each facility. Additionally, the facility will provide the Department with the required documents and a schedule of each Administrator for each facility. Krisztina agreed to pay outstanding annual fees by 2/28/2026. The Department will submit a referral to the Technical Support Program. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. Informal meeting concluded and a copy of report will be emailed. Facility Representative Signature is expected to be signed and returned to LPA by close of business, 2/10/2026.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2026

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA sent reminder emails about unpaid fees on 11/10/25 and 11/17/25. As of 12/2/25 administrator never sent LPA a copy of receipt and fees were not paid. Deficiencies were cited today on 809-D. Exit interview conducted and appeal rights and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.185(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2026

1569.185(a)(1)An application fee adjusted by facility and capacity shall be charged by the department for the issuance of a license to operate a residential care facility for the elderly. After initial licensure, a fee shall be charged by the department annually on each anniversary of the effective date of the license. This requirement is not met based upon outstanding Annual fee amount with late fee assessed. LIS payment history reviewed, which poses an potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility agreed to pay balance of past due annual fees by 1/5/2026.

Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff allowed residents to leave the facility unsupervised

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Karcia Walker to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfounded Interviews with Administrators indicated that Resident R1 has exit seeking behaviors which the facility was aware of at time of move in. Interviews indicated that staff continue to monitor R1 at all times and if exit seeking behaviors occur, one staff member will follow R1 to ensure safety while the other staff members stayed at the facility with other residents in care. The facility has protocols in place to ensure resident safety and document all incidents of elopement. All parties were notified during and after each elopement behavior. Documents reviewed indicated that facility was aware of R1’s elopement behaviors and had put procedures in place to redirect and calm R1 when the behaviors occurred. Interviews and documents indicated that R1 never left the facility unsupervised. Records reviewed and interviews conducted indicated that during the incident that occurred on 06/12/2025, R1 opened the front door and walked out of the facility during a behavioral episode. Staff were monitoring R1 during that time and one staff member followed R1 to ensure safety while additional staff stayed at the facility to oversee other residents and call administrators. R1 walked around the neighborhood with staff member. Staff attempted to redirect R1 but were not able to so they continued to follow R1. Eventually returned to the facility once an Administrator had arrived at the facility and was able to redirect R1. Based on records reviewed and interviews, LPA finds the above allegation to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. Copy of report was given to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250619083240
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived unannounced and met with Acting Administrator Karcia Walker to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed five (5) resident rooms and three (3) common area bathrooms. LPA observed rooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition, properly maintained, and the hot water temperature was observed to be 118.0 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two day perishable and (7) seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operational in the care home. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed six (6) resident files, two (2) staff files and resident medications. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA obtained a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Not enough staff to meet resident's needs Staff cannot communicate with resident

On 11/15/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Graham Gunby and Cheyenne Ratajczak, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Administrator Krisztina Ivascu. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed the administrator and staff. LPA reviewed the following documents: Resident list, staff list with telephone numbers, admission agreements, care plans, care tracking, Physicians report. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Not enough staff to meet resident's needs: Unsubstantiated R1 moved in on during the weekend. R1 does not have a responsible party or any local family. R1 was extremely combative towards care staff. Per R1s LIC602 they are non-ambulatory but can state their own needs and is a one person assist. After reviewing R1’s LIC602 and interviews with the staff, it is determined that R1 can bare weight during transfer and is not a 2 person assist. During interviews it was revealed that there is one care staff on the weekends and two care staff during the week. In interviews with staff LPAs learned that if needed on the weekends other care staff are available to assist. Allegation: Staff cannot communicate with resident: Unsubstantiated During the relocation into the facility R1 had not received their updated medications and was having behavioral breakdowns. During this time, R1 was speaking in Romanian and the caregivers were unable to communicate with the resident. While opening the complaint the resident was on updated medication and was able to communicate clearly and in English to LPAs and staff. During interviews with staff it was revealed that staff and R1 are able to clearly communicate with one another. Based on LPA's observations and interviews, the department has found the complaint allegations to be unsubstantiated, meaning that the although the allegations may have happened or are valid, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights were emailed to the Administrator. LPAs printer was not working.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240925143949
Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived on Wednesday April 3, 2024 to conduct the unannounced annual inspection. During today's annual inspection, the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement Tool was used. LPA Parks reviewed resident (6) and staff files (2). All resident files contained the required paperwork. All staff files contained the required paperwork and training. LPA Parks and Administrator Krisztina toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. The areas toured included resident rooms, bathrooms, living room, kitchen, and garage. In the areas toured, there were no health or safety violations observed. Facility was clean and well organized. Facility has PPE supply on hand. All required posting were observed. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was emailed to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 10 documents

20233 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the staff who resided in the facility

On 9/29/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with caregivers to deliver investigation findings. Administrator arrived to assist LPA reviewed staff records and facility records. LPAs also conducted inspections and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. The staff alleged to have not been provided reasonable living accommodations, no longer work at the facility. Phone contact to one staff was not responded to. An email for another staff mentioned was no longer active. R2, who has continually worked at the home was interviewed. The Department has conducted various inspections during the time the staff accommodations violations are alleged to have occurred. Inspections, records and interviews found that when staff have stayed at the facility for non-work times, they have been provided reasonable break and living accommodations. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and report provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230814143452
Jul 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Residents are chemically restrained with medication Facility staff not fingerprint-cleared Staff are using drugs while on duty Facility staff are abusing residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to continue investigation into allegations listed above. LPA met with Krisztina Ivascu during today's inspection. LPA investigated allegation, "Residents are chemically restrained with medication". LPA reviewed 4 of 4 resident medications, comparing with physician orders. Administrator stated all medications are dispensed as ordered by the physician and medications are never given to chemically restrain residents. LPA interviewed 2 of 4 residents that were able to be interviewed, and residents reported they are given their correct medications daily. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfounded LPA investigated allegation, "Facility staff are not fingerprint cleared". LPA reviewed staff files, and reviewed facility association list. LPA observed that all staff are associated to the facility roster, and have valid ID's. Due to information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be unfounded. LPA investigated allegation, "Staff are using drugs while on duty". LPA interviewed 2 caregivers and conducted a facility tour. LPA did not observe any illegal drugs or evidence of drug use. LPA interviewed caregivers on shift, and caregiver stated they have not used drugs or seen other staff members use drugs while on duty. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated she has not had any staff use drugs while on duty. Due to information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation, "Facility staff are abusing residents". LPA interviewed 2 caregivers and administrator and interviewed 2 residents in care. Residents stated they have not been hurt or abused by staff in any way. Residents reported they feel safe at the facility. LPA interviewed caregivers and administrator in which they stated they have not abused residents in anyway and they have not observed any other staff member abuse residents. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. The allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230328165009
Apr 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Krisztina Ivascu during today's inspection. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Masks. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 5 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, backyard and the garage area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Administrator stated there has been no positive COVID cases at the facility, and sufficient amount of PPE. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 3 of 6 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of one resident comparing with physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current first aid certificates completed and file drills are being completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. During today's inspection LPA observed S1 did not have their yearly training in 2022 completed. Deficiencies cited on 809-D. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20224 state visits · 7 documents

Nov 22, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: **Amended** Staff did not provide proper care and supervision to residents in care.

** Amended** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/22/22 to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with caregivers and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the complaint visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA completed a facility risk assessment upon arrival. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Administrator arrived to assist with the visit The department reviewed client/resident records and conducted interviews and inspections. The department finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Substantiated ** Amended** Records reviews conducted 10/14/22 by LPA Mknelly for R1 found that R1 did not have a care plan documented. The facility only had a pre-appraisal on file. The pre-appraisal, from 11/10/21, identified R1 as experiencing Dementia with short and limited long term memory, is active with a use of a walker, occasionally needs assistance with transfers. R1’s physician report dated 11/2/21 notes Dementia with confusion and aggression at times. R1’s injuries, supervision level and strategies for her to move safely were not communicated to staff in a written care plan. Interviews with staff found that staff had a informal plan of attending to R1 (and they reported to engage with R1 often). However, the strategy by staff was to remind R1 to move safely and call for assistance as needed. R1’s poor memory was not accounted for in the plan and therefore did not address R1’s care and supervision needs. 87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care. Report reviewed with Administrator . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided. ** Amended** The event of R1 found to have a medication still in their mouth following a medication time was an unusual event for that resident. LPAs observed staff to wash their hands and interview statements are that staff are disciplined in hand hygiene Residents alleged to be in soiled clothing for extended time was reported for a time when R1 was in the hospital. No additional incidents were found. Inspections found the facility odor free Staff interviews, records found notification of resident’s authorized representative of resident’s change in condition were regular and often. Interviews of residents did not support that staff do not respond to resident’s call for help Staff interviews and records reviews found that resident’s hygiene needs appear to be met. Allegations Resident sustained multiple injuries while in care and Resident sustained a fracture while in care found that R1 did, in fact, sustain injuries and a fractured wrist (3/27/22) while at the facility. However, the allegation, as written, does not attribute fault to staff care or lack of care. R1’s fracture was due a unwitnessed fall from bed as reported by R1 to staff. R1 stated that they informed staff of pain. Medical care was sought timely. R1’s other bruises and skin tears often were unwitnessed events when R1 was moving independently throughout the home. Therefore no violation is noted for these events at this time. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report provided. On 12/6/22, LPA emailed licensee amended report to licensee for signature to be in facility file reported outbreak but one did not occur at this residence during the period alleged. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220520084919

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2022

Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. This requirement was not met based on records review and interviews. This posed a potential risk to resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit completed and current needs and services plan for all current residents in care (as of 11/22/22) by the POC date of 12/13/22.

May 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident's personal rights violated.

LPA conducted interviews with residents and staff, reviewed records and conducted several inspections during this investigation. LPA finds that facility met Title 22 requirements and found no evidence that can prove that residents’ personal rights were violated. Based on interviews conducted by LPAs with facility residents, staff members and facility tour (03/17/22 and 04/19/22), the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview with Administrator. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220307135328

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not following public health mask requirement.

On 03/17/22, during interview with administrator, administrator stated that he was under the impression that with the new guidelines, fully vaccinated and boosted staff for Covid-19, were not required to wear a mask inside the facility. LPAs advised the administrator that this information is not correct and wearing of face mask still required inside the facility despite vaccination status and exemption. LPAs observed during 03/17/22 visit that staff were not wearing masks while caring for residents in care. Due to interview conducted with administrator and LPAs' observation during 03/17/22 visit, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 809-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the facility. The signature of the Administrator on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220307135328

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87470(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2022

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: During inspection conducted by CCLD on 3/17/2022, LPAs observed staff not wearing face masks while inside the facility, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct an in-service training for staff regarding COVID-19 precautionary measures, including proper face covering practices and screening. Facility will submit to LPA information regarding training, including time and date of training and training material, by POC due date 05/27/2022

May 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff lack of care and supervision resulted in resident's unexplained injuries.

On 5/20/2022, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz and Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Talwinder Bains and Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Andrei Dumitriu, to conclude a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPM and LPAs wore surgical masks and was screened by facility upon entry. Facility staff wore masks while on the premises. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: staff lack of care and supervision resulted in resident's unexplained injuries ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Unsubstantiated LPA conducted extensive interviews with residents and staff. LPA reviewed resident records. Based on facility records review for R1 and interviews conducted, it was found that R1 had not experienced any falls or any injuries while residing at the facility. The resident was admitted to the facility on 02/26/22 and was discharged from the facility 03/03/22 due to a change in condition. R1 was not identified as fall risk resident upon admission to facility on 02/26/22. From R1’s Medical Records review, it was also discovered that R1 was in the hospital multiple times prior to his admission to the facility due to his previous medical condition. Interviews indicated that R1 had a bruise on their hand at the time R1 was admitted to facility. LPA concluded that facility did not provide any actions which would harm or injured R1 while at facility. Based on interviews conducted by LPAs, observations during inspection, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. The signature of the Administrator on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220307135328
Apr 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Post Licensing visit is conducted in today's inspection. No deficiencies are cited. See 809 for Annual visit for 04/19/22 for details. Exit interview done and copy of the report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2022
Apr 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst Talwinder Bains arrived at the facility unannounced on 04/19/22 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator , Andrei Dumitriu , and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, the daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA wore the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during today's visit: surgical mask. LPA was screened by facility staff before entry to facility. LPA and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: kitchen, common areas, six (6) bedrooms , three (3) bathrooms, medication closet , garage, laundry room and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Administrator completed the infection control domain together and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2022
Mar 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An Office Meeting was conducted at 11:00 AM on 3/25/2022 at the Sacramento North Regional Office virtually via Microsoft Teams. Present for the meeting was: Administrator Krisztina Ivascu Staff Andrei Dumitriu LPM Laura Munoz LPM Troy Ordonez LPM Maribeth Senty LPM Anthony Perez LPA Kevin Mknelly LPA Talwinder Bains LPA Jacob Williams The purpose of the Office Meeting was to discuss the situation surrounding Silvana Senior Care, Inc. The Department has concerns stemming from site inspections on multiple dates during the year 2021 and 2022. Issues discussed during the meeting were: regulations regarding selling a business, Andrei Dumitriu advertising that he is owner/administrator on business cards when he is not owner/administrator, false information listed online & removing advertising with the name "Anca", state license is non-transferrable, whenever there is more than a 50% change of ownership a new license is required, number of facilities Krisztina Ivascu is acting Administrator, Nanny's Nest change of ownership from Staci Barnes to Krisztina Ivascu, the required time administrator must spend at each facility (roughly ~20 hours). CCL is requesting LIC500 & LIC308 for each Silvana Senior Care, Inc. facility. Copy of report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2022

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 22, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Silvana Senior Care, Inc., licensed since 2021.

Operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Silvana Senior Care · Rocklin
  • Silvana Senior Care 5 · Roseville
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
23
Total complaints
7
Substantiated allegations
4
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations20
Substantiated allegations40
Total complaints70

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Silvana Senior Care 4

Is Silvana Senior Care 4 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Silvana Senior Care 4 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Silvana Senior Care 4 been cited?

2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.

Is Silvana Senior Care 4 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 9, 2026.

What does Silvana Senior Care 4 cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,125 to $5,899 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Silvana Senior Care 4 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Silvana Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silvana Senior Care, Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Silvana Senior Care 4 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Silvana Senior Care 4 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SILVANA SENIOR CARE 4”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #312701026. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Silvana Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 23 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Rocklin · 0.3 mi

    Brighter Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
  • Map

    Rocklin · 0.3 mi

    Love You Dad

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Rocklin · 0.4 mi

    Montclair Villa

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Rocklin · 0.5 mi

    Love You Dad 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Rocklin · under 0.1 mi

    Silvana Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Rocklin · 0.3 mi

    Rocklin Modern Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Placer County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
SS

Call Silvana Senior Care 4

Rocklin · Licensed for 6

(916) 586-4713

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Silvana Senior Care 4

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages