Small home · Licensed for 6 · Rocklin
Rock Creek Senior Care
6408 Mendez Creek Ct, Rocklin, CA 95765Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Works with hospice
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Caring.com · September 9, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rock Creek Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,950a month to start
Likely $4,050–$6,100
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,950likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,950likely $4,050–$6,100
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,250
- $4,950
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,450
- $7,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $5,500
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,400.
- Oasis for Seniors at Heaven's GardenRocklin · 0.2 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Hills Senior Care 2Roseville · 0.5 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
- Aunt Dottie's PlaceRoseville · 0.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living 2Roseville · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Par Place Senior LivingRocklin · 1.2 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sapphire Senior CareRoseville · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
- Diamond Wood Senior CareRoseville · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Roseberry CareRoseville · 2.7 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (1)Room types
Room typesAll Private Rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
6408 Mendez Creek Ct, Rocklin, CA 95765Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sutter Roseville Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #312700212 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff physically assulted a resident causing injury resulting in hospitalization
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 02/18/2026 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 09/09/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Carmen Balint and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff physically assulted a resident causing injury resulting in hospitalization On 09/06/2025, R1 was admitted to Sutter Roseville Medical Center for complaint of left foot pain. An MRI confirmed moderate second proximal phalangeal bone marrow edema and severe second phalangeal bone marrow edema suspicious for osteomyelitis. Doctors subsequently amputated R1’s left index toe. R1 reported that a caregiver, S2, intentionally hit the toe with a standing lift. No other information contained in the medical records indicates that R1’s toe wound resulted from an intentional impact with an object like a standing lift. Historically, R1 suffered from foot cellulitis related to their diabetes diagnosis. Prior to their hospitalization, R1 received regular wound care treatment from InnovAge for various preexisting pressure wounds to their left foot. There was no indication of a left index toe injury until 04/22/2025 when redness was observed on the top of R1’s left index toe; however, the toe injury was not concerning until an open wound was observed on 08/14/2025. S2 denied the allegation to the Rocklin Police Department and the Investigations Branch and stated that R1 often threatened to have them terminated. On 09/04/2025, S2 told facility Administration that R1 threatened to report them and tell lies that would “spread like wildfire.” S2 subsequently documented the interaction in a handwritten letter. No other residents reported similar allegations against S2. R2 claimed to have been close with R1 and R1 expressed their frustrations related to the facility. R2 indicated that R1 never mentioned any physical abuse by S2 or another caregiver. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report provided. Allegation: Staff verbally abusing resident Interview conducted with staff member S1 indicated that staff members haven’t been heard being verbally abusive towards residents in care. R2 indicated that there are times when they have to elevate their voices due to residents not being able to hear (due to hearing loss) or understand the staff correctly. Interviews with R2 indicated that staff are helpful at all times and have not heard any staff verbally abusing residents in care. Allegation: Facility failed to meet reporting requirements LPA interviewed staff and reviewed facility information. Through interviews S1 stated when an incident occurs the staff writes a report and then sends the information to management. The management team reviews the information and creates an incident report. Administrator stated if needed they will send incident report into CCL. LPA reviewed incident reports sent into CCL and found facility is sending in incident reports throughout the year on incidents that have occurred with residents in care. The allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 59-AS-20250909171014
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with Administrator, Carmen Balint, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured include but not limited to resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen sink at 113.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and was last serviced on 09/30/25. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted in the entry of the facility. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files. Resident files contained all required documentation. LPA reviewed three (3) staff records. Staff have all required documentation and first aid training. No deficiencies are being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report will be emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual visit. This facility has six private resident rooms. One private room is to the right of the main entrance. The rest of the resident rooms and two common bathrooms are located to the left of the facility down a hallway. The entrance of the facility leads to an open floor plan that has the kitchen, dining, and sitting area. There is a locked storage closet for medications and records in the kitchen area. There locked laundry room and caregiver room in a nook area in the kitchen. The garage is only accessible from the outside and is used for storage. The backyard was inspected. There is a gate on both sides of the facility. -two staff records were reviewed -three resident records were reviewed -multiple topics were discussed The following shall be updated and submitted to Community Care Licensing by the end of the month: -LIC 500 facility personnel or staff schedule -LIC 610 emergency disaster plan -LIC 308 designation of administrative responsibility No citations were issuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/14/2023 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify administrator, Carmenuta Balint, of LPA's presence at the facility. Administrator arrived at a later time. At 10:00 AM, LPA reviewed a total of four (4) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, releases, and resident's rights. Medications are centrally stored, locked, and appear to be given per doctor order. LPA compared medications to those being given for four (4) residents and found no discrepancies. Facility is correctly using the Medication Administration Records (MAR). LPA reviewed a total of two (2) staff record. Staff has training in medications, first aid and CPR, and other various areas of care provision. At 10:30 AM, LPA and administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage, laundry room, and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of one (1) week and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxic and cleaning supplies locked and is inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was completed. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 11/1/2022. Fire drill was last conducted on 09/13/2023. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Jan 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Carmen Balint during today's inspection. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Masks. LPA toured facility with administrator to ensure health and safety of residents in care. LPA toured 6 resident rooms, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, common living spaces, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Administrator stated there has been no positive COVID cases at the facility, but have an isolation room and sufficient amount of PPE. LPA toured the backyard and all exits are accessible and unlocked. There is a locked storage for medications and toxins. Food supply is adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPA observed an adequate amount of linens and found the first aid kit to be complete. LPA reviewed 2 of 4 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA reviewed medications of two residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed indicated current first aid certificates and training completed. LPA observed a copy of current liability insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2023
Jan 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility locking residents in facility Administrator Qualifications
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver findings to a complaint investigation received on 10/28/2022. LPA met with Elenora Latu, and Sashauna Smith, caregivers, who contacted Administrator, Carmen Balint, who arrived at approximately 1:30 PM. LPA observed (1) resident to be in the common area and (3) residents to be napping or watching television in their rooms. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 Department protocols and was wearing a surgical mask and was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Co-Administrator, Carmen, (1) Administrator Designee, (3) residents, hospice nurse and a family member of resident (R2). LPA also observed the locking mechanism on the sliding glass doors and on the kitchen drawer used for sharps. LPA reviewed documentation related to the 9-1-1 call made on 10/28/22, the approved fire clearance with facility sketch, and for residents (R1 and R2). The investigation findings are as follows: cont on 9099C(1).. Unfounded Allegation: Facility locking residents in facility. Complaint alleges that Fire Crew observed a dead bolt lock on the front door that required a key to open from the inside, locking residents in the facility. LPA reviewed a report from local authorities, dated 10/28/22. which includes a photo taken of the inside of the front entrance door showing that a skeleton key type lock had been installed on the door frame and a photo of the key that was kept in a nearby drawer. On 10/28/22, LPA took photos of the facility front door showing a small hole on the right side of the door frame where an additional lock was installed. Administrator stated that she had just installed this additional lock because the door would not close properly. On 12/15/22, LPA observed the hole on the door frame to have been filled and only (1) lock to be in place on the front door that is able to be unlocked from the inside without a key. LPA took a photo. Administrator stated to LPA on 12/15/22 that prior to receiving the facility license, the fire department approved the front entrance door as an entrance only and required (3) additional interior doors as well as (2) additional glass sliding doors to be installed to be in compliance with fire code. LPA observed exit signs posted above each glass sliding door (3) and also posted in each resident room indicating the exit route to be used to exit through the glass doors. LPA also observed an exit sign above the inside of the front entrance door. On 12/15/22, LPA observed each glass sliding door to not have a locking mechanism in place and to be able to be opened easily. Administrator stated the doors have always had this specific non-locking mechanism. LPA interviewed resident (R1), who was awake during the early morning hours on 10/28/22 when 9-1-1 was called. R1 stated he has never had difficulty opening the glass sliding door in the common area from either the inside or outside patio area of the facility. There were no additional ambulatory residents able to be interviewed. Administrator Designee stated on 12/15/22 that the front entrance door at the facility is "always unlocked from the inside and always locked from the outside". The Administrator stated on 12/15/22 that the glass doors are "never locked" from the inside or outside and the doors have "always worked this way", asserting "the front door was "not considered an emergency exit" when fire issued their facility clearance during the licensing process. Fire clearance documentation shows the facility was approved for (6) non-ambulatory residents on 11-28-2017 and shows (4) designated or approved exits. R1 stated to LPA that he is always able to open the glass door and it has "never been a problem", but he was not able to open the front door when 9-1-1 arrived on 10/28/22. LPA observed R1 to be able to ambulate without any assistive device. cont on 90099C(2).. 9099C(2)..Based on information obtained during the investigation that there were/are (3) additional designated unlocked exits, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations are false, could not have happened and/ or is without reasonable basis. An Advisory Note is being issued today. Allegation: Administrator Qualifications. Regulation 87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties, was reviewed. LPA confirmed that the Administrator of record, Pavel P. Balint, has been a certified Administrator since on/around 2016 and holds a current RCFE Administrator Certificate- # 6043137740 with an expiration date of 1/8/2023. Administrator, Carmen, stated the renewal paperwork was recently submitted to the Department. There is a second Administrator, Carmenuta "Carmen" D. Balint, who has a current RCFE Administrator certificate- #6036317740- exp 8/13/2023. Carmen indicated she has been a certified RCFE Administrator since on/around 2015. LPA confirmed that Administrator has (3) current Administrator Designees in place. LPA spoke to one Designee on 12/15/22 when she arrived at the facility before Administrator arrived for the inspection. Administrator stated she is aware of her responsibilities of being an Administrator, including but not limited to, complying with all licensing requirements and regulations and if she isn't sure, she will contact CCLD for additional guidance. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- meaning that the allegations are false, could not have happened and/ or is without reasonable basis. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to facility. 9099A-C(2).. LPA observed a kitchen drawer with both sharp knives and non-sharp or table knives to have a magnetic locking mechanism in place on 10/28/22 and on 12/15/22. LPA did not observe any sharp knives or other sharps to be unlocked in the kitchen or other areas of the facility during both inspections. LPA reviewed R1's current physician's report, dated 8/2/22, which notes R1 has a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease, muscle weakness, Pneumonitis, and cognitive communication deficit. The physician's report does not indicat that R1 has Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Dementia. Administrator stated that sometimes R1 is forgetful and confused. Administrator stated that residents will use a table knife only during meals. LPA asked R1 if he can access sharp knives that are kept in a drawer in the kitchen. R1 stated he "doesn't know where everything is kept and if he did, he is not sure of what kind of locking system there is in place". LPA reviewed a report dated 10/28/22 written by local authorities. The report notes resident (R1) "was standing in the kitchen using a knife to cut an apple" when 9-1-1 arrived at approximately 01:05 hours . The fire report for the same incident indicates that fire personnel took the knife away from R1 when he was observed to be using it to cut an apple and after he stated he wasn't "allowed to have a knife". The report does not specify what kind of knife R1 was using and LPA was unable to confirm this information with fire personnel. R1 and Administrator stated R1 and resident R2 were the only ones awake when 9-1-1 was called on 10/28/22, while the local authorities report that there were (3) residents awake. R2 passed on/around November 2022 and was not able to be interviewed during a follow up inspection on 12/15/22. LPA was able to interview (1) additional resident (R3) who indicated he was asleep when 911 arrived and (1) other resident (R4) who stated the lights woke her up but she was unable to get out of bed. Administrator stated that sharps are always locked up and she was at the facility until 11:00 pm on 10/27/22 and is certain there were no sharps or sharp knives left out in the kitchen unlocked. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. Copy of report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221028101128
20221 state visit · 1 document
Oct 28, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff working at facility Facility not providing night supervision Facility not providing care and supervision to residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct 10-day inspection. LPA met with Paulette Barnett, caregiver, who contacted Administrator, Carmen Balint, who arrived at approximately 1:30 pm. LPA observed a second caregiver, Tiffany Phillips, washing dishes in the kitchen. LPA observed (3) residents to be watching television in the common area. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 Department protocols and was wearing a surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. During today's inspection, LPA interviewed Administrator, (5) residents, a family member of resident a resident (R1) and a nurse who provides care to resident (R1). LPA also reviewed all (6) resident binders, (2) staff binders and (2) Administrator binders. LPA observed all files to be organized and contain up to date documentation, including for trainings. The results of the investigation are as follows: cont on 9099C(1).. Substantiated 9099C(1). Allegation: Uncleared staff working at facility. LPA reviewed Department records confirming (2) Administrators and staff (S1) who was working on 10/27/22 and today are cleared and associated to the facility. LPA reviewed documentation showing that staff (S2) had her fingerprints taken yesterday, 10/27/22, just prior to starting to work at the facility. Administrator stated that a fingerprint clearance has not been received yet for S2. LPA observed S2 working at the start of today's inspection. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Allegation: Facility not providing night supervision. Complaint states that on 10/28/22 at approximately 12:49 am, crew from the local fire department responded to a 9-1-1 call and entered the house, because no one responded by opening the front door. Crew was calling out throughout the facility searching for staff. Fire Crew finally was able to locate 2 staff (S1 and S2) sleeping in a room. LPA interviewed residents (R1 and R2) who stated both stated that resident R1 needed assistance with toileting on 10/28/22 at approximately 12:45 am and was calling staff for help, but there appeared to be no one available to help R1. Administrator confirmed that she was at the facility on 10/27/22 until approximately 11:30 pm that day and had left shortly before R1 got up to use the restroom. Both R1 and R2 stated R1 had been calling for staff to assist for quite a while, approximately 15 minutes. The fire department crew had to enter through the back doors and window because no one answered the door. When fire department Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. cont on 9099C(2)... 9099C(2).. Allegation: Facility not providing care and supervision to residents. LPA interviewed residents (R1 and R2) who stated both stated that resident R1 needed assistance with toileting on 10/28/22 at approximately 12:45 am and was calling staff for help. Both residents also confirmed that resident R2 called 9-1-1 for assistance in helping R1 since there appeared to be no one else available to help R1. Administrator confirmed that she was at the facility on 10/27/22 until approximately 11:00 pm that day and had left shortly before R1 got up to use the restroom. R1's family member stated that R1 has not been sleeping well since recently moving to the facility and also has a faint voice and staff may have not heard him asking for help. R2 stated R1 had been "screaming for help" to assist for quite a while, approximately 15 minutes, but staff were sleeping. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (3) deficiencies and civil penalty is is cited on the 9099 page. Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2022 · control 25-AS-20221028101128
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87412(a)(13)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 31, 2022
87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information:(13) For employees that are required to be fingerprinted pursuant to Section 87355, Criminal Record Clearance: (B) Documentation of either a criminal record clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by Section 87355(e). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation reviewed and interviews conducted, the LIcensee did not ensure that staff (S2) was fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility, prior to beginning to work, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2022
Plan of correction: LIcensee/Administrator already requested that staff S2 complete her fingerprints. Licensee/Admin is waiting for the results and will forward them to us when you. Licensee/Administrator agree to read Regulation 87412 and submit a statement of understanding to the Department by 10/31/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87415(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 31, 2022
87415 Night Supervision (a) The following persons providing night supervision from l0:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shall be familiar with the facility's planned emergency procedures, shall be trained in first aid as required in Section 87465, Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services and shall be available as indicated below to assist in caring for residents in the event of an emergency.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the LIcensee did not ensure that there was staff that was awake or on call, and able to respond to resident's (R1) call for assistance, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agree to move the call light system and place it in the caregiver room and also instruct residents to call the caregiver for help instead of 9-1-1. Documentation that call light system/monitor has been moved to caregiver's room by 10/31/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 31, 2022
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the Licensee did not ensure that staff provided assistance to resident (R1) on 10/28/22 at approximately 12:45 am, when he called for assistance in the bathroom, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agree to move the call light system and place it in the caregiver room and also instruct residents to call the caregiver for help instead of 9-1-1. Documentation that call light system/monitor has been moved to caregiver's room by 10/31/2022.
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Nov 4, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On November 4, 2021, Licensing Program Analyst, LPA DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Carmen Balint, Administrator and informed her the reason for the visit. Prior to initiating the inspection LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by the front desk personnel upon arrival. LPA completed the inspection tool questionnaire with Carmen no issues or advisories to report. LPA observed the following: This is a 7 bedroom 2 bathroom home. Administrator certificate is valid and expires 8/13/2023. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguishers fully charged. Smoke alarms and Carbon Monoxide detector are working Hot water temperature measured 107 degrees F. Common areas were clean and in good repair. Bedrooms had required furniture and lighting. Facility has required (2) day perishable supply of food and (7) supply of non-perishable food. Medication was properly stored and locked away. There are no bodies of water on the premises. To continue see 809-C... As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. 10 Administrator shall submit the following documents to update the Regional Office files The following shall be updated and submitted to Community Care Licensing by 12/04/2021: -LIC 500 facility personnel or staff schedule -LIC 610 emergency disaster plan -LIC 308 designation of administrative responsibility -copy of liability insurance -updated facility sketch Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report given to Carmen Balint.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2021
3 of 6 beds were occupied at the February 18, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Rock Creek Senior Care LLC, licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 10
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rock Creek Senior Care
Is Rock Creek Senior Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Rock Creek Senior Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Rock Creek Senior Care been cited?
3 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Rock Creek Senior Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Rock Creek Senior Care cost?
$4,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,125 to $5,899 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rock Creek Senior Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rock Creek Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rock Creek Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Rock Creek Senior Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROCK CREEK SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #312700212. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Rock Creek Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Placer County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,600 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Placer County