Senior's Retreat, Inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Brea, Orange County, California — state license #306005914, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Senior's Retreat, Inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Brea, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005914, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
312 Guava Place · Brea, Orange County
Phone
(714) 332-0685
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY WITH BEDROOM #1 PERMITTED FOR 2 RESIDENTS. EXIT PATH SERVING BEDROOM #4 SHALL BE UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 25, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 25, 2026
Occupancy at the March 10, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 24, 2025 to March 10, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 7 documents
May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have a current administrator

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lorna Smith and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator reported they have a current Administrator's certificate but they have not received it from the Agency (CCL). LPA verified on the Agency website that the Administrator has a current certificate, number 7023081740 that expires on August 16, 2026. The Administrator reported that she sent in all the required documents to renew her certificate prior to the last certificate expiring. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided and explained. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250228145518
Feb 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was abandonded at the hospital

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior portion of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the complaint allegation: Resident was abandonded at the hospital During the complaint investigation, Staff 1 (S1) admitted to abandoning Resident 1 (R1) at the hospital. According to S1, R1 was fine the first day of admission. According to S1, the second day at the facility the resident was observed to be confused and wanted to leave the facility. R1 successfully eloped on third day. The police found the resident and called the facility and asked if they are missing a client. S1 said no and checked on the residents and noticed R1 was not present. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117140319
Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff applied a colostomy bag without a doctor's order Facility heater is inoperative

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior portion of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff applied a colostomy bag without a doctor's order During the complaint investigation 3 of 4 individuals interviewed provided information that confirms the complaint allegation, including Staff 1(S1) who admitted to placing a bag on the residents rectum/bottom area. S1 admitted to placing the colostomy bag on the resident 1’s rectum/bottom area. According to S1, R1 was dealing with a lot of “loose stool” so S1 used the colostomy bag to catch the loose stool to prevent further damage to R1’s already compromised skin area on the rectum/bottom area. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117100656
Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff caused injury to resident Facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature for the residents

Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff caused injury to resident During the complaint investigation, 3 of 4 individuals confirmed R1 was dealing with skin irritation on the rectum/bottom area. One witnessed described the skin irritation to be like a diaper rash. The witness claims the facility was provided cream to apply to the affected area. Staff 1 (S1) also confirmed R1 was dealing with irritation to the rectum area from the time R1 was admitted on January 8, 2025. S1 confirmed cream was being applied to the irritated area and it was improving until R1 began having loose stools, which irritated the already sensitive skin around R1’s rectum/bottom area. It is not clear what damage if any was caused by the bag that was placed on the rectum/bottom area as 3 of the individuals interviewed all confirmed R1 was already dealing with skin irritation to the area. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature for the residents Continued on LIC9099Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117100656
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints5typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file15typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026230202557220241102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 332-0685

Is Senior's Retreat, Inc. licensed?

Yes — Senior's Retreat, Inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Brea (Orange County): California license #306005914, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Senior's Retreat, Inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Senior's Retreat, Inc. with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY WITH BEDROOM #1 PERMITTED FOR 2 RESIDENTS. EXIT PATH SERVING BEDROOM #4 SHALL BE UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Senior's Retreat, Inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Senior's Retreat, Inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Senior's Retreat, Inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Senior's Retreat, Inc. is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on March 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Senior's Retreat, Inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2022 for Senior's Retreat, Inc.; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have a current administrator
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lorna Smith and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator reported they have a current Administrator's certificate but they have not received it from the Agency (CCL). LPA verified on the Agency website that the Administrator has a current certificate, number 7023081740 that expires on August 16, 2026. The Administrator reported that she sent in all the required documents to renew her certificate prior to the last certificate expiring. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided and explained. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250228145518
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was abandonded at the hospital
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior portion of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the complaint allegation: Resident was abandonded at the hospital During the complaint investigation, Staff 1 (S1) admitted to abandoning Resident 1 (R1) at the hospital. According to S1, R1 was fine the first day of admission. According to S1, the second day at the facility the resident was observed to be confused and wanted to leave the facility. R1 successfully eloped on third day. The police found the resident and called the facility and asked if they are missing a client. S1 said no and checked on the residents and noticed R1 was not present. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117140319
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff applied a colostomy bag without a doctor's order Facility heater is inoperative
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit regarding the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit upon entry. Before interviews began, LPA toured the interior and exterior portion of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff applied a colostomy bag without a doctor's order During the complaint investigation 3 of 4 individuals interviewed provided information that confirms the complaint allegation, including Staff 1(S1) who admitted to placing a bag on the residents rectum/bottom area. S1 admitted to placing the colostomy bag on the resident 1’s rectum/bottom area. According to S1, R1 was dealing with a lot of “loose stool” so S1 used the colostomy bag to catch the loose stool to prevent further damage to R1’s already compromised skin area on the rectum/bottom area. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117100656
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused injury to resident Facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature for the residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Regarding the complaint allegation: Staff caused injury to resident During the complaint investigation, 3 of 4 individuals confirmed R1 was dealing with skin irritation on the rectum/bottom area. One witnessed described the skin irritation to be like a diaper rash. The witness claims the facility was provided cream to apply to the affected area. Staff 1 (S1) also confirmed R1 was dealing with irritation to the rectum area from the time R1 was admitted on January 8, 2025. S1 confirmed cream was being applied to the irritated area and it was improving until R1 began having loose stools, which irritated the already sensitive skin around R1’s rectum/bottom area. It is not clear what damage if any was caused by the bag that was placed on the rectum/bottom area as 3 of the individuals interviewed all confirmed R1 was already dealing with skin irritation to the area. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature for the residents Continued on LIC9099CCDSS inspection report, January 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250117100656

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 332-0685
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Senior's Retreat, Inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.