Mainplace Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange, Orange County, California — state license #306005636, licensed for 153 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 49 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Mainplace Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 153 residents · Orange, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005636, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1800 1832 W. Culver Avenue · Orange, Orange County
Phone
(714) 978-2534
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 92 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 61 AMBULATORY AND 92 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 62 times and filed 49 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 3, 2026
Occupancy at the April 23, 2024 visit
106 of 153 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 13, 2022 to April 23, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 34 of 49 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202411 state visits · 14 documents
Sep 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings Facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as skilled nursing discharge paperwork and inventory list. Regarding the allegations that facility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings and facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 02/22/2024 after hospitalization at a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Discharge paperwork indicated resident's needs included a wheelchair but inventory list at discharge stated resident had no belongings. Staff 1 (S1) stated assisting the resident out of bed at the SNF and assisting the resident into van. Thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240415111317
Apr 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. Facility did not report theft.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Apr 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. Facility does not have required postings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident is administered eye drops as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident was provided a comfortable temperature. Facility does not have adequate staffing to respond to resident's call in a timely manner. Staff did not provide resident's authorized representative a copy of admissions agreement. Staff do not communicate with authorized representative changes of resident's health.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after explaining the purpose of the visit. Facility administrator was present to assist with the visit. The initial investigation visit was conducted at the facility on November 22, 2023. LPA requested and obtained partial resident records for resident R1, conducted a tour of the physical plant and interviewed multiple staff members. A follow-up visit took place on February 2, 2024. One staff interview with the facility's Executive Director was conducted. Additional records requested and obtained. A tour of R1's former unit was also conducted. Additional witness interviews conducted in person or via telephone on February 9, 2024. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231120213146
Jan 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility windows are not secured. Facility gate is not secured.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. Interviews were conducted with staff and Resident 1 (R1) regarding facility windows not being secured. Two out of three staff stated that facility windows are secure, have a latch, and a screen. One out of three staff stated the window in the resident room where R1 was thought to have exited, was not screened on at least one occasion. All three staff, however, confirmed R1 did not exit through their own bedroom window. R1 entered room 306, which was a different resident’s room, and exited through that window. On 8/16/22, LPA conducted initial complaint investigation inspection at the facility. At 3:50 p.m. LPA conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility. LPA observed facility windows within the methe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Jan 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in multiple wanderings from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. On 8/10/22, the Department received an Unusual Incident Report (LIC624) stating that on 8/09/22 at approximately 3:25 p.m. staff noted Resident 1 (R1) missing. Staff notified Wellness Director (WD) Kimberly Mims and Executive Director (ED) Phat Nguyen. A search of the unit including bathroom areas, bedrooms, and closets was conducted. Window in resident room 306 identified as possible exit point. Search of facility and surrounding area was initiated and expanded to surrounding neighborhoods. Per Case Management visit dated 8/10/22, R1 was found on 8/10/22 at approximately 1:15 p.m. by a good Samaritan standing outside a home miles away from the facility. Per Physician Reported dated 7/29/2022, R1 is not able to lthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. Residents are left unattended.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on 06/29/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Business Office Director Chasidy Washington arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Six of ten individuals interviewed denied the allegation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the July, November and December 2023 staff schedule. On average there are four caregivers and two medication technicians for the morning shift, two to four caregivers and two medication technicians for the evening shift and two caregivers and one medication technician for thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230629084645
Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing resident's fall risk.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by executive director (ED) Rhon Hipolito. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that staff are not addressing resident's fall risk. LPA De Perio conducted 7 resident interviews, of which 7 out of the 7 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 2 staff interviews, of which also did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are trained on the protocol for when a resident falls and is also advised to contact medical assistance immediately for the resident to obtain an evaluation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231226144300
20235 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 06/27/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Director of Sales and Marketing Elizabeth Bran Mendoza arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the facility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of ten individuals interviewed corroborated the allegation. Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez included the Mainplace Senior Living Theft and Loss Policy. Per Theft and Loss Policy “Lost or stolen property with a value of $100.00 or more will be reported to law enforcement within thirty-six (36) hours of the discovery of the loss or theft.” Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez inthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230627074740
Nov 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance.

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz and (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted a joint unannounced visit for the purpose to deliver findings for complaint allegation listed above. LPA Quiroz and LPA Tirre were greeted and granted entry by Front desk receptionist and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The ten day inspection visit was conducted on 10/3/2023 and a complaint follow up inspection visit was conducted on 10/17/2023. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses and documentation review but not limited to physician reports, needs and services plans and facility call log report. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance" the investigation revealed the following: Interviews conducted with interviewees consisting of staff and residents concluded that there is enough stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230929113543
Nov 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA’s) Jenifer Tirre and Rosie Quiroz made an unannounced joint visit to conduct follow up into complaint Investigation. LPA's was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA's identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Rhonwinn Hipolito. During the visit, LPA Tirre conducted interviews and requested pertinent documents such as Physician’s Report and Personnel Report. During the investigation, Interviews were conducted with staff and residents, Pertinent documents were reviewed and requested. On 1/20/23 the department received allegations that facility staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed. Per interviews conducted with staff five out of five staff confirmed there was no issues with prescribed medications provided to residents. Interviews with residents confirm that five out of five residents had no issues with receiving medications and that prescribed medications were administered. Interviews withthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230120095133
Nov 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. Resident has fallen multiple times while in care.

An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez, regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Rhon Hipolito and explained the purpose of the visit. Interviews were conducted with two staff and Resident 1 (R1). Two out of two staff corroborated both allegations, and stated they did not recall the exact dates and times but stated R1 fell numerous times and at least one of those times required hospitalization. Per both staff, a re-appraisal of R1 due to falls was not done to their knowledge. R1 also corroborated both allegations and stated they fell multiple times, but did not recall exact dates and times. R1 stated that as a result of these falls they are no longer ambulatory. LPA reviewed facility progress notes for R1, which stated R1 sustained a fall on 6/10/22 at 6:30 a.m., 6/19/22 at 10:00 a.m., 6/20/22 at 12:10 p.m., 6/23/22 at 4:30 p.m., and on 6/28/22 R1 was sent to the hospital fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220629113139
Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Facility does not meet resident’s needs. -Floor in resident room is not cleaned properly.

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn "Rhon" Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/12/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses. Regarding the allegation "Facility does not meet resident’s needs," the investigation revealed the following: Nine of ten interviewees denied the allegation. Six of six residents denied the allegation indicating staff respond timely when called for assistance. Resident 2 (R2) indicated "My room mate just wants to get rid of me and wants his own private room." CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230606092904
Sep 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations15typical 1
Substantiated complaints21typical 2
Total complaints33typical 7
State visits on file62typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020251012020241114120231112320228122
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 978-2534

Is Mainplace Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Mainplace Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange (Orange County): California license #306005636, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 153 residents. State records list 49 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Mainplace Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mainplace Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 61 AMBULATORY AND 92 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Mainplace Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Mainplace Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Mainplace Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Mainplace Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

106 of 153 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on April 23, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Mainplace Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 62 state visits and 49 dated documents since 2022 for Mainplace Senior Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 23, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings Facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as skilled nursing discharge paperwork and inventory list. Regarding the allegations that facility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings and facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 02/22/2024 after hospitalization at a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Discharge paperwork indicated resident's needs included a wheelchair but inventory list at discharge stated resident had no belongings. Staff 1 (S1) stated assisting the resident out of bed at the SNF and assisting the resident into van. TheCDSS inspection report, April 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240415111317
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. Facility did not report theft.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. Facility does not have required postings
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident is administered eye drops as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident was provided a comfortable temperature. Facility does not have adequate staffing to respond to resident's call in a timely manner. Staff did not provide resident's authorized representative a copy of admissions agreement. Staff do not communicate with authorized representative changes of resident's health.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after explaining the purpose of the visit. Facility administrator was present to assist with the visit. The initial investigation visit was conducted at the facility on November 22, 2023. LPA requested and obtained partial resident records for resident R1, conducted a tour of the physical plant and interviewed multiple staff members. A follow-up visit took place on February 2, 2024. One staff interview with the facility's Executive Director was conducted. Additional records requested and obtained. A tour of R1's former unit was also conducted. Additional witness interviews conducted in person or via telephone on February 9, 2024. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 14, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231120213146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility windows are not secured. Facility gate is not secured.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. Interviews were conducted with staff and Resident 1 (R1) regarding facility windows not being secured. Two out of three staff stated that facility windows are secure, have a latch, and a screen. One out of three staff stated the window in the resident room where R1 was thought to have exited, was not screened on at least one occasion. All three staff, however, confirmed R1 did not exit through their own bedroom window. R1 entered room 306, which was a different resident’s room, and exited through that window. On 8/16/22, LPA conducted initial complaint investigation inspection at the facility. At 3:50 p.m. LPA conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility. LPA observed facility windows within the meCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in multiple wanderings from the facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. On 8/10/22, the Department received an Unusual Incident Report (LIC624) stating that on 8/09/22 at approximately 3:25 p.m. staff noted Resident 1 (R1) missing. Staff notified Wellness Director (WD) Kimberly Mims and Executive Director (ED) Phat Nguyen. A search of the unit including bathroom areas, bedrooms, and closets was conducted. Window in resident room 306 identified as possible exit point. Search of facility and surrounding area was initiated and expanded to surrounding neighborhoods. Per Case Management visit dated 8/10/22, R1 was found on 8/10/22 at approximately 1:15 p.m. by a good Samaritan standing outside a home miles away from the facility. Per Physician Reported dated 7/29/2022, R1 is not able to lCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. Residents are left unattended.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on 06/29/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Business Office Director Chasidy Washington arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Six of ten individuals interviewed denied the allegation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the July, November and December 2023 staff schedule. On average there are four caregivers and two medication technicians for the morning shift, two to four caregivers and two medication technicians for the evening shift and two caregivers and one medication technician for theCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230629084645
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not addressing resident's fall risk.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by executive director (ED) Rhon Hipolito. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that staff are not addressing resident's fall risk. LPA De Perio conducted 7 resident interviews, of which 7 out of the 7 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 2 staff interviews, of which also did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are trained on the protocol for when a resident falls and is also advised to contact medical assistance immediately for the resident to obtain an evaluation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231226144300

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 06/27/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Director of Sales and Marketing Elizabeth Bran Mendoza arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the facility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of ten individuals interviewed corroborated the allegation. Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez included the Mainplace Senior Living Theft and Loss Policy. Per Theft and Loss Policy “Lost or stolen property with a value of $100.00 or more will be reported to law enforcement within thirty-six (36) hours of the discovery of the loss or theft.” Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez inCDSS inspection report, December 22, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230627074740
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz and (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted a joint unannounced visit for the purpose to deliver findings for complaint allegation listed above. LPA Quiroz and LPA Tirre were greeted and granted entry by Front desk receptionist and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The ten day inspection visit was conducted on 10/3/2023 and a complaint follow up inspection visit was conducted on 10/17/2023. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses and documentation review but not limited to physician reports, needs and services plans and facility call log report. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance" the investigation revealed the following: Interviews conducted with interviewees consisting of staff and residents concluded that there is enough staCDSS inspection report, November 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230929113543
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA’s) Jenifer Tirre and Rosie Quiroz made an unannounced joint visit to conduct follow up into complaint Investigation. LPA's was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA's identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Rhonwinn Hipolito. During the visit, LPA Tirre conducted interviews and requested pertinent documents such as Physician’s Report and Personnel Report. During the investigation, Interviews were conducted with staff and residents, Pertinent documents were reviewed and requested. On 1/20/23 the department received allegations that facility staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed. Per interviews conducted with staff five out of five staff confirmed there was no issues with prescribed medications provided to residents. Interviews with residents confirm that five out of five residents had no issues with receiving medications and that prescribed medications were administered. Interviews withCDSS inspection report, November 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230120095133
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. Resident has fallen multiple times while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez, regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Rhon Hipolito and explained the purpose of the visit. Interviews were conducted with two staff and Resident 1 (R1). Two out of two staff corroborated both allegations, and stated they did not recall the exact dates and times but stated R1 fell numerous times and at least one of those times required hospitalization. Per both staff, a re-appraisal of R1 due to falls was not done to their knowledge. R1 also corroborated both allegations and stated they fell multiple times, but did not recall exact dates and times. R1 stated that as a result of these falls they are no longer ambulatory. LPA reviewed facility progress notes for R1, which stated R1 sustained a fall on 6/10/22 at 6:30 a.m., 6/19/22 at 10:00 a.m., 6/20/22 at 12:10 p.m., 6/23/22 at 4:30 p.m., and on 6/28/22 R1 was sent to the hospital foCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220629113139
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility does not meet resident’s needs. -Floor in resident room is not cleaned properly.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn "Rhon" Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/12/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses. Regarding the allegation "Facility does not meet resident’s needs," the investigation revealed the following: Nine of ten interviewees denied the allegation. Six of six residents denied the allegation indicating staff respond timely when called for assistance. Resident 2 (R2) indicated "My room mate just wants to get rid of me and wants his own private room." CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE... UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230606092904
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met Staff did not ensure that resident was adequately fed Staff did not respond to resident's call for assistance Staff do not answer facility telephone Staff did not obtain medical care for resident in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings for the complaint received on 4/10/23. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted, by Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn Hipolito. It was alleged that staff did not ensure that resident's hygiene needs were met. During the physical plant of the facility, LPA observed residents to be clean and that hygiene needs were met. LPA reviewed documents such as the showering schedule and caregiver tasks. 9 interviews were conducted, which consisted of staff, residents, and external parties, of which interviews stated that if a resident refuses of wanting to shower that day, then staff will return the following day and attempt to assist resident with showering. 3 interviews conducted with residents verified that staff do assist with ensuring that hygiene needs are met. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230410155851
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal eviction.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre made an unannounced visit to follow up on Complaint investigation. During visit LPA met with Business Office Coordinator Chasidy Washington and Coordinator Elizabeth Mendoza. Ombudsman Joan Matheson was present and Administrator Rohn Hipolito was present via telephone. During investigation LPA toured facility, conducted interviews, and requested pertinent documents such as warning notice, copy of eviction notice and resident file. Regarding allegation Illegal Eviction, investigation revealed the following, Resident 1 and Resident 2 were issued final notice warnings dated 2/3/23 regarding disruptive verbal altercations with each other.Both parties were warned that further inappropriate behavior could lead to a 30 Day eviction notice. On 4/4/23, Resident 1 was issued a 30 day eviction notice for failure to follow house rules. Licensing Department granted approval for eviction notice. At this time facility has received court approval for UnlawCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230120095133
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to administer medication Facility failed to provide resident's record to emergency personnel Facility failed to provide care and supervision to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patricia Velazquez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Velazquez gained entry into the facility and met with Medication Technician Anthony Sanchez and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Velazquez spoke with Executive Director (ED) Rhon Hipolito on the phone to inform ED of the purpose of today's visit. On today's visit LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also requested copies of facility and resident records. During the course of the investigation the following was revealed. LPA Velazquez conducted interviews with residents and staff. LPA Velazquez also reviewed copies of facility and resident records. The records reviewed included email communication between the facility and the Reporting Party (RP), Resident Preplacement Appraisal Information, Physician's Report, Resident (R) #1's Veterans Administration (VA) LonCDSS inspection report, June 10, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230317144713
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure residents room was clean. Resident's appearance is unkempt due to staff neglect. Staff did not ensure resident's bathroom was clean. Staff did not ensure resident had toilet paper.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Rhon Hipolito. LPA explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, staff did not ensure resident's room was clean, revealed the following. It was alleged the Resident 1's (R1) room was not kept clean. Staff reported that all rooms are cleaned once a week and as needed if something is noticed by staff or reported by residents or their visitors. Staff interviewed reported that resident rooms are cleaned regularly but sometimes residents have accidents and they are cleaned as quickly as possible. LPA toured the facility and did not observe any rooms that were not clean. LPA toured R1's former room and observed it was clean. No evidence was provided that supports the allegation. Based on the evidence gathered the allegation, staff did not ensure residents roomCDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230518155233

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's medication was not administered as prescribed. Staff are not properly trained. Staff do not answer facility phone. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above for the purpose of delivering findings. LPA met with Administrator In Training (AIT) Rhon Hipolito and discussed the purpose of the visit. Complaint alleges resident's medication was not administered as prescribed, staff are not properly trained, staff do not answer facility phone, and facility is in disrepair. LPA interviewed two Medication Technicians and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims regarding allegation resident’s medication not administered as prescribed. Three out of three staff stated that the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) allows medication to be administered or checked as administered an hour before or an hour after the prescribed time. LPA reviewed Resident 1’s (R1’s) MARs for the month of July and August. On the MARs, there are administration times of 8 a.m., 9 a.m., 7 p.m., and 8 p.m. with staffCDSS inspection report, December 14, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220802095010
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's call button is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator In Training (AIT) Rhon Hipolito and Wellness Director (WD) Kim Mims. LPA was taken on a guided tour of the inside and outside of the facility. Complaint alleges resident's call button is in disrepair. Interviews were conducted with former Executive Director (ED) Phat Nguyen, staff, and Reporting Party (RP). During interviews, RP stated the facility had no call button, just reception bells. ED Nguyen stated the call buttons are on a “piggyback system” and that a resident ripped theirs out of the wall, “so it took down the whole system.” In the meantime, the facility had given the residents silver desk bells. Staff 1 (S1), during their interview, stated that the light to room 326 was broken and could not be turned off. Therefore, staff "ignore" the light. (Cont. LIC 9099-C). SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220802095010
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not adequately supervise resident resulting in multiple falls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Phat Nguyen. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrators Kathleen Olson and Brianna Boyd, staff, and witnesses as well as documentation from the facility. The following was determined: R1 was admitted into the facility on 2/15/21. According to records reviewed, R1 needed assistance with ADL’s, was non-ambulatory and a fall risk due to diagnosis. R1 was non-ambulatory and used a wheelchair for mobility. R1 could not leave the facility unassisted and needed assistance with transfers to his wheelchair. Records and interviews further disclosed that R1 had approximately 15 unwitnessed falls from 3/4/21 to 4/16/21. R1 also left the facility at least 6 times without staff knowledge. R1 was returned by staff, good Samaritans or law enforcement. R1’s doctor and family were made aware of R1’s falls and eloping behavior. R1CDSS inspection report, August 10, 2022 · control 22-AS-20210428152302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident did not receive meals. Facility staff mismanage resident's medications. Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Phat Nguyen. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator Phat Nguyen, staff, and witnesses as well as documentation from the facility. The following was determined: Resident #1(R1) was admitted into the facility on 12/6/13. Staff were responsible for administering R1's medications. On 5/11/21 R1's physician notified facility staff via written letter, that R1 could administer all her own medications. On 12/28/21 the same Physician provided written certification that staff were to manage all medications. R1's Physician also discontinued several of R1's medications. Interviews disclosed that staff were following doctor's orders. LPA also reviewed the Meal Check in report from 11/22/21-12/30/21 for R1. The report disclosed that R1 did receive meals and sometimes refused meals. Dinner was marked as not being given forCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2022 · control 22-AS-20220103122410
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility dryers were nonoperational and resident laundry not washed Resident tv and cable were nonoperational
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Wellness Director Kim Mims and Phat Nguyen. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator Mike Marion, staff, and residents as well as documentation from the facility. The following was determined: Administrator Mike Marion admitted to LPA that the dryers were non-operational on 12/2/20 and that they were repaired on 12/4/20. At that time, residents were instructed that laundry would be delayed as there was a backup. Mr. Marion stated that residents were told that they could take their laundry to a laundry mat if it was something urgent that needed washed. He stated that due to Covid there was a delay in having the dryers repaired. On 12/31/20, the cable at the building was nonoperational. Emails provided disclosed that two technicians came out to the facility on 1/2/21 and the issue was still not resolved. Due to tCDSS inspection report, August 10, 2022 · control 22-AS-20210102174521
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident touched inappropriately by another resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator Phat Nguyen. The investigation consisted of interviews with the Administrator, staff, and resident as well as documentation from the facility. The following was determined: R1 was admitted into the facility on 9/28/19. On 10/6/20 R1 reported that R2 grabbed R1’s buttocks on two different occasions while staff were walking R1 to the dining room for breakfast. R2 denied the allegations and staff interviewed also denied that the incidents took place. Based upon interviews and a review of records, the allegations above are unfounded, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint allegation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Administrator Phat Nguyen. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, July 26, 2022 · control 22-AS-20201006092817
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to escort Resident #1 to breakfast causing resident to faint Staff failed to provide first aid to Resident #1
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Reed arrived at the facility to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with Administrator Phat Nguyen. The investigation consisted of interviews with the Administrator, staff, and resident as well as documentation from the facility. The following was determined: R1 was admitted into the facility on 9/28/19. Records reviewed disclosed that R1 is non-ambulatory, has capacity for self care and stores and administers his own medications. The allegations allege that on 9/27/20, staff failed to escort R1 to breakfast. According to staff interviewed, R1 refused to go to breakfast. R1 administered himself his medications without food which caused R1 to faint and fall resulting in a cut on R1’s leg. When staff were later told of the incident staff did not administer first aid as R1 refused to be assessed for any injuries. Staff asked R1 if he would like go to the hospital or to the doctor's. R1 stated "no, I am goCDSS inspection report, July 26, 2022 · control 22-AS-20200929093348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Responsible party did not get a copy of admission agreement. -Responsible party did not receive a refund.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit. LPA Quiroz was COVID-19 screened and greeted by front desk receptionist. LPA Quiroz met with Administrator Phat Nguyen identified herself and discussed the purpose of today's visit to deliver findings for the complaint allegations listed above. The initial 10-day tele visit was completed on 6/24/2020 via telephone due to COVID-19 precautionary measures. During the course of this investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews, reviewed documents including but not limited Resident 1 (R1's) admission agreement, Resident Refund Request Summary dated 6/23/2020, Email from Administrator Jeff Gollihar dated 6/29/2020 at 9:51am and Main Place Senior Living Verification of Received/Reviewing Move-In Forms. It was alleged that "Responsible Party did not get a copy of admission agreement " and "Responsible Party did not receive a refund." During the course of this investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted inteCDSS inspection report, July 13, 2022 · control 22-AS-20200615083228

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 62 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
15
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
21
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
33
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
62
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 978-2534
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Mainplace Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.