Mainplace Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange, Orange County, California — state license #306005636, licensed for 153 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 49 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 62 times and filed 49 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 6, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 13, 2022 to April 23, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
May 6, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 13, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 15, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 26, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 19, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 29, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 15, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 18, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 23, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 21, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 8, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 8, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 23, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings Facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as skilled nursing discharge paperwork and inventory list. Regarding the allegations that facility staff did not safeguard resident's belongings and facility staff are not answering communications from resident's responsible person, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 02/22/2024 after hospitalization at a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Discharge paperwork indicated resident's needs included a wheelchair but inventory list at discharge stated resident had no belongings. Staff 1 (S1) stated assisting the resident out of bed at the SNF and assisting the resident into van. Thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240415111317
Apr 10, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. Facility did not report theft.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not safeguard residents’ belongings in room. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Apr 10, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. Facility does not have required postings
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced follow up visit to the facility to complete additional interviews and deliver the findings on the complaint allegations above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, a resident family member, a witness, and document review. Two additional witnesses were contacted but could not be reached. Regarding the complaint allegation: Facility did not have appropriate staffing to meet residents needs. During the investigation interviews were conducted with facility staff, residents, and witnesses for a total of nine interviews. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240112162107
Mar 14, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 14, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident is administered eye drops as prescribed. Staff did not ensure resident was provided a comfortable temperature. Facility does not have adequate staffing to respond to resident's call in a timely manner. Staff did not provide resident's authorized representative a copy of admissions agreement. Staff do not communicate with authorized representative changes of resident's health.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility staff after explaining the purpose of the visit. Facility administrator was present to assist with the visit. The initial investigation visit was conducted at the facility on November 22, 2023. LPA requested and obtained partial resident records for resident R1, conducted a tour of the physical plant and interviewed multiple staff members. A follow-up visit took place on February 2, 2024. One staff interview with the facility's Executive Director was conducted. Additional records requested and obtained. A tour of R1's former unit was also conducted. Additional witness interviews conducted in person or via telephone on February 9, 2024. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231120213146
Jan 31, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility windows are not secured. Facility gate is not secured.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. Interviews were conducted with staff and Resident 1 (R1) regarding facility windows not being secured. Two out of three staff stated that facility windows are secure, have a latch, and a screen. One out of three staff stated the window in the resident room where R1 was thought to have exited, was not screened on at least one occasion. All three staff, however, confirmed R1 did not exit through their own bedroom window. R1 entered room 306, which was a different resident’s room, and exited through that window. On 8/16/22, LPA conducted initial complaint investigation inspection at the facility. At 3:50 p.m. LPA conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility. LPA observed facility windows within the methe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Jan 31, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in multiple wanderings from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Chasidy Washington and Community Liason, Elizabeth Mendoza. On 8/10/22, the Department received an Unusual Incident Report (LIC624) stating that on 8/09/22 at approximately 3:25 p.m. staff noted Resident 1 (R1) missing. Staff notified Wellness Director (WD) Kimberly Mims and Executive Director (ED) Phat Nguyen. A search of the unit including bathroom areas, bedrooms, and closets was conducted. Window in resident room 306 identified as possible exit point. Search of facility and surrounding area was initiated and expanded to surrounding neighborhoods. Per Case Management visit dated 8/10/22, R1 was found on 8/10/22 at approximately 1:15 p.m. by a good Samaritan standing outside a home miles away from the facility. Per Physician Reported dated 7/29/2022, R1 is not able to lthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024 · control 22-AS-20220809112719
Jan 10, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. Residents are left unattended.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on 06/29/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Business Office Director Chasidy Washington arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility does not staff appropriately to meet residents' needs. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Six of ten individuals interviewed denied the allegation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the July, November and December 2023 staff schedule. On average there are four caregivers and two medication technicians for the morning shift, two to four caregivers and two medication technicians for the evening shift and two caregivers and one medication technician for thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230629084645
Jan 4, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing resident's fall risk.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to the facility and to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, and was greeted by executive director (ED) Rhon Hipolito. During the investigation, LPA De Perio toured the physical plant of the facility, conducted interviews, and requested copies of pertinent records reviewed. It was alleged that staff are not addressing resident's fall risk. LPA De Perio conducted 7 resident interviews, of which 7 out of the 7 interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 2 staff interviews, of which also did not corroborate with the allegation by stating that staff are trained on the protocol for when a resident falls and is also advised to contact medical assistance immediately for the resident to obtain an evaluation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231226144300
Dec 22, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 06/27/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Receptionist Noemi Otero. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Director of Sales and Marketing Elizabeth Bran Mendoza arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the facility did not report theft of resident's personal belongings. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of ten individuals interviewed corroborated the allegation. Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez included the Mainplace Senior Living Theft and Loss Policy. Per Theft and Loss Policy “Lost or stolen property with a value of $100.00 or more will be reported to law enforcement within thirty-six (36) hours of the discovery of the loss or theft.” Records reviewed by LPA Ramirez inthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230627074740
Nov 20, 2023Unfounded
Allegation investigated: -Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz and (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted a joint unannounced visit for the purpose to deliver findings for complaint allegation listed above. LPA Quiroz and LPA Tirre were greeted and granted entry by Front desk receptionist and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The ten day inspection visit was conducted on 10/3/2023 and a complaint follow up inspection visit was conducted on 10/17/2023. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses and documentation review but not limited to physician reports, needs and services plans and facility call log report. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance" the investigation revealed the following: Interviews conducted with interviewees consisting of staff and residents concluded that there is enough stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230929113543
Nov 20, 2023Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed.
Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA’s) Jenifer Tirre and Rosie Quiroz made an unannounced joint visit to conduct follow up into complaint Investigation. LPA's was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA's identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Rhonwinn Hipolito. During the visit, LPA Tirre conducted interviews and requested pertinent documents such as Physician’s Report and Personnel Report. During the investigation, Interviews were conducted with staff and residents, Pertinent documents were reviewed and requested. On 1/20/23 the department received allegations that facility staff did not provide medications to resident as prescribed. Per interviews conducted with staff five out of five staff confirmed there was no issues with prescribed medications provided to residents. Interviews with residents confirm that five out of five residents had no issues with receiving medications and that prescribed medications were administered. Interviews withthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230120095133
Nov 15, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. Resident has fallen multiple times while in care.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez, regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Rhon Hipolito and explained the purpose of the visit. Interviews were conducted with two staff and Resident 1 (R1). Two out of two staff corroborated both allegations, and stated they did not recall the exact dates and times but stated R1 fell numerous times and at least one of those times required hospitalization. Per both staff, a re-appraisal of R1 due to falls was not done to their knowledge. R1 also corroborated both allegations and stated they fell multiple times, but did not recall exact dates and times. R1 stated that as a result of these falls they are no longer ambulatory. LPA reviewed facility progress notes for R1, which stated R1 sustained a fall on 6/10/22 at 6:30 a.m., 6/19/22 at 10:00 a.m., 6/20/22 at 12:10 p.m., 6/23/22 at 4:30 p.m., and on 6/28/22 R1 was sent to the hospital fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220629113139
Oct 3, 2023Unfounded
Allegation investigated: -Facility does not meet resident’s needs. -Floor in resident room is not cleaned properly.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings for complaint allegations listed above. LPA Quiroz was greeted and met with Executive Director (ED) Rhonwinn "Rhon" Hipolito and discussed purpose of today's visit. The 10 day visit was conducted on 6/12/2023 by LPA Quiroz. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses. Regarding the allegation "Facility does not meet resident’s needs," the investigation revealed the following: Nine of ten interviewees denied the allegation. Six of six residents denied the allegation indicating staff respond timely when called for assistance. Resident 2 (R2) indicated "My room mate just wants to get rid of me and wants his own private room." CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230606092904
Sep 19, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Mainplace Senior Living licensed?
Yes — Mainplace Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange (Orange County): California license #306005636, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 153 residents. State records list 49 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Mainplace Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mainplace Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 61 AMBULATORY AND 92 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.
How much does Mainplace Senior Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Mainplace Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Mainplace Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Mainplace Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
106 of 153 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on April 23, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Mainplace Senior Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 62 state visits and 49 dated documents since 2022 for Mainplace Senior Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 23, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2024
2023
2022
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 62 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(714) 978-2534Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Mainplace Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.