Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Ana, Orange County, California — state license #306006204, licensed for 130 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 130 residents · Santa Ana, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006204, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2025 N Bush St · Santa Ana, Orange County
Phone
(714) 541-3357
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 130 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 50 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 50 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 50 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 50.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 43 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated March 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 4, 2026
Occupancy at the November 12, 2025 visit
76 of 130 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 21 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 8, 2022 to November 12, 2025. 21 of the 21 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 21 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 21 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 27 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident at hospital

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge records. Regarding the allegation that staff abandoned resident at hospital, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was hospitalized on 10/29/2025 after having a psychotic episode and breaking a window in the resident's room. Per UCI Hospital Social Worker and Psych Consultant RN, resident was medically cleared to return to the facility on 11/03/2025. Facility was contacted for discharge in the morning on 11/03/2025 and was unwilling to accept the resident back. Social Worker stated contacting Ombudsman at that time as well as notifying Licensing via an SOC 341 at 3:07 PM. Administrator contacted LPA on 11/03/2025 at 3:59 PM questionthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251104112811
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not provide mail to resident in care

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conclude and deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Alma Espinal arrived later to assist with the visit. The Department received a complaint on June 6, 2025. During the investigation, LPA Tea spoke to facility staff and residents and reviewed and collected pertinent documents and information. It was alleged that staff did not provide mail to resident in care. Per interviews with residents, six out eight residents stated that there were no issues with mail services. Most of the residents received their expected mail. A few of the residents complained that their mail was either stolen or went missing. One resident was waiting for a checkbook, and they had never received it. Despite that issue, a staff member was able to get them a replacement checkbook. One resident said beforthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250606123601
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) William Vanegas made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA Vanegas was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Administrator (AD) Alma Espinal LPA introduced themselves and stated the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on May 28, 2025. During the visit, LPA Vanegas gathered and reviewed pertinent records pertaining to residents in care in regard to the allegations stated above. LPA Vanegas interviewed residents. LPA Vanegas also gathered and reviewed employee files relevant to the allegations being investigated. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections, revealed the following. It was alleged that facility staff are injecting residents with insulin. No dates or times were provided of when the allegethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250520155200
May 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings.

Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Mota spoke with Alma Espinal, Administrator via telephone visit to discuss the findings for the above allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, reporting party, and Resident (R1). The investigation also consisted of obtaining Police Records, facility, photographs, and medical records. The investigation revealed the following: An inspection of R1’s room on 5/16/2024 revealed the room to be cluttered with large amounts of clothing and jewelry. Interviews conducted with six (6) out of seven (7) residents stated that they have not had any items missing or stolen from the facility. One (1) resident stated that three (3) items of clothing were missing, but did not feel that they had been stolen, but misplaced. R1 stated during an interview on 5/16/2024 that their entire wardrobe is missing, although photos that same day show many items of clothing on hangars along with shoes, stockings, gold jewelry, and a belt in the room. Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240508154100
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's personal rights were violated.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of initiating the complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Housekeeper Alice Castillo and stated the purpose of the visit to Activity Director (AD) Maroma Herrera. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed three staff, however the resident in question, (R1), had passed away due to natural causes on May 3, 2025, and could not be interviewed. LPA obtained pertinent records such as the resident/staff rosters, March/May 2025 activity calendars, R1's face sheet, physician's report, admission agreement, death certificate, as well as the employee handbook, and resume of Staff #1 (S1). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, Resident's personal rights were violated, it was reported that a TikTok video of R1 and S1 dancing was posted on S1's TikTok account. Based on the review of S1's Tiktok account, there were nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250515094714
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit on this day for the purpose of initiating an investigation into the above allegation. On this day, LPA was greeted and met with Maintenance Director Tony Ruiz. LPA met with Administrator Alma Espinal via telephone. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings, the investigation revealed the following: Facility indicates a pipe repair occurred in the facility on 04/07/2025 which resulted in Resident 1 (R1) being unable to use the resident's toilet for a couple hours. On 04/08/2025, Staff 1 (S1) unclogged the resident's toilet which took about four hours. S1 denies taking any items out of the resident's room. R1's roommate, R2, denies ever having anything taken out of the resident's room and states that R1 did not have any of the noted stolen items in the room at any time. Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250507101501
Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries due to lack of supervision Resident sustained unwitnessed fall due to lack of supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit on this day for the purposes of delivering findings into the above allegation. On this day, LPA was greeted and met with Maintenance Director Tony Ruiz. On September 12, 2024, the Department received a complaint alleging Resident sustained unexplained injuries due to lack of supervision; Resident sustained unwitnessed fall due to lack of supervision; and Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed. A health and safety visit was conducted by the Department on September 13, 2024, and an investigation initiated. The investigation determined as follows: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on August 07, 2024. Per Physician Report dated August 07, 2024, R1 has a diagnosis of generalized weakness and Alzheimer’s disease and requires some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing, toileting, and dressing. Per Physician Report, R1 requires 24-hour monitoring due to cognitive ithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240912142400
202410 state visits · 13 documents
Nov 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegation of Illegal eviction, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was served an eviction notice on 04/17/2024 for violation of house rules, alcohol usage. The department approved the eviction notice as legal. The resident as well as two out of two staff confirm alcohol usage in the resident's room. Resident 1 initially denied receipt of eviction notice but openly discussed the terms of the notice and the violation with LPA. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240502094405
May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide comfortable living accommodations for resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Michael Tea made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide comfortable living accommodations for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Residents 1 and 2 (R1, R2) became roommates on 04/12/2024. On 04/26/2024, staff informed Administrator that the residents were arguing and unhappy with the living situation. Administrator spoke with both residents same day to come up with a solution. On 04/30/2024, Administrator spoke with residents to advise they would be residing in separate rooms. LPA observed staff getting R2's room ready and moving personal affects. Both residents confirm acceptance of the move. Facility indicates this is the sithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240426103500
May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with meeting dining needs Staff do not provide adequate activities for residents

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Michael Tea made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as activities schedule. Regarding the allegations that staff did not assist resident with meeting dining needs and staff do not provide adequate activities for residents, the investigation revealed the following: On 04/17/2024, facility had a dining staff call out. Administrator as well as Activity Coordinator pitched in to serve the residents lunch. There are no activities during lunch time. Six out of six residents confirm receipt of lunch and the server call out had no impact on receiving lunch or participating in activities. Six out of six residents state ample activities atthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240418134733
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 03/27/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. Resident was hospitalized at Kaiser prior to admittance into facility. When resident admitted into the facility, Kaiser failed to provide medication/ medication orders. Facility and family were working on getting the situation remedied. On 03/29/2024, R1 was observed by staff on the ground by the resident's bed in the resident's room. Staff assisted getting the resident up and was assethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240402090752
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a resident an admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as admission agreement. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide a resident an admission agreement, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 02/29/2024 and admission agreement on file at facility is signed and dated by R1 on 02/29/2024. Billing invoice is dated 02/29/2024-03/31/2024. Administrator indicates admission agreement was signed at time of admission on 02/29/2024. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240405084807
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow proper eviction procedures

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as text messages. Regarding the allegation that staff did not follow proper eviction procedures, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) moved out of the facility on 02/24/2024 with the resident's family member who is also the durable power of attorney (DPOA). DPOA provided a 30 day notice to the facility via text message but moved the resident out same day. Interview with resident indicated the resident is happy and satisfied with the move out of facility. Administrator as well as witness confirm resident was not evicted out of the facility and moved out voluntarily. Based on record review and intervithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240306123021
Feb 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately placed resident on an involuntary 72hr hold Staff did not provide resident with keys in a timely manner Staff are not providing activities for residents Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as psychiatric hospital documentation. Regarding the allegations that staff inappropriately placed resident on an involuntary 72hr hold, staff did not provide resident with keys in a timely manner, staff are not providing activities for residents and staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was evaluated by a mental health professional on 06/10/2023 due to increaing behaviors and was sent out to LA Downtown Medical Center for a 72 hour hold. Resident was transferred to the medical center as the resident was deemed to have a grave disabilthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240215130307
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not serve dinner to residents at an appropriate time Staff does not ensure that residents' food is served warm Staff are not able to effectively communicate with the residents due to a language barrier

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the kitchen, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as room meal delivery list. Regarding the allegations that staff does not serve dinner to residents at an appropriate time, staff does not ensure that residents' food is served warm, and staff are not able to effectively communicate with the residents due to a language barrier, the investigation revealed the following: LPA toured the kitchen and observed food supply on-site on two different occasions. On both occasions there is adequate food supply available. LPA observed food warmers in kitchen as well as the process to send out delivered meals. Six out of seven residents state food is warm when delivered to the room. Admthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240201105417
20234 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not allowing resident to participate in the planning of their care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as durable power of attorney and physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff are not allowing resident to participate in the planning of their care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) has a responsible party per power of attorney paperwork dated 03/02/2016. Facility administrator acknowledges resident's power of attorney. Resident was signed up for hospice care in the facility effective 10/06/2023 without approval or consultation with responsible party who acts as an agent for the resident. R1's responsible party was only informed of the enrollment when the resident's insurancethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231122171857
Dec 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility illegally evicted resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed resident and staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report. Regarding the allegation that facility illegally evicted resident, the investigation revealed the following: Facility gave Resident 1 (R1) a thirty day eviction notice dated 10/20/2023 indicating the reason for eviction was "Refusing to log in personal/ valuable properties as inventoried items." Facility admission agreement states that facility will only inventory/ provide an inventory log if resident's property is entrusted to the care of the facility. Resident has no items entrusted to the care of the facility. The eviction notice is not legal per department guidelines. The prthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231023121324
Oct 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure resident's medication was administered correctly Facility does not have sufficient staffing Resident room has a cigarette odor

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and staff schedule. Regarding the allegations that resident room has a cigarette odor, facility does not have sufficient staffing and facility did not ensure resident's medication was administered correctly, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1's (R1) room is on the opposite side of the designated smoking area. R1 indicates residents smoke after hours in the courtyard below resident's room. Administrator acknowledges discovering a resident had smoked in the un-designated area and facility has taken steps to ensure all smoking is occurring in the designated area.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231003163937
Aug 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident care needs Staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner Residents are not provided with activities Residents are not provided adequate shower assistance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, residents and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff schedule. Regarding the allegations that facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident care needs, staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner, residents are not provided with activities and residents are not provided adequate shower assistance, the investigation revealed the following: Eight out of nine residents interviewed indicate a staffing shortage and state caregivers are working as dining room servers. Staff and Administrator confirm caregivers are filling in as servers and activity coordinators. Staff indicate working two per shift with a med tech. Facility hathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230731155923
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations8typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints22typical 7
State visits on file43typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202588320241013020236742022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 541-3357

Is Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Ana (Orange County): California license #306006204, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 130 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 130 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 50 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 50.

How much does Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

76 of 130 beds occupied (58%) when the state visited on November 12, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 43 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2022 for Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living; 21 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 12, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

21 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff abandoned resident at hospital
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed pertinent documentation such as hospital discharge records. Regarding the allegation that staff abandoned resident at hospital, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was hospitalized on 10/29/2025 after having a psychotic episode and breaking a window in the resident's room. Per UCI Hospital Social Worker and Psych Consultant RN, resident was medically cleared to return to the facility on 11/03/2025. Facility was contacted for discharge in the morning on 11/03/2025 and was unwilling to accept the resident back. Social Worker stated contacting Ombudsman at that time as well as notifying Licensing via an SOC 341 at 3:07 PM. Administrator contacted LPA on 11/03/2025 at 3:59 PM questionCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251104112811
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not provide mail to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea made an unannounced visit to conclude and deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry by facility staff and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Alma Espinal arrived later to assist with the visit. The Department received a complaint on June 6, 2025. During the investigation, LPA Tea spoke to facility staff and residents and reviewed and collected pertinent documents and information. It was alleged that staff did not provide mail to resident in care. Per interviews with residents, six out eight residents stated that there were no issues with mail services. Most of the residents received their expected mail. A few of the residents complained that their mail was either stolen or went missing. One resident was waiting for a checkbook, and they had never received it. Despite that issue, a staff member was able to get them a replacement checkbook. One resident said beforCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250606123601
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) William Vanegas made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA Vanegas was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Administrator (AD) Alma Espinal LPA introduced themselves and stated the purpose of the visit. An initial investigation visit was conducted on May 28, 2025. During the visit, LPA Vanegas gathered and reviewed pertinent records pertaining to residents in care in regard to the allegations stated above. LPA Vanegas interviewed residents. LPA Vanegas also gathered and reviewed employee files relevant to the allegations being investigated. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections, revealed the following. It was alleged that facility staff are injecting residents with insulin. No dates or times were provided of when the allegeCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250520155200
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Mota spoke with Alma Espinal, Administrator via telephone visit to discuss the findings for the above allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, reporting party, and Resident (R1). The investigation also consisted of obtaining Police Records, facility, photographs, and medical records. The investigation revealed the following: An inspection of R1’s room on 5/16/2024 revealed the room to be cluttered with large amounts of clothing and jewelry. Interviews conducted with six (6) out of seven (7) residents stated that they have not had any items missing or stolen from the facility. One (1) resident stated that three (3) items of clothing were missing, but did not feel that they had been stolen, but misplaced. R1 stated during an interview on 5/16/2024 that their entire wardrobe is missing, although photos that same day show many items of clothing on hangars along with shoes, stockings, gold jewelry, and a belt in the room. RCDSS inspection report, May 27, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240508154100
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's personal rights were violated.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of initiating the complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Housekeeper Alice Castillo and stated the purpose of the visit to Activity Director (AD) Maroma Herrera. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed three staff, however the resident in question, (R1), had passed away due to natural causes on May 3, 2025, and could not be interviewed. LPA obtained pertinent records such as the resident/staff rosters, March/May 2025 activity calendars, R1's face sheet, physician's report, admission agreement, death certificate, as well as the employee handbook, and resume of Staff #1 (S1). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, Resident's personal rights were violated, it was reported that a TikTok video of R1 and S1 dancing was posted on S1's TikTok account. Based on the review of S1's Tiktok account, there were nCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250515094714
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit on this day for the purpose of initiating an investigation into the above allegation. On this day, LPA was greeted and met with Maintenance Director Tony Ruiz. LPA met with Administrator Alma Espinal via telephone. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings, the investigation revealed the following: Facility indicates a pipe repair occurred in the facility on 04/07/2025 which resulted in Resident 1 (R1) being unable to use the resident's toilet for a couple hours. On 04/08/2025, Staff 1 (S1) unclogged the resident's toilet which took about four hours. S1 denies taking any items out of the resident's room. R1's roommate, R2, denies ever having anything taken out of the resident's room and states that R1 did not have any of the noted stolen items in the room at any time. RCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250507101501
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries due to lack of supervision Resident sustained unwitnessed fall due to lack of supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit on this day for the purposes of delivering findings into the above allegation. On this day, LPA was greeted and met with Maintenance Director Tony Ruiz. On September 12, 2024, the Department received a complaint alleging Resident sustained unexplained injuries due to lack of supervision; Resident sustained unwitnessed fall due to lack of supervision; and Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed. A health and safety visit was conducted by the Department on September 13, 2024, and an investigation initiated. The investigation determined as follows: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on August 07, 2024. Per Physician Report dated August 07, 2024, R1 has a diagnosis of generalized weakness and Alzheimer’s disease and requires some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing, toileting, and dressing. Per Physician Report, R1 requires 24-hour monitoring due to cognitive iCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240912142400

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal eviction
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident. Regarding the allegation of Illegal eviction, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was served an eviction notice on 04/17/2024 for violation of house rules, alcohol usage. The department approved the eviction notice as legal. The resident as well as two out of two staff confirm alcohol usage in the resident's room. Resident 1 initially denied receipt of eviction notice but openly discussed the terms of the notice and the violation with LPA. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this reCDSS inspection report, May 7, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240502094405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide comfortable living accommodations for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Michael Tea made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide comfortable living accommodations for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Residents 1 and 2 (R1, R2) became roommates on 04/12/2024. On 04/26/2024, staff informed Administrator that the residents were arguing and unhappy with the living situation. Administrator spoke with both residents same day to come up with a solution. On 04/30/2024, Administrator spoke with residents to advise they would be residing in separate rooms. LPA observed staff getting R2's room ready and moving personal affects. Both residents confirm acceptance of the move. Facility indicates this is the siCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240426103500
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with meeting dining needs Staff do not provide adequate activities for residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Michael Tea made an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as activities schedule. Regarding the allegations that staff did not assist resident with meeting dining needs and staff do not provide adequate activities for residents, the investigation revealed the following: On 04/17/2024, facility had a dining staff call out. Administrator as well as Activity Coordinator pitched in to serve the residents lunch. There are no activities during lunch time. Six out of six residents confirm receipt of lunch and the server call out had no impact on receiving lunch or participating in activities. Six out of six residents state ample activities atCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240418134733
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 03/27/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. Resident was hospitalized at Kaiser prior to admittance into facility. When resident admitted into the facility, Kaiser failed to provide medication/ medication orders. Facility and family were working on getting the situation remedied. On 03/29/2024, R1 was observed by staff on the ground by the resident's bed in the resident's room. Staff assisted getting the resident up and was asseCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240402090752
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide a resident an admission agreement
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as admission agreement. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide a resident an admission agreement, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 02/29/2024 and admission agreement on file at facility is signed and dated by R1 on 02/29/2024. Billing invoice is dated 02/29/2024-03/31/2024. Administrator indicates admission agreement was signed at time of admission on 02/29/2024. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interviewCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240405084807
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow proper eviction procedures
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as text messages. Regarding the allegation that staff did not follow proper eviction procedures, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) moved out of the facility on 02/24/2024 with the resident's family member who is also the durable power of attorney (DPOA). DPOA provided a 30 day notice to the facility via text message but moved the resident out same day. Interview with resident indicated the resident is happy and satisfied with the move out of facility. Administrator as well as witness confirm resident was not evicted out of the facility and moved out voluntarily. Based on record review and interviCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240306123021
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately placed resident on an involuntary 72hr hold Staff did not provide resident with keys in a timely manner Staff are not providing activities for residents Staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as psychiatric hospital documentation. Regarding the allegations that staff inappropriately placed resident on an involuntary 72hr hold, staff did not provide resident with keys in a timely manner, staff are not providing activities for residents and staff are not allowing resident to leave the facility, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was evaluated by a mental health professional on 06/10/2023 due to increaing behaviors and was sent out to LA Downtown Medical Center for a 72 hour hold. Resident was transferred to the medical center as the resident was deemed to have a grave disabilCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240215130307
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not serve dinner to residents at an appropriate time Staff does not ensure that residents' food is served warm Staff are not able to effectively communicate with the residents due to a language barrier
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the kitchen, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as room meal delivery list. Regarding the allegations that staff does not serve dinner to residents at an appropriate time, staff does not ensure that residents' food is served warm, and staff are not able to effectively communicate with the residents due to a language barrier, the investigation revealed the following: LPA toured the kitchen and observed food supply on-site on two different occasions. On both occasions there is adequate food supply available. LPA observed food warmers in kitchen as well as the process to send out delivered meals. Six out of seven residents state food is warm when delivered to the room. AdmCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240201105417

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not allowing resident to participate in the planning of their care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as durable power of attorney and physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff are not allowing resident to participate in the planning of their care, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) has a responsible party per power of attorney paperwork dated 03/02/2016. Facility administrator acknowledges resident's power of attorney. Resident was signed up for hospice care in the facility effective 10/06/2023 without approval or consultation with responsible party who acts as an agent for the resident. R1's responsible party was only informed of the enrollment when the resident's insuranceCDSS inspection report, December 13, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231122171857
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility illegally evicted resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed resident and staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report. Regarding the allegation that facility illegally evicted resident, the investigation revealed the following: Facility gave Resident 1 (R1) a thirty day eviction notice dated 10/20/2023 indicating the reason for eviction was "Refusing to log in personal/ valuable properties as inventoried items." Facility admission agreement states that facility will only inventory/ provide an inventory log if resident's property is entrusted to the care of the facility. Resident has no items entrusted to the care of the facility. The eviction notice is not legal per department guidelines. The prCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231023121324
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure resident's medication was administered correctly Facility does not have sufficient staffing Resident room has a cigarette odor
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and staff schedule. Regarding the allegations that resident room has a cigarette odor, facility does not have sufficient staffing and facility did not ensure resident's medication was administered correctly, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1's (R1) room is on the opposite side of the designated smoking area. R1 indicates residents smoke after hours in the courtyard below resident's room. Administrator acknowledges discovering a resident had smoked in the un-designated area and facility has taken steps to ensure all smoking is occurring in the designated area.CDSS inspection report, October 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231003163937
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident care needs Staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner Residents are not provided with activities Residents are not provided adequate shower assistance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, residents and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff schedule. Regarding the allegations that facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident care needs, staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner, residents are not provided with activities and residents are not provided adequate shower assistance, the investigation revealed the following: Eight out of nine residents interviewed indicate a staffing shortage and state caregivers are working as dining room servers. Staff and Administrator confirm caregivers are filling in as servers and activity coordinators. Staff indicate working two per shift with a med tech. Facility haCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230731155923
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is overcharging resident in care Staff does not provide an itemized list of financial costs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, resident, and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and facility correspondence. Regarding the allegation that staff is overcharging resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into the facility on 03/09/2023. Interview conducted with facility indicated resident was charged for the month of March and did not prorate for the prior eight days not admitted into facility. After discussion with facility regarding the fee, facility provided a refund to the resident for $353. LPA reviewed admission agreement during the investigation. Admission agreement does not indicate the basic service rateCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230414121958

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 43 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
22
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
43
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 541-3357
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Willow View Gardens Memory Care & Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.