Belmont Village Aliso Viejo is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Aliso Viejo, Orange County, California — state license #306005563, licensed for 180 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 26, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Belmont Village Aliso Viejo

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 180 residents · Aliso Viejo, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005563, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
300 Freedom Ln · Aliso Viejo, Orange County
Phone
(949) 643-1050
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 180 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 35 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 35 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 180 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 35.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 29 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 26, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
May 26, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
131 of 180 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 28, 2022 to May 26, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
May 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff excluded resident's authorized person from making decisions regarding resident's care Staff retained resident at the facility without consent or court order

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as court documents. Regarding the allegations that Staff retained resident at the facility without consent or court order and Staff excluded resident's authorized person from making decisions regarding resident's care, the investigation revealed the following: R1 has Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) paperwork dated July 6, 2021, designating three family members as agents of healthcare and financial decisions. The Department reviewed a Probate Settlement Agreement dated 06/10/2025 through the Superior Court of Orange County. Agreement indicates if R1 is unable to be safely maintained in the home, the residthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260107132248
May 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation that staff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/12/2024, Staff 1 (S1) had an altercation with a memory care resident. Resident 1 (R1) grabbed a duster from S1's cart and attempted to push the cart. Per interviews conducted, S1 reacted inappropriately and was subsequently terminated. LPA reviewed training record for S1 and the staff received Dementia training in 05/23/2023 and 12/14/2023 even though she was employed as a housekeeper and not a caregiver. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240212153740
Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
May 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide an appropriate sleeping arrangement for a resident Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as home health documentation. Regarding the allegations that staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident and staff did not provide an appropriate sleeping arrangement for a resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was seen by home health for dermatitis for approximately two months and was discharged from home health on 01/24/2024. Resident has a primary care physician in the San Diego area and stated requesting a physician visit from the Wellness Center in an attempt to find a physician nearby. Resident stated having some swelling on the legs as the resident is prone to Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240501161913
Apr 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to provide care and supervision which resulted in resident sustaining injuries during elopement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including Physician Report, Resident Service Plan, Orange County Sheriff’s Report, Orange County Death Certificate and Mission Hospital Medical Records. The purpose of today’s visit is to follow up on an investigation conducted by the Department regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on April 30, 2023. Physician report dated April 25, 2023, notes that R1 had a diagnosis of Dementia. On July 09, 2023, R1 sustained a fall from their bedroom window located on the second floor of the facility. Surveillance video obtained from Alithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230711102555
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility failed to provide resident's records to authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA interviewed Executive Director as well as reviewed and obtained documentation such as request letter for documents. Regarding the allegation that facility failed to provide resident's records to authorized representative, the investigation revealed the following: Facility received a request for Resident 1's (R1) records dated 11/16/2023 and received via Federal Express 11/17/2023. Facility indicated working on submitting records as of today, 11/29/2023 but that the records had not been submitted to date. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231121140704
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give medications timely Oxygen was not kept on resident according to physicians orders

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and hospice notes. Regarding the allegations that oxygen was not kept on resident according to physicians orders and staff did not give medications timely, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) admitted into hospice care on 12/02/2021. Hospice orders dated 12/02/2021 indicated an order for oxygen, 2 liters, given continuously and 2-5 liters for shortness of breath. Two out of two staff stated that the resident was agitated and would pull the canula out. However, hospice notes dated 01/14/2022 and 01/19/2022 indicated the oxygen tank was turned off when hospice nurse arthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220223091921
Oct 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 09/05/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) Rosa Ayala. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff did not provide adequate food service. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Three of ten individuals interviewed corroborated the allegation. During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Belmont Village Aliso Viejo Weekly Menu dated 09/07/23 through 09/20/23. Per Belmont Village Aliso Viejo Weekly Menu residents have multiple options to choose from for breakfast, lunch and dinner. During the interviews with residents it was reported that staff do not bring the correct food order. Per Resident 1 (R1) thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230905151814
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file29typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644020252302024330202345220228102
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 643-1050

Is Belmont Village Aliso Viejo licensed?

Yes — Belmont Village Aliso Viejo is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Aliso Viejo (Orange County): California license #306005563, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 180 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 26, 2026, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can Belmont Village Aliso Viejo care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Belmont Village Aliso Viejo with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 180 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 35.

How much does Belmont Village Aliso Viejo cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Belmont Village Aliso Viejo's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Belmont Village Aliso Viejo accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Belmont Village Aliso Viejo is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

131 of 180 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on May 26, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Belmont Village Aliso Viejo?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 29 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Belmont Village Aliso Viejo; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 26, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff excluded resident's authorized person from making decisions regarding resident's care Staff retained resident at the facility without consent or court order
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as court documents. Regarding the allegations that Staff retained resident at the facility without consent or court order and Staff excluded resident's authorized person from making decisions regarding resident's care, the investigation revealed the following: R1 has Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) paperwork dated July 6, 2021, designating three family members as agents of healthcare and financial decisions. The Department reviewed a Probate Settlement Agreement dated 06/10/2025 through the Superior Court of Orange County. Agreement indicates if R1 is unable to be safely maintained in the home, the residCDSS inspection report, May 26, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260107132248

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation that staff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/12/2024, Staff 1 (S1) had an altercation with a memory care resident. Resident 1 (R1) grabbed a duster from S1's cart and attempted to push the cart. Per interviews conducted, S1 reacted inappropriately and was subsequently terminated. LPA reviewed training record for S1 and the staff received Dementia training in 05/23/2023 and 12/14/2023 even though she was employed as a housekeeper and not a caregiver. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegation isCDSS inspection report, February 4, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240212153740

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide an appropriate sleeping arrangement for a resident Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as home health documentation. Regarding the allegations that staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident and staff did not provide an appropriate sleeping arrangement for a resident, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was seen by home health for dermatitis for approximately two months and was discharged from home health on 01/24/2024. Resident has a primary care physician in the San Diego area and stated requesting a physician visit from the Wellness Center in an attempt to find a physician nearby. Resident stated having some swelling on the legs as the resident is prone to DCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240501161913
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide care and supervision which resulted in resident sustaining injuries during elopement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including Physician Report, Resident Service Plan, Orange County Sheriff’s Report, Orange County Death Certificate and Mission Hospital Medical Records. The purpose of today’s visit is to follow up on an investigation conducted by the Department regarding the above allegation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on April 30, 2023. Physician report dated April 25, 2023, notes that R1 had a diagnosis of Dementia. On July 09, 2023, R1 sustained a fall from their bedroom window located on the second floor of the facility. Surveillance video obtained from AliCDSS inspection report, March 20, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230711102555

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 29 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
29
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 643-1050
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Belmont Village Aliso Viejo? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.