Care Juliet 1 is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange, Orange County, California — state license #306005500, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

19 homes in view

Care Juliet 1

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Orange, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005500, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
479 S Wellington Rd · Orange, Orange County
Phone
(209) 914-1153
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 22, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 22, 2026
Occupancy at the July 21, 2023 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 3, 2023 to July 21, 2023. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 3 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file11typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202411020234732022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2023 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 914-1153

Is Care Juliet 1 licensed?

Yes — Care Juliet 1 is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Orange (Orange County): California license #306005500, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 22, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Care Juliet 1 care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Care Juliet 1 with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

How much does Care Juliet 1 cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Care Juliet 1's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Care Juliet 1 accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Care Juliet 1 through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on July 21, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Care Juliet 1?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2022 for Care Juliet 1; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 21, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has fire hazards.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jessica Cho made an uannounced visit for the purpose to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by House Manager (HM) Juileta Cervania and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA also met with Caregivers Janella Cervania and Bayani Villarosa. LPA spoke to Administrator (Admin) Lester Del Rosario via a telephone call approximately 9:55am and received consent for HM to sign the report on his behalf. During the course of the investigation, LPA observed six residents in care, toured the physical plant including the patio, interviewed residents/staff, and obtained pertinent resident records. The following are the findings which involved observations, record review, and interviews: It was alleged that facility has fire hazards. LPA along with HM Cervania observed the presence of the Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) located in the patio area and observed that it was being occupied by Caregiver #2 (C2) as their pCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230714131232
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUntrained staff
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced initial 10-day visit regarding the complaint allegation listed above. LPA identified himself and explained the reason for the visit with staff who called Administraotr (AD) John Del Rosario via telephone who arrived a short time later. Before interviewing residents and staff to gather details, LPA Haley toured the interior and exterior of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the allegations, “Untrained staff” The investigation revealed the following: During the initial visit May 1, 2023, LPA Haley toured the facility and conducted interviewes with the Administrator, 2 staff and 4 residents. During the interview with Staff 2 (S2), S2 stated he was new and he has not received/started any training yet. S2 did mention he's only shadowing right now and explained what he's learned. After the interview, LPA Haley asked AD Del Rosario about training for S2 and asked to review training records for S2. There were no trining reCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230427090922
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced initial 10-day visit regarding the complaint allegations listed above. LPA identified himself and explained the reason for the visit with staff who called Administraotr (AD) John Del Rosario via telephone who arrived a short time later. Before interviewing residents and staff to gather details, LPA Haley toured the interior and exterior of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). Regarding the allegations, “Staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents” The investigation revealed the following: During the initial visit May 1, 2023, LPA Haley toured the facility and observed all six residents in care. The facility was observed to be clean and well organized. During the visit LPA Haley interviewed AD Del Rosario, two staff, and four residents. 4 of 4 reisdents interviewed denied the allegation above. 2 of 2 staff and AD Del Rosario denied the allegation above. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230427090922
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not lock residents' medications at the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 01/19/23. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and initially met with caregiver Julieta Cervania. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Lester A. Del Rosario arrrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff does not lock residents’ medications at the facility. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the initial visit conducted on 01/26/23 and visit conducted on 02/03/23 LPA Ramirez observed resident’s medications to be centrally stored and locked inaccessible to others. Two of twelve individuals interviewed corroborated the allegation; However, six of twelve individuals reported medications get locked in the kitchen cabiCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230119084106
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff mismanaged resident's medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 01/19/23. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and initially met with caregiver Julieta Cervania. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Lester A. Del Rosario arrrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff mismanaged resident’s medications. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Four of six residents interviewed reported that the facility manages their medication. The remaining two residents interviewed either could not be qualified and/or refused to answer questions. Six of six resident files reviewed indicate that residents are not able to administer their own prescription medications. During the interviews Staff 1 (S1) repCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230119084106
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are forcing the residents to participate in undesired activities.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. and Andrea Mendivil conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 01/23/23. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and initially met with caregiver Julieta Cervania. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Lester A. Del Rosario arrrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility staff are forcing the residents to participate in undesired activities. LPA Ramirez conducted interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: Four of six residents interviewed reported that activities are “always voluntary” and “never” feel forced to participate in activities. The remaining two residents interviewed either could not be qualified and/or refused to answer questions. Four of four staff interviewed reported “never” witnessing residents being forced to participateCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230123111444

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 914-1153
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Care Juliet 1? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.