Silver Lining Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim, Orange County, California — state license #306005453, licensed for 14 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Silver Lining Residential Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 14 residents · Anaheim, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005453, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1243 N. Brookhurst Street · Anaheim, Orange County
Phone
(661) 810-7293
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 8 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY AND 8 NON-AMBULATORY.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 12, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 12, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
7 of 14 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 1, 2024 to June 12, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Faciity not providing activities to residents 2-Facility staff not handling residents medical appointments timely 3-Facility not providing variety of meals 4-residents being overmedicated 5-Facility is over resident capacity 6-Staff does not know how to verbally communicate with residents 7-Facility Staff did not report incident to responsible party 8-Licensee is not responding to responsible party 9-Resident sustained injuries from lack of care & supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings to the above-mentioned allegations. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by office manager, Miriam Esquivel. and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department received a complaint on 03/16/2026, and During the investigation, LPA reviewed records relevant to the allegations, including the complaint report, R1’s 2026 medical records, facility fire clearance,, facility menu, and facility activity calendar. LPA interviewed three staff members. LPA also attempted to interview three residents; however, LPA was unable to obtain relevant information due to the residents’ cognitive ability. . LPA attempted to contact the reporting party on 06/02/2026, 06/04/2026, and 06/12/2026; however, LPA was unable to reach the reporting party. LPA did not leave a voicemail due to the instruction documented in the complaint report, which stated not to leave a voicemail and to calthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260316072225
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure adequate care is provided to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an announced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by care staff, Nancy Valdez, and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit, there were seven residents in care. The Department received a complaint alleging that “Staff do not ensure adequate care is provided to residents.” The complaint alleged general concerns that staff neglect residents, and residents are living under poor conditions. The complaint did not identify a specific resident, staff member, date, time, incident, or specific care need that was allegedly unmet. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, reviewed available facility records, and made observations of the facility and residents in care. LPA conducted a comprehensive walk-through of the interior and exterior of the facility. During the walk-through, LPA observed three cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260519143142
May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow resident to return to the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an announced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff and later met with Licensee Lacy Faddoul. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that “Staff did not allow resident to return to the facility.” During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews with staff, residents, the Responsible Party, and the Licensee. LPA reviewed Resident 1’s (R1) Admission Agreement, dated May 8, 2025, which confirmed that R1 was admitted to Silver Lining Residential Care. LPA also reviewed an incident report dated February 23, 2026, which documented that R1 became physically aggressive toward staff and physically assaulted another resident. The report further indicated that R1 was taken by the CAT team on a 5150 hold for 72 hours. {***CONTINUE9099C*** {***THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT***} Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260311085816
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is verbally abusing residents by telling them to shut up and that they are crazy Facility staff is failing to provide care and supervision to residents after 5pm

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed resident records. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff is verbally abusing residents by telling them to shut up and that they are crazy, revealed the following. The Administrator denied the allegation. 5 out of 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation. At the time the complaint was filed 9 residents resided at the facility. 4 out of 9 residents were interviewed. 2 residents refused to be interviewed and 2 residents (diagnosed with Dementia) did not respond to the LPAs questions. 1 resident responded by making random statements. 4 out of 4 residents reported they have never verbally abused in any way. LPA did not observe any evidence to suppothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220719100645
Oct 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff providing care and supervision without criminal record clearance Staff monitor residents via hidden cameras Staff are unqualified to meet residents needs Staff providing care and supervision while intoxicated Staff is financially abusing residents Staff is denying residents' access to make and receive confidential calls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, staff providing care and supervision without criminal record clearance, revealed the following. It was alleged that Staff 1 (S1) was working at the facility without a valid background clearance. The Administrator reported that S1 was going to be hired pending their background clearance was approved. The Administrator reported that the background clearance was not approved and S1's association to the facility was removed September 15, 2018. The Administrator reported that S1 never worked at the facility. On December 6, 20219 a case management visit was conducted to verify S1 was not at the facility (See LIC809 dated December 6, 2019 for more details). 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported they never worked wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230320142719
Apr 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction Medication not being administered as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. Staff called the Administrator and informed her of the visit. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed facility records. The investigation into the allegation, unlawful eviction, revealed the following. It was alleged the Resident 1 (R1), was unlawfully evicted and not allowed to return to the facility after their hospital stay. On Friday August 30 2024, staff attempted to give R1 a shower and R1 became agitated and hit and scratched 2 staff members. Staff reported R1 was aggressive and yelling so they called 911. The Administrator and family members of R1 were notified. R1 was taken to the hospital. R1 was ready for discharge on September 04, 2024. The Administrator reported that after R1 was assessed they wanted R1 to hathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240906145147
Apr 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff would not allow residents provider to visit the resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator/ Licensee Foudil via telephone. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, resident, and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as sign in logs and physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff would not allow residents provider to visit the resident, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/23/2024 at 12:30 PM, provider stated they arrived for a visit with Resident 1(R1) and was told by staff that the resident was not present at the facility. Provider states being denied entrance. Subsequent information revealed the resident was at the facility during that time frame. Three out of three facility staff deny the incident and state visitors are never denied visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223151431
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints7typical 1
State visits on file14typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265512025230202433120231102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 810-7293

Is Silver Lining Residential Care licensed?

Yes — Silver Lining Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim (Orange County): California license #306005453, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 14 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 12, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Silver Lining Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silver Lining Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY AND 8 NON-AMBULATORY.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

How much does Silver Lining Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silver Lining Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silver Lining Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silver Lining Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

7 of 14 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on June 12, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silver Lining Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2022 for Silver Lining Residential Care; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 12, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Faciity not providing activities to residents 2-Facility staff not handling residents medical appointments timely 3-Facility not providing variety of meals 4-residents being overmedicated 5-Facility is over resident capacity 6-Staff does not know how to verbally communicate with residents 7-Facility Staff did not report incident to responsible party 8-Licensee is not responding to responsible party 9-Resident sustained injuries from lack of care & supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings to the above-mentioned allegations. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by office manager, Miriam Esquivel. and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department received a complaint on 03/16/2026, and During the investigation, LPA reviewed records relevant to the allegations, including the complaint report, R1’s 2026 medical records, facility fire clearance,, facility menu, and facility activity calendar. LPA interviewed three staff members. LPA also attempted to interview three residents; however, LPA was unable to obtain relevant information due to the residents’ cognitive ability. . LPA attempted to contact the reporting party on 06/02/2026, 06/04/2026, and 06/12/2026; however, LPA was unable to reach the reporting party. LPA did not leave a voicemail due to the instruction documented in the complaint report, which stated not to leave a voicemail and to calCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260316072225
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure adequate care is provided to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an announced visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by care staff, Nancy Valdez, and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit, there were seven residents in care. The Department received a complaint alleging that “Staff do not ensure adequate care is provided to residents.” The complaint alleged general concerns that staff neglect residents, and residents are living under poor conditions. The complaint did not identify a specific resident, staff member, date, time, incident, or specific care need that was allegedly unmet. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, reviewed available facility records, and made observations of the facility and residents in care. LPA conducted a comprehensive walk-through of the interior and exterior of the facility. During the walk-through, LPA observed three cCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260519143142
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not allow resident to return to the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an announced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff and later met with Licensee Lacy Faddoul. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. It was alleged that “Staff did not allow resident to return to the facility.” During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed facility records and conducted interviews with staff, residents, the Responsible Party, and the Licensee. LPA reviewed Resident 1’s (R1) Admission Agreement, dated May 8, 2025, which confirmed that R1 was admitted to Silver Lining Residential Care. LPA also reviewed an incident report dated February 23, 2026, which documented that R1 became physically aggressive toward staff and physically assaulted another resident. The report further indicated that R1 was taken by the CAT team on a 5150 hold for 72 hours. {***CONTINUE9099C*** {***THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT***} SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260311085816

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is verbally abusing residents by telling them to shut up and that they are crazy Facility staff is failing to provide care and supervision to residents after 5pm
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed resident records. The investigation into the allegation, facility staff is verbally abusing residents by telling them to shut up and that they are crazy, revealed the following. The Administrator denied the allegation. 5 out of 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation. At the time the complaint was filed 9 residents resided at the facility. 4 out of 9 residents were interviewed. 2 residents refused to be interviewed and 2 residents (diagnosed with Dementia) did not respond to the LPAs questions. 1 resident responded by making random statements. 4 out of 4 residents reported they have never verbally abused in any way. LPA did not observe any evidence to suppoCDSS inspection report, October 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220719100645
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff providing care and supervision without criminal record clearance Staff monitor residents via hidden cameras Staff are unqualified to meet residents needs Staff providing care and supervision while intoxicated Staff is financially abusing residents Staff is denying residents' access to make and receive confidential calls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, staff providing care and supervision without criminal record clearance, revealed the following. It was alleged that Staff 1 (S1) was working at the facility without a valid background clearance. The Administrator reported that S1 was going to be hired pending their background clearance was approved. The Administrator reported that the background clearance was not approved and S1's association to the facility was removed September 15, 2018. The Administrator reported that S1 never worked at the facility. On December 6, 20219 a case management visit was conducted to verify S1 was not at the facility (See LIC809 dated December 6, 2019 for more details). 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported they never worked wCDSS inspection report, October 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230320142719

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction Medication not being administered as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. Staff called the Administrator and informed her of the visit. LPA met with Administrator Lacy Faddoul. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed facility records. The investigation into the allegation, unlawful eviction, revealed the following. It was alleged the Resident 1 (R1), was unlawfully evicted and not allowed to return to the facility after their hospital stay. On Friday August 30 2024, staff attempted to give R1 a shower and R1 became agitated and hit and scratched 2 staff members. Staff reported R1 was aggressive and yelling so they called 911. The Administrator and family members of R1 were notified. R1 was taken to the hospital. R1 was ready for discharge on September 04, 2024. The Administrator reported that after R1 was assessed they wanted R1 to haCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240906145147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff would not allow residents provider to visit the resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator/ Licensee Foudil via telephone. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, resident, and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as sign in logs and physician report. Regarding the allegation that staff would not allow residents provider to visit the resident, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/23/2024 at 12:30 PM, provider stated they arrived for a visit with Resident 1(R1) and was told by staff that the resident was not present at the facility. Provider states being denied entrance. Subsequent information revealed the resident was at the facility during that time frame. Three out of three facility staff deny the incident and state visitors are never denied visitCDSS inspection report, March 1, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240223151431

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 810-7293
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silver Lining Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.