Ardent Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim, Orange County, California — state license #306005211, licensed for 27 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 31 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

14 homes in view

Ardent Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 27 residents · Anaheim, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005211, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1665 South Brookhurst Street · Anaheim, Orange County
Phone
(714) 991-0991
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 21 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 27 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 21 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 6 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 42 times and filed 31 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 6, 2026
Occupancy at the October 29, 2025 visit
24 of 27 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 2, 2022 to October 29, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 31 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate food service Staff installed video camera with audio without resident's consent Staff did not ensure resident has hot water in the bathroom

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough arrived at the facility to investigate the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with AD Melinda Flores and Alex Blancarte and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegations of staff do not provide adequate food service, staff installed video camera with audio without resident's consent and staff did not ensure resident has hot water in the bathroom revealed the following: Regarding the allegation of staff do not provide adequate food service, LPA observed food menus for five cycles. The menus had a variety of fresh nutritious options for residents in care. LPA toured the facility kitchen and did not observe an adequate two-day perishable and seven day nonperishable food supply on hand. LPA observed staff walking into the facility with grocery bags. Continue on 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250930102714
Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Melinda Flores and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was alleged that, staff does not provide adequate supervision to resident in care, which led to Resident 1 (R1) falling on February 5, 2023 and February 6, 2023. Both incidents were reported to the Agency and R1's responsible party. After each incident staff assessed R1 and immediately called 911. After the fall on February 5, 2023 R1 had a bump on their forehead and after the fall on February 6, 2023 R1 had a bump on the back of their head. When R1 was admitted to the hospital after their fall on February 6, 2023 and discharged on February 9, 2023. R1 was admitted to the hospital because they suffered 2 falls, 2 days in a row, their loss of consciousness (on February 6), and history of hypertension. Thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230210111523
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident engaged in inappropriate behavior with another resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings related to the investigation of the complaint allegation identified above. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA spoke with Melinda Flores, Administrator explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted and resident file record review. It is alleged that a resident engaged in inappropriate behavior with another resident while in care. Record review revealed that CCLD received an LIC624 unusual incident report regarding residents (R1 & R2) for June 01, 2022, R1 was found in R2’s room on top of R2 over their face naked trying to force R2 to open Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220603100514
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff fail to seek timely medical attention for resident Staff refuse resident to leave facility

On June 20, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA met with Administrator Melinda Flores and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included the following activities: On January 21, 2025, LPA Kim conducted the initial visit, during which relevant records were obtained. In addition, interviews were conducted with three staff members (S1–S3), five residents (R1–R5), and three witnesses (W1–W3). The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250115141051
Apr 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff restricted resident's visitation rights Staff engaged in a verbal altercation in front of resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an announced visit to deliver findings after a complaint visit on April 3, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and met with Alex Blancarte, Assistant Administrator (AA). LPA reviewed facility Visiting Policy, Visitor's Log for 2025, House Rules, Unusual Incident Reports and Staff Schedule. LPA also reviewed five of five resident records and four of four staff files. LPA interviewed residents, staff, family members and eyewitnesses regarding resident visitation rights. All residents denied allegation that visitation rights are restricted. LPA reviewed the visitor's log for 2025 and noted visitors were allowed to visit with the resident. The facility stated visiting hours in the House Rules from 8am to 8pm and the visitor had wanted to visit after 8:30pm. The visitor was advised by staff that the resident's roommate was already asleep and that visitors would not (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250328143510
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Melinda Flores and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, the facility’s brochure, Resident #1’s (R1) Appraisal dated July 1, 2020, R1’s Individual Service Plan dated May 11, 2020, R1’s Admission Agreement dated July 2, 2020, and the facility’s Plan of Operation. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged: it was alleged that residents whose incontinence supplies are covered by insurance are now bthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240329153408
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fall due to lack of supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 09/30/20. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Medication Technician (MT) Fabiola Fuentes. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Per Tittle 22, Section 87506 Resident Records under (e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years. Due to the complaint being over three years LPA was unable to review Resident 1 (R1) records. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident sustained a fall due to lack of supervision. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of five individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During interviews conducted with residents, R1 reported that staff are helpful and stated that he has not had a fall due to lack of supervision. During the interviews Administrator (AD) stated that CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 22-AS-20200930151047
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit the residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 06/30/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Medication Technician (MT) Fabiola Fuentes. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Melinda Flores arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff hit the residents. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of eight individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During interviews conducted with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that no staff hits her or other residents and stated that staff are good to her. During interviews conducted with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that she has never witness staff hitting the residents and stated that if she sees staff hitting the residents that she would make a report since shethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230630160447
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an injury from lack of supervision.

LPA Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation: Resident sustained an injury from lack of supervision. During the investigation 7 interviews were conducted with facility staff, the resident involved, and a family member of the resident involved. None of the 7 individuals interviewed were able to support the complaint allegation as reported. During the investigation, it was discovered Resident 1 did have a fall in the middle of the night and was sent to the hospital for a head injury. All staff members interviewed, including the Administrator confirmed there were two employees working when R1 had an unwitnessed fall in her room around 3:00AM. During an interview with a family member of R1, it was discovered the family member was notified right away and went to the ER with R1. The family member had no problem with how the caregivers responded tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231103104532
Dec 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of care and supervision from the facility's staff resulted in untimely medical attention for resident who sustained injuries.

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Melinda Flores, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 02/08/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted an initial visit on 02/09/2023. During the visit LPA Mendivil reviewed documents including physician’s reports, assessments, staff schedules and admission agreements. Regarding the allegation Lack of care and supervision from the facility's staff resulted in untimely medical attention for resident who sustained injuries., the investigation revealed the following: On 01/23/2023 Resident 1 (R1) was assessed by Administrator Melinda Flores at the facility. Based on interviews with Administrator Melinda it was reported that R1 had previous falls prior to moving into Ardent Care. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230208145448
Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Melinda Flores. It was alleged that staff hit resident in care. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 10 interviews. 4 interviews conducted with staff stated that there were "talks" about a staff hitting a resident or "heard" information regarding this incident, however were unsure about the validity of the allegation. 5 interviews were conducted with residents, of which all resident interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. On 4/17/23, the facility contacted the Anaheim Police Department, to conduct an investigation, and per interview with the detective assigned, the detective stated that there was no evidence that could corroborate with the allegation. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, LPA is unable to asthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230420165830
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file42typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026450202591122024551202356120224412021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 991-0991

Is Ardent Care licensed?

Yes — Ardent Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Anaheim (Orange County): California license #306005211, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 27 residents. State records list 31 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ardent Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ardent Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 27 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 21 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 6 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Ardent Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ardent Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ardent Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Ardent Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Orange County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

24 of 27 beds occupied (89%) when the state visited on October 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ardent Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 42 state visits and 31 dated documents since 2021 for Ardent Care; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 29, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate food service Staff installed video camera with audio without resident's consent Staff did not ensure resident has hot water in the bathroom
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough arrived at the facility to investigate the above-mentioned complaint allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with AD Melinda Flores and Alex Blancarte and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegations of staff do not provide adequate food service, staff installed video camera with audio without resident's consent and staff did not ensure resident has hot water in the bathroom revealed the following: Regarding the allegation of staff do not provide adequate food service, LPA observed food menus for five cycles. The menus had a variety of fresh nutritious options for residents in care. LPA toured the facility kitchen and did not observe an adequate two-day perishable and seven day nonperishable food supply on hand. LPA observed staff walking into the facility with grocery bags. Continue on 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250930102714
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide adequate supervision to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Melinda Flores and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. It was alleged that, staff does not provide adequate supervision to resident in care, which led to Resident 1 (R1) falling on February 5, 2023 and February 6, 2023. Both incidents were reported to the Agency and R1's responsible party. After each incident staff assessed R1 and immediately called 911. After the fall on February 5, 2023 R1 had a bump on their forehead and after the fall on February 6, 2023 R1 had a bump on the back of their head. When R1 was admitted to the hospital after their fall on February 6, 2023 and discharged on February 9, 2023. R1 was admitted to the hospital because they suffered 2 falls, 2 days in a row, their loss of consciousness (on February 6), and history of hypertension. TheCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20230210111523
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident engaged in inappropriate behavior with another resident while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings related to the investigation of the complaint allegation identified above. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA spoke with Melinda Flores, Administrator explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included interviews conducted and resident file record review. It is alleged that a resident engaged in inappropriate behavior with another resident while in care. Record review revealed that CCLD received an LIC624 unusual incident report regarding residents (R1 & R2) for June 01, 2022, R1 was found in R2’s room on top of R2 over their face naked trying to force R2 to open Continued on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220603100514
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff fail to seek timely medical attention for resident Staff refuse resident to leave facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On June 20, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA met with Administrator Melinda Flores and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included the following activities: On January 21, 2025, LPA Kim conducted the initial visit, during which relevant records were obtained. In addition, interviews were conducted with three staff members (S1–S3), five residents (R1–R5), and three witnesses (W1–W3). The investigation revealed the following: Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250115141051
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff restricted resident's visitation rights Staff engaged in a verbal altercation in front of resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an announced visit to deliver findings after a complaint visit on April 3, 2025. LPA was greeted and granted entry and met with Alex Blancarte, Assistant Administrator (AA). LPA reviewed facility Visiting Policy, Visitor's Log for 2025, House Rules, Unusual Incident Reports and Staff Schedule. LPA also reviewed five of five resident records and four of four staff files. LPA interviewed residents, staff, family members and eyewitnesses regarding resident visitation rights. All residents denied allegation that visitation rights are restricted. LPA reviewed the visitor's log for 2025 and noted visitors were allowed to visit with the resident. The facility stated visiting hours in the House Rules from 8am to 8pm and the visitor had wanted to visit after 8:30pm. The visitor was advised by staff that the resident's roommate was already asleep and that visitors would not (Continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250328143510

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Melinda Flores and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that the facility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, staff, and witnesses, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, the facility’s brochure, Resident #1’s (R1) Appraisal dated July 1, 2020, R1’s Individual Service Plan dated May 11, 2020, R1’s Admission Agreement dated July 2, 2020, and the facility’s Plan of Operation. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not ensure residents are not being overcharged: it was alleged that residents whose incontinence supplies are covered by insurance are now bCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240329153408
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fall due to lack of supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 09/30/20. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Medication Technician (MT) Fabiola Fuentes. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Per Tittle 22, Section 87506 Resident Records under (e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years. Due to the complaint being over three years LPA was unable to review Resident 1 (R1) records. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that Resident sustained a fall due to lack of supervision. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of five individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During interviews conducted with residents, R1 reported that staff are helpful and stated that he has not had a fall due to lack of supervision. During the interviews Administrator (AD) stated that CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiaCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2024 · control 22-AS-20200930151047
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit the residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on 06/30/23. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Medication Technician (MT) Fabiola Fuentes. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Melinda Flores arrived shortly after. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff hit the residents. LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: One of eight individuals interviewed confirmed the allegation. During interviews conducted with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that no staff hits her or other residents and stated that staff are good to her. During interviews conducted with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that she has never witness staff hitting the residents and stated that if she sees staff hitting the residents that she would make a report since sheCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230630160447

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury from lack of supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegation above. LPA Haley was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation: Resident sustained an injury from lack of supervision. During the investigation 7 interviews were conducted with facility staff, the resident involved, and a family member of the resident involved. None of the 7 individuals interviewed were able to support the complaint allegation as reported. During the investigation, it was discovered Resident 1 did have a fall in the middle of the night and was sent to the hospital for a head injury. All staff members interviewed, including the Administrator confirmed there were two employees working when R1 had an unwitnessed fall in her room around 3:00AM. During an interview with a family member of R1, it was discovered the family member was notified right away and went to the ER with R1. The family member had no problem with how the caregivers responded toCDSS inspection report, December 6, 2023 · control 22-AS-20231103104532
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of care and supervision from the facility's staff resulted in untimely medical attention for resident who sustained injuries.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Melinda Flores, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 02/08/2023 and LPA Mendivil conducted an initial visit on 02/09/2023. During the visit LPA Mendivil reviewed documents including physician’s reports, assessments, staff schedules and admission agreements. Regarding the allegation Lack of care and supervision from the facility's staff resulted in untimely medical attention for resident who sustained injuries., the investigation revealed the following: On 01/23/2023 Resident 1 (R1) was assessed by Administrator Melinda Flores at the facility. Based on interviews with Administrator Melinda it was reported that R1 had previous falls prior to moving into Ardent Care. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 30, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230208145448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Celine De Perio conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings. LPA De Perio explained the purpose of today's visit, was greeted by facility administrator (AD) Melinda Flores. It was alleged that staff hit resident in care. LPA De Perio conducted a total of 10 interviews. 4 interviews conducted with staff stated that there were "talks" about a staff hitting a resident or "heard" information regarding this incident, however were unsure about the validity of the allegation. 5 interviews were conducted with residents, of which all resident interviews did not corroborate with the allegation. On 4/17/23, the facility contacted the Anaheim Police Department, to conduct an investigation, and per interview with the detective assigned, the detective stated that there was no evidence that could corroborate with the allegation. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, review of documents obtained, and observations, LPA is unable to asCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230420165830
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff speak inappropriately to the residents. Facility is not kept clean. Facility is malodorous.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Assistant Administrator Alexandra Blancarte. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator (AD) Melinda Flores arrived shortly after. On today’s visit LPA Ramirez conducted file reviews and interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Regarding the allegations, the following was revealed: One of eight individuals interviewed corroborated the allegations. Seven of eight individuals interviewed denied the allegations. Per AD she has not witness staff speaking innapropriately to the residents and that all staff are mandated reporters. Per interviews conducted residents reported that staff do not speak inappropriately to the residents and that staff are good people. Residents appeared to be comforCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230630160447

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 42 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
42
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 991-0991
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ardent Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.