Whittier Glen Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Whittier, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603162, licensed for 93 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 102 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Whittier Glen Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 93 residents · Whittier, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603162, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10615 Jordan Rd · Whittier, Los Angeles County
Phone
(562) 943-3724
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 93 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 93 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 125 times and filed 102 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the November 17, 2025 visit
89 of 93 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 27, 2021 to November 17, 2025. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 53 of 102 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202511 state visits · 17 documents
Dec 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility elevator is maintained in good repair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/30/25 LPA Daniel Konishi conducted a unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit obtained a copy of the staff/resident roster and interviewed 1 Staff. Further investigation was needed. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251028084138
Nov 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did provide adequate care and supervision to a resident. Staff denied a resident entry to the facility. Staff did not properly maintain a resident's room. Staff exposed a resident to harmful material. Staff did not ensure a resident attended scheduled appointments. Staff did not meet a resident's bathing needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/14/25 LPA Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit and obtained copies of the staff/resident rosters, obtained the appraisal, physician's report, FACE sheet, and transportation records for Resident #1 (R1), and also interviewed 2 Staff. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251006120341
Nov 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs were met. Staff threatened resident. Staff retaliated against resident for reporting. Staff wrongfully evicted resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 10/30/25 LPA Daniel Konishi conducted a unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit and obtained a copy of the staff/resident rosters. Further investigation was needed. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251021104817
Nov 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted subsequent unannounced complaint visit to deliver fidnings for the above allegation. LPA met with Maddison Guardian, Medical Technician and discussed the purpose of the visit. 11/10/2025 - The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing five (5) (staff S#1 - S#5), nine (9) residents (R#1 - R#9), one witness, LPA obtained copies of the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, R1 ‘s physicians report, and appraisal needs and service plan, doctor’s order for R1, MAR for 11/2025 and other medical records. LPA also took tour of facility common areas. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Staff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner. It is alleged that staff are not addressing resident’s change of condition on a timely basis. LPA interviewed five (5) staff, and all five (5) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed eight (8) residents and all eight (8) could not corroborate the allegthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251105142214
Nov 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure residents care needs are being met. Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff speak to residents in an inappropriate manner.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Chan and Elena Mallett conducted the initial complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPAs arrived unannounced and met with the interim Administrator, Monica Guardian. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPAs obtained copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents regarding Resident #1. Interviews were held with the administrator, seven (7) staff, and ten (10) residents. LPA attempted to interview Staff #1 but was unsuccessful. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Staff does not ensure resident's care needs are being met. It is alleged that on 10/29/25, Staff #1 (S1) did not assist with changing Resident #1’s (R1) soiled diaper because R1 was changed not that long ago. LPAs interviewed the interim administrator and seven (7) staff. The administrator was aware of the incident, and an internal investigation was conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251029101156
Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202416 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20239 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations24typical 1
Substantiated complaints34typical 2
Total complaints80typical 7
State visits on file125typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264502025111712024161802023303902022182122021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 943-3724

Is Whittier Glen Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Whittier Glen Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Whittier (Los Angeles County): California license #198603162, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 93 residents. State records list 102 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Whittier Glen Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Whittier Glen Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 93 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Whittier Glen Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Whittier Glen Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Whittier Glen Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Whittier Glen Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

89 of 93 beds occupied (96%) when the state visited on November 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Whittier Glen Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 125 state visits and 102 dated documents since 2021 for Whittier Glen Assisted Living; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility elevator is maintained in good repair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/30/25 LPA Daniel Konishi conducted a unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit obtained a copy of the staff/resident roster and interviewed 1 Staff. Further investigation was needed. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251028084138
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did provide adequate care and supervision to a resident. Staff denied a resident entry to the facility. Staff did not properly maintain a resident's room. Staff exposed a resident to harmful material. Staff did not ensure a resident attended scheduled appointments. Staff did not meet a resident's bathing needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/14/25 LPA Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit and obtained copies of the staff/resident rosters, obtained the appraisal, physician's report, FACE sheet, and transportation records for Resident #1 (R1), and also interviewed 2 Staff. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251006120341
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's showering needs were met. Staff threatened resident. Staff retaliated against resident for reporting. Staff wrongfully evicted resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to address the allegations listed above. LPA met with Monica Guardian and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 10/30/25 LPA Daniel Konishi conducted a unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit and obtained a copy of the staff/resident rosters. Further investigation was needed. During todays visit 11/17/25 LPA Herrera conducted a subsequent visit, LPA toured facility, obtained copies of the following Physician Reports for R1 and R2, Food Menu, House Rules, Showering Schedule, Elevator Repair Invoices and Staff/Resident Rosters. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 17, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251021104817
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted subsequent unannounced complaint visit to deliver fidnings for the above allegation. LPA met with Maddison Guardian, Medical Technician and discussed the purpose of the visit. 11/10/2025 - The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing five (5) (staff S#1 - S#5), nine (9) residents (R#1 - R#9), one witness, LPA obtained copies of the following documents: staff roster, resident roster, R1 ‘s physicians report, and appraisal needs and service plan, doctor’s order for R1, MAR for 11/2025 and other medical records. LPA also took tour of facility common areas. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Staff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner. It is alleged that staff are not addressing resident’s change of condition on a timely basis. LPA interviewed five (5) staff, and all five (5) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed eight (8) residents and all eight (8) could not corroborate the allegCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251105142214
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure residents care needs are being met. Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff speak to residents in an inappropriate manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Chan and Elena Mallett conducted the initial complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPAs arrived unannounced and met with the interim Administrator, Monica Guardian. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPAs obtained copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents regarding Resident #1. Interviews were held with the administrator, seven (7) staff, and ten (10) residents. LPA attempted to interview Staff #1 but was unsuccessful. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Staff does not ensure resident's care needs are being met. It is alleged that on 10/29/25, Staff #1 (S1) did not assist with changing Resident #1’s (R1) soiled diaper because R1 was changed not that long ago. LPAs interviewed the interim administrator and seven (7) staff. The administrator was aware of the incident, and an internal investigation was conducted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251029101156

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not abiding to admission agreement Staff did not advise residents of complaints filed against the facility Resident is being charged for services not received
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Jose Villalobos and Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. Today’s complaint investigation was conducted with Administrator Pamela Junge. Purpose of the visit was discussed. Initial visit was conducted on 12/1/21 and consisted of the following: LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) and Resident #1 (R1). LPA toured the physcial plant and room #229. LPA reviewed and collected copies of R1's resident file. LPA also recieved a copy of the staff and resident roster. On Todays visit , LPA interviewed Staff #2-#5 (S2-S5) and Resident #2-#5 (R2-R5). LPA reviewed and collected copies of R1's resident file. Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211122141422
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was left in soiled diapers for an extended amount of time. Staff did not communicate with authorized representative.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegations. LPA met with Pamela Junge (Executive Director) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed Resident #1 (R1) file and obtained copies of Identification and Emergency Information Form, Physician's Report, Resident Appraisal, and Service Request. LPA also interviewed the Executive Director, Staff #1 - Staff #3, and Resident #1 - Resident #8. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "resident was left in soiled diapers for an extended amount of time", it is alleged that on 06/05/22 (R1) was observed in a soiled diaper. It is unknown how long (R1) was in the soiled diaper. Interviews conducted with staff members deny the allegation. Staff members interviewed indicated R1 does not use diapers and does not require continence assistanceCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220607114242
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not following doctor's orders.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Pamela Jungi (Executive Director) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 03/03/2022, LPA obtained a copy of resident and staff rosters, copies of face sheet, physician report, preplacement appraisal information, medication records, and hospice care documents for Resident 1 (R1). LPA also interviewed the Wellness Director, Hospice Care Case Manager, and Resident 1 (R1). On today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of resident and staff rosters, copies of February & March 2022 medication log for Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPA interviewed the Executive Director, Staff 1 - Staff 2 (S1 - S2), R2 - R7 and Hospice Care Nurse. Regarding the allegation "facility not following doctor's orders", it is alleged that the hospice care agency ordered the facility 02/12/22 to stop using tCDSS inspection report, April 20, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220222111310
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury from a fall while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted a complaint inspection for the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Pamela Junge and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters and Incident report dated 4/1/22. LPA reviewed Resident #1 (R1) file and obtained copies of Face Sheet, Physician's Report, Services Plan, and admissions agreement. LPA interviewed Staff #1-#4 (S1-S4) and residents #1-#3 (R1-R3). LPA toured the physical plant. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation "Resident sustained an injury from a fall while in care" it was alleged that R1 sustained an injury in the facility while intoxicated due to lack of supervision. (4) of (4) staff interviewed denied the allegations. (3) of (3) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that R1 and R2 were privately drinking in R2's room on 4/1/22 when staff walkingCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220407162336
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not administering medication as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a complaint inspection on the above allegation. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the Executive Director Sophia Chan and explained the purpose of the inspection. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed Resident #1 (R1) file and obtained copies of Face Sheet, Physician's Report, and Resident Appraisal. LPA interviewed Executive Director, Staff #1 (S1) and Resident 2 (R2). LPA also reviewed a random sample of residents medications during today's visit and observed medications to be not documented properly and given as prescribed. LPA was unable to interview R1 because R1 was not at the facility during the visit. Continue 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220316094043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fall while in care Staff did not notify authorized representative of an incident involving a resident Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident Facility has inadequate record keeping Facility has inadequate staffing for the facility Resident's sliding door is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Sophia Chan and Wellness Director Brooke Lamotte. The purpose for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained a client and staff roster and interviewed Staff #1 – #6 (S1 – S6), and Resident #1-#6 (R1 – R6). Reviewed and obtained copies of R1's File, and toured the physical plant. LPA interviews staff from R1's Hospice Agency. In regards to the allegation "Resident sustained a fall while in care ", it was alleged that R1 fell in the facility due to lack of care and supervision. (6) of (6) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that S1 was pushing R1's wheelchair when R1 suddenly pulled forward and reached out as if to grab something resulting in R1 falling.... Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220302112849
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's funds are being stolen.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos initiated a complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. Today’s complaint investigation was conducted with Administrator Sophia Chan. Purpose of the visit was discussed. On Todays visit , LPA interviewed Staff #2-#3 (S2-S3) between 10am-10:45am and Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2) from 1pm-1:45pm. LPA toured the physical plant and room #121 from 12:30pm-1pm. LPA reviewed and collected copies of R1's resident file and S1's Staff file between 10:45am-12:30pm. LPA also recieved a copy of the staff and resident roster. S1 was not available for interview as S1 no longer works in the facility. The investigation revealed the following, in regards to the allegation "Resident's funds are being stolen", it was alleged that S1 was responsible for unusual spending in R1s bank account while S1 was responsible for R1's finances... Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211229150408

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedRequests for assistance are not being responded to in a timely manner Residents in wheelchairs are blocking facility exitway. Facility is cold Resident was not provided medication in a timely manner. Food not being prepared in a safe manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint visit to address the above allegations and met with Caregiver-Tanya Ramos and explained the reason of the visit. At around 10:00am, the Executive Director- Sophia Chan arrived and assist with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the facility and interviewed six (6) residents, executive director and six (6) staff and obtained copy of the resident and staff rosters. The investigation revealed of the following: Allegation#1 "Requests for assistance are not being responded to in a timely manner. " LPA interviewed six (6) residents and five (5) residents stated that the staff responded quick and it usually takes about couple minutes for them to come and assist them. LPA interviewed the staff and all denied the allegation. The executive director reported it would never happened or acceptable for a resident to wait for an hour for asssitance. (See LIC 9099C for Continuation) UnsubsCDSS inspection report, December 27, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211220120618

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 125 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
24
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
34
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
80
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
125
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 943-3724
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Whittier Glen Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.