Golden Bliss Board And Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in North Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610532, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated June 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Golden Bliss Board And Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · North Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610532, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8609 Aqueduct Ave · North Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 697-3926
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #3 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5. BUSINESS/PROPERTY OWNER MUST LIVE IN JUNIOR ADU OR SFD PER LADBS AGREEMENT.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 1, 2026
Occupancy at the December 17, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 3, 2024 to December 17, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff engaged in financial misconduct involving a resident’s bank account. Staff did not accord a resident privacy during visits.

At approximately 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit in response to the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Staff#1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. Entrance interview conducted. During investigation LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:30 AM. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and four (4) out of four (4) residents between 10:14 AM to 11:47 AM. Between 11:48 AM and 12:00 PM, LPA requested and reviewed copies of pertinent information, which included, but were not limited to, LIC 500 (Staff Roster), LIC 9020 (Client Roster), R1’s Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, Inventory record of personal belongings, and other documents relevant to the investigation. In addition, at 1:10pm, LPA spoke with R1’s family member/responsible party over the phone. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251210155414
Sep 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff retaining resident against her will. Staff do not provide resident medications as prescribed. Staff ignored resident's request for medical treatment.

On 9.15.2025 at 11:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at this facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver final determination of the above noted allegations. LPA was granted entry into the facility by the staff #1 (S1). An entrance interview was conducted. At the time of this visit, at approximately 11:15 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. To investigate the allegations, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit on 06.19.2025 at which time, at approximately 11:16 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. While conducting the physical plant tour, LPA interviewed a resident 1 (R1), who was sitting at the patio, and three (3) other residents who were present in the facility. Per LPAs observation R1 was using a walker and able to respond to the questions. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250617185613
Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not maintain documentation of resident(s) records.

On 06/03/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lorena Casillas and Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegations. LPAs were greeted and allowed entry by Administrator Marianna Ghazaryan. LPAs explained the reason for the visit and an entrance interview was conducted. From 10:00 am to 2:00 pm LPAs toured the facility with Administrator, interviewed three (3) out of three (3) clients, and reviewed facility files. LPA Casillas requested copies of client roster, LIC 500, liability insurance and Administrator Certificate. LPAs also requested copies of pertinent information relevant to the investigation including but not limited to client medical records and any information pertaining to clients in care. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529092935
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately handled resident in care. Staff yelled at resident in care.

At 1:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at the facility in response to the abovementioned allegations. LPA met with the licensee, Marianna Ghazaryan, and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Allegation #1: Staff inappropriately handled the resident in care. Allegation #2: Staff yelled at the resident in care. To investigate the allegation, LPA requested a copy of the facility records. At 1:05 PM, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, made observations, and interviewed the licensee (S1) and staff #2 (S2). LPA observed that LIC 9020 did not show that the individual in question is a current resident at this facility. Interviews with the licensee, S2, and two (2) residents revealed that the individual in question was never a resident of this facility. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250509155907
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlicensed Care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tihesha Smith made an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this location at approximately 10:10 am. LPA was greeted by staff who informed Marianna was on the way. Marianna arrived shortly and LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 11/02/2023, a Notice of Operation in Violation of Law (NOVL) and citation under Health and Safety Code 1569.44 was issued. During the initial visit Tenant #1 (T1) was determined to have needed care and supervision. Prior to this visit operator notified LPA Smith that T1 was relocated to a licensed facility on 11/04/2023. During today’s visit, LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and confirmed that T1 is no longer living at the facility and T1’s bed is cleared. LPA observed the facility to be clean and has a sufficient supply of food. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20231024152959
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file10typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020254512024331
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 697-3926

Is Golden Bliss Board And Care licensed?

Yes — Golden Bliss Board And Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in North Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610532, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Golden Bliss Board And Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Golden Bliss Board And Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #3 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5. BUSINESS/PROPERTY OWNER MUST LIVE IN JUNIOR ADU OR SFD PER LADBS AGREEMENT.

How much does Golden Bliss Board And Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Golden Bliss Board And Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Golden Bliss Board And Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Golden Bliss Board And Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Golden Bliss Board And Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2024 for Golden Bliss Board And Care; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff engaged in financial misconduct involving a resident’s bank account. Staff did not accord a resident privacy during visits.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit in response to the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Staff#1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. Entrance interview conducted. During investigation LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:30 AM. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and four (4) out of four (4) residents between 10:14 AM to 11:47 AM. Between 11:48 AM and 12:00 PM, LPA requested and reviewed copies of pertinent information, which included, but were not limited to, LIC 500 (Staff Roster), LIC 9020 (Client Roster), R1’s Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Identification and Emergency Information, Inventory record of personal belongings, and other documents relevant to the investigation. In addition, at 1:10pm, LPA spoke with R1’s family member/responsible party over the phone. Continue to LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251210155414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff retaining resident against her will. Staff do not provide resident medications as prescribed. Staff ignored resident's request for medical treatment.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9.15.2025 at 11:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at this facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver final determination of the above noted allegations. LPA was granted entry into the facility by the staff #1 (S1). An entrance interview was conducted. At the time of this visit, at approximately 11:15 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. To investigate the allegations, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit on 06.19.2025 at which time, at approximately 11:16 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. While conducting the physical plant tour, LPA interviewed a resident 1 (R1), who was sitting at the patio, and three (3) other residents who were present in the facility. Per LPAs observation R1 was using a walker and able to respond to the questions. Continue to LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250617185613
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not maintain documentation of resident(s) records.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 06/03/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lorena Casillas and Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegations. LPAs were greeted and allowed entry by Administrator Marianna Ghazaryan. LPAs explained the reason for the visit and an entrance interview was conducted. From 10:00 am to 2:00 pm LPAs toured the facility with Administrator, interviewed three (3) out of three (3) clients, and reviewed facility files. LPA Casillas requested copies of client roster, LIC 500, liability insurance and Administrator Certificate. LPAs also requested copies of pertinent information relevant to the investigation including but not limited to client medical records and any information pertaining to clients in care. Continued on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529092935
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately handled resident in care. Staff yelled at resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
At 1:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at the facility in response to the abovementioned allegations. LPA met with the licensee, Marianna Ghazaryan, and explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Allegation #1: Staff inappropriately handled the resident in care. Allegation #2: Staff yelled at the resident in care. To investigate the allegation, LPA requested a copy of the facility records. At 1:05 PM, LPA conducted a tour of the facility, made observations, and interviewed the licensee (S1) and staff #2 (S2). LPA observed that LIC 9020 did not show that the individual in question is a current resident at this facility. Interviews with the licensee, S2, and two (2) residents revealed that the individual in question was never a resident of this facility. Continue to LIC 9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250509155907

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlicensed Care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tihesha Smith made an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this location at approximately 10:10 am. LPA was greeted by staff who informed Marianna was on the way. Marianna arrived shortly and LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 11/02/2023, a Notice of Operation in Violation of Law (NOVL) and citation under Health and Safety Code 1569.44 was issued. During the initial visit Tenant #1 (T1) was determined to have needed care and supervision. Prior to this visit operator notified LPA Smith that T1 was relocated to a licensed facility on 11/04/2023. During today’s visit, LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and confirmed that T1 is no longer living at the facility and T1’s bed is cleared. LPA observed the facility to be clean and has a sufficient supply of food. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20231024152959

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 697-3926
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Golden Bliss Board And Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.