Brightstar Senior Care,inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610305, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated September 16, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Brightstar Senior Care,inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Granada Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610305, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10455 Gaynor Ave · Granada Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 517-0544
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) NONAMBULATORY. ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #3. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6). UPSTAIRS ROOMS ARE FOR STAFF USE ONLY.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated September 16, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 10, 2026
Occupancy at the September 15, 2023 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 25, 2022 to September 15, 2023. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not preventing resident(s) from being abused while in care. Staff are not ensuring that residents' care needs are being met while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Zinaida Safaryan and Irina Grigoryan, and advised them of the complaint. LPA advised the office manager, Narine Aida and administrator, Ayedah Allahdad over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents and a physical plant inspection. Staff are not preventing resident(s) from being abused while in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that at least two (2) residents stated they're being abused. No residents were identified to who was being abused. There were also no witnesses identified to the allegation. During the course of the investigation, two (2) of two staff interviewed and they deny the allegation. According to both administrator and office manager, they are unaware of any abuse being made and haven't received any complaints from residents about being mistreated. LPA interviewedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230907102318
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. Staff did not provide a safe environment for resident(s) in care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Christopher Alemoh conducted a subsequent complaint visit to follow-up with the facility about the above allegations. LPAs were greeted by staff #1 (S1) and granted access. LPAs met with the house manger Narineh Ohanian and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. In regards to the allegation, it was reported that a staff spoke very limited English and was unable to understand instructions or requests for assistance. Interviews with staff #1 (S1) on 2/13/2023 indicated that they do speak limited English but it does not hinder them from taking care of the residents. According to S1 they can use google translate if need be. Interview with residents on 02/13/2023 and 08/14/2023 revealed S1 doesn't speak English very well but is able to assist when needed. Various resident interviews indicate if one staff doesn't understand they call on another staff that does. Othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230208125524
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints7typical 0
State visits on file15typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025220202411020235712022452
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 517-0544

Is Brightstar Senior Care,inc licensed?

Yes — Brightstar Senior Care,inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610305, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 16, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brightstar Senior Care,inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brightstar Senior Care,inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FIVE(5) NONAMBULATORY. ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #3. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6). UPSTAIRS ROOMS ARE FOR STAFF USE ONLY.

How much does Brightstar Senior Care,inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brightstar Senior Care,inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brightstar Senior Care,inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Brightstar Senior Care,inc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on September 15, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brightstar Senior Care,inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2022 for Brightstar Senior Care,inc; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 15, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not preventing resident(s) from being abused while in care. Staff are not ensuring that residents' care needs are being met while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Zinaida Safaryan and Irina Grigoryan, and advised them of the complaint. LPA advised the office manager, Narine Aida and administrator, Ayedah Allahdad over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents and a physical plant inspection. Staff are not preventing resident(s) from being abused while in care: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that at least two (2) residents stated they're being abused. No residents were identified to who was being abused. There were also no witnesses identified to the allegation. During the course of the investigation, two (2) of two staff interviewed and they deny the allegation. According to both administrator and office manager, they are unaware of any abuse being made and haven't received any complaints from residents about being mistreated. LPA interviewedCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230907102318
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. Staff did not provide a safe environment for resident(s) in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Christopher Alemoh conducted a subsequent complaint visit to follow-up with the facility about the above allegations. LPAs were greeted by staff #1 (S1) and granted access. LPAs met with the house manger Narineh Ohanian and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. In regards to the allegation, it was reported that a staff spoke very limited English and was unable to understand instructions or requests for assistance. Interviews with staff #1 (S1) on 2/13/2023 indicated that they do speak limited English but it does not hinder them from taking care of the residents. According to S1 they can use google translate if need be. Interview with residents on 02/13/2023 and 08/14/2023 revealed S1 doesn't speak English very well but is able to assist when needed. Various resident interviews indicate if one staff doesn't understand they call on another staff that does. OCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230208125524
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is denying residents visitation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evilin Rios and Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to obtain additional information pertaining to the above allegation. LPAs met with the administrator, Ayedeh Allahdadi, and advised her of the visit. Today's investigation consisted of record review, which was conducted at apprximately 1:30pm to 2:00pm. Based on the information obtained, the investigation to remain Unsubstantiated at this time. The administrator was advised and a copy of this report given. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 20, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230322162006
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to follow-up with the facility about the above allegation. LPAs met with the administrator, Ayedah Allahdadi and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff did not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. In regards to the allegation, it was reported that staff did not respond to resident when they pushed their call button. Interviews with staff Narineh Ohanian on 2/13/2023 indicated that resident #1 (R1) would continuously push her call button and requested to know the time it was in the middle of the night. According to Narineh because staff knew it was R1 requesting to know the time at night they removed her call button. Interview with R1 and R1's roommate resident #2 (R2) revealed R1 would become disoriented at night and consistently request to know the time becasue R1did not know if it was morning, staff would no longer respond to R1's request.CDSS inspection report, July 20, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230208125524
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is denying residents visitation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that since Resident 1 (R1) has moved into the facility, R1 wasn't allowed visitation by family and friends. LPA met with staff, Narineh Ohanian, and advised her of the complaint. The investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents in care. Interviews with four of four residents do not corroborate with the allegations of not being allowed visitors, stating they are allowed visitation. According to staff, residents have never been denied any visitation, so long as visitors come and visit during visitng hours. Regarding R1, staff stated it was their family's decision to limit visitation at this time, as R1 was recently diagnosed with a condition that causes them to become aggressive when they do have guests. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230322162006
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide resident medications as prescribed. Staff did not provide resident with resident's medical records as requested. Staff did not accord resident privacy. Staff withheld resident' personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit at the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with the administrator, Ayedah Allahdadi and staff, Narineh Ohanian, and advised them of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff that were held between 8:40am to 11:00am. At approximately 11:00am to 12:00pm, a physical plant inspection was made. Between 12:00pm and 1:00 pm, LPAs conducted a record revew. Staff does not provide resident medications as prescribed: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) was not given their medication consistently. Interview made with R1 could not confirm the allegation. R1 could not identify what medication and what time of the day, their medications were supposed to be taken. Interviews with the administrator and staff indicate that R1 received their medication as prescribed. LPAs also interviewed two of two residents. Both resiCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230307095829

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident’s are locked inside of facility. Facility outdoor passageway is not kept free of obstruction.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility in response to the above mentioned allegations. The LPA was greeted by facility staff and all Covid checks were preformed before allowing the LPA entrance. The administrator was notified of the LPA's visit and arrived a short while later. Allegation 1. Resident’s are locked inside of facility. The LPA was able to interview staff and residents regarding this allegation. Facility staff denied ever locking or restricting the residents movements while inside the facility. There were two residents residing at the home during the visit. The first resident (R1) was interviewed at the kitchen table and could not recall if the doors had been locked. R1 appeared to be forgetful and at times confused. The second resident (R2) was interviewed in R2's room. R2 stated that R2 had never tried to leave the facility unassisted and required a walker to move around. Continues on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 13, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221207151234
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident did not receive a copy of their Admissions Agreement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility in response to the above mentioned allegation. The LPA was greeted by facility staff and the administrator was called and arrived a short while later. Allegation 1. Resident did not receive a copy of their Admissions Agreement. The LPA was able to interview staff and residents regarding this allegation. The facility staff and the facility administrator both confirmed that an admission agreement had been completed. Both the staff and the administrator also confirmed that one resident had requested a copy of the report, but due to a slow printer a copy was not provided to the resident. One out of the 4 residents interviewed also confirmed that an admission agreement was requested but was not provided. Based on interviews conducted with residents and admission from staff and the administrator, this allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited and report issued. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 25, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221020145038

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 517-0544
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brightstar Senior Care,inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.