Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Wyngate Villa GardensLicense #197610099 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareWyngate Villa GardensLicense #197610099 · 7634 Wyngate Street, Tujunga, CA · (818) 352-4270Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Tujunga/Wyngate Villa Gardens
Map · 7634 Wyngate Street

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,450/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 352-4270

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

WV

Call Wyngate Villa Gardens

Tujunga · Licensed for 68

(818) 352-4270

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 68 · Tujunga

Wyngate Villa Gardens

7634 Wyngate Street, Tujunga, CA 91042 · Licensed since 2021

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Wyngate Villa Gardens

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,450 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 68: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 22 residents
  • Hospiceup to 10 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 10 residents

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (46) AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR (22) NON-AMNULATORY, OF WHICH (10) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL BEDROOMS IN BUILDING 2 ARE CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. ALL OTHER BEDROOMS IN OTHER BUILDINGS ARE FOR AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (10).

935 - ELDERLY · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Wyngate Villa Gardens: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,450a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,650

From 20 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,450–$5,650

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,800
$4,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$9,000
$6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes20 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,600 to $6,100

$1,600$6,100

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

20 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$5,450.

  • Savant of Burbank WestBurbank · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sparr Heights Estates Senior LivingMontrose · 4.9 mi · Large community
    $4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Belmont Village BurbankBurbank · 5.1 mi · Large community
    $6,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at BurbankBurbank · 7.1 mi · Large community
    $5,395Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Nikkei Senior GardensArleta · 7.1 mi · Large community
    $5,900Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Terra Assisted LivingGlendale · 7.2 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Fine Gold ManorNorth Hollywood · 7.3 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Evergreen RetirementBurbank · 7.7 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Valley VillageValley Village · 8.2 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Atria GlendaleGlendale · 8.2 mi · Large community
    $4,595Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Mother Gertrude HomeSan Fernando · 8.7 mi · Large community
    $2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Assisted LivingSylmar · 8.8 mi · Large community
    $1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ararat GardensGlendale · 9.0 mi · Large community
    $4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Mariposa StGlendale · 9.1 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Boynton StGlendale · 9.2 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Leisure Vale Assisted LivingGlendale · 9.2 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Courtyard PlazaVan Nuys · 9.4 mi · Large community
    $2,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Valley Vista Senior LivingVan Nuys · 9.4 mi · Large community
    $3,395Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at Studio CityStudio City · 9.7 mi · Large community
    $4,895Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
  • The Gardens at Park BalboaVan Nuys · 9.9 mi · Large community
    $3,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

7634 Wyngate Street, Tujunga, CA 91042Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197610099 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 13 of 27 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 8 “Unsubstantiated”.

20265 state visits · 5 documents

Aug 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced case management visit to this facility to follow up on the Fire Safety Order received by CCL on 08/12/26. LPA met with Licensee Representative Nieva Ruiz and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 10:06 AM and requested copies of facility documents relevant to the purpose of the visit. LPA also interviewed the Licensee Representative and Fire Inspector. LPA observed that the physical plant part of the Fire Safety Order were cleared by the facility. LPA's interview with the Licensee Representative revealed that they have already applied for the renewal for the Permit at the LAFD. Fire Inspection as required was done on 08/13/26. There is no health and safety issues observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026
Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone. Resident did not have an access to the SSI check. Resident wrongfully was placed on hospice

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with the Business Office Manager (BOM), Nieva Ruiz and explained the reason for the visit. The administrator, Alma Epinal, was advised over the phone. The initial visit to this complaint was made on 01/29/26. During today’s visit LPA conducted a tour of the facility between 10:30am and 11:30am, interviewed administrator and two (2) staff between 11:30am to 12:30pm and interviewed ten 10) residents between 12:30pm and 1:30pm. LPA also reviewed and requested copies of the following documents (between 1:30pm to 2:30pm): Resident 1’s (R1) Information Sheet, R1’s Admission Agreement, R1’s Identification and Emergency Contact Information, Consent Forms, Appraisals, and Physician’s Report. Regarding allegation: Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone, it was reported that facility staff isolated R1 and prevented R1 from reaching out to their POA/friend, often turning off Unsubstantiated R1's cell phone. R1 no longer resides at the facility. The reporting party is unable to confirm if this allegation occurred at this facility, or the most recent facility where R1 is now. Interview with administrator and staff deny the allegation stating R1 had their own personal cell phone, and would call their friend or family, or have their friend or family visit them at least twice per week. LPA was able to obtain R1's contact information and made contact with R1, who stated this allegation is towards current location where R1 is at. R1 had no issues while residing at Wyngate, but opted to move into a community more related to R1's ethnicity. R1 confirmed they were able to use their personal cell phone to communicate with their friend or POA. In addition to interviewing R1, LPA interviewed ten residents, of which the majority had no complaints or issues with making contact with their friends and family. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that Resident was not allowed to communicate with POA/friend by phone. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation: Resident did not have an access to their SSI check, it was reported that From October 2023 through January 2025, R1 was at two different Board & Care facilities and R1 never saw their Social Security checks. Interviews with administrator and staff deny the allegation, stating R1 managed their own finances during their stay at this facility. R1's Security Check was mailed to them during their stay here, and R1 made their monthly payments on time. Rent was $1420 a month. Interview with R1 confirm that they manage their own finances and their Social Security check was received during their stay at facility. LPA also interviewed ten residents, of which the majority had no issues with receiving their mail or Social Security checks. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 did not have an access to their SSI check. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation: Resident wrongfully was placed on hospice, it was reported that R1 was placed fraudulently under hospice care. Interviews with administrator and staff deny R1 being on hospice or being placed on hospice while at facility. Interview with R1 also confirm that they are not receiving hospice care. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1 was wrongfully placed on hospice. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260122141516
Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have hot water Facility is in disrepair Staff does not provide adequate care to prevent resident falls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met staff Jaqueline Montoya who called the Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. Mr. Chavez is indisposed at this time. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM, reviewed documents between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that the Facility does not have hot water, LPA's observation during visit on 01/13 26, hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 107.2°F, building #2 at 114.6°F, building #3 at 118.1°F, building #4 at 112.5°F and building #5 at 111.3°F. During today's visit, hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 106.7°F, building #2 at 113.0°F, building #3 at 116.2°F, building #4 at 118.8°F and building #5 at 108.2°F. All were within the required range. LPA's interview with five (5) residents today or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that they always have hot water in their building. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Facility is in disrepair, it was alleged that overhead roof falling and electricity attached to it in an illegal and/or hazardous way, LPA's observation on prior and today's visit revealed that the facility's bathroom and kitchen are generally clean and in good repair, no machine or equipment was observed to be broken or in disrepair. Further, the roof and ceiling on each building were observed to be intact and in good repair, LPA did not observe any exposed electrical wire anywhere in the facility. LPA's interview with the maintenance manager on 01/13/26 at 12:45 PM revealed that the only exposed wire was telephone wire which was no longer in use which was covered immediately. Regarding the allegation that Staff does not provide adequate care to prevent resident falls, LPA records review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that there was no resident who fell at the facility in 2025 up to May of 2026. LPA's interview with five (5) residents today or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that the facility has enough staff to care for them. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegation are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260106085440
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents have grooming supplies. Staff are mismanaging residents' mail.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Co-Administrator Alma Espinal and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:43 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:18 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 AM and 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure residents have grooming supplies, it was alleged that toiletries were not provided for residents both men and women. LPA's observation during visit revealed that the facility has sufficient stock of toiletries from shampoo, razors and shaving cream, bath soap, toothpaste, etc. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census between 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents both male and female get their toiletries supplies regularly and were not refused when they ask the staff for toiletries. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation Staff are mismanaging residents' mail. It was alleged that social security cards and state identification cards were missing when checks were expected via mail route. LPA's interview with the Administrator and staff between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM, revealed that they distribute on the same day regularly during dinner time at the dining area and for non-ambulatory residents, the medication technician brings the mail during medication pass. Further interview with the Administrator also revealed that there was no missing mail reported to the office for the last two (2) years. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM, revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents stated that they get their mail regularly and did not have any mail missing. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 31-AS-20250905101430
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Ricardo Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The co Administrator Alma Espinal arrived twenty (20) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:25 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation Plan and Infection Plan on file.. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one (1) at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 06/20/25. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 129.2°F, building #2 at 134.4°F, building #3 at 118.8°F, building #4 at 145.0°F and building #5 at 108.3°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Medications were reviewed and inventoried, medication count did not tally with the record. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 11/10/25. A fire alarm inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 09/23/24 with validity until 03/31/27. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Five (5) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026

20253 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has mold/fungus. Staff do not ensure that facility is free of pests.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:10 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:48 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that the facility has mold/fungus, it was alleged that the bathrooms have mold, fungus, bugs, and dirty towels. LPA's observation during physical plant tour today revealed that all the bathrooms and toilets in buildings 1,2,3,4 & 5 were clean and did not observe anything that may look like fungus and mold in any of the bathrooms. Further, LPA did not see any towels in any of the bathroom. LPA's interview with the administrator revealed that all the toilets are being cleaned every day and re-stocked with toilet paper. LPA's interview with two (2) housekeepers today confirmed that they clean all the toilets on all buildings every day. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure that facility is free of pests, it was alleged that the bathrooms have bugs. LPA's observation during physical plant tour today revealed that all the bathrooms and toilets in buildings 1,2,3,4 & 5 were free of bugs and pests. LPA's record review today also revealed that the facility has a contracted pest control company that visits monthly to ensure that there is no infestation at the facility. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or 10% of the current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents did not see any bugs or pests in their bathroom at any time. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250905101430

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a safe environment for resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:08 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:32 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not provide a safe environment for resident in care, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was choked by Resident #2 (R2) after R1 refused to be intimate with R2. LPA's interview with R1 on 05/20/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed that the incident happened at the parking area at around 7:30 AM while they were waiting for transportation going to the Day Program. Further interview also revealed that R1 had a relationship with R2 and tried to break up with R2 during that incident. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with R2 today at 11:33 AM, however, revealed that R1 asked R2 to massage R1 at the back so R2 did but denied choking R1 in any way because it was only massaging R1's nape and not R1's throat. LPA's interview with the Administrator today at 10:30 AM and Assistant Administrator on 05/20/25 revealed that when R1 reported to them the incident R1 stated that the incident happened in R1's room and when they interview R2, R2 denied choking R1. LPA's interview with both R1 & R2 confirmed that there was no one else present in the parking area when the incident occurred. LPA's record review on 05/20/25 also revealed that there was no camera installed at the parking area so there was no record of the alleged choking incident. LPA's interview with two (2) residents that are both living in the same building as R1 and rooms were adjacent to R1 revealed that they did not witness R2 being rough to R1 and coming to R1's room during early morning hours. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250514160241
Mar 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded

On 03/17/2025 at 10:00 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lorena Casillas conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegation. LPA was greeted by staff who allowed entry and called Administrator Oscar Chavez, to meet with LPA. Administrator arrived shortly after, and LPA explained the reason for the visit. An entrance interview was conducted. From 10:30 am to 2:00 pm LPA toured the facility with Administrator, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed facility files. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. LPA requested copies of resident roster, LIC 500, Liability Insurance and Administrator Certificate. LPA requested copies of pertinent information relevant to the investigation including but not limited to admission agreements, resident property inventory sheet, resident medical records, and any information pertaining to residents in care. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded. It is alleged that staff do not ensure that resident's belongings are safeguarded. Regarding this allegation it is reported that Resident #1 (R1)’s room was broken into and R1’s tablet was broken. Interview with Administrator revealed that R1 did report to staff that the tablet was broken on 03/14/25 however Administrator stated that R1 has a tendency of damaging property and accusing others of stealing but when staff investigate, belongings are left forgotten in common areas by R1 and property that is damaged is caused by R1. Interview with two (2) out of two (2) staff assigned to R1’s building revealed that R1 did not directly report anything to them however staff did express that they are aware of R1’s tablet incident. Staff stated R1 has a tendency of making false allegations due to R1’s mental state, furthermore staff revealed that R1 has the ability to lock the room and does so every day, therefore no other residents would have access to R1’s room. Interview with ten (10) out of (10) residents revealed that they have never had issues with their property being stolen or damaged and that staff make sure that their belongings are safeguarded by being vigilant about residents staying out of other residents’ rooms. LPA reviewed resident records and found a property inventory sheet for R1 that did not reflect a tablet. LPA also reviewed the facility admission agreement that reflects that residents agree that they will self-report and update their own property inventory sheet and that they are responsible for their own belongings. LPA did not find a tablet on R1’s inventory sheet but Administrator did confirm that R1 has a broken tablet. Furthermore, Administrator states that they looked over video footage for 03/14/25 when incident was reported to staff and there was no observation of anyone other than R1 entering and/or leaving R1’s room. Footage is only recorded for seven (7) days and as of today’s date anything outside of seven (7) days is not available. LPA interviewed R1 and R1 states that they do not know how the tablet was broken as they did not witness anyone breaking it, R1 just suspects that it was broken by someone else but cannot state who or when. Therefore, based on observations, file reviews and interviews this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Report signed by designee Ricardo Rodriguez as Administrator had to leave before LPA was able to deliver report. No citation issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250312131151
Mar 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 03/17/25 LPA Casillas arrived at facility above to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigation for complaint # 31-AS-20250312131151. This Case Management is not related to the original complaint visit. During the facility tour LPA observed that cleaning supply cart was left unattended for an extended period of time. This allowed residents to have access to cleaning supplies. LPA asked staff why it was left unattended and staff replied that the cleaning staff was performing another duty. LPA asked staff to please call cleaning staff to return to cart and put away the supplies until they are able to supervise them appropriately. LPA waited for cleaning staff member to return and take charge of cart. LPA explained to Administrator the importance of ensuring that harmful products are not left unattended if outside the locked storage area. LPA explained to Administrator that a citation would be issued for this deficiency. LPA also advised Administrator that there needs to be a training of all staff on the importance of keeping harmful items locked for resident safety. Administrator will email LPA a copy of the training that was provided along with a log of all staff that was in attendance by end of POC date. Report signed by designee Ricardo Rodriguez as Administrator had to leave before LPA was able to deliver report. Citation Issued. Appeal rights discussed and provided. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 24, 2025

87309(a)Storage Space and Access ...the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions…and other similar items ....are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This was not met as evidenced by: Based observation, staff do not ensure that cleaning supplies were inaccessible to residents in care, this poses a potential health and safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Supply cart with cleaning supplies was put away in LPA’s presence. Administrator will email LPA a copy of the training that was provided along with a log of all staff that was in attendance by end of POC date.

20244 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Vanessa Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Assistant Administrator Alma Espinal arrived thirty (30) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:35 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. There are required posters posted at each main door and all over the facility. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet and hand sanitizer is available. All the staff were observed to be wearing mask. The facility had an approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has multiple screening stations all through out the facility. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one (1) at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 04/04/24. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 118.9°F, building #2 at 126.5°F, building #3 at 113.9°F, building #4 at 130.5°F and building #5 at 119.5°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 10/18/24. A fire alarm inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 09/23/24 with validity until 03/31/27. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Six (6) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is charging residents to take a shower Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Staff did not administer medications to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff is charging residents to take a shower, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) charges residents to give showers. LPA's interview with six (6) residents who needs shower assistance on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and additional three (3) residents who also needs shower assistance on 01/11/24 between 10:34 AM to 1:00 revealed that nine (9) out of nine (9) residents interviewed denied paying S1 or any of the staff for their showers. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with S1 on 08/24/23 at 11:34 AM revealed that S1 never asked any residents for payment when assisting them with their showers nor witnessed or have knowledge of any staff charges any resident to give them showers. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:00 PM also revealed that he did not receive any report of S1 or any staff of charging any resident for showers. Regarding the allegation that Staff left residents in a soiled diaper for a long period of time, it was alleged that residents (no particular resident was identified on the complaint) are left with soiled diapers for four (4) to five (5) hours. LPA's interview with three (3) incontinent residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM, one (1) incontinent resident on 01/11/24 between 10:34 AM to 1:00 and three (3) additional incontinent residents today between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM revealed that all seven (7) incontinent residents interviewed stated that staff always change their diapers on time three (3) to four (4) times a day and staff always come within reasonable time or within (15) minutes or less when they push their call button. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not administer medications to residents, it was alleged that S1 did not give residents their medication. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:00 PM revealed S1 or any caregiver do not administer medication to any resident, only the medication technician. LPA's interview with S1 today at 12:30 PM revealed that S1 never once administer or provided any medication to any resident at any time. LPA's interview with six (6) residents today between 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM. revealed that six (6) out of six (6) residents interviewed confirmed that S1 did not administer or gave them any medication at any time. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230818155055
Jan 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year visit at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Vanessa Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator Oscar Chavez arrived fifteen (15) minutes later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:25 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. There are required posters posted at each main door and all over the facility. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet and hand sanitizer is available. All the staff were observed to be wearing mask. The facility had an approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has multiple screening stations all through out the facility. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 04/07/23. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 106.6°F, building #2 at 112.6°F, building #3 at 119.2°F, building #4 at 116.9°F and building #5 at 115.8°F. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 01/19/24. A fire inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 07/27/22 with validity until 03/31/24. There is no body of water in the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed, LPA reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Six (6) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2024
Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are allowed to smoke inside the facility Staff shower resident with only cold water

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:44 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Residents are allowed to smoke inside the facility, it was alleged that some residents smoke inside the facility especially residents in room #9. LPA physical plant tour on prior visit on 08/24/23 at 9:18 AM and today at 9:44 AM revealed that no traces of cigarette smell was observed inside the facility especially surrounding Room #9. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and four (4) residents today between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that ten (10) out of ten (10) residents interviewed did not smoke or witnessed anyone smoking inside the facility. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff shower resident with only cold water, it was alleged that a resident is showered with cold water all the time. LPA's interview with six (6) residents on 08/24/23 between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM and four (4) residents today between 10:34 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that eight (8) out of ten (10) residents interviewed were assisted by the staff to shower and eight (8) out of eight (8) residents interviewed were showered with warm water. The two (2) residents who did not need assistance showering also revealed that they always shower with warm water. Ten (10) out of ten (10) residents interviewed confirmed that the facility always has hot water. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230818111812
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 14 documents

20236 state visits · 6 documents

Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:38 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents and witness between 10:10 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was punched by Resident #2 (R2) in the shoulder. LPA's record review today at 10:15 AM revealed that both R1 and R2 are independent and attending Adult Health Day Center (ADHC) in Canoga Park. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 10:10 AM revealed that it was reported to him by R1 that the incident happened at the ADHC when R1 and R2 were doing activity in the ADHC and when R1 tried to assist R2 in the game, R2 allegedly hit R1. LPA's interview with the staff of ADHC today at 12:35 PM revealed that the staff did not witness any physical or verbal altercation between R1 and R2 at any time while in the day program. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further interview with the ADHC staff also revealed that no staff and/or client witnessed the alleged incident either per the staff's investigation. LPA's interview with another resident which is a common friend of both R1 & R2 confirmed the story of the administrator that the incident did not happen at the facility and also revealed that R1 & R2 had an ongoing relationship. Further interview with the administrator also revealed that there was no reported incident wherein R2 had any physical or verbal altercation with R1 at any time while in the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231002164728
Sep 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Resident developed a pressure injury while in care 2. Resident's pressure injury developed maggots while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Tuesday Cabiness and Christopher Alemoh conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the final findings of the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator, Oscar Chavez and informed him the reason of the visit. The following was determined: Allegation # 1: It was alleged that resident developed a pressure injury while in care. On 09/14/2021, 09/15/2021, 05/09/2022, 03/09/2023, 04/03/2023, 06/23/2023, and 08/23/2023, from various times, ranging from 8am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed medical records pertaining to resident # 1 (R1). Based on the information obtained, prior to being admitted to the facility, R1 had a series of medical issues, and was admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) from 04/15/2021 through 04/28/2021, for wounds on the left and right leg, lateral ankle, and right heel. R1 was then admitted to the facility on 04/28/2021 with a history of lower extremities edema, diabetic issues, and previous wound care treatment. R1 was subsequently hospitalized several times, for various other medical health issues after being admitted to the facility. Substantiated Although, home health continued to treat the wounds for R1, medical records dated 09/28/2021 and 09/29/2021, report R1 was again admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with numerous stage III and unstageable wounds. Treatment was provided by the hospital, and R1 was discharged back to the facility. Allegation #2: It was alleged that resident’s pressure injury developed maggots while in care. According to the medical report reviewed by LPA, dated 07/09/2023, R1 was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with pressure injuries of the foot. Home Health was ordered, and treatment started 07/16/2021 for the right heel, and right lateral foot, 3x a week. Medical records dated 09/09/2021 through 09/10/2021, report hospital discovered maggots in R1’s heel. R1 was treated and discharged back to the facility. Records show while in the care at the facility, R1’s skin condition and wounds were getting worse and not healing. Facility continued to allow R1 to reside at the facility, when R1 developed a prohibited health condition. From 10/09/2021 through 10/15/2021, R1 was admitted to the hospital and eventually transferred to a SNF for further treatment of wound care for ulcers of right foot, as well as other health related issues. Therefore, based on medical review and records, LPA determined both allegations are SUBSTANTIATED. This poses as a immediate health and safety risk for residents in care. The following deficiencies were cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 – see attached 9099D; and immediate $500 civil penalty will be issued. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023 · control 31-AS-20210914112329

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 21, 2023

Prohibited Health Conditions - (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including...shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on record review & interviews, R1 developed and sustained, unstageable wounds, as well as stage 3 & 4 pressure injuries. Medical records also reported R1 developed maggots in the wound. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. An immediate penalty of $500 will be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator Oscar, must email LPA by POC date (09/21/2023), informing LPA how much time is needed to submit a written plan, describing how the facility shall prevent pressure injuries/wounds to residents in care; and understand what prohibited health conditions mean. An immediate penalty of $500 shall be assessed as a result of the severe wounds developed on R1.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 21, 2023

Basic Services. (d) A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs…., either directly or through outside resources. This requirement is not met as evidenced by.Licensee did not ensure to continue to the appropriate care for R1, who was home health to treat wounds. R1 wounds developed into unstageable, stage 3 and 4 wounds, which resulted in R1 developing maggots in wounds. This is pose as an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023

Plan of correction: By the POC due date (09/21/2023), the Administrator Oscar must email LPA regarding how much time is needed to submit a written plan, describing how the facility shall prevent injuries/wounds to residents as a results of deficiencies incurred by the facility. This POC will be included in the written plan for deficiency 87615(a)(1). It is not a separate plan.

Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff withhold resident's EBT card Facility is not kept clean

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:18 AM with the administrator, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:43 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM. Regarding the allegation that the Staff withhold resident's card, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) took away residents' EBT card and left them with no money. LPA's interview with six (6) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:45 PM, revealed that all six (6) of them were never asked by any staff nor withhold any bank card or EBT from them. LPA's interview with S1 today at 11:34 AM revealed that S1 never asked any residents of their bank or EBT Card. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:00 PM also revealed that he did not receive any report of S1 withholding or taking any EBT or bank card of any resident. Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that the Facility is not kept clean, it was alleged that the facility has dirt and trash on the floors and underneath the resident's bed. Facility bathrooms also have trash on the floor, not cleaned well and have smell of feces and urine. LPA's observation during today's physical plant tour at 9:18 AM revealed that all the buildings (Building 1 to 5) visited were generally clean and free of odor including their bathrooms. LPA's interview today with six (6) residents or more than 10% of the current census revealed that all six (6) of them stated that their rooms and bathrooms are being cleaned by the housekeeper and caregiver everyday and that they are almost always clean. Based on the information gathered during this visit. These allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230818111812

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced Required One (1) year at this facility today. LPA initially met with staff Vanessa Rodriguez who called the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator stated that former administrator Alma Espinal will come. Licensee Christine Juarez and company arrived 30 minutes later and Alma Espinal arrived an hour later. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:40 AM and the following was noted: The facility consists of five (5) buildings, each house has one main entrance. There are required posters posted at each main door and all over the facility. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Sign in sheet and hand sanitizer is available. All the staff were observed to be wearing mask. The facility had an approved Mitigation Plan. Signs to wear a mask and other COVID-19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the door. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in the bathroom and all over the facility. The facility has multiple screening stations all through out the facility. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the storage room. The facility has five (5) buildings with a total of (34) shared bedrooms. Each building has their own bathrooms ranging from one at building #3 up to five (5) on building #2. The facility is fire cleared for forty six (46) ambulatory and twenty two (22) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which maybe bedridden in building #2 only. Approved hospice for ten (10) residents. Common areas were inspected. All buildings has its own living room. Activity room is located on building #4 and dining area is located on building #2. Dining area was observed to be neat, clean and in proper order. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. There are carbon monoxide detector installed in the facility. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and last inspected on 04/07/23. The facility is equipped with emergency pull alarm and sprinkler system. (continued from LIC 809) Laundry room is located adjacent to the kitchen and was observed to be locked. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room inaccessible to the residents. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food. Knives and sharp objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passage ways are lit. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed that there are appropriate grab bars in the showers and toilets. The hot water temperature at building # 1 measured at 144.1°F, building #3 at 128.4°F and building #4 at 129.5°F. The facility handyman immediately adjusted the water heater and last measure was at a range of 118.5°F to 119.2°F for the above mentioned buildings. There were enough clean linen available in the closets. Medications were kept in a locked medication carts in the medication room. The medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There are multiple complete first aid kits located in the medication room. Facility emergency disaster plan was reviewed. Facility disaster drill was last conducted on 03/03/23. A fire inspection by the LAFD was last performed on 07/27/22 with validity until 03/31/24, In addition to the physical plant inspection, residents and staff records were reviewed. There is no body of water at the facility. Back and front yard passageways were observed to be clear from obstruction. There is a shaded area on each building for the residents. LPAs reviewed files of five (5) randomly selected residents. Residents files appear to be complete and updated. Six (6) staff files were also reviewed, staff files appear to be complete and updated. Citation issued. Appeal rights explained and given. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2023
Apr 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Wrongful death. 2. Facility financially abused resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with assistant Administrator Oscar Chavez, and informed him the reason of the visit. The following final findings of the allegations above were determined: Allegation # 1: Wrongful death; On 10/08/2021, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding an allegation of a wrongful death. It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) was being overly medicated by facility staff, and that R1 was not able to make sound and stable decisions. R1 was transferred to the hospital, where R1 passed away. On 10/11/2021 an initial (10-day) visit was conducted, and a physical plant tour; facility and resident records were obtained and reviewed. On the same day, LPA attempted to contact the complainant, and R1’s son; neither calls were successful and R1’s son’s phone was disconnected. On March 10, 2023 and March 16, 2023, LPA was able to connect and interview the complainant, and R1’s son from various times, from 8am to 12pm. LPA reviewed R1’s medical history and records, and after review of medication records, Unsubstantiated it didn't indicate that R1 passed away due to facility's neglect or mismanagement of medication. There were no discrepancies in R1’s medication records, or that the facility was over medicating R1. The death report was sent to LPA on 01/23/2023 by the Administrator. Upon review of the death certificate, and R1’s medical history, R1 cause of death was due to severe medical issues, without any other contributing diagnosis. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation, therefore, it is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: Facility financially abused resident: It was alleged that facility staff financially abused Resident #1 (R1). On 10/08/2021, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding an allegation of facility financially abused resident. On 10/11/2021 an initial (10-day) visit was conducted, and a physical plant tour; facility and resident records were obtained and reviewed. On the same day, LPA attempted to contact the complainant, and R1’s son; neither calls were successful and R1’s son’s phone was disconnected. On March 10, 2023 and March 16, 2023, LPA was able to connect and interview the complainant, and R1’s son from various times, from 8am to 12pm. LPA reviewed R1’s safeguard cash resources records, and based on the information, R1 was receiving monthly allowances for personal expenses, and documentation of R1’s signature was observed. Facility staff also provided written receipts for purchases; and facility bank statements; reflecting the deposits and credits for R1. It was also reported to LPA that R1’s son and friend, often had R1’s bank card, and would withdraw money with and without the presence of R1. Therefore, based on interviews and record review, LPA does not have sufficient evidence to prove the facility financially abused resident, and the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2023 · control 31-AS-20211008095722
Mar 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time

This is to amend the report that was delivered on 11/21/2022. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Ricardo Rodriguez, who was designated by the Administrator to accept this report, and explained the reason for the visit. ---Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time It was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) was the only staff on duty and did not change Resident #1 (R1) timely due to the Administrator’s instructions for S1 to stay away from R1. To investigate the allegation on 11/14/2022 at 9:30 AM, LPA made observations during a physical plant tour, at 10:00 AM, LPA requested documents, from 10:15 AM – 10:45 AM, LPA interviewed other parties, from 10:50 AM – 11:50 AM, LPA randomly selected and interviewed at least 10% of the residents present at the facility, and from 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM, LPA interviewed staff. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated During observation, LPA did not experience any malodor and residents were clean and well groomed. A review of the facility’s records shows that there are two staff assisting residents during the morning, afternoon and overnight shifts. During interviews with other parties, they stated that S1 declined to assist with incontinent care and that S1 was instructed by the Administrator not to assist R1. R1 admitted to throwing liquids that hit S1, but that it was inadvertent, and did not refuse assistance from Staff #4 (S4). During interviews with other residents, they stated that staff change them often, or as needed, and staff have never refused services. During interviews with S1, they stated that R1 threw something at them, did not feel safe with R1 and was instructed by the Administrator not to deal with R1. S1 also stated that S4 was on duty that day and R1 refused services from S4. All remaining staff stated that the residents are changed frequently, they are checked on at least every two hours, that residents are not left without a change in diapers for an extended period of time and do not refuse incontinent services. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazards observed during the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221104160936

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 8, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegation. It was reported that on around October 2021, Resident 1 (R1) was removed from the facility. Their belongings were packed in plastic bags by the administrator, and no written 30 day notice to vacate the facility was issued to R1. During the course of the investigation, LPA met with the administrator, Oscar Chavez, and advised him of the complaint. Between 9:45am to 12:00pm, LPA conducted interviews and record review. At approximately 12:00pm to 1:00pm, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents in care, and that passageways were clear of any obstruction. According to the administrator, R1 voluntarily left in October 2021. R1 was having trouble making their monthly payment, but was falling behind in rent. Administrator stated they were tryng to assist R1 with making rent by providing them options in payment that can be suitable for their financial situation, but it Unsubstantiated was still too expensive for R1 to stay. R1 was able to find a room at an Independent living, that was more affordable for their financial situation. The administrator adds that R1 is independent and required minimal assistance during their stay at this facility. Administrator also stated when R1 left, they were all caught up with their rent and had no balance due. Interview with R1 reveal that they left Wyngate Villa Gardens on their own. Their decision was made because R1 could not afford to live there anymore. Monthly rent was to high for R1. According to R1, after paying their rent, they would barely have money left over for themselves. R1 confirms that they moved into an Independent Living, on their own, where rent is more suitable for their finances. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation of illegal eviction. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210929113700
Aug 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident wandered away from facility Facility did not report AWOL incident Staff will not allow resident to return to facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with administrator Oscar Chavez and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour from 10:45-11am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present and none were noted. Resident wandered away from the facility It is alleged that resident #1 (R1) wandered away from the facility due to staff not watching R1. LPA conducted interviews with the administrator from 11-11:30am and the hospital from which R1 was discharged from to the facility. Information from interviews reveal that R1 was discharged from Mission Community Hospital on 8/1/22 to this facility. Upon arriving to the facility R1 decided they did not want to stay at the facility and left the facility. R1 was not in the facility for twenty minutes before they left the facility. Facility staff attempted to get R1 to stay but R1 refused. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility staff could not prevent R1 from leaving the facility. Unsubstantiated Facility did not report AWOL incident It is alleged that the facility did not report the AWOL incident to licensing or the law enforcement. LPA interviewed the administrator in addition to checking to see if an incident report was received regarding R1 leaving the facility from 11:30-12pm. LPA found that an incident report was sent in to Community Care Licensing regarding R1 leaving the facility and that law enforcement was also contacted regarding R1 leaving the facility on 8/3/22. Based on the information obtained through interview and record review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff will not allow resident to return to facility It is alleged that the facility refuses to accept R1 back from the hospital. LPA conducted an interview with the administrator and hospital staff regarding this allegation. Information from interviews reveal that Verdugo Hills Hospital wants to discharge R1 to the facility but that R1 still does not want to come back to the facility. Administrator stated they would accept R1 back to the facility if they wanted to come back but they can't force R1 to come back if they don't want to be at the facility. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220803141056
Apr 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to deliver final findings for the above allegation. LPA met with staff Juan Rivas who called the administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The administrator designated Juan Rivas to sign the report. On 05/11/21, LPA Smith conducted the initial visit. During the initial visit, LPA conducted physical plant tour at 12:00 PM and requested facility documents relevant to the investigation. On 07/15/21, LPA Pitz conducted subsequent visit and interviewed staff between 1:15 to 4:15 PM. It was alleged by the Complainant that Resident #1 (R1) felt that R1 was abused at the facility while asleep. LPA Pitz’s interview with the administrator on 05/11/2021 at around 4:00 PM indicated that R1 had a history of false allegation about assault and abuse and was referred to Adult Protective Services and law enforcement via SOC 341. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) Police came to the facility to investigate with negative results. LPA's record review on 04/03/22 at around 3:30 PM documented that R1 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (Paranoid type) and a history or false allegations including unknown person(s) putting poison on R1’s food or person(s) trying to attack or harm R1. Further review also revealed that R1 was unreasonably delusional and refused to take psychotropic medication. LPA attempted to locate R1 since R1 did not come back to the facility upon release from hospitalization on 05/07/21, to no avail. Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation, there is insufficient information to support the allegation and therefore unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2022 · control 31-AS-20210511090535
Jan 31, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA met with facility staff and explained the reason for this visit. Facility is fire cleared for forty-six non ambulatory residents, twelve non-ambulatory, and ten bedridden residents. All non-ambulatory residents are to be building 2. Building 2 is fully sprinklers related to smoke detector. All other buildings are ambulatory. LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility has five different buildings which residents reside in. LPA toured each building and observed all buildings to be appropriately furnished. LPA checked random resident bedrooms and observed them to be furnished. LPA checked the common areas restrooms and bathrooms. LPA observed them to have grab bars and non skid material. Throughout the common areas of the facility LPA observed there to be posters reminding residents to keep six feet distance and follow covid-guidance with washing their hands. LPA observed stations with hand sanitizers throughout the buildings. LPA checked the facility kitchen for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non perishable food. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be working properly. LPA observed the medication room to be locked and inaccessible from clients. No deficiencies cited during this visit. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2022

20214 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 31, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed. Staff did not assist in arranging for medical care appropriate to the conditions and needs of resident.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. Upon entry, LPA was offered sanitizer, screened for COVID 19, and signed in. LPA met with the Assistant Administrator, Oscar Chavez. ----Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed. It was alleged that staff have not obtained prescriptions since resident #1 (R1) has been at the facility. To investigate these allegations, on 11/16/21 at 2:00pm, LPA spoke with staff and residents. In addition, at 3:00pm LPA requested and reviewed R1’s facility files and other relevant documents. The documents show that the facility did in fact assist with obtaining medication and that R1 attempted to pick up medication that was not yet due for a refill. Based on the information revealed from interviews and records, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated ----Staff did not assist in arranging for medical care appropriate to the conditions and needs of resident. It was alleged that staff have not scheduled any doctor’s appointments for R1 to be seen. To investigate these allegations, on 11/16/21 at 2:00pm, LPA spoke with staff and residents. In addition, at 3:00pm LPA requested and reviewed R1’s facility files and other relevant documents. Facility reported that R1 had a doctor’s appointment scheduled for 10/19/2021 at 10:00am, documents show that transportation arrangements were made, but R1 refused to provide the doctor’s address and phone number. The pain management doctor that R1 was attempting to see was not the Primary Care Physician and unknown to the facility. An incident report that was filed prior to the complaint is consistent with what was reported during the investigation. Based on information from interviews and records, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazards were noted during the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211109082703
Dec 20, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed Staff failed to safeguard resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for this visit. LPA took a tour of the physical plant area to ensure no immediate health and safety issues from 10:10am-10:20am. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. Staff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed It is alleged that facility did not administer resident # 1 (R1) medication as R1 was supposed to get it. LPA conducted an interview with R1 from 10:45am-11:15 am regarding the complaint allegations. LPA interviewed the administrator regarding this allegation from 10:20-10:40am. LPA also reviewed R1's facility file and obtained copies of pertinent information from 11:15am-11:45am. Information revealed that R1 refused to take their insulin medication but that facility did offer R1 their insulin medication. Administrator stated they contacted R1's physician and let him know about it. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiated Staff failed to safeguard resident's personal belongings It is alleged that R1's belongings were stolen from them at the facility. LPA conducted interviews with R1 and the administrator regarding this allegation. LPA also reviewed incident reports that was submitted to licensing regarding this allegation. Interviews revealed that R1 did lose some of their personal belongings but that it did not happen at the facility but while R1 was out in the community. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211216134633
Oct 7, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Facility is dirty 2. Facility phone does not work 3. Residents smoking in non-designated smoking areas of facility 4. Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit for the allegations mentioned above. LPA arrived at the facility and met with medication technician Oscar Chavez, who was informed the reason of the visit. Oscar, contacted Administrator Alma Espinal, who LPA spoke with and also informed the reason of the visit. Licensee Kristine Juarez arrived to the facility at 1045am, and LPA informed her the reason of the visit. Administrator Alma Espinal arrived at 1pm. From 10am to 2pm, LPA reviewed facility and client records, conducted interviews, and completed a physical plant inspection. The following was determined: Allegation # 1: Facility is dirty. Concerns were expressed that the bathroom sink and toilet was filthy, and had spider webs. During the physical plant inspection, LPA observed the common areas to be clean, such as resident rooms, bathroom, and kitchen area. LPA also Unsubstantiated observed housekeepers cleaning various areas at the facility. Although it was reported that the facility was dirty, based on today's observations, LPA did not find evidence the facility was dirty, and the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation # 2: Facility phone does not work. During today's inspection, at 10:30am, LPA contacted the facility phone number, and staff answered the phone. LPA was informed, that on 09/28/2021, the facility's mother board for telephone service, stopped functioning, and the facility was not receiving incoming calls. The telephone company was contacted for repair, and it was fixed. LPA was also informed that the facility has (2) other phone lines; (1) telephone line for residents, and another business line, that is for Administration. Although, the phone was not working for a specific day, the facility had other operating telephone service for emergencies. The Licensee informed LPA, that she will include the other (2) operating lines on there website, and provide it to others, such to family and business contacts. Therefore, based on the information obtained during today's visit, and the facility phone was not working, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation # 3: Residents are smoking in non-designated smoking areas. During today's physical inspection and observations, LPA observed several areas where residents were smoking: front, side, and in the back of the facility. According to interviews conducted, Administration has designated several areas for residents to smoke. Although Administration prefer residents to smoke in the back of the facility, LPA was informed, that residents are allowed to smoke anywhere outside of the facility; but not allowed to smoke in there rooms, or inside common areas in the facility. Administration has chosen to allow residents to secure there own cigarettes and smoke at there own free will; but outside. Therefore, the allegation, residents are smoking in non-designated smoking areas, is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation # 4: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. During today's interviews, it was reported staff was not checking resident's oxygen levels. Through information, obtained, LPA was informed that there were no medical concerns, and the allegation mentioned was written in error, and the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview and copy of report providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211001123510
Jul 15, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident not being provided medication as prescribe.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pitz conducted an unannounced visit on this day in response to the above allegation. As part of this investigation LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1) on 2/25/21 and resident 1 (R1) on 7/15/21 at 1:45pm. LPA also reviewed the medication assistance record (MAR) for R1 on 7/15/21 at 2:45pm. Allegation #1, that "Resident not being provided medication as prescribe" has been unsubstantiated based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed. At 1:45pm on 7/15/21 R1 denied having any difficulty with getting their medication prescriptions filled or receiving any other necessary assistance. A review of R1's MAR at 2:45 pm did not reveal any discrepancies. Report reviewed signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210226123234

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

52 of 68 beds were occupied at the July 17, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

All Health Operations, Inc., licensed since 2021.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
25
Total complaints
16
Substantiated allegations
2
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations01
Substantiated allegations22
Total complaints166

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Wyngate Villa Gardens

Is Wyngate Villa Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Wyngate Villa Gardens licensed for?

68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Wyngate Villa Gardens been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 25 state visits over the same years.

Is Wyngate Villa Gardens still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Wyngate Villa Gardens cost?

$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 133 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,306 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 133 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Wyngate Villa Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by All Health Operations, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Can Wyngate Villa Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Wyngate Villa Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WYNGATE VILLA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610099. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to All Health Operations, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 25 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 25 state visits in that period.
  • 16 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 10, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sunland · 0.4 mi

    Solvita Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sunland · 1.1 mi

    Happy Days Assisted Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 0.5 mi

    Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

    Large community · licensed for 60

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 1.1 mi

    Golden Age Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sunland · 1.2 mi

    Solvita Residential Care 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sunland · 1.3 mi

    Sunland Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
WV

Call Wyngate Villa Gardens

Tujunga · Licensed for 68

(818) 352-4270

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Wyngate Villa Gardens

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages