Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Tujunga, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197609631, licensed for 60 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 60 residents · Tujunga, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197609631, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10159 Hillhaven Ave · Tujunga, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 352-1559
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 60 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOPSICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 13, 2026
Occupancy at the September 27, 2025 visit
44 of 60 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 21 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 8, 2021 to September 27, 2025. 21 of the 21 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (21). 21 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 21 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 23 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 12:30 PM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:50 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:50 PM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff hit resident, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) were "whacking" and "smashing" Resident #1 (R1)'s hands repeatedly. LPA's interview with S1 on 09/25/25 revealed that S1 did not touch R1 unless doing S1's regular duty such as changing R1's diapers and/or dressing R1. S1 denied smashing or whacking R1's hand at any time S1 was working with R1. LPA's interview with S2 today revealed that S2 also denied hurting R1's arm in any way. LPA's interview with R1 today revealed that it was the nurse at the hospital who sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250923134116
Sep 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident soaked in urine Staff does not ensure resident has wheelchair access to the bathroom

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant Administrator arrived 30 minutes later. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:30 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 9:30 AM to 12:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff left resident soaked in urine, it was alleged that R1 was soaked in urine during Reporting Party’s (RP)’s visit. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:02 AM, revealed that there was no time that R1 was left soaked or soiled for a long time and staff are regularly changing R1 at all times. LPA's interview with four (4) incontinent residents today revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that staff change them regularly and check on them regularly all thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250611093220
Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met Staff does not provide resident toiletries.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Assistant Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegations that Staff does not provide resident toiletries, it was alleged that there are no paper towels or towels in Resident #1 (R1)'s bathroom to dry hands after washing. LPA's observation on 06/03/25 and today during physical plant tour revealed that of the nine (9) rooms visited including that or R1's, all nine (9) rooms have towels and toiletries in their room. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348
Aug 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:59 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 11:10 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) was going to take Resident #1 (R1)’s “(marijuana) pipe” even if she has to drag R1 out of R1’s room. LPA’s record review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that R1 made similar allegations on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and then again on 11/04/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20241104113106 and both were unsubstantiated (please see report on the same date.) LPA’s interview with R1 today atthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250731111405
Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is overcharging resident Staff is not addressing facility plumbing issues Staff does not ensure resident's restroom is kept sanitary

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:15 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff is overcharging resident, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was told that there is a $300 fine if R1 soils bedding and the facility has to provide new. LPA's record review today at 1:00 PM revealed that R1 is a client of Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LA DMH) and does not have a Share of Cost (SOC) or simply, R1 is not paying the facility out of pocket. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:18 AM, revealed that it was a misrepresentation of R1's statement, R1 denied saying there was a fine at the facility. LPAthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348
Apr 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being sexually abused

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. On 09/26/24, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted as an assignment by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Olivia Spindola to interview Resident #1 (R1). On 09/27/2024 at 9:16 AM, LPA initiated the complaint visit. LPA interviewed the assistant administrator, staff and residents and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued to LIC 9099) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240926144530
Jan 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted a initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Itzel Guevara and advised them about the visit. At 10:45 AM LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the clients in care. An entrance interview was conducted. Allegation #1: Staff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed. It was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was not given medication (PRN) when needed as prescirbed by physician. LPA did a record review on 1.2.2025 between 11:15 AM to 12:30 PM revealed that R1 has been getting their medication on-time as precribed by the physician. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 2, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241227105933
202410 state visits · 11 documents
Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being verbally abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:55 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) is experiencing verbal abuse and name calling to where R1 lives. LPA's record review between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM today revealed that R1 made the same allegation on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and was unsubstantiated. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:37 AM revealed that R1 did not personally see or heard any of the staff verbally abusing or calling R1 names but only overheard it through the wall of R1's room. Further interview with R1 also revealed thathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241104113106
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident's credit card Staff did not safeguard resident's funds.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:05 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. LPA also conducted record review between 12:15 PM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff stole resident's credit card, it was alleged that staff is taking Resident #1 (R1)'s credit cards. LPA's interview with R1 on 01/25/24 at around 12:30 PM revealed that no staff took R1's credit card and R1 kept all of R1's bank cards and denied any usage from any staff. LPA's observation also revealed that R1 had own one on one caregiver from Lanterman Regional Center five (5) days a week during daytime. LPA's interview with the R1's caregiver confirmed ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103
Jul 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's needs were met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:54 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:15 AM and interviewed staff, residents, and witness between 11:30 AM to 1:10 PM. It was alleged that Staff doesn't come when needed and R1's wheelchair is broken and not being replaced. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 is a client of Frank D Lanterman Regional Center (FDLRC) since 2012. Further review also revealed that R1 is being provided a 1:1 care staff by the Regional Center for five (5) hours every day five (5) days a week. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:30 AM revealed that R1 was aware that it was the responsibility of and following up with FLDRC for the replacement ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240712160413
Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was physically abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:22 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:53 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:35 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident#1 (R1) was slapped by a caregiver's husband and threw coffee at R1. No other information was provided for this allegation. LPA made a reasonable attempt to contact the reporting party to get more details of the allegation but to no avail. LPA's record review revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 07/20/23 and went to the hospital due to a medical condition on 11/27/23 and discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) on 12/01/23. LPA's interview with the assistant administrator today at 12:06 PM reveathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240628155539
May 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened resident Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:18 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:24 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM, It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was threatened by a staff to throw R1 in the stairs in R1's wheelchair. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:12 AM revealed that it wasn't a staff who threatened R1 but another resident of the facility. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) who allegedly threatened R1 revealed that R2 did not know R1 and did not threaten anyone. Further interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was not threatened directly by R2 but only overheard it and did not remember when and where R1 overheard it. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240516145438
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Staff took resident's personal items received by mail 2. Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the final finding of the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Cisneros and Administrator Itzel Guevara and informed the reason of the visit. Allegation # 1: It was alleged staff took resident’s personal items received by mail. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 12pm to 2pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. Through interviews, it was reported that residents receive their packages and mail, and never have had any issues. Residents also stated that they were not 100% sure staff opened or took their mail. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: It was alleged staff do not ensure that resident’s dietary needs are met. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staffthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230131105058
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fracture while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to to deliver the final finding of the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Ciscernos and Administrator Itzel Guevarra and informed the reason of the visit. It was alleged resident sustained fracture while in care. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit, and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 930am to 12pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. From all the information obtained, it was revealed, resident # 1 (R1) complained to the in-house physician about pain in the shoulder. R1 did not inform staff that R1 was in any pain or injured. R1 was sent to the hospital by the orders of the doctor. It was later reported to the Administrator that R1 needed a higher level of care and would not be returning to the facility and would be admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). It was also revealed to LPA, that staff visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230130162534
Mar 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff spat in a residents drink.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted a physical tour at 9:09 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:33 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 AM. Regarding the allegation that Staff spat in a resident’s drink, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) watched the staff members spit in R1's drink. LPAs' interview with Resident #1 (R1) today at 10:00 AM revealed that R1 did not witness any staff mentioned on the report spitting on R1's drink and R1 just "tasted" the saliva on the drink. LPAs' record review today revealed that all the staff mentioned are kitchen staff and four (4) out of four (4) staff has current State Food Handling certificate on file. LPAs' interview with the four (4) kitchen staff also revealthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240320145828
Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is free of pest.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA was greeted by the facility manager Adriana Cisneros. LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 9:45 AM LPA met with facility administrator Itzel Guevara. Entrance interview conducted. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested facility documents relevant to the investigation which include but not limited to maintenance records and contracts for the pest control company. LPA reviewed records between 9:52 AM and 11:18 AM. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 13 residents between 11:20 AM and 1:08 PM. Conitnue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240207092211
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following resident's dietary plan

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 11:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:02 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:20 PM to 1:45 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff are not following resident's dietary plan, it was alleged that staff are ignoring Resident #1 (R1)'s dietary restriction is being ignored by the staff. LPAs' record review at 12:15 PM revealed R1 had no dietary restriction on record for the last four (4) years. LPAs' interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was aware that R1 had no dietary order from a physician. Based on the information gathered during this visit. The allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints20typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020259100202410110202322020222302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 352-1559

Is Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc licensed?

Yes — Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Tujunga (Los Angeles County): California license #197609631, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 60 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOPSICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

How much does Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

44 of 60 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on September 27, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2022 for Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc; 21 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 27, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

21 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 12:30 PM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:50 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:50 PM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff hit resident, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) were "whacking" and "smashing" Resident #1 (R1)'s hands repeatedly. LPA's interview with S1 on 09/25/25 revealed that S1 did not touch R1 unless doing S1's regular duty such as changing R1's diapers and/or dressing R1. S1 denied smashing or whacking R1's hand at any time S1 was working with R1. LPA's interview with S2 today revealed that S2 also denied hurting R1's arm in any way. LPA's interview with R1 today revealed that it was the nurse at the hospital who sCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250923134116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident soaked in urine Staff does not ensure resident has wheelchair access to the bathroom
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant Administrator arrived 30 minutes later. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:30 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 9:30 AM to 12:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff left resident soaked in urine, it was alleged that R1 was soaked in urine during Reporting Party’s (RP)’s visit. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:02 AM, revealed that there was no time that R1 was left soaked or soiled for a long time and staff are regularly changing R1 at all times. LPA's interview with four (4) incontinent residents today revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that staff change them regularly and check on them regularly all theCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250611093220
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met Staff does not provide resident toiletries.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Assistant Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegations that Staff does not provide resident toiletries, it was alleged that there are no paper towels or towels in Resident #1 (R1)'s bathroom to dry hands after washing. LPA's observation on 06/03/25 and today during physical plant tour revealed that of the nine (9) rooms visited including that or R1's, all nine (9) rooms have towels and toiletries in their room. (continued to LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 20, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:59 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 11:10 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) was going to take Resident #1 (R1)’s “(marijuana) pipe” even if she has to drag R1 out of R1’s room. LPA’s record review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that R1 made similar allegations on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and then again on 11/04/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20241104113106 and both were unsubstantiated (please see report on the same date.) LPA’s interview with R1 today atCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250731111405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is overcharging resident Staff is not addressing facility plumbing issues Staff does not ensure resident's restroom is kept sanitary
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:15 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff is overcharging resident, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was told that there is a $300 fine if R1 soils bedding and the facility has to provide new. LPA's record review today at 1:00 PM revealed that R1 is a client of Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LA DMH) and does not have a Share of Cost (SOC) or simply, R1 is not paying the facility out of pocket. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:18 AM, revealed that it was a misrepresentation of R1's statement, R1 denied saying there was a fine at the facility. LPACDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from being sexually abused
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. On 09/26/24, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted as an assignment by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Olivia Spindola to interview Resident #1 (R1). On 09/27/2024 at 9:16 AM, LPA initiated the complaint visit. LPA interviewed the assistant administrator, staff and residents and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued to LIC 9099) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 6, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240926144530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted a initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Itzel Guevara and advised them about the visit. At 10:45 AM LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the clients in care. An entrance interview was conducted. Allegation #1: Staff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed. It was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was not given medication (PRN) when needed as prescirbed by physician. LPA did a record review on 1.2.2025 between 11:15 AM to 12:30 PM revealed that R1 has been getting their medication on-time as precribed by the physician. Continue to LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 2, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241227105933

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being verbally abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:55 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) is experiencing verbal abuse and name calling to where R1 lives. LPA's record review between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM today revealed that R1 made the same allegation on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and was unsubstantiated. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:37 AM revealed that R1 did not personally see or heard any of the staff verbally abusing or calling R1 names but only overheard it through the wall of R1's room. Further interview with R1 also revealed thaCDSS inspection report, November 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241104113106
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff stole resident's credit card Staff did not safeguard resident's funds.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:05 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. LPA also conducted record review between 12:15 PM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff stole resident's credit card, it was alleged that staff is taking Resident #1 (R1)'s credit cards. LPA's interview with R1 on 01/25/24 at around 12:30 PM revealed that no staff took R1's credit card and R1 kept all of R1's bank cards and denied any usage from any staff. LPA's observation also revealed that R1 had own one on one caregiver from Lanterman Regional Center five (5) days a week during daytime. LPA's interview with the R1's caregiver confirmed thCDSS inspection report, August 7, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's needs were met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:54 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:15 AM and interviewed staff, residents, and witness between 11:30 AM to 1:10 PM. It was alleged that Staff doesn't come when needed and R1's wheelchair is broken and not being replaced. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 is a client of Frank D Lanterman Regional Center (FDLRC) since 2012. Further review also revealed that R1 is being provided a 1:1 care staff by the Regional Center for five (5) hours every day five (5) days a week. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:30 AM revealed that R1 was aware that it was the responsibility of and following up with FLDRC for the replacement ofCDSS inspection report, July 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240712160413
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was physically abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:22 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:53 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:35 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident#1 (R1) was slapped by a caregiver's husband and threw coffee at R1. No other information was provided for this allegation. LPA made a reasonable attempt to contact the reporting party to get more details of the allegation but to no avail. LPA's record review revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 07/20/23 and went to the hospital due to a medical condition on 11/27/23 and discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) on 12/01/23. LPA's interview with the assistant administrator today at 12:06 PM reveaCDSS inspection report, July 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240628155539
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff threatened resident Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:18 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:24 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM, It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was threatened by a staff to throw R1 in the stairs in R1's wheelchair. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:12 AM revealed that it wasn't a staff who threatened R1 but another resident of the facility. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) who allegedly threatened R1 revealed that R2 did not know R1 and did not threaten anyone. Further interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was not threatened directly by R2 but only overheard it and did not remember when and where R1 overheard it. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240516145438
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Staff took resident's personal items received by mail 2. Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the final finding of the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Cisneros and Administrator Itzel Guevara and informed the reason of the visit. Allegation # 1: It was alleged staff took resident’s personal items received by mail. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 12pm to 2pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. Through interviews, it was reported that residents receive their packages and mail, and never have had any issues. Residents also stated that they were not 100% sure staff opened or took their mail. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: It was alleged staff do not ensure that resident’s dietary needs are met. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staffCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230131105058
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fracture while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to to deliver the final finding of the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Ciscernos and Administrator Itzel Guevarra and informed the reason of the visit. It was alleged resident sustained fracture while in care. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit, and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 930am to 12pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. From all the information obtained, it was revealed, resident # 1 (R1) complained to the in-house physician about pain in the shoulder. R1 did not inform staff that R1 was in any pain or injured. R1 was sent to the hospital by the orders of the doctor. It was later reported to the Administrator that R1 needed a higher level of care and would not be returning to the facility and would be admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). It was also revealed to LPA, that staff visitCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230130162534
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff spat in a residents drink.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted a physical tour at 9:09 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:33 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 AM. Regarding the allegation that Staff spat in a resident’s drink, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) watched the staff members spit in R1's drink. LPAs' interview with Resident #1 (R1) today at 10:00 AM revealed that R1 did not witness any staff mentioned on the report spitting on R1's drink and R1 just "tasted" the saliva on the drink. LPAs' record review today revealed that all the staff mentioned are kitchen staff and four (4) out of four (4) staff has current State Food Handling certificate on file. LPAs' interview with the four (4) kitchen staff also revealCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240320145828
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility is free of pest.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA was greeted by the facility manager Adriana Cisneros. LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 9:45 AM LPA met with facility administrator Itzel Guevara. Entrance interview conducted. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested facility documents relevant to the investigation which include but not limited to maintenance records and contracts for the pest control company. LPA reviewed records between 9:52 AM and 11:18 AM. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 13 residents between 11:20 AM and 1:08 PM. Conitnue to LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240207092211
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following resident's dietary plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 11:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:02 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:20 PM to 1:45 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff are not following resident's dietary plan, it was alleged that staff are ignoring Resident #1 (R1)'s dietary restriction is being ignored by the staff. LPAs' record review at 12:15 PM revealed R1 had no dietary restriction on record for the last four (4) years. LPAs' interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was aware that R1 had no dietary order from a physician. Based on the information gathered during this visit. The allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issueCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide refund in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah, administrator Itzel Guevara arrived ten (10) minutes later. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:38 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM and interviewed staff between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA also conducted records review between 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM. It was alleged that the facility withdrew payment for February and March 2023 for Resident #1 (R1) and not getting a refund for these months as R1 left on 01/14/23 to the hospital and never came back. LPA's record review between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM revealed that R1 was self responsible and paid the facility by own personal check. LPA's interview with the administrator and staff today between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM revealed that the facility has no access whatsoever to RCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230329080514

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
20
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 352-1559
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Golden Hills Retirement Ctr Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.