Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Golden Hills Retirement CtrLicense #197609631 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGolden Hills Retirement CtrLicense #197609631 · 10159 Hillhaven Ave, Tujunga, CA · (818) 352-1559Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Tujunga/Golden Hills Retirement Ctr
Map · 10159 Hillhaven Ave

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,500/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,700 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 352-1559

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GH

Call Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

Tujunga · Licensed for 60

(818) 352-1559

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 60 · Tujunga

Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

10159 Hillhaven Ave, Tujunga, CA 91042 · Licensed since 2018

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,500 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,700 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 60: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 60 residents
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 10 residents

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOPSICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Golden Hills Retirement Ctr: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,700

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,500likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,850
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$9,050
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes19 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,600 to $6,100

$1,600$6,100

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

19 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$5,450.

  • Sparr Heights Estates Senior LivingMontrose · 4.4 mi · Large community
    $4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Savant of Burbank WestBurbank · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Belmont Village BurbankBurbank · 4.9 mi · Large community
    $6,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Terra Assisted LivingGlendale · 6.9 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at BurbankBurbank · 7.0 mi · Large community
    $5,395Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Fine Gold ManorNorth Hollywood · 7.3 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Nikkei Senior GardensArleta · 7.6 mi · Large community
    $5,900Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Evergreen RetirementBurbank · 7.7 mi · Large community
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Atria GlendaleGlendale · 7.9 mi · Large community
    $4,595Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Glen Park at Valley VillageValley Village · 8.4 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ararat GardensGlendale · 8.6 mi · Large community
    $4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Mariposa StGlendale · 8.7 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at Glendale - Boynton StGlendale · 8.8 mi · Large community
    $5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Leisure Vale Assisted LivingGlendale · 8.9 mi · Large community
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mother Gertrude HomeSan Fernando · 9.2 mi · Large community
    $2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Assisted LivingSylmar · 9.4 mi · Large community
    $1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Courtyard PlazaVan Nuys · 9.7 mi · Large community
    $2,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Valley Vista Senior LivingVan Nuys · 9.8 mi · Large community
    $3,395Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at Studio CityStudio City · 9.9 mi · Large community
    $4,895Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

10159 Hillhaven Ave, Tujunga, CA 91042Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609631 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 24 of 31 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 20 “Unsubstantiated”.

20263 state visits · 3 documents

Aug 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros for a One (1) Year Required visit for this facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This facility is fire cleared for sixty (60) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which may be bedridden. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:12 AM and the following was noted: There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, the front main entrance door. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation and Infection plan. The facility have designated visitors' area at the front yard. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the office upstairs. The facility is a two (2) storey building with shared and private bedrooms and bathrooms. Second floor is used only as an office/storage for staff use only. All indoor and outdoor passageways/exits were free of obstruction. There is no body of water in the facility. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard wired and tested regularly every month. Fire inspection was last done on 06/30/26 and valid until 03/31/28. The facility is also equipped with sprinkler system which was last tested on June 2026 and valid for five (5) years. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 10/13/25. Fire Drill was last conducted on 07/03/26. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and properly stored at the facility. Knives, cleaning agents, and other potentially hazardous items were locked and inaccessible. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 9099) Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with one chair, night stand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: LPA observed all bathrooms to be clean, properly supplied and equipped with functional fixtures. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Residents have sufficient amounts of supplies for personal hygiene. There are four (4) common shower rooms in the facility, all observed to be clean and in good repair. Hot water was measured in random bathroom at the range of 108.6°F to 119.2°F and observed to be within the required range. Common Areas: These includes the living room, dining room and outdoor areas. Facility common areas appeared to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of this visit, no accessible hazards were observed. Medications were observed to be stored in designated Medication room. The Medication room was observed to be locked at the time of visit. There is a complete set of first aid kit in the Medication room. Resident/Staff File Review: LPA reviewed records of five (5) random residents and five (5) staff. Residents and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Laundry room located in the underground level of the facility and observed to be locked during visit. There is no immediate health and safety hazard during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2026
May 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident soiled for an extended period of time Staff did not respond to residents call for help Staff did not ensure documents are not accessible to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:20 AM, requested copies of facility documents at 9:49 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:15 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff left resident soiled for an extended period of time, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was found covered in own urine when the Agency Staff arrived on shift. LPA's record review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that on 04/28/26 the facility staff changed R1's diaper to 1:20 AM, 3:00 AM, 5:40 AM, 7:00 AM and 9:05 AM., or immediately after the arrival of Agency Staff at 9:00 AM. LPA's interview with four (4) other incontinent residents today between 11:00 AM to 2:30 PM revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that they are being changed regularly by staff all the time including nights. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that Staff did not respond to residents call for help, it was alleged that R1 called for help and needed assistance to change but help did not arrive. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:29 AM revealed that whenever R1 needed help staff always come. LPA's interview with Staff #1 (S1) today at 12:45 PM revealed that S1 regularly checked on R1 during shift and did not get any call from R1 at any time during S1's shift. LPA's interview with four (4) other incontinent residents today between 11:00 AM to 2:30 PM revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that staff always come to help whenever they call at any time. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not ensure documents are not accessible to residents, it was alleged that the facility did not present any logs of the rounds they do every two hours during the night, rather they said a resident goes into the office and takes their documents to draw on. LPA's observation during today's visit revealed that the Incontinent log was always kept in the office to be accessible to all caregivers to sign on every after routine checks to all residents but this particular resident (R2) always picks up any paper near or by the office and write/draw on them. LPA's interview with staff and Administrator revealed that the Incontinent log was located at the table in the office and R2 reached out from the window to open the office and took the Incontinent log and drew on them. The log did not have any information aside from the name of the resident and the time and staff initials when they did the routine check on the resident. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260507112329
Jan 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

LPA conducted an unannounced case management visit at this facility to conduct health and safety check and operational well being of the facility. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 11:23 AM, LPA observed that the facility has enough supplies of food both perishable and non-perishable. LPA also observed that they have sufficient stock cleaning supplies and toiletries in their storage. The facility is fully staffed during visit. LPA also conducted interview with staff and administrator. Staff interview revealed that they did not experience any financial distress at this facility pay and operation wise. There is no health and safety issue during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2026

20259 state visits · 10 documents

Dec 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speaks inappropriately to resident Staff do not ensure resident has privacy in their bedroom

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM, reviewed records from 10:15 AM to 11:15 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:15 AM and 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff speaks inappropriately to resident, it was alleged that staff told Resident #1 (R1) "a drunk and every bad thing a person can call a person". LPA’s record review today between 10:15 AM to 11:15 AM revealed that R1 made similar allegations on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and then again on 11/04/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20241104113106 and again on 07/31/ 25 under complaint control number 31-AS-20250731111405. All were unsubstantiated (please see reports on the same date). (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA’s interview with R1 today at 11:19 AM revealed that R1 did not directly hear any staff talking to or about R1 but heard it over the speaker on the wall and the Television on R1's room. LPA did not observe any speaker on the wall nor a hidden camera nor a bug in R1's room. LPA's interview with the Assistant Administrator today at 1:12 PM revealed that this is an ongoing thing with R1 that whenever R1 goes to the hospital or anywhere else outside of the facility such as mental health clinics or the like. Regarding the allegation that Staff do not ensure resident has privacy in their bedroom, it was alleged that staff put a “bug by the end table and can tell what R1 was reading and they have a microphone and cameras in R1's room. LPA's observation today revealed that there was no speaker on the wall, no microphone or any camera's installed in R1's room. LPA's interview with the Administrator today confirmed that the facility doesn’t install any microphone, "a bug" and/or camera in R1's room. LPA's record review today also revealed that R1 had a mental health condition that causes paranoia. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251204081145
Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff administering unprescribed medication to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:30 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:58 AM, reviewed records between 10:05 AM to 11:15 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 11:15 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff administering unprescribed medication to resident, it was alleged that staff are crushing up a medication called Taminal and put it into Resident #1 (R1)'s food. LPA's interview with R1 today at 12:18 PM, revealed that the staff did not give R1 unprescribed medication, R1 was given a medication that is called Klonopin (Clonazepam) that is blue in color but now the staff are giving R1 a green colored pill which they say is the same medication. LPA's record review today at 10:05 AM, revealed that Klonopin is a Pro Re Nata (PRN) medication or only given as needed for R1 and the pill color is green. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's observation during inspection of R1's medication confirmed that all Klonopin (1 mg) pills are green in color compared to other residents' medication of the same name. LPA's interview with staff today between 11:15 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that the same medication used to be color blue but the pharmacy is sending them the green ones, both two (2) medication staff interviewed denied crushing any pill for R1 as they have no doctor's order for it. LPA's record review confirmed that there was no order for R1 to be given a crushed pill. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 31-AS-20251020105302
Sep 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 12:30 PM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:50 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:50 PM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff hit resident, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) were "whacking" and "smashing" Resident #1 (R1)'s hands repeatedly. LPA's interview with S1 on 09/25/25 revealed that S1 did not touch R1 unless doing S1's regular duty such as changing R1's diapers and/or dressing R1. S1 denied smashing or whacking R1's hand at any time S1 was working with R1. LPA's interview with S2 today revealed that S2 also denied hurting R1's arm in any way. LPA's interview with R1 today revealed that it was the nurse at the hospital who smashed R1's hand over and over again and denied any staff at the facility hurting R1. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250923134116
Sep 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident soaked in urine Staff does not ensure resident has wheelchair access to the bathroom

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint to further investigate the above allegations. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Assistant Administrator arrived 30 minutes later. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 8:30 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:02 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 9:30 AM to 12:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff left resident soaked in urine, it was alleged that R1 was soaked in urine during Reporting Party’s (RP)’s visit. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:02 AM, revealed that there was no time that R1 was left soaked or soiled for a long time and staff are regularly changing R1 at all times. LPA's interview with four (4) incontinent residents today revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that staff change them regularly and check on them regularly all the time. (continuef on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with two (2) staff today confirmed that they changed incontinent residents regularly four (4) to five (5) times a day during their shift and check on them every one and a half (1 1/2) hours to two (2) hours. Regarding the allegation that Staff does not ensure resident has wheelchair access to the bathroom, it was alleged that R1 is unable to get into the available bathrooms. LPA's observation during physical plant tour revealed that the bathroom nearest R1's room is wheelchair accessible and about fifteen (15) feet away. Further, LPA observed that R1 was able to wheel self around the facility going to the dining room, TV room and office which is farther than R1's room. LPA's interview with the staff revealed that R1 would rather have the staff change R1's diapers rather than going to the bathroom. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250611093220
Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra for a One (1) Year Required visit for this facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This facility is fire cleared for sixty (60) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which may be bedridden. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:14 AM and the following was noted: There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, the front main entrance door. There are required poster posted at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. There is also a sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks available. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation and Infection plan. The facility have designated visitors' area at the front yard. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the office upstairs. The facility is a two (2) storey building with shared and private bedrooms and bathrooms. Second floor is used only as an office/storage for staff use only. All indoor and outdoor passageways/exits were free of obstruction. There is no body of water in the facility. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard wired and tested regularly every month. Fire inspection was last done on 08/04/23 and valid until 05/31/26. The facility is also equipped with sprinkler system which was last tested on April 2023 and valid for five (5) years. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 10/09/24. Fire Drill was last conducted on 07/10/25. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 9099) Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and properly stored at the facility. Knives, cleaning agents, and other potentially hazardous items were locked and inaccessible. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with one chair, night stand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: LPA observed all bathrooms to be clean, properly supplied and equipped with functional fixtures. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Residents have sufficient amounts of supplies for personal hygiene. There are four (4) common shower rooms in the facility, all observed to be clean and in good repair. Hot water was measured in random bathroom at the range of 117.3°F to 118.6°F and observed to be within the required range. Common Areas: These includes the living room, dining room and outdoor areas. Facility common areas appeared to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of this visit, no accessible hazards were observed. Medications were observed to be stored in designated Medication room. The Medication room was observed to be locked at the time of visit. There is a complete set of first aid kit in the Medication room. Resident/Staff File Review: LPA reviewed records of five (5) random residents and five (5) staff. Residents and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Laundry room located in the underground level of the facility and observed to be locked during visit. There is no immediate health and safety hazard during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025
Aug 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met Staff does not provide resident toiletries.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the Assistant Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegations that Staff does not provide resident toiletries, it was alleged that there are no paper towels or towels in Resident #1 (R1)'s bathroom to dry hands after washing. LPA's observation on 06/03/25 and today during physical plant tour revealed that of the nine (9) rooms visited including that or R1's, all nine (9) rooms have towels and toiletries in their room. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with five (5) residents or more than 10% of current census revealed that five (5) out of five (5) residents interviewed were provided with towels and toiletries everyday by the staff and if they need more, they always ask the office and they are provided with toiletries including but not limited to soap, shampoo & deodorant. Regarding the allegation that Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met, it was alleged that R1 was supposed to be given the opportunity to go to the hospital lab to get stool samples so that R1 can be further tested with regards to R1's chronic medical condition. To date this still hasn't happened and it can't be left for R1 to figure out. LPA's interview with R1 on 06/23/25 at around 11:00 AM revealed that R1 was the one who supposed to make the appointment to the medical test but hasn't done so yet. LPA's interview with R1's Social worker from non-governmental agency that helps R1 for all medical appointments and transport revealed that they were the ones responsible to make an appointment and bring R1 to any medical or diagnostic appointments and not the facility. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348
Aug 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:28 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:59 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 11:10 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff made an inappropriate comment towards a resident in care, it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) was going to take Resident #1 (R1)’s “(marijuana) pipe” even if she has to drag R1 out of R1’s room. LPA’s record review today between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM revealed that R1 made similar allegations on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and then again on 11/04/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20241104113106 and both were unsubstantiated (please see report on the same date.) LPA’s interview with R1 today at 11:15 AM revealed that S1 did not directly tell R1 but heard S1 over the speaker on the wall of R1's room. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) LPA’s observation during physical plant tour revealed that there is no speaker on R1's room wall or any resident's room anywhere. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) or R1's roommate today at 11:59 AM today revealed that R2 did not experience nor witness S1 saying inappropriate comments at anyone. LPA’s interview with a total of four (4) residents or 10% of current census revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed did not experience or witness S1 saying inappropriate comments to anyone at the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250731111405
Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is overcharging resident Staff is not addressing facility plumbing issues Staff does not ensure resident's restroom is kept sanitary

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:02 AM and interviewed residents and staff between 10:15 AM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff is overcharging resident, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was told that there is a $300 fine if R1 soils bedding and the facility has to provide new. LPA's record review today at 1:00 PM revealed that R1 is a client of Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LA DMH) and does not have a Share of Cost (SOC) or simply, R1 is not paying the facility out of pocket. LPA's interview with R1 today at 10:18 AM, revealed that it was a misrepresentation of R1's statement, R1 denied saying there was a fine at the facility. LPA's interview with the Assistant Administrator (AA) today at 11:04 AM revealed that AA is not aware of any fine at the facility nor they impose any fine at any resident at any time. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff is not addressing facility plumbing issues, it was alleged that R1 was informed that the facility has very bad plumbing. LPA's observation during physical plant tour at around 9:31 AM, revealed that there was no issue on R1's room plumbing, LPA tested that toilet multiple times and the bathroom sink and shower too and did not observe anything wrong or there is any plumbing issue at R1's bathroom. LPA's interview with R1 today with revealed that there is no plumbing issue at R1's room and was only told by the staff of the probable issue with plumbing. LPA's interview with R2 or R1's roommate confirmed that there was no plumbing issue in their bathroom Regarding the allegation that Staff does not ensure resident's restroom is kept sanitary, it was alleged that R1 has been using Depends (Pull up Diaper), that R1 will wear the same item for weeks on end for fear that there is nowhere or no process to dispose of it. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 has no bladder and/or bowel impairment, ambulatory and has the capacity for self-care including but not limited to bathing, dressing, grooming and toileting. LPA's interview with R1 today revealed that R1 used Depends sparingly at R1's own volition only. R1 stated that R1 goes to the bathroom on R1's own and able to take care of own toileting needs and denied being incontinent. LPA's observation during physical plant tour revealed that there is a trash can with lid at R1's bathroom. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250529123348

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being sexually abused

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. On 09/26/24, a complaint was received by the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office. The complaint was referred to and accepted as an assignment by Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to IB investigator Olivia Spindola to interview Resident #1 (R1). On 09/27/2024 at 9:16 AM, LPA initiated the complaint visit. LPA interviewed the assistant administrator, staff and residents and obtained copies of the facility records relevant to the investigation. (continued to LIC 9099) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) During the course of the investigation, LPA Tan interviewed the assistant administrator, staff, and resident on 09/27/24 between 10:30 AM PM to 1:15 PM. Investigator Spindola interviewed R1 on 10/23/24 at approximately 12:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not prevent resident from being sexually abused, it was alleged that R1 was sexually abused by Resident #2 (R2). Investigator Spindola’s interview with R1 revealed that no other resident bothered R1. Further, R1 denied being raped or sexually abused by R2 at any time. LPA’s record review on 03/29/25 at 9:44 AM revealed that R1 has a history of false accusation against staff and resident prior to this complaint, please see report dated 09/15/22 (complaint control no.: 31-AS-20220321155906) and 03/28/24 (complaint control no.: 31-AS-20240320145828) LPA’s interview with Assistant administrator also confirmed that R1 had accused R2 before and other staff of abusing R1 physically and sexually but it never really happened as R1’s room is located just in front of the front office which is manned by a staff 24/7. Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240926144530
Jan 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted a initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Itzel Guevara and advised them about the visit. At 10:45 AM LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the clients in care. An entrance interview was conducted. Allegation #1: Staff failed to ensure medication were assisted with as prescribed. It was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was not given medication (PRN) when needed as prescirbed by physician. LPA did a record review on 1.2.2025 between 11:15 AM to 12:30 PM revealed that R1 has been getting their medication on-time as precribed by the physician. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated At 11:30 AM LPA interview with three (3) staff on 1.2.2025 confirmed that R1 called 911 on 11.29.2024 by themselves and was brought to the hospital for breathing issues. Upon discharged R1 was adamant about getting Clonazepam for a refill, that was just prescribed for only 14 days. Refill request was denied by prescribing physician and/ or primary care physician (PCP); which made R1 was very upset with the facility. LPA interview seven (7) out of thirty-five (35) residents who were at the facility and it was revealed that medication were given on-time to all the residents with the right dosage. A review of R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) supported the information received from staff. Therefore, residents interview revealed that staff do administer medications as prescribed and on time. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 2, 2025 · control 31-AS-20241227105933

202410 state visits · 11 documents

Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being verbally abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:55 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) is experiencing verbal abuse and name calling to where R1 lives. LPA's record review between 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM today revealed that R1 made the same allegation on 05/16/24 under complaint control number 31-AS-20240516145438 and was unsubstantiated. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:37 AM revealed that R1 did not personally see or heard any of the staff verbally abusing or calling R1 names but only overheard it through the wall of R1's room. Further interview with R1 also revealed that R1 narrated the same things that R1 told the LPA during the interview on the prior complaint stated above. (continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with three (3) staff today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that no one among the three (3) staff witnessed anyone calling R1 names or yelling or verbally abusing R1. Further, all the staff interviewed denied calling R1 names, yelled or verbally abused R1. LPA's interview with four (4) residents today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that all of them did not experience being called names, yelled at, or verbally abused by any staff nor witnessed any staff calling names, verbally abusing, or yelling at any resident. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241104113106
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and Office Manager Adriana Cisneros for a One (1) Year Required visit for this facility. LPAs explained the reason for the visit. This facility is fire cleared for sixty (60) non-ambulatory residents, ten (10) of which may be bedridden. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 11:15 AM and the following was noted: There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, the front main entrance door. There are required poster posted at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. There is also a sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks available. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation and Infection plan. There are hand sanitizing stations all over the facility. There are signs for Covid 19 prevention protocol were posted inside. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in common bathrooms and all over the common areas of the facility. The facility have designated visitors' area at the front yard. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the office upstairs. The facility is a two (2) storey building with shared and private bedrooms and bathrooms. Second floor is used only as an office/storage for staff use only. All indoor and outdoor passageways/exits were free of obstruction. There is no body of water in the facility. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard wired and tested regularly every month. Fire inspection was last done on 08/14/23 and valid until 05/31/26. The facility is also equipped with sprinkler system which was last tested on April 2023 and valid for five (5) years. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 10/12/23. Fire Drill was last conducted on 07/08/24. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 9099) Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPAs observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and properly stored at the facility. Knives, cleaning agents, and other potentially hazardous items were locked and inaccessible. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with one chair, night stand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: LPAs observed all bathrooms to be clean, properly supplied and equipped with functional fixtures. LPAs observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Residents have sufficient amounts of supplies for personal hygiene. There are four (4) common shower rooms in the facility, all observed to be clean and in good repair. Hot water was measured in random bathroom at the range of 114.4°F to 118.9°F and observed to be within the required range. Common Areas: These includes the living room, dining room and outdoor areas. Facility common areas appeared to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of this visit, no accessible hazards were observed. Medications were observed to be stored in designated Medication room. The Medication room was observed to be locked at the time of visit. There is a complete set of first aid kit in the Medication room. Resident/Staff File Review: LPAs reviewed records of four (4) random residents and five (5) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Laundry room located in the underground level of the facility and observed to be locked during visit. There is no immediate health and safety hazard during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024
Aug 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident's credit card Staff did not safeguard resident's funds.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to further investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:05 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. LPA also conducted record review between 12:15 PM to 1:00 PM. Regarding the allegation that staff stole resident's credit card, it was alleged that staff is taking Resident #1 (R1)'s credit cards. LPA's interview with R1 on 01/25/24 at around 12:30 PM revealed that no staff took R1's credit card and R1 kept all of R1's bank cards and denied any usage from any staff. LPA's observation also revealed that R1 had own one on one caregiver from Lanterman Regional Center five (5) days a week during daytime. LPA's interview with the R1's caregiver confirmed that R1 did not lose any bank card or not that the caregiver was aware of since started working with R1. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Regarding the allegation that Staff did not safeguard resident's funds, it was alleged that R1 had a $6000 check that was missing. LPA's interview with R1 on 01/25/24 at around 12:30 PM revealed the supposed missing check was from a settlement money from when R1 had a car accident about eight (8) or more years ago. Further interview also revealed that it supposed to have come from R1's lawyer that R1 could not remember. LPA's interview with the Administrator today at 11:10 AM revealed that R1 did not disclose anything financial to the facility since admission and the administrator was not aware of any accident happened to R1 while living at the facility nor the facility received any letter from any lawyer other than the regular lawyer of R1 who pays R1's rent. LPA's record review today between 12:15 PM to 1:00 PM revealed that R1 was able to manage own cash resources and LPA's interview with the administrator today at 11:10 AM confirmed that R1 had been managing own cash resource from the time R1 was initially admitted at this facility in 2013, so any mail or money goes directly to R1 and never passed on to or through the facility. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visits, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103
Jul 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's needs were met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Adriana Cisneros and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:23 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:54 AM, reviewed records from 10:00 AM to 11:15 AM and interviewed staff, residents, and witness between 11:30 AM to 1:10 PM. It was alleged that Staff doesn't come when needed and R1's wheelchair is broken and not being replaced. LPA's record review today revealed that R1 is a client of Frank D Lanterman Regional Center (FDLRC) since 2012. Further review also revealed that R1 is being provided a 1:1 care staff by the Regional Center for five (5) hours every day five (5) days a week. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:30 AM revealed that R1 was aware that it was the responsibility of and following up with FLDRC for the replacement of R1's wheelchair. LPA's interview with FDLRC's staff confirmed that R1's wheelchair is FLDRC's responsibility and has been working for the replacement since it was broken. Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with the Assistant Administrator today at 12:13 PM revealed that the facility has a spare wheelchair in stock and willing to give it to R1 if R1 agreed. R1 agreed to have the replacement today offered by the Assistant Administrator. Further interview with R1 also revealed that staff always come when needed as it has been for long time. LPA's interview with additional four (4) residents or more than 10% of the current census also revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated that staff always come when needed within reasonable time (5-15 minutes). Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240712160413
Jul 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was physically abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:22 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:53 AM, reviewed records between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:35 AM to 1:00 PM. It was alleged that Resident#1 (R1) was slapped by a caregiver's husband and threw coffee at R1. No other information was provided for this allegation. LPA made a reasonable attempt to contact the reporting party to get more details of the allegation but to no avail. LPA's record review revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 07/20/23 and went to the hospital due to a medical condition on 11/27/23 and discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) on 12/01/23. LPA's interview with the assistant administrator today at 12:06 PM revealed that R1's sister took R1's belongings at the facility on 12/08/23 and told the facility that R1 was not coming back. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) and former roommate of R1 while still at the facility revealed that R2 did not remember R1 but did not witness any roommate being slapped or physically/verbally abused or being thrown coffee by any staff or anyone in their room. LPA's interview with the administrator today at 12:54 PM also revealed that she did not receive any complaint from R1 of being physically or verbally abused by anyone while still living at the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240628155539
May 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened resident Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:18 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:24 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM, It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was threatened by a staff to throw R1 in the stairs in R1's wheelchair. LPA's interview with R1 today at 11:12 AM revealed that it wasn't a staff who threatened R1 but another resident of the facility. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) who allegedly threatened R1 revealed that R2 did not know R1 and did not threaten anyone. Further interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was not threatened directly by R2 but only overheard it and did not remember when and where R1 overheard it. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect, it was alleged that staff are calling R1 names. LPA's interview with five (5) residents or more than 10% of the current census today between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that five (5) of five (5) residents believe that the staff are respectful and did not experience nor witness being called names by any staff of the facility. LPA's interview with Resident #3 (R3), R1's roommate for one and a half year (1 1/2) years revealed that R3 did not witness any staff calling R1 name when they were together in their room. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240516145438
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Staff took resident's personal items received by mail 2. Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the final finding of the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Cisneros and Administrator Itzel Guevara and informed the reason of the visit. Allegation # 1: It was alleged staff took resident’s personal items received by mail. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 12pm to 2pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. Through interviews, it was reported that residents receive their packages and mail, and never have had any issues. Residents also stated that they were not 100% sure staff opened or took their mail. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: It was alleged staff do not ensure that resident’s dietary needs are met. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, Unsubstantiated LPA conducted additional interviews from staff and residents, and obtained and reviewed records pertaining to the complaint. From the information obtained, it was revealed, R1 has had no dietary restriction on record for the last four (4) years. LPAs' interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was aware that R1 had no dietary order from a physician. Therefore, based on documentation and interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230131105058
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fracture while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit to to deliver the final finding of the allegation mentioned above. LPA met with Adriana Ciscernos and Administrator Itzel Guevarra and informed the reason of the visit. It was alleged resident sustained fracture while in care. On 02/09/2023, former LPA Shira Stamps, conducted the initial visit, and interviewed staff and residents. During today’s visit, from 930am to 12pm, LPA conducted additional interviews and obtained resident records. From all the information obtained, it was revealed, resident # 1 (R1) complained to the in-house physician about pain in the shoulder. R1 did not inform staff that R1 was in any pain or injured. R1 was sent to the hospital by the orders of the doctor. It was later reported to the Administrator that R1 needed a higher level of care and would not be returning to the facility and would be admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). It was also revealed to LPA, that staff visited R1 while in the SNF, and R1 never mentioned falling at the facility, and interviews revealed no-one witnessed R1 falling. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230130162534
Mar 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff spat in a residents drink.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Ray Comer conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted a physical tour at 9:09 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:33 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 AM. Regarding the allegation that Staff spat in a resident’s drink, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) watched the staff members spit in R1's drink. LPAs' interview with Resident #1 (R1) today at 10:00 AM revealed that R1 did not witness any staff mentioned on the report spitting on R1's drink and R1 just "tasted" the saliva on the drink. LPAs' record review today revealed that all the staff mentioned are kitchen staff and four (4) out of four (4) staff has current State Food Handling certificate on file. LPAs' interview with the four (4) kitchen staff also revealed that none of them spat on any residents' food and/or drink nor witness any other staff spat on any resident's food and/or drink. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPAs' interview with four (4) random residents today between 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM revealed that four (4) out of four (4) residents did not witness any staff spitting on any resident's food and/or drink at any time. Based on the information gathered during this visit. The allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240320145828
Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is free of pest.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA was greeted by the facility manager Adriana Cisneros. LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 9:45 AM LPA met with facility administrator Itzel Guevara. Entrance interview conducted. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at 9:31 AM, requested facility documents relevant to the investigation which include but not limited to maintenance records and contracts for the pest control company. LPA reviewed records between 9:52 AM and 11:18 AM. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 13 residents between 11:20 AM and 1:08 PM. Conitnue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated The complainant’s concern is that the facility staff does not ensure the facility is pest free. LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviewed residents. At the time of inspection, LPA did not observe any pests in the facility. Twelve(12) out of thirty-eight (38) residents state that there were no pests observed in their rooms. LPA toured the room of the one resident who may have had an issue with pests, however, did not observe and active infestation. Interviews with five (5) out of fourteen (14) staff) revealed that there are no pests observed in the facility. LPA reviewed the pest control company’s invoice. The facility maintains a contract with the pest control company to come out a couple time a month to ensure the facility is free of pests which include roaches. Therefore, based on inspection, observation and interviews, there is an insufficient information to support the allegation. The allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240207092211
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following resident's dietary plan

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gary Tan and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with administrator Itzel Guevarra and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs conducted physical plant tour at 11:35 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 12:02 PM and interviewed staff and resident between 12:20 PM to 1:45 PM. Regarding the allegation that Staff are not following resident's dietary plan, it was alleged that staff are ignoring Resident #1 (R1)'s dietary restriction is being ignored by the staff. LPAs' record review at 12:15 PM revealed R1 had no dietary restriction on record for the last four (4) years. LPAs' interview with R1 also revealed that R1 was aware that R1 had no dietary order from a physician. Based on the information gathered during this visit. The allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240123093103

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 7 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan met with Office Manager Adriana Cisneros for a One (1) Year Required visit for this facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:32 AM and the following was noted: There is only one entrance being utilized at the facility, the front main entrance door. There are required poster posted at the main door. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. There is also a sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks available. The facility had submitted and approved Mitigation and Infection plan. There are hand sanitizing stations all over the facility. There are signs to wear a mask and other Covid 19 prevention protocol signs were posted outside the doors. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, physical distancing and other necessary signs were posted in common bathrooms and all over the common areas of the facility. The facility have designated visitors' area at the front yard. The facility has sufficient stock of PPE in the office upstairs. The facility is a two (2) storey building with shared and private bedrooms and bathrooms. Second floor is used only as an office/storage for staff use only. All indoor and outdoor passageways/exits were free of obstruction. There is no body of water in the facility. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 75°F. The facility's smoke alarms are hard wired and tested regularly every month. Fire inspection was last done on 08/14/23 and valid until 05/31/26. The facility is also equipped with sprinkler system which was last tested on April 2023 and valid for five (5) years. Fire extinguishers are located all throughout the facility and were last serviced on 10/12/22. Fire Drill was last conducted on 07/08/23. (continued to LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 9099) Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and properly stored at the facility. Knives, cleaning agents, and other potentially hazardous items were locked and inaccessible. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with one chair, night stand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Bathrooms: LPA observed all bathrooms to be clean, properly supplied and equipped with functional fixtures. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Residents have sufficient amounts of supplies for personal hygiene. There are four (4) common shower rooms in the facility, all observed to be clean and in good repair. Hot water was measured in random bathroom at the range of 117.1°F to 119.8°F and observed to be within the required range. Common Areas: These includes the living room, dining room and outdoor areas. Facility common areas appeared to be clean and appropriately furnished at the time of this visit, no accessible hazards were observed. Medications were observed to be stored in designated Medication room. The Medication room was observed to be locked at the time of visit. There is a complete set of first aid kit in the Medication room. Resident/Staff File Review: LPA reviewed records of five (5) random residents and five (5) staff. Resident and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Laundry room located in the underground level of the facility and observed to be locked during visit. There is no immediate health and safety hazard during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023
Apr 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide refund in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA initially met with staff Emily Shah, administrator Itzel Guevara arrived ten (10) minutes later. LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:38 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:00 AM and interviewed staff between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM. LPA also conducted records review between 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM. It was alleged that the facility withdrew payment for February and March 2023 for Resident #1 (R1) and not getting a refund for these months as R1 left on 01/14/23 to the hospital and never came back. LPA's record review between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM revealed that R1 was self responsible and paid the facility by own personal check. LPA's interview with the administrator and staff today between 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM revealed that the facility has no access whatsoever to R1's bank account and/or money and pay by own personal check so it is not possible for the facility to withdraw money from R1's account unless R1 paid by own check but record shows that R1 only paid only up to the month of 01/2023 (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) Further, LPA was able to obtain a copy of the check issued by the facility refunding R1 for the entire month of January 2023. LPA was also able to obtain copy of the personal check issued by R1 paid to the facility and a copy of the text message sent to the Business Office Manager (BOM) by R1's family member informing the BOM that the family member received the refund check and the issue of refund are now resolved. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230329080514

20222 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: .Staff physically abusing resident while in care 2.Staff verbally abusing resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with Facility Manager Adriana Cisneros and informed her the reason of the visit. LPA delivered the final findings to the allegations mentioned above: Allegation # 1: Concerns were expressed that staff was physically abusing resident while in care. On 03/25/2022 and 09/15/2022, from various times, ranging from 930am to 2pm, LPA obtained facility/resident documents, and conducted interviews with the complainant, residents, and facility staff. According to the information obtained during the investigation, it was alleged that a staff was physically abusing resident # 1 (R1) while cleaning R1’s private area. LPA interviewed R1, who reported, there are times when staff could be rough when cleaning the private area, but staff are not physically abusing resident. Other residents reported to LPA, staff are not physically abusive. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation #2: Concerns were expressed that staff was verbally abusing resident while in care. On 03/25/2022 and 09/15/2022, from various times, ranging from 930am to 2pm, LPA obtained facility/resident documents, Unsubstantiated and conducted interviews with the complainant, residents, and facility staff. According to the information obtained during the investigation, it was alleged that a staff was verbally abusing resident # 1 (R1). LPA interviewed R1, who reported staff are not verbally abusive, and staff treat R1 well, and there are no issues. LPA interviewed other residents, who reported, staff treat them well and they are not abusive. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220321155906
Sep 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an unannounced infection control inspection/visit. Upon arriving, LPA was greeted by the front desk receptionist Emily Shah. Facility has a health screening questionnaire and masks for visitors. There have not been any active or past COVID cases at the facility, and 99.% of residents and all staff have been vaccinated. The current census is (36). LPA observed staff and residents to have full mask covering; it not recommended but not required. COVID-19, CDC, Department of Public Health, and Licensing postings and hand sanitizing stations were visible seen at each corner of the facility, and signs posted on the walls throughout the facility. Administrator Itzel Guevara was not available during today's visit. Facility manager Adriana Cisneros arrived to the facility to conclude the inspection. The infection control inspection began with the receptionist Emily and ended with Adriana. The common areas were observed to be clean, including resident rooms, and staff and visitor bathrooms. Soap and towels, and hand washing signs were visually posted. The facility has cleaning procedures and protocols in place, which include staff and housekeeping cleaning common areas, elevator, and doorknobs (2x) a day. The facility has documentation of all vaccination records and other pertinent information pertaining to COVID-19, in staff and resident files. All new employee hires and new resident admits, will be properly screened, and provided a negative COVID test, prior to entering the facility. Facility prefers vaccinated staff and new residents; but it is not required. The facility only surveillance test, when there are symptoms from staff or residents. If there are any signs or symptoms from residents or staff, the facility has a rapid test kits in place, and uses a COVID testing agency if needed. The Administrator receives departmental emails. Facility continues to provide and conduct training to staff in relation to COVID-19 and other required training. There is medication training scheduled in the next (2) weeks. There is a sick sick leave policy. The facility does not have staffing issues. There are designated rooms for potential positive COVID residents because the facility has private rooms. PPE supplies were inspected and have over (30) day supply. The facility continues to implement the best practices for the facility; to ensure the health and safety of residents and staff. The facility is aware to report any changes with residents and staff to Licensing and there LPA, pertaining to positive COVID-19 cases. Exit interview was conducted and copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2022
Jul 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was able to wander from the facility while in care Resident's hygiene and grooming needs not being met while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with facility staff and explained the reason for this visit. LPA conducted a physical plant tour from 9-9:15am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. Resident was able to wander from the facility while in care It is alleged that resident #1(R1) wandered away from the facility due to lack of care. LPA conducted an interview with facility staff from 9:15-9:45am regarding this allegation. LPA also conducted an interview with R1 regarding this allegation from 10-10:15am. LPA reviewed R1's facility file and obtained copies of pertinent information from 10:15-10:45am. Information obtained revealed that R1 left the facility on the morning of 7/11/22 at approximately 8am which R1 normally does. After R1 did not come back to the facility staff called 911 to report a missing person at approximately 8pm on the same day. Law enforcement came to the facility and made a report. Unsubstantiated The next morning R1 was brought back to the facility by law enforcement. A review of R1's physician report and Needs and Appraisal show that R1 is able to leave the facility unassisted. Facility stated that they will have R1 reassessed to see if there is a change in condition. Based on the information obtained through interviews and documentation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Resident's hygiene and grooming needs not being met while in care It is alleged that R1's hygiene and grooming needs are not being met. LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and R1 from 9:15-10:15am regarding this allegation. LPA reviewed R1's physician report and needs and service plan from 10:15-10:45am. Information obtained from interviews and record review show that R1 does not need assistance with hygiene and grooming. Facility has agreed for R1 to be reassessed to see if their care needs have changed. Based on the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220713095719

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 14, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pitz conducted an unannounced infection control visit on this day. LPA was greeted upon entry and screened for COVID-19 symptoms. LPA toured the facility with administrator Itzel Guevara and confirmed that they do have an approved mitigation plan on file. LPA utilized the infection control domain of the RCFE inspection tool to verify that the facility was in compliance with various aspects of the mitigation plan, including but not limited to: screening visitors, having ample handwashing/ sanitizing supplies on site, having adequate PPE on site, having signs posted throughout the facility to remind residents and staff of various Covid precautions. LPA did not note any concerns at the time of visit. Report reviewed, signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, no deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021
Jul 8, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Financial Abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pitz conducted an unannounced visit on this day in response to the above allegation. As part of this investigation LPA interviewed the faciilty administrator and requested relevant facility records on 1/7/21, and on 7/8/21 LPA visited the facility to interview the administrator, Resident 1 (R1), and review additional records. LPA also interviewed the Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center representative for R1 telephonically. Allegation #1, that the facility is committing "financial abuse" has been unsubstantiated based on the interviews conducted. At 12:00 PM LPA interviewed R1 and was informed that former staff member 1 (S1) had been soliciting money from them under false pretenses, and this began after S1 was no longer employed by the facility. Unsubstantiated R1 stated that a sum of $14,000 had ultimately been returned to them by S1, but did not want to provide any financial documentation or proof to LPA. At 12:22PM LPA spoke with the caseworker for R1 and was informed that R1 is their own payee and neither the facility nor Regional Center are involved in their finances. Casworker confirmed that this issue was first reported to him, and likely began, after S1 stopped working at the facility. The allegation is unsubstantiated. Report reviewed, signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, no deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2021 · control 31-AS-20201231160550

52 of 60 beds were occupied at the May 13, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Golden Hills Retirement Center Inc., licensed since 2018.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
29
Total complaints
21
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations01
Substantiated allegations02
Total complaints216

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

Is Golden Hills Retirement Ctr licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Hills Retirement Ctr licensed for?

60 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Golden Hills Retirement Ctr been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 29 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Hills Retirement Ctr still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Golden Hills Retirement Ctr cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 133 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,306 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 133 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Hills Retirement Ctr take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Golden Hills Retirement Center Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Can Golden Hills Retirement Ctr keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Golden Hills Retirement Ctr license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN HILLS RETIREMENT CTR INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609631. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 60 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Golden Hills Retirement Center Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 29 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 29 state visits in that period.
  • 21 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sunland · 0.9 mi

    Solvita Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 0.5 mi

    Wyngate Villa Gardens

    Large community · licensed for 68

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 0.9 mi

    Paradise of North Valley

    Large community · licensed for 72

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 1.1 mi

    My Home II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 1.1 mi

    Tujunga Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Tujunga · 1.4 mi

    Golden Age Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GH

Call Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

Tujunga · Licensed for 60

(818) 352-1559

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Golden Hills Retirement Ctr

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages