Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Skyhill Quality LivingLicense #197608910 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareSkyhill Quality LivingLicense #197608910 · 3919 W Victory Blvd, Burbank, CA · (818) 558-1482Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Burbank/Skyhill Quality Living
Map · 3919 W Victory Blvd

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,550/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 558-1482

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

SQ

Call Skyhill Quality Living

Burbank · Licensed for 6

(818) 558-1482

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Burbank

Skyhill Quality Living

3919 W Victory Blvd, Burbank, CA 91505 · Licensed since 2015

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Skyhill Quality Living

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,550 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 1 resident
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Skyhill Quality Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,550a month to start

Likely $3,700–$5,600

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,550likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,700–$5,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,800
$4,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $8,000

$2,500$8,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$8,000.

  • Seniors' HavenBurbank · 0.2 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • The LighthouseToluca Lake · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity of VerdugoBurbank · 1.8 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity Homes of BurbankBurbank · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ardenville Home Care IBurbank · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hollywood Healthy LivingSun Valley · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Victor Jem Happy HomesBurbank · 2.6 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

3919 W Victory Blvd, Burbank, CA 91505Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Providence Saint Joseph Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.4 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197608910 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 4 of 15 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.

20251 state visit · 1 document

Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nadia Shahbazian conducted an unannounced annual required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with Tina Arutyunyan - Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The facility is licensed to serve six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which (1) may be bedridden. Facility has an approved waiver for (4) hospice residents. At 10:45am, with the assistance of Administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story structure with six (6) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room and office area. Required postings were observed in the office area. The smoke/carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired and interconnected. At 11:05am smoke/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and observed to be functional. The fire extinguisher is located in the hallway and was purchased on 09/25/2025. Facility conducts quarterly fire drills, the last fire drill was done on 10/05/2025. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were functional at the time of the visit. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining room. There is a television set, gaming area and a covered fireplace in the living room. The common areas were properly furnished with tables and chairs for the number of residents. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient supply of perishable (2 days) and non-perishable (7 days) foods at the facility. Chemicals and detergents were stored in a locked cabinet in the hallway, next to the living room. Knives were stored in a kitchen drawer but LPA observed a small scissors and a large, sharp knife in a drawer. Staff immediately removed and locked the sharp objects; a citation will be provided. Continued on LIC809-C Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms, five (5) of which are designated for residents' use. Currently bedroom #2 is vacant. Bedroom# 6 is designated as staff room. All bedrooms are were properly furnished with appropriate beddings, chairs, cabinets, linens and have sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms, one near the office and one across from bedrooms #2 and #3. LPA observed functional fixtures, grab bars and non-skid mats in each bathroom. Hot water temperature was measured at 107.2 and 112.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Surrounding Grounds: There were no bodies of water present. Pathways and exits were free of obstructions. There is a patio table with umbrella and chairs, in the backyard. There is a two car attached garage, which is currently used for storage. There are two exits near the office, both clearly marked with exit signs. The side exit, near the office has a ramp leading to the side street and is used as the main exit during emergencies. Laundry Room: A stacked washer/dryer was observed next to bedroom #2. Chemicals and detergents were locked in a cabinet in the hallway. Resident Files/Medications: LPA reviewed files for all five (5) residents for required documents. LPA observed the medications stored in a locked cabinet in the living room. Medications for three (3) residents were counted for accuracy of administration. LPA observed a complete first aid kit and the manual in the office cabinet. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and in compliance with licensing requirements. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, deficiencies were cited and appeal rights provided during the visit. Exit Interview conducted / A Copy of the Report Issued to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/12/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with house manager Rowena Bacucang and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Bucucan contacted administrator Tina Arutyunyan by telephone who was not able to be present for this visit. The facility is licensed to operate for six (6) non-ambulatory of which (1) may be bedridden. The facility is approved for (4) hospice residents. Currently, the facility has (4) residents in hospice care. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. It consists of the following: five (5) resident's rooms, two (2) common bathrooms, a living area, a dining area, a kitchen, an outside patio area, and garage used for storage. LPA toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, storage for resident personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. The water temperature measured 109.0-degree F. A comfortable temperature of 73 degree was maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. Fire extinguishers were charged, smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were operable. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was maintained in order. The facility has conducted a disaster drill on 07/14/24. A landline telephone was in working condition. A review of staff CPR/First Aid training is current. Evaluation Report Continues LIC 809-C During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, and sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. All mandated inspection control posters were posted. The facility is current on Community Care Licensing annual dues. An audit of residents #1-#6 (R1-R6) service files and staff #1-#4 (S1-S4) personnel files revealed to be complete. The facility has the current administrator's certification on file for Akop Ekmyan #7001640740 exp. 07/31/25. DEFICIENCIES: Resident room #4 is missing a window screen. Resident #4 is diagnosed with Dementia and (4) residents on hospice with no night shift "awake" staff. (2) stove burners and oven non-operable. Kitchen walls, ceiling and exhaust fan full of grease is unsanitary. Bathroom faucet and toilet flusher loose/not tight fitting require repair. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiencies has been observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 809-D). An exit interview conducted with Rowen Bucucang, a copy of report and appeal rights provided. Note: *Citations not cleared by the due date will be a $100 fine assessed for each citation until it is cleared. Civil penalties will continue to accrue until Proof of Corrections (POC) are cleared. *the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2024
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect in supervision contributed to resident's death. Facility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. Facility staff did not keep accurate records.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to complete investigation of the above allegations and to deliver final findings. LPA met with licensee, Rowena Bazucang, and explained the reason for the visit. --- Neglect in supervision contributed to resident's death. --- Facility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. It was alleged that caregivers did not seek medical attention and did not call 911 in timely manner, which contributed to the death of resident #1 (R1). The investigation was initiated by the LPA Abeye Duguma on 01/31/24, at which time LPA inspected the facility and gathered R1’s facility records. The case was referred to CCLD Investigation Branch (IB) and investigation was continued by the Senior Investigator (SI) Sonia Sandoval. (CONT. on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated To investigate the allegations, on 03/12/24, Investigator Sandoval requested and reviewed R1’s medical and hospice records and interviewed facility staff members, residents and other witnesses, including police officers from the Burbank Police Department. The review of the hospice records revealed Resident #1 (R1) had a DNR on file. On 01/29/2024 at approximately 7:20a.m., hospice staff attended the facility after being informed of a change in R1’s condition and confirmed R1 had expired. The interviews of facility staff revealed at approximately 6:45a.m., staff reportedly discovered R1 unresponsive (not breathing or with no pulse). Staff #1 (S1) indicated the hospice nurse was immediately notified and several attempts were made to inform the responsible party. The interview of responsible party confirmed that on 01/29/2024 they had several missed calls (commencing at approximately 7:00a.m. hours) from the facility. Responsible party indicated when they called the facility back, they were informed R1 had passed away. The interview of Burbank Police Department Detective revealed the incident was not assigned for further investigation as the decedent was on hospice and there was no evidence of foul play observed by the responding officers. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. --- Facility staff did not keep accurate records. It was alleged that there was conflicting documentation at the facility regarding the resident. To investigate the allegation, LPA requested pertinent documents at 12:45p.m., and interviewed three (03) staff between 1:00p.m. to 02:40p.m. A review of the facility records clearly shows that the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment have different dates on both documents. The Attempt Resuscitation was signed 08/20/2020 and the Do No Resuscitate was signed on 12/22/2022. LPA did not find any documentation in the resident’s file that contradicted these orders. During interviews with staff, all staff stated that resident had an Attempt Resuscitation order and that it was changed to Do No Resuscitate. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazards were noted during the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240130133804
Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility unaware of resident's condition. Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner.

On 01/03/24 at 1:26 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted a subsequent complaint visit to this facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was greeted by staff, Rowene Bacucang who called the administrator Tina Arutyunyan to inform them LPA was at the facility. LPA informed the administrator the purpose of the visit. Administrator was unable to meet LPA at the facility and designated staff to sign todays report. During the course of the investigation, on 12/28/22, at 9:52 a.m. LPA interviewed three (3) out of six (6) residents in care. LPA conducted interviews with staff and the administrator from 10:12 a.m. to 11:12 a.m. LPA conducted a record review from 11:12 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. and obtained copies of pertinent information. On 12/30/22 from 9:30 a.m. to 10:12 a.m. LPA conducted follow-up interviews with two (2) out of two (2) staff in regards to the allegations above. From 10:12 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. LPA obtained more copies of pertinent information. From 10:51 a.m. to 11:01 a.m. LPA conducted a follow-up interview with the administrator. (Cont. on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Facility unaware of resident's condition. In regards to the allegation, it was reported resident #1 (R1) had a medical emergency and staff could not provide paramedics with any of R1's medical information when requested. LPA's interview with staff #3 (S3) present during the events in question revealed they had called the administrator Tina to inform her of R1's change in condition at around 11:00 a.m. because she was fine during breakfast at around 8:30 a.m. According S3, Tina then called R1's Hospice nurse from Miracle Healing Hospice Inc. S3 goes on to state, Hospice nurse arrived at the facility around 3:00 p.m. and takes R1's vitals. At this time R1 has a fever of 104 degrees Fahrenheit and is not eating. The Hospice nurse instructs staff to give R1 Tylenol to reduce the fever and give oxygen. Hospice nurse tells staff to continue to observe R1's condition. According to S3 they call Tina and requests permission to call 911. S3 calls 911 at around 8:00 p.m. because R1's conditioned had not improved. According to S3 they were trying to give all the information requested by the paramedics but the paramedic was not allowing staff to explain. S3 goes on to say they believe their own accent could have been an issue. On 12/28/2023 LPA asked staff two (2) out of the three (3) staff to provide residents' primary diagnoses. LPA confirmed diagnoses with residents physician's report. LPA questioned staff where they would find residents' records and Hospice records. Staff were able to show LPA where resident files are stored. Based on the information obtained, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #2: Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. In regards to the allegation, it was reported staff did not seek adequate medical attention or timely intervention for resident #1 (R1) which resulted in deterioration of R1. According to a reliable witness, R1 arrived to the emergency room and was not responding to stimuli. As reported by S3 they contacted the administrator first who then according to S3 and confirmed by the administrator they contacted the Hospice nurse. LPA reviewed R1's Hospice records which revealed R1 had been admitted to Hospice. LPA attempted to contact Hospice agency and Hospice nurse but was unsuccessful and did not receive a returned. Upon discharge R1 would be readmitted to the facility. On 01/03/24 LPA confirmed R1 is still at the facility, a resident re-appraisal and needs and services was conducted. LPA attempted to interview R1 on 01/03/24 at 2:50 p.m. According to Rowene, R1 has been improving and is eating regularly. According to interviews facility contacted Hospice first as directed to do so before calling 911. Based on the information obtained, although allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20221219161213
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 11 documents

20225 state visits · 7 documents

Dec 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst LPA Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on office visit conducted on 04/26/22 regarding Quarterly Case Management visits. LPA met with Rowena P. Bacugang Caregiver and was met short later by Administrator Tina Arutytunyan and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Lopez, with caregiver Rowena present, tested the water temperature and it measured between 105.5 to 106.8 which is within range. LPA and administrator toured five resident's rooms, common area and outside physical plant. Facility had enough nonperishable food for 7 days and perishable food for 2 days. Record of Resident's Safeguarded Cash Resource was reviewed for R1. All 3 exit door alarms were not functioning properly during visit. Deficiency cited, please see 809D for details. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided to Administrator Tina Arutytunyanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87505(j) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 2, 2022

87705(j) Care of Persons with Dementia. The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits, if exiting presents a hazard to any resident. This requirement was not met as evident of: Facility retains dementia resident and alarms on exit doors were not working properly.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2022

Plan of correction: The Administrator stated that she will fix the alarms on all 3 exit doors. Administrator will inform CCL in writing explaining how she fixed the alarms. The pictures of the doors and alarms must be submitted to CCL by POC due date. ***Administrator fixed all 3 door alarms during visit and no further actions is required***

Sep 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst LPA Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on office visit conducted on 04/26/22 regarding Quarterly Case Management visits. LPA met with Carmen Cunanan Caregiver and was met short later by Administrator Tina Arutytunyan and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Lopez, cargiver Carmen, and Administrator Tina Arutyunyan toured five resident's rooms, common area and outside physical plant. Facility had enough Nonperishable food for 7 days and perishable food for 2 days. Water temperature was tested in bathroom #1 at 139.7 degrees F and in the shower at 146.7 by room #3 The kitchen sink was tested 145.3 degrees F, and bathroom #2 at 144.9 degrees F., which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. Record of Resident's Safeguarded Cash Resource was reviewed for R1. Deficiency cited please see 809D for details. Civil penalties issued for repeat violation within 12 months. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided to Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 17, 2022

(e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degrees C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degrees C). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by Bathroom 1 water temperature tested at 139.7 Degrees F at 10:38am. Shower by room #3 tested 146.7 at 10:55 am, kitchen sink tested at 145.3 at 10:21am Bathroom #2 tested at 144.9 at 10:30am which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to adjust water temperture and send proof of correction to LPA by POC date.

May 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores and Alberto Lopez conducted a case management visit - plan of correction(POC) to follow up on deficiency given during a complaint investigation on 4/26/22. LPAs met with Carmen Cunanan Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Tina Arutyunyan arrived 15 minutes later. On 4/26/22 LPA Flores delivered findings for complaint 28-AS-20210824084953 during an office meeting at the Monterey Park Regional Office. Section 87217 (b) Safeguard for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Values was noted on LIC 9099D. Deficiencies POC due date was 5/10/22. The deficiency was not cleared by the due date. On 5/26/22 LPA Flores noted correction for P&I funds to be return to R3 in the amount of $996 as R3 moved out of the facility on 10/27/22. During this visit LPA is providing the deficiency on LIC 809D. Exit interview was conducted with Tina Arutyunyan Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2022

87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Values: (b)... facility shall take appropriate measures to safeguard residents' cash resources,...which have been entrusted to the licensee.... The licensee shall give the residents receipts for all such articles or cash resources. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents reviewed licensee did not ensure to maintain record receipts for items purchase with P&I funds for R1,R2,R4 which poses a potential health, safety, personal rights risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

Plan of correction: The licensee will refund P&I funds for R1 amount $2329, R2 amount $1104, and R3 amount $996 and proof must be submitted to the deparment by 5/27/22.

May 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA)s Alberto Lopez and Mary Flores conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on office visit conducted on 04/26/22 regarding Quarterly Case Management visits. LPAs met with Carmen Cunanan Caregiver and was met short later by Administrator Tina Arutytunyan and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Lopez, Flores and Administrator Tina Arutyunyan toured three resident's rooms, common area and outside physical plant. Facility had enough Non perishable food for 7 days and perishable food for 2 days. Water temperature was tested in bathroom #1 at 122.6 degrees F and in the shower at 122.1 by room #3 The kitchen sink was tested 123.7 degrees F., and bathroom #2 at 123.3 degrees F., which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. LPAs and Administrator observed one knife in the kitchen drawer that was unlocked and cleaning solutions where unlocked and accessible to residents. LPAs reviewed residents files and observed facility has 3 bedridden residents out of 5 residents. Resident #1(R1), #2(R2), #3(R3) have ambulatory status noted as bedridden in physician's report. Administrator stated R1 is bedridden and will discuss status of R2 and R3 with primary physician. Record of Resident's Safeguarded Cash Resource was reviewed for R1. Deficiencies cited on 809D per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Tina Arutyunyan and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2022

2. Hot water temperature is to be maintained between 105-120*F.(2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C) LPA's and admiistrator observed that the hot water measured from a low of 122.1 to degrees F. to a high of 123.7 degrees F. in the kitchen and restrooms.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will adjust water temperture and provide evidence to LPA and certify that water temperture has been adjusted and within range of 105 degrees F and 120 degress F by 5/27/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87309(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 26, 2022

(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. (1) Storage areas for poisons, and firearms and other dangerous weapons shall be locked. LPAs, Administrator and DSP observed cleaning soutions and knifes unlocked and accesible to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee locked up the cleaning solutions and knife during visit. Deficiency is cleared as of 5/26/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87204(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2022

87204 Limitations - Capacity and Ambulatory Status: (a) A licensee shall not operate a facility beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license, including specification of the maximum number of persons who may receive services at any one time... This requirement is not met by evidence as: Licensee did not ensure R2 and R3 ambulatory status was within the limitations of the license which allows 1 bedridden resident which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal righs risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will contact primary physicain for R2 and R3 and verify ambulatory status for the R2 and R3 and will submit physician's report to the department by 5/27/22.

Apr 26, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Financial Abuse

An Office Meeting was held in the Monterey Park Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (MPASCRO). The attendees present during the meeting: Regional Manager Araceli Ramirez, Audit Department Manager Jacqueline Juarez, Licensing Program Manager(s) (LPM) Lisa Hicks, Stefanie Coronel, Naira Margaryan (Woodland Hills Regional Office (WH ASCRO)), Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores, Noemi Galarza, LPAs WH ASCRO Rosaura Valenzuela, Yelena Avestisyan, and Tuesday Cabiness. At the time of this Office Meeting a final finding of the investigation report was delivered to the Licensee Representative Tina Arutyunyan Licensee by LPA Mary Flores. The investigation consisted of the following: On 9/1/21 LPA Flores and Luis Mora conducted a tour/health and safety check of the facility around 10:15am, LPAs interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),attempted to interview resident#3(R3), and #4(R4), staff #1(S1) #2(S2) and contacted administrator over the phone. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiated LPAs reviewed R1,R2,R3,R4 personal files and requested copies of admission agreement, physician's report, identification and emergency information, pre-appraisal agreement, needs and service appraisal, and DHS/ Brillance Corner documentation. Administrator will email hospice documents and Personal and Incidental (P&I) funds, and mail proof of association documents for staff #2(S2), surety bond, and cable statements. On 9/13/21 LPA Flores conducted an interview with administrator over the phone. During the course of the investigation LPA Flores submitted a request for audit services on 9/20/21. On 11/3/21 Department's audit service met with Licensee Tina Arutyunyan via Microsoft Teams. On 3/8/22 LPA Flores received complete Trust Audit Report. The investigation reveled the following: Regarding allegation: Financial Abuse. It is alleged, there is an issue of financial abuse and there are no logs to record all monthly deposits and withdrawals from each client's Personal and Incidental (P&I) funds since placement. On 9/1/21 Interviews with residents revealed 1 out 4 residents has not gone to purchase clothe and does not have need of clothes as resident is mostly in bed, 1 out of 4 residents stated to only use regular Spanish channels and does not have someone come sing to them. 1 out of 4 residents stated to have everything they need, and 1 out of 4 residents was out of the facility at the time of the visit. LPAs did not observed clothes listed on purchased receipts, furniture or make up listed in receipts was not observed. On 3/8/22 Trust Audit Report conducted by Audit Services Department revealed multiple residents did not have access to or were not distributed P&I funds. Regarding finding: Multiple Residents did not have access to or were not distribute P&I funds. Brilliant Corners provides funding for R1,R2,R4's rent and P&I amounts which are paid to the licensee in a lump sum amount. On 8/19/21 during a visit by Department of Health Services (DHS) representative interviews were conducted with residents, regarding items listed on handwritten receipts without resident's initials/signature which were requested on 6/11/21 and residents stated to not have received items listed on receipts and furniture listed on receipts were not observed by DHS representative in resident's rooms. Interviews with agencies, licensee, and residents revealed P&I funds were not distribute to residents in care. Regarding finding: Proper Documentation for expenditures was not maintained. Licensee did not maintained proper record keeping of P&I money entrusted to licensee, receipts were hand written and not signed by residents. Regarding finding: Licensee is commingling facility funds with P&I amounts. Brilliant Corners provides funding for R1,R2,R4's rent and P&I amounts which are paid to the licensee in a lump sum amount. Bank statements reviewed revealed personal account and money from funding agency for Skyhill Quality Living and Skyhill Quality Living 2 were maintain int the same account. (CONTINUED LIC (9099C) Regarding finding: Only residents identified with P&I from Brilliant Corners were affected. It was determined that residents not associated to Brilliant Corner were either able to handle their own money or had a representative on file. Regardining finding: Licensee does not have policies and procedures or proper bonding. Licensee did not ensure to obtain proper bonding for the license facility to be able to safeguard resident's P&I money, current bond covers the corporation and not the license facility. During a Microsoft teams meeting on 11/3/21 with the department and licensee, licensee was notified to keep records and distribute P&I amounts to residents. The licensee is to pay the residents all P&I amounts since each residents time of placement up to November 2021, as follow: R1 must be pay the total amount of $2329.00 R2 must be pay the total amount of $1104.00 and R4 must be pay the total amount of $1104.00. Based on interviews and documents review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee Tina Arutyunyan and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210824084953

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87217 Safeguard for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Values (b) Every facility shall take...measures to safeguard residents' cash resources, ... have been entrusted to the licensee...The licensee shall give the residents receipts for all such articles or cash resources. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents reviewed licensee did not ensure to maintain record receipts for items purchase with P&I funds for R1,R2,R4 which poses a potential health, safety, personal rights risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: The licensee will refund P&I funds for R1 amount $2329, R2 amount $1104, and R3 amount $1104 and proof must be submitted to the deparment by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables: (c)... facility shall account for any cash resources entrusted...(1) Cash resources include but are not limited to monetary gifts,...personal and incidental need allowances from funding sources such as SSI/SSP. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents reviewed licensee did not ensure to be accountable for resident's cash resources which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will implement policies and procedures regarding resident's cash resources and valuables. Licensee will provide a copy of the policies and procedures to the department by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(e) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87217 Safeguards for Residents, Personal Property,and Valuables: (e)Cash resources... which are handled by the licensee... shall not be commingled... used as the facility funds or petty cash, and shall be separate,...from any liability ... in the use of his own or the facility's funds and valuables... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents reviewed licensee did not ensure to maintain a separate account for residents' cash resources wihch poses a potential risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will open a separate trust account fo resident P&I funds. A document regarding a new bank account will be submitted to the department by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87216(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87216 Bonding: (a) Each licensee,... entrusted to safeguard...cash resources, shall file or have on file with the licensing agency a copy of a bond issued by a surety company to the State of California as principal. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on document review the licensee did not ensure to obtain a proper surety bond prior to handling the resident's cash resources which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain a required surety bond. A proof of adequate bond will be submitted to the department by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(2-3)(5) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

Administrator - Qualifications and Duties.The administrator shall... If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements...apply. (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to... laws, rules and regulations. (3) Ability to maintain or supervise... financial and other records. (5) Good character and a continuing reputation of personal integrity. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents review licensee did not ensure to maintain accuracy of financial records which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will attend continued education classes provided for Administrators. Licensee will secure the appoitment to attend classes and provide proof of enrollment by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87215 · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87215 Commingling of Money: Money and valuables of residents entrusted to the licensee of one community care facility licensed under a particular license number shall not be commingled with those of another residential care facility... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documentation reviewed licensee did not maintain a separate checking account for facility from personal account which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee is to maintain a separate checking account for facility funds and a separete account for P&I funds, facility expenses and revenue and submit proof of account designated to facility by 5/10/22.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2022

87207 False Claims: No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents reviewed licensee did not ensure to provide accurate information and records to teh LPAs and other agency representatives which poses a health, safety, or personal rights risk for the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will schedule vendorized training related to the cited section as well as 87408:Denial or Revocation of a Certificate 87777: ExclusionsPersonal Rights. Verification of scheduled training with the trainers credentials will need to e submitted by 4/29/2022 and completed by 5/13/2022.

Apr 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Office

An office meeting was held at the Monterey Park Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (MP ASCRO) to deliver the Final Findings of a Trust Audit Report involving the following facilities: Skyhill Quality Living #2 197609098: [complaint investigation - Control#:28-AS-20210824090807], Skyhill Quality Living 197608910, Our Sweet Home Inc 197607711, Our Sweet Home Inc #2 197608083, and Our Sweet Home Inc #3 197608084, Attendees present during the meeting were: Licensee/Administrator Tina Arutyunyan,Administrator Akop Ekymyan CCLD Regional Manager Aracely Ramirez, CCLD Audit Department Manager, Jacqueline Juarez, Licensing Program Manager(s) Lisa Hicks, Naira Margaryan, Stefanie Coronel, and Licensing Program Analyst(s) Noemi Galarza, Mary Flores, Yelena Avetisyan, Tuesday Cabiness, and Rosaura Valenzuela. The purpose of the meeting was explained to Licensee Ms. Arutyunyan. On 08/24/2021 Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received complaints against all above noted facilities operated by the same Licensee. The complainant was alleging financial abuse of the residents' Personal and Incidental (P&I) funds. An initial investigation visit was conducted on 09/01/2021. As a part of the complaint investigation, the complaints were referred to the CCLD Audit Department for a Trust Audit. The audit investigation conducted by Jacqueline Juarez concluded the following: * The Licensee/Administrator Misappropriated residents Personal and Incidental (P&I) funds. Multiple residents did not have access to, or were not distributed P&I funds. * The Licensee/Administrator failed to maintain adequate safeguards and records for residents' cash resources. Proper documentation for expenditures was not maintained. * The Licensee/Administrator Commingled the residents P&I monies with facility funds. See 809-C for report continuation. On today's date, CCLD Audit Manager Jacqueline Juarez delivered findings on the Trust Audit Report and discussed required plan of corrections (POCs). The Licensee/Administrator was notified that she will need to complete the following: * Refund all residents' enrolled in the Brilliant Corners program the amounts identified in the Trust Audit report and submit proof of repayment. * Provide proof of Surety Bond that covers each facility license and not the corporation. * Submit a written plan on how they will distribute P&I funds to residents and bank statements showing that P&I funds have been deposited in a separate trust account. *Submit an updated Plan of Operation reflecting the changes in population that will be served. On 10/8/2022, Licensee/Administrator is to submit to the Audit Section the LIC 405's and corresponding receipts for each facility to ensure proper record-keeping. The deficiencies related to the complaint allegation were also discussed during today's Office meeting, and were disclosed in the final complaint investigation report delivered to the Licensee Ms. Arutyunyan. See complaint control number 28-AS-20210824090807. During the initial complaint investigation visit dated (9/1/2021) resident's files were reviewed. Based on record review observation, LPA observed the resident files were incomplete and/or missing required forms i.e. personal and incidental (P & I) records, original receipts, hospice care plans, and admission agreements were missing authorized representative parties contact information. Licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. Update all facility admission agreements to include contact information for all residents’ representative parties. Licensee was informed that Quarterly Case Management visits will be conducted. Technical Support Program brochure was email to licensee during this meeting and a referral will be submitted to Residential Technical Support Program for the facility. Per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6 Chapter 8, Article 09, a deficiency was cited. See LIC 809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was issued to Licensee Tina Arutyunyan.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2022

87506 Personal Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requireement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review observations during the visit dated 9/1/21 in reference to complaint # 28-AS-20210824090807, residents' files were incomplete and/or missing required forms i.e. P & I ledgers, hospice care plans, original receipts of P & I expenditures, and authorized representative contact information. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to ensure that all resident records are complete and accurrate.Administrator is to review Title 22 regulations section 87506(b)(1-17) as a guide to required resident record information. Submit a signed statement of understanding and intent to abide by the cited regulation.

Mar 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of an annual required. LPA met with S1 and S2, an explained the purpose of today's visit. At 10:15 Administrator Arutyunyan arrived and assisted with the remainder of the visit. Upon arrival LPA checked association and observed S2 not on the association list. S2 confirmed that she has worked here for a week. Facility is licensed to serve 6 over the age of 60. 6 of which is non-ambulatory, and 1 can be bedridden. Hospice waiver approved for 4 residents. Facility is a one-story house in a residential area. LPA made a complete tour of facility which included: 6 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining room, laundry area, outdoor area, and garage. Administrator certificate #6002858740 expires 4/5/2023. The following was observed, reviewed, and inspected: Bedrooms #1-5 are designated for residents. Bedroom #6 is designated for staff. Each bedroom contained the required furniture and linens as mandated. Bathroom was observed to contain working fixtures, and were equipped with necessary grab bars. Resident bathroom was missing non-slip mat. Water temperature measured in the residents bathroom at 123.6 degrees F, which is not in the required range of 105-120 degrees F. Kitchen was inspected and no deficiencies observed; cleaning materials and knives were secured in a locked cabinet, appliances were clean and operational, and an adequate supply of 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable. LPA observed sufficient linen,required documents were posted in the office area, trash cans with tight fitting lids. Smoke detector and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operable, fire extinguisher(s) fully charged, front and back yard clean and free of debris. Staff files for administrator, S1 and S2 was reviewed. Administrator stated S2 do not have a file yet because she is newly hired. Medication for all residents was reviewed. The last disaster drill was conducted on March 4th 2022 . Report continued on 809C Pursuant to Title 22 Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Civil penalties issued/ Exit Interview Conducted / Appeal Rights provided / A Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 30, 2022

20214 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 4, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Staff, Maria Limaco, and explained the purpose of the visit. The licensee, Tina Arutyunyan, arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Chan obtained copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and documents pertaining to Resident #1 (R1). LPA toured the facility with the licensee and conducted interviews with the licensee, Administrator, 3 Staff, 2 Residents, R1, R1's family member, and Staff at Cedar Assisted Living facility. R1 is no longer residing at the facility. (Continue on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: In regards to allegation, resident sustained injuries from a fall while in care. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) fell and sustained bruises underneath the eyes and swelling around the nose. LPA interviewed the Staff #1 (S1), who was on duty for the overnight shift but did not witness the fall. S1 stated that the fall occurred around 2 a.m. When S1 heard R1's fall, S1 immediately went into the room to observe R1 by the end of the bed and already standing up. S1 checked on resident for any injuries and asked what had happened. R1 responded by saying that R1 might had slipped on the wet floor but there was no pain. R1 agreed to take a Tylenol as a precaution and went to sleep right after but S1 did not observe any bruising or swelling in the face at that moment or in the morning. Per R1's family member, R1 stated that R1 either fainted or lost balance while trying to get up. R1 also refused to go to the doctor when family member went to visit that morning and noticed some redness by the nose. The licensee showed LPA a photo of R1's alleged injury from the fall but also stated it is difficult to determine if the fall caused any bruising or swelling since R1 normally has puffiness underneath the eyes. LPA interviewed the Marketing Director of Cedar Assisted Living who stated that the R1's sister informed her that R1 had a fall at the former facility. R1 was not observed with any swelling or bruises in the eye or nose area upon admission at new facility. According to interviews conducted with facility personnel, Resident #1 (R1) does not require much assistance and is able to ambulate on own. All the staff reported that R1 moves around the house using a walker sometimes but does not need staff to assist with mobility, which is also mentioned on the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan and/or Physician's Report. However, Staff check on all residents regularly and respond right away when they hear residents' calls. LPA also interviewed 2 out of 3 residents which both stated Staff check on them and assist with their needs. Although R1 had fallen, there is no supporting evidence indicating a lack of supervision or neglect from the staff. In addition, there is no evidence to show that the fall caused any form of bruising or swelling in the eyes and nose area. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with the licensee via telephone. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided to the Staff whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211101125943
Sep 13, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst(s) LPA Mary Flores conducted a plan of correction (POC) visit at the facility for deficiencies given on 9/1/21. LPA Flores met with Tina Arutyunyan administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 9/1/21 LPA Flores conducted a complaint investigation visit and conducted a physical plant review. During the visit LPA cited type A deficiencies due on 9/2/21 and type B deficiencies. Today's visit LPA Flores conducted a POC visit to cleared the deficiencies due on 9/2/21 and 9/7/21. The following type A deficiencies were cited on 9/1/21: 87303(e)(2) - Maintenance and Operation - Facility's water temperature was tested at 145 degrees F in bathroom #1 and 144.5 degrees F in bathroom #2. LPA Flores measured water temperature in bathroom #1 and tested at 118.8 degrees F and bathroom #2 tested at 117.5 degrees F. 87355(e)(1) - Criminal Record Clearance - Staff #2 was observed working since 8/20/21 and does not have a criminal background clearance. LPA Flores observed staff leave the facility during the visit of 9/1/21 and did not observed staff working at the facility. 87303(a) - Maintenance and Operation - Resident #3's dresser and closet door are not in good repair, and living room smoke detector is not working. LPA Flores observed dresser in room #5 removed from room, receipt for purchased dresser was email to LPA during the visit, closet door was repaired and smoke detector was tested and working properly. (CONTINUED LIC 809C) 87307(a)(3)(C) - Personal Accommodations and Services - Resident #1 and #3 did not have all required bedding items. LPA Flores observed the following items in Resident #1 and #3 beds; have bottom sheet, flat sheet, blanket, room #4, #1, and #3 have a comforter, pillow, and pillow case. Closet with linens have additional blankets and comforters. 87307(a)(3)(B) - Personal Accommodations and Services - administrator did not ensure each resident in Room #4, #2, #1 have a night stand. LPA Flores observed a night stand in room #1,#2,#4. Exit interview was conducted with Tina Arutyunyan administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2021
Sep 1, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst(s) Mary Flores and Luis Mora conducted a case management for deficiencies observed during a complaint investigation visit on 9/1/21. LPAs met with Paula Castro and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs conducted a tour of the facility around 10:15am. LPAs observed the following: Kitchen staff was preparing meals and stated to have sharps cabinet and cabinet under the sink with chemicals unlock as she was using items. Living room smog detector had battery sticking out and not functioning. Cabinet in hallway with cleaning supplies was unlock and linen closet had sufficient linens, no blankets observed. LPAs tested water temperature in bathroom #1(B1) and tested at 145.0 degrees F, and bathroom #2 (B2) was tested at 144.5 degrees F. which is not under the required 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed vacant room #1(R1) bed does not have padding, top sheet, blanket, comforter, pillow, and pillow case, LPA observed a blanket in the closet and pillows. Room #2(R2) and #3(R3) with half bed rails, Room #5(R5) no mattress padding, no top sheet, no blanket, no comforter, dresser has a broken drawer, and broken closet door, Room #4(R4), R2, R3,and R1 do not have a night stand. Staff #1 has been working since 7/29/21, who is not associated to the facility administrator will email transfer request and mail verification to LPAs email by 5:00pm, and staff #2 has been working since 8/20/21 and does not have a criminal record background clearance after checking in criminal background system. Deficiencies were cited under Title 22 Regulations on LIC 809D. Exit interview was conducted with Paula Castro, lead caregiver and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 2, 2021

87303 Maintenance and Operation: (e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal ...shall deliver hot water... maintained to ... a temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C). This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation administrator did not ensure water temperature is maintain within the required 105 to 120 degrees F; LPAs tested water temperature in B1 at 145 and B2 at 144.5 degrees F which poses an immediate Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to 4 out of 4 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will adjust water heater to deliver water temperature between 105 to 120 degrees F and submit LIC 9098 by 9/2/21. Administrtor will maitain a 7 day log of water temperature and will submit to the department by 9/9/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 2, 2021

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPAs observation and records administrator did not ensure S2 does not have a criminal background clearance which poses an immediate Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to persons in care. *Civil penalties are being assessed in the amount of $ 500.00.*the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Admistrator is to ensure all staff obtain a criminal record background clearance. S2 should not return to work until cleared and associated to the facility. Administrator is to submit LIC 9098 to certify, and copy livescan and transfer request and submitted to the department by 9/2/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 7, 2021

(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPAs observation administrator did not ensure R3's dresser and closet door are in good repair, and living room smoke detector is working properly which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure facility is in good repair at all time, will replace dresser and fix closet door in R3, and will replace smoke detector in living room. Administrator to take pictures and submit to the department by 9/7/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(a)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 7, 2021

87307 Personal Accomodations and Services: (a) Living accommodations... shall...(3) Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care...(C) Clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads,... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observation administrator did not ensure R1 and R3 did not have all required bedding which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal rights risk for persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure R1 is readily for new admission and that R3 maintains all bedding items available at all times. Administrator will submit pictures to the department by 9/7/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(3)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 7, 2021

87307 Personal Accomodations(a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be...(3) Equipment and supplies necessary... (B) Bedroom furniture, which shall include, for each resident, a chair, night stand, a lamp, or lights sufficient for reading, and a chest of drawers. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation administrator did not ensure each resident in R4, R2, R1 have a night stand which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal rights to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure that each resident has a night stand in R1, R2, and R4 and will submit pictures to the department by 9/7/21.

Aug 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Spencer conducted an unannounced annual inspection focusing on the Infection Control Domain. LPA was greeted by administrator Tina Arutyunan and discussed the purpose of today's visit. This single-story home contains six (6) bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms, a living room, kitchen, dining area, backyard, and attached garage. The following was observed/inspected: The facility had a universal entrance screening area including a thermometer, hand sanitizer and sign-in sheet. A temperature check log was present but not updated. COVID-19 signage was placed in several areas including entrance, hallway, and bathrooms. Facility maintained a 30-day supply of PPE. One (1) out of three (3) bathrooms were in disrepair including the toilet, sink, and shower. There was a sufficient supply of 2-day perishables and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Cleaning solutions and sharps were locked and inaccessible. Water temperature was measured in kitchen/bathrooms and were within required 105-120 degrees F. Each room contained required furniture including bed, dresser, night stand, lamp and chair. Medications were locked and centrally stored. Medications were reviewed for four (4) residents and facility did not maintain a 30-day supply of medications. Staff wore face masks throughout their shift. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide detectors were present and operable. At least one (1) fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and serviced. Client files were inspected and emergency contact information was up to date. Administrator qualifications were checked and administrator certificate expires on 4/2023. Obstructions were observed in the outdoor area as two bed springs and headboards were placed there and were not properly discarded. Pursuant to Title 22, deficiencies were cited on the attached 809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2021

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the September 25, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Skyhill Quality Living Inc., licensed since 2015.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Skyhill Quality Living #2 · Burbank
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
12
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
6

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations60
Substantiated allegations10
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Skyhill Quality Living

Is Skyhill Quality Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Skyhill Quality Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Skyhill Quality Living been cited?

1 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Skyhill Quality Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Skyhill Quality Living cost?

$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Burbank that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $8,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,250 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Skyhill Quality Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Skyhill Quality Living Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Skyhill Quality Living Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center is 2.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Skyhill Quality Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Skyhill Quality Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SKYHILL QUALITY LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197608910. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Skyhill Quality Living Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 7, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Burbank · 0.2 mi

    Seniors' Haven

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $4,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Burbank · 0.1 mi

    Love and Faith Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Burbank · 0.1 mi

    Angel's Grace Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Burbank · 0.1 mi

    Love and Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Burbank · 0.6 mi

    Las Casitas Assisted Living

    Mid-size home · licensed for 17

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$5,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · 0.6 mi

    Prestige Residential Care Facility

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
SQ

Call Skyhill Quality Living

Burbank · Licensed for 6

(818) 558-1482

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Skyhill Quality Living

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages