Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608506, licensed for 120 residents, listed as licensed/pending increase in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 59 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 120 residents · Glendale, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608506, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1220 S Mariposa St · Glendale, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 242-9000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
120 NON-AMBULATORY, 30 OF WHICH MAYBE BEDRIDDEN ON ROOMS 32,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,79,83,84,85,87, 88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 67 times and filed 59 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 27, 2026
Occupancy at the December 13, 2022 visit
76 of 120 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 1, 2021 to December 13, 2022. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (21). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 29 of 59 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 15 documents
Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints50typical 7
State visits on file67typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265502025121502024660202378020221516120219111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 242-9000

Is Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St licensed?

Yes — Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale (Los Angeles County): California license #197608506, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 120 residents. State records list 59 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record120 NON-AMBULATORY, 30 OF WHICH MAYBE BEDRIDDEN ON ROOMS 32,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,79,83,84,85,87, 88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.

How much does Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

76 of 120 beds occupied (63%) when the state visited on December 13, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 67 state visits and 59 dated documents since 2021 for Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 13, 2022, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring residents are not exposed to hazardous smells. Staff are not ensuring the facility ventilation system is not in disrepair. Staff are not ensuring the floors are free of dirt.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Administrator, Susan Park. The purpose of the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Chan toured the facility and obtained copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and housekeeping assignment sheet. Interviews were held with the Administrator, 5 Staff, and 7 Residents. The investigation revealed the following: For allegation - Staff are not ensuring residents are not exposed to hazardous smells. It is alleged that the smoke and/or smells from the kitchen is polluting the facility and making residents sick. Administrator Park denied any hazardous smells that are causing any residents to be sick. She stated that this concern was brought to her attention and it has been addressed. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 13, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221207084028
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff refused to accept resident back after hospital stay.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint investigation at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Susan Park (Administrator) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff/Resident rosters, Resident #1's (R#1) Physician's Report, 30 Day Notice to Quit and Medical Records. LPA also interviewed Staff #1 in the Activity Room and interviewed Skilled Nursing Social Worker via telephone. In regards to the allegation: Facility staff refused to accept resident back after hospital stay. Interview with Staff #1 indicate R#1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/21/22 and was later transferred to a Skill Nursing facility on 12/02/22. R#1 returned to the facility on 12/05/22 from the Skilled Nursing facility and was not refused acceptance back to the facility. Review of medical records indicate R#1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/21/22. LPA verified with the Skilled Nursing facility Social Worker that R#1 was at tCDSS inspection report, December 8, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221201141010
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report supersedes the complaint investigation report created on 11/03/2022 due to the initial report containing client confidential information (diagnostic). No other changes have been made to the report. On 11/03/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted the initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Susan Park and explained the purpose of today's visit. During this visit, LPA obtained a copy of the resident roster, staff roster, interviewed Staff #1 through Staff #3 (S-1 through S-3) and reviewed file for Resident #1 (R-1) and obtained copies of relevant documentation. R-1 is no longer residing at this facility. LPA attempted to interview R-1 via telephone at R-1's current location and was unable to interview as R-1 did not understand interview questions. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 28, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221028082245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted the initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Susan Park and explained the purpose of today's visit. During this visit, LPA obtained a copy of the resident roster, staff roster, interviewed Staff #1 through Staff #3 (S-1 through S-3) and reviewed file for Resident #1 (R-1) and obtained copies of relevant documentation. R-1 is no longer residing at this facility. LPA attempted to interview R-1 via telephone at R-1's current location and was unable to interview as R-1 did not understand interview questions. Per record review, R-1 is diagnosed with Dementia. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 3, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221028082245
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado made an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings for the complaint regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Maldonado met with Administrator Susan Park and explained the purpose for the visit. On 10/20/22, LPA Maldonado made an initial visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegations. During the visit, LPA reqested a copy of the resident and staff roster, and the Facesheet and Physician's Repor for Residents# 1-7 (R1-R7). LPA also requested copies of the following documents for R1: Psychiatric Evalutions and Incident Reports for the months of March 2022-October 2022, Eviction Notice, Copy of House Rules, and written warning of possible eviction. The following documents were obtained for Staff# 1-3 (S1-S3): Personnel Records and Required Training Certification. Interviews were conducted with R1-R7 and S1-S3. (Report Continued on LIC9099-C...) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221018112737
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaliating against a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joe Katrdzhyan conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Staff / Darkis Giron and was later joined by the Administrator / Susan Park who assisted with the visit. LPA Katrdzhyan explained the purpose of today’s visit is to discuss the above mentioned allegation of "Facility is retaliating against a resident". During today's visit, LPA interviewed the Administrator, the Assistant Administrator and Resident 1 (R1). Also, copies of the following documents were obtained and reviewed in reference to R1; • Identification and Emergency Information • Physician's Report • Admission Agreement • Unusual Incident/Injury Reports • 30 Day Notice to Quit • Friendly Reminder/Final Written Order • House Rules • Medical Reports from LA Downtown Medical Center (LADMC) Please see LIC 9099C for additional information UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221017102430
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet resident's needs. Resident's personal belongings are missing.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Asst. Administrator (A2: Rachel de Chavez). LPA/RA spoke to A2 prior to entering the facility to conduct a risk assessment. A2 informed LPA/RA that the facility has no COVID cases nor do any of the residents or staff have symptoms. The purpose of today’s visit is to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. An initial 10-Day visit was conducted by LPA Nicol Wesley on 10/01/21. LPA/RA Ceniceros re-interviewed (between 2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m.) Asst. Administrator (A2: Rachel de Chavez) and Witness #1 (W1: Dr. James Lee, M.D.). Resident #1 was not re-interviewed; as the resident moved on 08/16/22 and the contact numbers were out of service. LPA/RA Ceniceros reviewed (between 2:45 p.m. – 3:20 p.m.) the requested documents: Emergency I.D. & Information Face Sheet, Physician’s Report (dated 06/22/22) - including additional documents:CDSS inspection report, September 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210924163328
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not assist the resident with making phone calls as needed. Resident not accorded dignity in personal relationships with staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted a visit in response to the above allegations. On today's visit, LPA met with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez who assisted with the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff do not assist resident #1 with making phone calls as needed, the investigation consisted of : Interviews with Assistant Administrator, Staff #1 and Resident #1- Resident #6 and review of Resident #1's file. Assistant Administrator and Staff #1 stated that resident(s) who receive phone calls at the facility are assisted when needed. Staff interviewed stated that if a call comes in for a resident, staff will page the resident, and will transfer the phone call to another phone for the resident. Resident(s) interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of Six resident(s) interviewed stated that staff do provide assistance to resident(s) with phone calls when needed. Regarding the allegation that Resident #1 is not accorded dignity in persCDSS inspection report, August 18, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220812093156
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident(s) not being provided their prescriptions as prescribed. Resident(s) medications not being refilled in a timely manner. Facility is in disrepair. Unqualified staff providing residents medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Siranush Aleksanyan - Receptionist and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 4/4/22 LPA Flores requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA and assistant administrator tour rooms #20,12,32,29,48,96,90, hallways, and dining room. LPA Flores interviewed residents #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7, assistant administrator(S1), and staff #2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5). LPA Flores reviewed medication for residents #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6),#7(R7) and requested copies of medication sheets (MARS) for January, February, March 2022 for R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6,R7, training for staff, call logs for physician/pharmacy contacts, contract for roof repairs. On 7/14/22 LPA Flores requested copy of staff/resident roster, Med-Tech notes for March, and delivered findings for the above allegations.CDSS inspection report, July 14, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220328134143
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep resident's records confidential
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: LPA conducted interviews with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez, Receptionist Darkis Giron and Resident 1-7 (R1-7). LPA obtained copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed R1's facility file and collected copies of the following documents: Identification and Emergency Information (LIC601),Physician's Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) dated 2/8/22, Functional Capability Assessment (LIC9172) dated 2/14/22, Individual Service Plan (ISP) dated 2/9/22, Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 11/24/20 and Internal Resident Incident Reports for dates 2/17/22 - 6/1/22. LPA also attempted a call to The Gardens of El Monte. (See LIC9099C for continuation)CDSS inspection report, June 9, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220603145532
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being discriminated against while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to investigate the above allegation. Interviews were conducted from 9:30 AM to 11:30 AM with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and Resident's R1-R8. File was reviewed for Resident R8 and SIR's, Physician's Report, and Emergency ID page were submitted. In regards to the allegation Resident is being discriminated against while in care, based on interviews conducted and information gathered all 8 residents interviewed had not observed any discrimination. Resident R 8 confirmed that staff are respectful on a daily basis and staff are ok. Stated that unhappy that family member isn't able to stay overnight. 7 of 8 resident's interviewed stated staff are nice, respectful and do a good job. Staff interviewed stated that they do person centered care and there is no discriminaCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220525084343
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident belongings not safeguarded. Resident’s medications are being mismanaged
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an Initial 10-Day complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Assistant Administrator, Rachel De Chavez. Investigation consisted of the following: interviews of staff from Staff #1 (S1) through Staff #4 (S4); interviews of residents from Resident#1 (R1) through Resident #6 (R6); reviewed resident#1’s (R1) record reviews, and a facility tour. LPA obtained copies of the Staff and Resident Rosters; and residen files for Resident #1 (R1) with relevant information. The investigation revealed the following: For the allegation of “resident belongings not safeguarded”, it was alleged that resident#1 had several items stolen from resident's room. (-continued in LIC 9099 C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220524162211
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator does not ensure a safe and healthful environment for residents Financial abuse Administrator is retaliating against a resident Staff do not assist residents with incontinence needs Resident do not get enough to eat Staff do not provide snacks to residents Staff do not afford resident confidentiality Staff do not safeguard residents property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Marina Pink and Assistant Administrator, Rachel De Chavez who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that Administrator does not ensure a safe and healthful environment to residents, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Staff #1 and Resident #1- Resident #6. Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that the facility does ensure a safe and healthful environment for residents. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 5 out of 6 residents stated that the environment at the facility is safe and healthful. Regarding the allegation of financial abuse, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Staff #1 and Resident #1- Resident #6. Adminstrator and staff interviewed denied the allegaCDSS inspection report, April 6, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220329161435
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not meet the residents dietary needs. Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Rachel De Chavez, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the staff roster, resident roster, food menu, staff schedule and duties, list of diabetic residents, and a resident tracking sheet. A tour of the dining room and kitchen was conducted with Staff. LPA also interviewed 6 Staff and 7 Residents today. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation - Staff do not meet the residents dietary needs. The facility has started a seasonal menu which began on March 6, 2022 and menu will change every quarter. Per the Administrator, the food menu is created by a licensed dietitian from the New Menus Solution Company, who looks at the dietary needs of residents on low sodium, low carbs, and/or those with diabetes. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 30, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220324093208

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member inappropriately touched resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation findings for the above stated allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: During the initial visit conducted on 11/16/20, LPA conducted a telephone interview with Office Manager Leticia Flores and also conducted a televisit via Facetime with Office Manager for the purpose of conducting a health and safety check. LPA Gonzalez and Office Manager Flores toured the facility. Health and safety check included a tour of the entire facility including lobby and dining room and a sample of resident rooms. LPA did not observe any signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA additionally requested and received copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. On 12/16/21, LPA Gonzalez interviewed Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez, Office Manager Leticia Flores and Licensee/CDSS inspection report, December 16, 2021 · control 28-AS-20201113111739
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff threatens residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Marina Pink and Assistance Administrator, Rachel De Chavez who assisted with today's visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with administrator, assistant administrator, staff #3 to staff #7, interviews with residents #1 to resident #7, and review of resident #1 files. Regarding the allegation that Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect, it was alleged that Staff#7 (R7) talk to Resident# 1 (R1) in a disrespectful manner. Per staff interviews, seven (7) of seven (7) staff denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed staff treat residents with respect and dignity. Per resident interviews, seven (7) of seven (7) residents could not corroborate the allegation. LPA observed that staff treat residents with respect and dignity during the visit. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 8, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211129121019
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted an initial complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. The purpose of the visit was discussed with Administrator Marina Pink. The investigation consisted of the following: A physical plant tour of the facility, record review, staff (S1- S6), and residents (R1- R8) were interviewed. Resident (R1's) file was reviewed and documents [Admission Agreement, Face Sheet, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Physician Report, Individual Service Plan (ISP), Resident Appraisal, Functional Capability Assessment, incident reports,bathing schedule, staff roster, and resident roster ] were obtained. No health and safety issues were observed during the visit. See LIC 9099C for report continuation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 18, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211116162531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are abusing residents Staff are stealing from residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
This report supersedes report generated on 8/20/2021 to clarify previous report.********* Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA's) Linda Almaraz and Luis Mora conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA's met with Assistant Administrator Leticia Flores and explained the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/24/2020, LPA Almaraz interviewed Staff #1-2. On 8/20/2021, LPA's interviewed Flores, Staff #3-5, Residents #1-7 and requested a copy of staff and resident roster. The investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews conducted with staff they have not seen any other staff be abusive to residents or towards residents. Staff also stated they have not heard or been told by residents that they are being mistreated or abused. In regards to the allegation "Staff are stealing from residents," all interviews conducted stated they have not hear of any staff stealing from residents. ( Continued on an LIC 90CDSS inspection report, November 6, 2021 · control 28-AS-20201217072050
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being harassed by another resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Marina Pink and Assistant Administrator, Rachel De Chavez who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that resident is being harrassed by another resident. The investigation consisted of interviews with administrator, assistant administrator, interviews with residents #1 - resident #5, and review of resident #1 and resident #2 files. The investigation revealed that there was an incident on 9/17/21, involving resident #1 and resident #2. Resident #1 stated that resident #2 came to his room, holding an aersol can and threatening to spray it at him. Resident #2 stated that she was holding an aerosol can, but she did not threaten resident #1. Staff interviewed stated that resident #1 and resident #2 have an ongoing issue due to resident #1's playing his music too loudly for resident #2's liking. Resident #3 witnessed the incideCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211020141223
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting residents with voting
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: LPA collected copies of Staff and Resident Rosters, conducted interviews with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez at 10:15am -10:30am, Office Manager Leticia Flores at 10:45am, Receptionist Siranush Aleksanyan at 11:00am, Activity Director Shirley Lee at 11:15am and Residents 1-7 (R1-7) from 11:30-12:30pm. (See LIC9099C for continuation) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 20, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210913134558
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: On 10/19/20, LPA conducted an interview with Office Manager Leticia Flores and obtained copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. On 9/20/21, LPA collected copies of Staff and Resident Rosters, conducted interviews with Assistant Administrator Rachel De Chavez at 10:15am -10:30am, Office Manager Leticia Flores at 10:45am, Receptionist Siranush Aleksanyan at 11:00am, Activity Director Shirley Lee at 11:15am and Residents 1-7 (R1-7) from 11:30-12:30pm. LPA also reviwed R8's facility file and (See LIC9099C for continuation) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 20, 2021 · control 28-AS-20201012151908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Linda Almaraz conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was met by Assistant Administrator, Leticia Flores and explained the purpose of today's visit. Later during the visit, Administrator Marina Pink arrived. The investigation consisted of the following: On 7/17/20, LPA conducted telephone interviews with Flores, and Staff #1-3. On 8/31/21, LPA interviewed Staff #4-6 and attempted to interview Staff #7 and Residents' #1 (1:1) Caregiver but was unable because Staff #7 was not at the facility and the 1:1 caregiver was no longer working at the facility. LPA contacted staffing agency for the residents 1:1 caregiver but was not able to reach anyone. LPA also interviewed Residents #1-7. Resident #1's and Staff #1 and 2 file was also requested. The investigation revealed the following: On 7/11/20, an incident occurred at the facility were Resident #1 was getting the residents daily eyedrops from Staff #7 anCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2021 · control 28-AS-20200716165452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff stole resident's valuable items
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicole Spencer conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Spencer met with assistant administrator Rachel de Chavez and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit on 6/21/21, LPA Spencer took a tour of the physical plant and interviewed staff #1-3 (S1-S3) and residents #1-7 (R1-R7). During subsequent visit on 8/31/21, LPA interviewed staff #4-5 (S4-S5). LPA received copies of the staff roster, resident roster, theft and loss policy, and for R7: physician’s report, individual service plan (ISP), personal property inventory list and incident reports from May-July 2021. See LIC9099C for continuation of this narrative. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210614095847
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are abusing residents Staff are stealing from residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA's) Linda Almaraz and Luis Mora conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA's met with Assistant Administrator Leticia Flores and explained the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/24/2020, LPA Almaraz interviewed Staff #1-2. On 8/20/2021, LPA's interviewed Flores, Staff #3-5 and requested a copy of staff and resident roster. The investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews conducted with staff they have not seen any other staff be abusive to residents or towards residents. Staff also stated they have not heard or been told by residents that they are being mistreated or abused. In regards to the allegation "Staff are stealing from residents," all interviews conducted stated they have not hear of any staff stealing from residents. ( Continued on an LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 20, 2021 · control 28-AS-20201217072050
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 06/01/2021. The purpose of this amended Licensing report is to change the finding to unsubstantiated. *** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an initial complaint investigation of the above allegation on 06/01/21 and subsequent visit on 06/02/22. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit to Rachel. On 06/01/21, investigation consisted of staff interviews from staff#1 to staff#4; resident interviews from resident #1 to resident #8; review of maintenance log; and obtained Resident roster and Staff roster. For the allegation of “facility is in disrepair”, investigation revealed that facility's underground water pipe had burst and water was off for a half day on 05/25/21 and 05/26/21 to complete the repair. Plumbing issue was completed on 05/26/21. Seven out of seven residents confirmed the facility’s water was off only half day and had water supply for half day. Four out of fCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210526161530

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 67 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
50
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
67
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 242-9000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Glen Park At Glendale - Mariposa St? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.