Victor Royale, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197608401, licensed for 60 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 94 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Victor Royale, Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 60 residents · Glendale, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197608401, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
120 E. Laurel Street · Glendale, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 243-7442
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 49 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
49 NON-AMBULATORY, 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 11 & 28. AMBULATORY ONLY IN COTTAGES 1511 & 1515. HOSPICE FOR 6.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 110 times and filed 94 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the August 8, 2022 visit
55 of 60 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to August 8, 2022. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (20). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 44 of 94 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20268 state visits · 9 documents
Jul 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202414 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations22typical 1
Substantiated complaints26typical 2
Total complaints82typical 7
State visits on file110typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026890202591002024141802023151702022283322021893
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 243-7442

Is Victor Royale, Llc licensed?

Yes — Victor Royale, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Glendale (Los Angeles County): California license #197608401, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 60 residents. State records list 94 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Victor Royale, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Victor Royale, Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record49 NON-AMBULATORY, 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 11 & 28. AMBULATORY ONLY IN COTTAGES 1511 & 1515. HOSPICE FOR 6.

How much does Victor Royale, Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Victor Royale, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Victor Royale, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Victor Royale, Llc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

55 of 60 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on August 8, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Victor Royale, Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 110 state visits and 94 dated documents since 2021 for Victor Royale, Llc; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 8, 2022, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have all required posted signs in the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted a visit in response to the above allegation. On today's visit, LPA met with Administrator, Peter Babaian who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that facility does not have all required posted signs in the facility, the investigation consisted of : Interview with Administrator, Staff #1, as well as facility tour and review of facility wall posting(s). Administrator and Staff #1 stated that they recently removed some of the posted signs, because they were redecorating the facility, and adding wall paper to the facility. Administrator stated that the redecorating was completed approximately 2-3 months ago. LPA observed that the Ombudsman poster was posted on a white board in the hallway. LPA observed that all required postings were not posted on today's visit : Residents' Rights, Community Care licensing report(s), Resident council information, non discrimination notice, and admission agreement was not posted, nor wCDSS inspection report, August 8, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220801153004
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to prevent resident from AWOL’ing from facility. Staff is admitting residents who need a higher level of care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado made a subsequent unannounced complaint visit at the facility regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA Maldonado met with assistant Administrator Alise Nazarian and Administrator Peter Babaian, and explained the purpose for the visit. During today's visit, LPA Maldonado toured the physical plant with assistant administrator Alise Nazarian. A copy of the resident and staff roster were requested, as well as a copy of the following documents for Resident# 1 (R1): Admission's agreement, Physician's report, identification and emergency information, Preplacement Appraisal, Needs and Services Plan, Medication Administration Records (MARs) for September 2020, and the Plan of Operations- Absentee Notification Plan for Missing Residents. Administrator, assistant adminstrator, Staff# 1 (S1), and Residents# 2-6 (R2-R6) were also interviewed. Report Continued on LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20200909154000
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting residents with medical appointments
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/21/22 at 9:30 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with S1 and explained the purpose of the visit. At 10:15 Administrator Peter Babaian joined the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During today’s visit LPA toured the facility with S1, obtained the resident/ staff roster, and obtained a copy of S1-S6 LIC-602. The investigation reveals the following: Regarding “staff is not assisting residents with medical appointments”, it is alleged that residents have not received a second booster. 6/6 residents confirmed staff assists residents with medical appointments and COVID vaccinations. Report Continued on LIC9099c UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220714083638
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not make the phone available frequently. Staff did not provide adequate first aid. Staff do not intervene when resident is bullied. Admission Agreement is not adhered to
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Calderon initiated a subsequent unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Peter Babian and explained the purpose of the visit which was to deliver investigation findings. On 03/24/21, LPA Tao conducted a telephonic initial visit, during visit, LPA interviewed Staff #1, Staff #2, Staff # 3, and Resident #1 and obtained copies of resident roster and staff schedule. LPA Tao requested copies of the following documents, Resident#1’s (R1) Face sheet, physician report, admission agreement, appraisal -needs and services plan, incident reports for March 2021 related to R1, training logs regarding residents’ rights, wound care, first aid, residents being bullied and staff #1’s &#2 first aid certificates. Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20210319083138
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not keep resident's bathroom clean & sanitary Staff is retaliating against resident for complaining
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Peter Babaian and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained a copy of the residents and staff rosters, conducted a tour of the facility and interviewed the Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 3 (S1 - S3) and Resident 1 - Resident 6 (R1 - R6). The investigaion revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff did not keep resident's bathroom clean & sanitary", it is alleged that S2 refused to clean smeared feces in a private bathroom inside a shared resident bedroom. Other staff were asked to do it, but also refused. The administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that none of the staff have denied to clean any bathroom. (CONTINUED TO LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 12, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220707144303
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident Staff handled resident in a rough manner Resident sustained injuries while in care Staff threatened residents Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On the above date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an intiail 10 days complaint which included the 24 hours healthy and safety check. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Alise Nazarian and explained the reason of the visit and she also assisted LPA with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: A physical plant tour of the facility was conducted. No health and safety issues were observed. LPA also interviewed seven residents (R1-R7), administrator and five staff (S1-S5) and also obtained copy of residents roster, staff roster and incident report for R1 and reviewd the residents' diaper changing log book The investigation revealed of the following: Allegation#1 " Staff hit resident." LPA interviewed seven residents and six out of seven residents denied the allegation and reported they never seen any staff hit resident. LPA interviewed the victim and also denied any staff was hitting him in the facility and reported it never happened. (See LIC 909CDSS inspection report, June 30, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220628163253
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not post Ombudsman poster.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/21/22 at 10:05 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival LPA met with Peter Babaian(Administrator) and explained the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of the following: During today’s visit LPA toured the facility with assistant administrator, obtained resident/ staff roster, remodeling invoice dated 10/26/2021- 2/10/22 and photo of remodeling sign posted outside dining room. LPA interviewed residents R1- R7. LPA Interviewed administrator, Staff S1- S3. The investigation reveals the following: In regard to "Staff does not post Ombudsman poster.", it is alleged that the facility does not have the Ombudsman poster posted in the facility. During the visit LPA toured the facility and was not able to locate the Ombudsman poster. LPA observed a signed posted by dining room confirming remolding started August 16th, 2021. Administrator confirmed poster was removed during facility remodeling on MaCDSS inspection report, June 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220615161924
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not allowed to participate in their appraisal needs and services plan.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Peter Babaian Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA interview resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6), administrator, staff #2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4). Requested copies of identification and emergency information sheet, physician's report, appraisal/needs and service plan for R1,R2,R3,R4,R5 and assisted living waiver(ALW) individual service plan (ISP) for R1 from resident's files. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Residents are not allowed to participate in their appraisal needs and services plan. It is alleged staff have not included resident in decision making regarding appraisal needs and service care plan. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220616144854
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility refused to comply with resident's physician report Staff spoke to resident inappropriately
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Peter Babaian who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that the facility refused to comply with resident #1's physician's report, the investigation consisted of Review of Resident #1's physician report, and Interview(s) with Administrator, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Resident #1 - Resident #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed stated that resident #1 resides in a cottage which is located behind the main building. Administrator and staff interviewed stated that the cottages are for ambulatory residents. Staff stated that resident #1's physician report dated 4/19/22 states that he is ambulatory, however he has been using a walker for the last couple of months due to reduced mobility. Staff indicated that they would prefer resident #1 move to the main building for his safety. However, they are not going to move resident #1 aCDSS inspection report, May 4, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220429103611
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled a resident inappropriately Staff locked a resident in the patio Staff did not intervene during resident to resident conflict Staff do not safeguard table setting for residents in dining room Staff are interfering with resident phone calls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with administrator Peter Babaian and explained the purpose of today's visit. An initial 10-day telephonic complaint visit was conducted on 12/28/2020 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) P. Rivas. A subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 12/10/2021 by LPA N. Margaryan. During the visit LPA Margaryan conducted interviews with the administrator, facility staff and residents regarding the allegations listed above. Continue 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2022 · control 28-AS-20201218154545
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident not allowed telephone calls.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Peter Barbarian administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/11/22 LPA Flores conducted initial visit and requested copies of resident and staff roster. LPA Flores observed facility's cordless telephone at front desk, pay phone in patio, pay phone at cottage accessible to residents in working condition. LPA interview residents #1(R1), #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4), #5(R5). LPA Flores requested copies of facility phone bills for the last 3 months to be email to LPA by end of day. On 4/11/22 LPA Flores requested copies of phone bills for the months of November 2021 - February 2022 and interviewed Staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),and#4(S4). (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220104154426
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not provided with a 30 day notice to change rooms
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Peter Barbaian and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested copies of staff/resident roster, Resident #1(R1) 30 day notice, admission agreeement, physician's report, appraisal needs and care plan, notices for room change. LPA Flores interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R3),#5(R5),#6(R6) administrator, staff #2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation; Resident was not provided with a 30 day notice to change rooms. It is alleged resident was not provided with a 30 day notice to change rooms. (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220405121014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate food service for residents Staff are not properly sanitizing dishes
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with LVN-Amy Smbatuni and explained the reason of the visit. Shortly after, the administrator Peter Babaian arrived. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the kitchen and dining room. LPA interviewed six (6) residents (R1-R6) and administrator and four (4) staff (S1-S4) and obtained copy of the resident and staff roster and the menu for the week. The investigation revealed of the following: Allegation#1 "Staff are not providing adequate food service for residents." LPA interviewed six (6) residents and five (5) residents reported they always get enough food in the facility. They can have second plate if they want and they can get substitue choices if they do not like the food on the meun of the day. They were never being hungry or starving in the facility. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220318101341
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident did not receive proper room change notice
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alma Gonzalez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to gather information pertaining to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Peter Babaian and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of: LPA conducted interviews with Administrator Peter Babaian, Assistant Administrator Alice Nazarian, Staff 1 (S1) and Residents 1-5 (R1-5). LPA requested and received copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed R1's file and obtained copies the following documents: Admission Agreement, Resident Appraisal dated 1/1/21, Identification and Emergency Information dated 3/5/21, Physician's Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) LIC602A dated 5/19/21, Appraisal/ Needs and Services Plan dated 1/1/21 and 1/1/22, Two letters addressed to R1 dated 3/10/22 and 3/15/22, Unusual Incident/ Injury Report LIC624 dated 2/28/22 and 3/25/21. LPA also conducted a tour of facility which included observations of commoCDSS inspection report, March 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220310140032
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not keeping copies of the last 30 days of menus
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trueman conducted a complaint visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Peter Babaian and explained the reason for the visit. The kitchen was toured at 12:45 PM along with Assistant Administrator Alice Mazarian and the menu for 2/27 to 3/5 was posted and a sufficient supply of perishables and non-perishables were observed. Reception desk was toured and included a binder containing menus. From 12:30 PM to 1:15 PM Staff S1- S4 were interviewed. From 1:10 PM to 1:30 PM Resident R 1 was interviewed telephonically. In regards to the allegation Facility is not keeping copies of the last 30 days of menus,during tour LPA observed a binder containing menus from 1/30 to 3/5. Staff interviewed stated binder is always kept with 6 weeks of past menus available for review and menu for current week is posted by dining room. Resident 1 stated that he wants to review past 30 days of menus and if there are 6 weeks in binder that is goodCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220222160553
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility administration is telling the resident he has to change his insurance to their insurance.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegation. LPA met with Peter Babaian and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Staff and Resident Rosters. LPA also reviewed Resident #1 (R1's) file and obtained copies of the following documents: Copy of Insurance Card, Physician's Report, ID Emergency Information, Resident Appraisal, and Needs & Services Plan. LPA also interviewed Staff #1 - Staff # 2 and Resident #1 (R1) - Resident #5 (R5). The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "facility administration is telling the resident he has to change his insurance to their insurance", it is alleged that facility administrators are telling a resident that he must change his insurance to the facility insurance company. It is alleged that this resident would lose his dental and vision insurance if the change is made and would haveCDSS inspection report, February 15, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220208095038
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in inappropriate interactions between resident's.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Peter Babaian (Administrator) and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff schedule and Resident roster. LPA interviewed Staff #1 in the office at 10:20 am and interview Resident #2 and #3 in their bedrooms between 10:40 am to 11:10 am. In regards to the allegation: Lack of supervision resulting in inappropriate interactions between resident's. A review of the Staff schedule indicate Staff is sufficient on the date of the incident. There is one night staff on duty and 3 staff on call which can arrived to the facility within 10 minutes if notified. Interviews with Resident and Staff revealed that on the night of the incident, Resident #3 was in Resident #2's bedroom for a cigarette. There is no indication that Residents engaged in any type of inappropriate interactions. Continue to LIC9099C...... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220203150134

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was pushed by another resident. Staff allow residents to smoke inside the facility. Resident was not accorded a healthful accommodation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
/22/2021 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nina Galarza conducted an unannounced subsequent visit regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with staff, Amy Smbatuni and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA later met with Administrator Peter Babaian and stated the purpose of the visit. On 12/15/2021 LPA toured the facility with Staff#1(S1). The investigation consisted of the following; On 12/15/2021, interviews with Administrator, Staff #1-5(S1-S5) and Residents #1-5(R1-R5). On 12/15/2021 LPA obtained copies of staff roster, resident roster, face sheet for R1-R5, admission agreement and house rules. On 12/22/2021, interviews with Administrator and R1- R5. On 12/22/21 LPA obtained copies of staff roster, resident roster, facility sketch, and notice of construction. CONTINUED 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 22, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211209150317
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident changed another resident's diaper while in care Facility has inadequate record keeping Staff are not meeting the diapering needs of the residents Staff did not prevent a resident on resident altercation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicole Spencer conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegations listed above. LPA Spencer was met by administrator Peter Babaian and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit on 7/20/21, LPA Spencer took a tour of the physical plant and interviewed the administrator, staff #1-4 (S1-S4) and residents #1-6 (R1-R6). LPA attempted to interview S5 but was unable to be reached and R2 was non-verbal so the interview was discontinued. LPA received copies of the staff roster, resident roster, and diapering logs for three (3) specified residents. During today's visit on 12/9/21, LPA Spencer interviewed staff #6 (S6), resident #7-9 (R7-R9), and collected copies of needs and services plan for two specified residents. ***See LIC9099C for continuation of this narrative*** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 9, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210715162136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff pushed resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kruz Long conducted an unannounced complaint at the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with Alise Nazarian and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Peter Babaian arrived a short time later and assisted with the complaint investigation. During today's visit, LPA obtained a copy of the Staff/Resident rosters and interviewed Staff #1 in the office at 9:39 am, interviewed Resident #1 in the office at 10:12 am, interviewed Residents #2 and #3 in the office between 10:56 am to 11:19 am and interviewed Staff #2 and #3 in the office via telephone between 11:34 am to 12:12 pm. In regards to the allegation: Staff pushed resident: LPA's interviews with Staff and Resident who were present during the time of incident was not able to corroborate Staff pushed Resident. Continue to LIC9099C........ UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 8, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211103151811
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced complaint visit to address the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Peter Babaian. The purpose of the visit was discussed. The investigation consisted of the following: On today's visit, LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed residents #1-#7 (R1-R7), and interviewed Staff #1-#6 (S1-S6). LPA also reviewed R1's facility file. The investigation revealed of the following: In regards to the allegation, "Staff left resident in soiled clothing for an extended period of time." it was alleged that on 10/23/21, it was observed that R1's diaper had not been changed and was left with soiled clothing. (6) of (6) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (7) of (7) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews with staff show that R1 does wear a diaper but as a personal choice. Interviews state that R1 is able to use the restroom and staff frequently ask R1 if they would like assistance but R1CDSS inspection report, November 4, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211027104935
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff engaged in a physical altercation with a resident while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Linda Almaraz conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit in regards to the allegation above. LPA was greeted by Peter Babaian and Alise Nazarian and explained the reason for todays visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/27/2020, LPA Almaraz conducted telephonic interviews with Administrator, Staff #1-4, and Residents #1-4. LPA requested copies of: Staff and Resident Roster, Police report number and Incident Reports. LPA also requested video footage of the incident. On 9/15/2021, LPA requested files for Staff #2, Resident #1 and #5. LPA also attempted to interviewed Resident #5 but the resident no longer lives at the facility. The investigation revealed the following: Based on interviews conducted, on 8/19/2020, Staff #2 was near a reception area when Resident #1 came by and was standing near the area. Staff #2 stated that Resident #1 was trying to enter the back of the reception area and told Resident #1, resident could not gCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2021 · control 28-AS-20200819155029
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with receiving medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Chan and Nune Margaryan conducted a complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPAs met with Alise Nazarian, Assistant Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs interviewed the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, 3 Staff, and 6 Residents. LPAs obtained a copy of the Staff and Resident rosters, and documents for Resident #1 (R1): Face Sheet, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Physican's Report, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Medication log from January - June 2021, and facility notes. Resident #1 has not returned to the facility since 6/11/21 and was not interviewed. In regards to allegation - Staff did not assist resident with receiving medication. According to interviews with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and 1 Staff, they were aware of Resident #1's (R1) refusal of medication. Staff interviewed noticed that R1's behavior was becoming more agressive than usual and the refusal of medicationsCDSS inspection report, July 20, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210713094059
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not conducting fire drills.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Sicairos conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above stated allegation. LPA met with Alise Nazarian and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Peter Babian arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA toured the facility and obtained Staff & Resident Rosters. LPA reviewed the LPA also interviewed the Administrator and Staff #1 - Staff #2. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "facility is not conducting fire drills", it is alleged that since the facility was last cited for this same allegation back in 2020, the facility has only conducted 1 fire drill. Per interview with Administrator, the last drill was conducted on 04/23/21 in the afternoon shift. However, Administrator was unable to provide documentation of said drill. (CONTINUED ON 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210707161111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not notified to participate in their appraisal needs and services plan.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Elizabeth Irra and Nune Margaryan conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with the Assistant Administrator and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The Facility Administrator arrived at approcximately 10:20 A.M. and assisted with this visit. During today's visit, LPAs interviewed the Assistant Administrator (S-1), Facility Administrator (S-2), Licensed Vocational Nurse (S-3), Activities Director (S-4) and Housekeeper (S-5). LPAs also interviewed Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #5 (R-5) and reviewed Residents files. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210629083147

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 110 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
22
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
26
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
82
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
110
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 243-7442
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Victor Royale, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.