Brookdale Monrovia is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Monrovia, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197606301, licensed for 75 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Brookdale Monrovia

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 75 residents · Monrovia, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197606301, held since 2005 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
201 E Foothill Blvd · Monrovia, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 301-0204
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 34 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE 41 AMBULATORY AND 34 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND OVER. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS. NON-AMBULATORY TO BE HOUSED ON SECOND FLOOR ONLY. NO BEDRIDDEN ALLOWED.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 12, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 12, 2026
Occupancy at the October 2, 2025 visit
69 of 75 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 4, 2021 to October 2, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following reporting requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Konishi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Danny Vera, Exedutive Director and Ken Patrick Padilla Wellness Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director, Danny Vera arrived shortly after and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Resident #1 (R1’s) file documents such as Face Sheet. LPA reviewed and requested copies of Resident #2 (R2’s) file documents such as Face Sheet, Physician's Report, Personal Rights, and Resident Personal Property and Valuables document. LPA interviewed the Executive Director, Wellness Director, Staff #1 (S1) to Staff # 6 (S6), Resident #1 (R1), and Resident #3 (R3) to Resident #8 (R8). LPA attempted to interview R2. However, R2 is currently at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and LPA attempted to call SNF but LPA was unable to speak with R2. LPA also obtained tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250925083433
Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speaks inappropriately to resident in care Staff does not ensure that residents' incontinence needs are being met Staff does not assist residents, when responding to call button

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Logan Harrison, Executive Director for the facility, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #1 - 7 (R1 - R7), conducted a tour of the facility, and also obtained the staff and resident rosters, tested a call light pendant of a resident, obtained the police report number for the investigation conducted by the Monrovia Police Department, and also reviewed the staff file of Staff #6 (S6). LPA attempted to interview Staff #6 however they had recently resigned. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Staff speaks inappropriately to resident in care," it is alleged that S6 had been making inappropriate and belittling remarks towards R1. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250221115902
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to adhere the admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit and met with Executive Director Logan Harrison. The purpose of today’s visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: Interview with Executive Director Logan Harrison (person assigned to handle admissions, discharge and refunds, and interviews with 4 residents. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and Resident #1’s (R1) facility files, admission agreement, Preplacement Appraisal Information, ID and Emergency Information, and R1’s 30-day notice to vacate. (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231107160807
Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not clean resident's room. Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of the residents in care. Unqualified staff are performing glucose testing for residents in care. Facility staff are not properly trained. Staff did not ensure that a resident was administered medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Administrator, Logan Harrison. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit is to discuss the above-mentioned allegations. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, facility tours, and review of facility records. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and residents’ facility files. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to allegation “staff did not clean resident's room," it was alleged that staff did not clean resident’s room who had dog(s). Seven (7) out of seven (7) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Two (2) residents interviewed had a dog and five (5) residents interviewed did not have pets. Resident interviews revealed that staff clean resident's rooms daily and housekeeping staff conducted deep cleaning weekly. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230918163747
Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not properly trained. Facility has pests. Resident's personal items poses a hazard for resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with the Administrator of the facility Logan Harrison and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: during the initial visit conducted on 04/14/2022, LPA Joe Katrdzyhyan interviewed two (2) Staff Members, three (3) Residents, toured the room of Resident #1 (R1), and obtained copies of the Course Completion History, Training Hours and Work Schedule for Staff #1 (S1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza reviewed these documents and also obtained an updated Staff and Resident Roster list, Physician Reports for Residents #3 - 5 (R3 - R5) along with Resident #8 (R8), and also obtained records of trainings for Staff #3 - 7 (S3 - S7). LPA Zaragoza also interviewed S2 - S7, and also Residents #2 - 8 (R2 - R8). LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer lives in the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220407091359
Aug 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fall due to lack of supervision Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner Resident did not receive hot meals

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Mia Nakamatzu Business Office Manager of the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Logan Harrison arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation revealed the following: during the initial visit conducted on 08/03/2022, LPA Joe Katrdzyhyan interviewed the Administrator, four (4) staff members, five (5) residents, and also obtained copies of Resident #1's (R1) Unusual incident/injury reports, Physician Report, Personal Service Plan, DIscharge Report, Residents/Staff Roster, and Facility Progress notes. During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza reviewed these documents and also obtained an updated Staff and Resident Roster list. LPA Zaragoza also interviewed Staff #1 - 6 (S1 - S6), and also Residents #2 - 9 (R2 - R9). LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer lives in the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220928101305
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2005.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025331202411020236702021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 301-0204

Is Brookdale Monrovia licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Monrovia is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Monrovia (Los Angeles County): California license #197606301, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 75 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 12, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Monrovia care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Monrovia with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE 41 AMBULATORY AND 34 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND OVER. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS. NON-AMBULATORY TO BE HOUSED ON SECOND FLOOR ONLY. NO BEDRIDDEN ALLOWED.

How much does Brookdale Monrovia cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Monrovia's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Monrovia accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Monrovia is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

69 of 75 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on October 2, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Monrovia?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Monrovia; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 2, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following reporting requirements
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Konishi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Danny Vera, Exedutive Director and Ken Patrick Padilla Wellness Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director, Danny Vera arrived shortly after and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of Resident #1 (R1’s) file documents such as Face Sheet. LPA reviewed and requested copies of Resident #2 (R2’s) file documents such as Face Sheet, Physician's Report, Personal Rights, and Resident Personal Property and Valuables document. LPA interviewed the Executive Director, Wellness Director, Staff #1 (S1) to Staff # 6 (S6), Resident #1 (R1), and Resident #3 (R3) to Resident #8 (R8). LPA attempted to interview R2. However, R2 is currently at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and LPA attempted to call SNF but LPA was unable to speak with R2. LPA also obtained tCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250925083433
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff speaks inappropriately to resident in care Staff does not ensure that residents' incontinence needs are being met Staff does not assist residents, when responding to call button
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Logan Harrison, Executive Director for the facility, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #1 - 7 (R1 - R7), conducted a tour of the facility, and also obtained the staff and resident rosters, tested a call light pendant of a resident, obtained the police report number for the investigation conducted by the Monrovia Police Department, and also reviewed the staff file of Staff #6 (S6). LPA attempted to interview Staff #6 however they had recently resigned. The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Staff speaks inappropriately to resident in care," it is alleged that S6 had been making inappropriate and belittling remarks towards R1. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 25, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250221115902

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to adhere the admission agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit and met with Executive Director Logan Harrison. The purpose of today’s visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: Interview with Executive Director Logan Harrison (person assigned to handle admissions, discharge and refunds, and interviews with 4 residents. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and Resident #1’s (R1) facility files, admission agreement, Preplacement Appraisal Information, ID and Emergency Information, and R1’s 30-day notice to vacate. (Continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231107160807
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not clean resident's room. Facility is not adequately staffed to meet the needs of the residents in care. Unqualified staff are performing glucose testing for residents in care. Facility staff are not properly trained. Staff did not ensure that a resident was administered medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tao conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Administrator, Logan Harrison. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit is to discuss the above-mentioned allegations. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, facility tours, and review of facility records. LPA obtained resident roster, staff roster, and residents’ facility files. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to allegation “staff did not clean resident's room," it was alleged that staff did not clean resident’s room who had dog(s). Seven (7) out of seven (7) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Two (2) residents interviewed had a dog and five (5) residents interviewed did not have pets. Resident interviews revealed that staff clean resident's rooms daily and housekeeping staff conducted deep cleaning weekly. (-continued in LIC 9099 C-) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230918163747
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not properly trained. Facility has pests. Resident's personal items poses a hazard for resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with the Administrator of the facility Logan Harrison and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: during the initial visit conducted on 04/14/2022, LPA Joe Katrdzyhyan interviewed two (2) Staff Members, three (3) Residents, toured the room of Resident #1 (R1), and obtained copies of the Course Completion History, Training Hours and Work Schedule for Staff #1 (S1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza reviewed these documents and also obtained an updated Staff and Resident Roster list, Physician Reports for Residents #3 - 5 (R3 - R5) along with Resident #8 (R8), and also obtained records of trainings for Staff #3 - 7 (S3 - S7). LPA Zaragoza also interviewed S2 - S7, and also Residents #2 - 8 (R2 - R8). LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer lives in the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220407091359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fall due to lack of supervision Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner Resident did not receive hot meals
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a follow up complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Mia Nakamatzu Business Office Manager of the facility and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Logan Harrison arrived shortly thereafter. The investigation revealed the following: during the initial visit conducted on 08/03/2022, LPA Joe Katrdzyhyan interviewed the Administrator, four (4) staff members, five (5) residents, and also obtained copies of Resident #1's (R1) Unusual incident/injury reports, Physician Report, Personal Service Plan, DIscharge Report, Residents/Staff Roster, and Facility Progress notes. During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza reviewed these documents and also obtained an updated Staff and Resident Roster list. LPA Zaragoza also interviewed Staff #1 - 6 (S1 - S6), and also Residents #2 - 9 (R2 - R9). LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer lives in the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220928101305
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to re-filled Prescription for resident Facility fail to inform responsible party prescription was not filled
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Wong conducted an unannounced initial 10 days complaint visit and LPA met with Business Office Manager Mia Nakamatzu who allowed the entry of the facility and explained the reason of the visit. Shortly after, the Executive Director Danny Vera arrived and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On today's visit, LPA interviewed Executive Director, three staff (S1-S3)in the facility and one staff via telephone and six residents (R2-R7) in the facility and obtained Resident#1 (R1) documents including face sheet, admission agreement, Medication Admin Adult Report (Jan to March, 2023), Physician Report dated on 05/06/2021, Personal Service Plan dated on 06/25/2022, Progress Notes (June 2022 to Feb 2023) and LPA reviewed three residents' medication in the facility. (See LIC 9099C for continuation) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230310090010

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident mistreated by staff Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joe Katrdzhyan conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Executive Director / Alison Pastores who assisted with the visit. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit is to discuss the above mentioned allegations of "Resident mistreated by staff" and "Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal property". During today's visit, LPA interviewed Resident #1 (R1), Staff #1 (S1) and former Executive Director / Ralph Balbin (via telephone). The investigation revealed the following; Allegation: Resident mistreated by staff. The details of this allegation states that R1 is sickened by how he was treated, and cries at night because of the treatment he received from former Executive Director / Ralph Balbin. During the interview with R1, R1 denied being abused by any staff members. The allegation of R1 being UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 4, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210729090721

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 301-0204
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Monrovia? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.