Quality Care Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bakersfield, Kern County, California — state license #157209146, licensed for 54 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 57 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Quality Care Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 54 residents · Bakersfield, CA · Kern County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #157209146, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2607 Mt. Vernon Avenue · Bakersfield, Kern County
Phone
(661) 871-8133
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 22 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 32 AMBULATORY & 22 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 66 times and filed 57 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the December 10, 2024 visit
49 of 54 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 5, 2022 to December 10, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (10), “Unfounded” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 46 of 57 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202413 state visits · 21 documents
Dec 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility. Staff did not file report in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Caregiver/Office Staff Jan Krizia Adajar. Administrator Nancy Cudal gave permission for Caregiver/Office Staff Jan Krizia Adajar to sign for this report. LPA reviewed and obtained copies of R1's file. Based on interviews and records review R1 can leave facility unassisted per LIC602. Based on records review and interviews, facility reported to Bakersfield Police Department report number 2024-00146406 on 12/3/24. Based on record reviews and interviews, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241204234223
Dec 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to pay electrical bill

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA interviewed Administrator. LPA obtained a copy of the electric bill showing a past due balance of $13,878.18. LPA received a photo of the PG & E Final notice posted at facility. Facility did not report to Licensing electric was going to be shut off. LPA requested copies of utility bills (water, garbage, electric, gas, phone) for July 2024, August 2024, September 2024 and October 2024 (or most current) submitted by 10/15/2024. LPA toured the facility and observed the power to be on and water was running. The facility was set at a comfortable temperature. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241011073600
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is not safeguard resident’s property Resident is not getting is P & I funds Facility uses intimidation to violate residents personal rights

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested a copy of and reviewed the resident roster. LPA interviewed Administrator. Facility does not have a client by the name listed in this complaint. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Facility is not safeguard resident’s property, Resident is not getting is P & I funds and Facility uses intimidation to violate residents personal rights. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, which means it could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241003164659
Oct 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not administering residents medications Facility is not meeting the residents needs

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested copies of R1's file. LPA toured the facility. LPA interviewed resident and staff. Based on record reviews and interviews, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241003163936
Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA reviewed records and interviewed staff and residents. Based on records review and interviews, there is missing documentation for pain medication (PRN) being administered for R1. R1's June 2024 MARS log shows Olanzapine twice but does not show why one of the medications was not being administered. It is unknown if the medication was discontinued due to lack of documentation or missed for June 2024. Based on the Departments interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Civil Penalty issued for repeat violation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240627092941
Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is provided clean clothing. Staff does not ensure resident attends scheduled appointments. Staff does not ensure resident is provided shoes. Staff shaved resident's hair without resident's consent. Staff does not allow resident to receive personal calls.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff. LPA obtained copies of residents file. LPA interviewed R1's family. LPA toured the facility and checked R1's room. LPA observed clean clothing for R1. Based on observation and interviews LPA was unable to determine if there was a time R1 did not have clean clothing. During the course of the visit, LPA observed clean clothing in R1's closet and drawers. Based on record review and interviews, LPA was unable to determine if staff ensures resident attends scheduled appointments. After records review, staff notes show R1 refused a medical appointment on May 7, 2024 which was rescheduled for May 31, 2024. After conducting interviews, it was found R1 does refuse medical appointments sometimes. During today's visit, R1 was at a medical appointment. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240508153114
Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff providing care and supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA contacted Administrator Ria Loria via telephone who gave permission for Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela to sign for the report. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA toured the facility. LPA reviewed staff file for S1. LPA obtained a copy of the staff schedule and the resident roster. LPA reviewed staff schedule and found S1 is working in the facility on 4/17/24, 4/19/24 and 4/20/24 and is not associated to the facility. LPA reviewed S1's file, which only consisted of the LIC 501. Facility did not have any other information for S1. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240417130037
Apr 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service for residents Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela advised the Administrator is currently out of the country. LPA toured the facilty. LPA checked the food and took photos. LPA took photos of the menu. LPA requested staff training for kitchen staff. Facility could not provide staff training documents for food service. LPA interviewed staff. Facility does not have a 2 day pershiable and a 7 day non pershiable food supply. LPA took photos. Facility is serving won ton soup and eggrolls with jello for lunch during visit. LPA oberved a small bowl of soup with 3 wontons in each bowl, 3 egg rolls and 2 small slices of oranges. The menu states liver an onions, mashed potatoes, sweet green peas, dinner rolls, cake and an alternative of roasted chicken. For dinner the menu states chili dog with cheese diced onions, french fries, pickle sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240116151446
Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela advised the Administrator is currently out of the country. LPA toured the facilty. LPA interviewed staff. Facility staff stated R1 did not have a roommate. Resident no longer resides at the facility. LPA requested a copy of R1's file. LPA reviewed the property list. Based on interviews and records review, it is not determined whether or not Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met and if Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240129151358
Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not afford residents privacy during phone calls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff and residents. After conducting interviews, it was found facility phone calls for residents are being transferred to staff's personal cell phones. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of the this report was provided to the Administrator with appeal rights and plan of correction. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240111220531
Mar 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Unlawful evicted.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff. LPA obtained copies of R1 file and medical records showing R1 was in the hospital and then transferred to a higher level of care. Based on LPA's interviews, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Unlawful eviction. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, which means it could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231222111549
Mar 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are hiding medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizula. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. Staff Paola Maribel Brizula contacted Administrator Ria Loria via telephone who gave permission for Staff Paula Maribel Brizula to sign for this report. LPA interviewed both medication technicians. Based on interviews, it is not determined whether or not Staff are hiding medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240214153005
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela contacted Administrator Ria Loria who gave permission for Staff to sign for this report. LPA interviewed Staff. LPA reviewed medication log and centrally stored log. Centrally stored log was missing medications for R1. Based on interviews, R1 missed the medication for 4 days, 1/1/24 - 1/4/24. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Civil penalty was issued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240105154108
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's dietary needs are not being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility and took photos of the food and the menu. LPA observed lettuce and 1 bag carrots only. LPA did not observe any fresh fruit. Administrator could not provide staff training or qualified staff to create a special diet menu for LPA to view. Facility menu had an old facility name on it "Golden Castle". LPA reviewed resident files. C1 did not have a diagnosis on C1's LIC602. C2 did not have a LIC 602 for this facility. See 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231017081313
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member mismanages residents' medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed C1 and C2's medications and medication records. Facility had a centrally stored log for all medications that came from the Medicine Shoppe pharmacy, however did not have centrally stored log for medications that came from other pharmacys. LPA was unable to determine a start date or review centrally stored logs from the previous month. LPA reviewed the MARS log which was not current. LPA reviewed the medications which were in bubble packs and were administered up until todays date. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of this report was provided to staff with plans of correcthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231004164333
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diapers/clothes for an extended period of time

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Tracie White. LPA asked staff to contact Administrator Ria Loria. Staff contacted Administrator who advised it would take her 2 1/2 hours to respond to the facility and to have Staff Tracie White assist with the visit. LPA was unable to review resident records due to staff not having access to resident records. LPA interviewed staff and resident ad toured the facility. Based on interviews, staff does not have access to care plans or LIC602's. LPA was unable to review staff training. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. The Department found additional deficiencies during the course of the investigation, which will be addressed and cited on a separate 8the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230922145354
Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. Administrator Ria Loria responsed to the facility and met with LPA. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and obtained copies of residents files. LPA requested a copy of R1's last doctor visit on 7/8/23 through facetime. LPA reviewed R1's progress notes. On 08/05/23, R1 went to the doctor. R1 was diagnosed with a condition that can cause confusion and was placed on antibiotics. Due to this diagnosis, facility will not be evicting R1. Based on interviews and records review, it is not determined whether or not Staff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. Unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230710121649
Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations8typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints14typical 2
Total complaints36typical 7
State visits on file66typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026660202591102024132162023511420224702021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Kern County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (661) 871-8133

Is Quality Care Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Quality Care Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bakersfield (Kern County): California license #157209146, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 54 residents. State records list 57 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Quality Care Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Quality Care Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 32 AMBULATORY & 22 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.

How much does Quality Care Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Quality Care Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Kern County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Quality Care Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Quality Care Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Kern County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

49 of 54 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on December 10, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Quality Care Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 66 state visits and 57 dated documents since 2021 for Quality Care Assisted Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 10, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility. Staff did not file report in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Caregiver/Office Staff Jan Krizia Adajar. Administrator Nancy Cudal gave permission for Caregiver/Office Staff Jan Krizia Adajar to sign for this report. LPA reviewed and obtained copies of R1's file. Based on interviews and records review R1 can leave facility unassisted per LIC602. Based on records review and interviews, facility reported to Bakersfield Police Department report number 2024-00146406 on 12/3/24. Based on record reviews and interviews, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241204234223
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to pay electrical bill
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA interviewed Administrator. LPA obtained a copy of the electric bill showing a past due balance of $13,878.18. LPA received a photo of the PG & E Final notice posted at facility. Facility did not report to Licensing electric was going to be shut off. LPA requested copies of utility bills (water, garbage, electric, gas, phone) for July 2024, August 2024, September 2024 and October 2024 (or most current) submitted by 10/15/2024. LPA toured the facility and observed the power to be on and water was running. The facility was set at a comfortable temperature. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241011073600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not safeguard resident’s property Resident is not getting is P & I funds Facility uses intimidation to violate residents personal rights
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested a copy of and reviewed the resident roster. LPA interviewed Administrator. Facility does not have a client by the name listed in this complaint. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Facility is not safeguard resident’s property, Resident is not getting is P & I funds and Facility uses intimidation to violate residents personal rights. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, which means it could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241003164659
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not administering residents medications Facility is not meeting the residents needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested copies of R1's file. LPA toured the facility. LPA interviewed resident and staff. Based on record reviews and interviews, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241003163936
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette (LPA) conducted a visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA reviewed records and interviewed staff and residents. Based on records review and interviews, there is missing documentation for pain medication (PRN) being administered for R1. R1's June 2024 MARS log shows Olanzapine twice but does not show why one of the medications was not being administered. It is unknown if the medication was discontinued due to lack of documentation or missed for June 2024. Based on the Departments interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Civil Penalty issued for repeat violation. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240627092941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident is provided clean clothing. Staff does not ensure resident attends scheduled appointments. Staff does not ensure resident is provided shoes. Staff shaved resident's hair without resident's consent. Staff does not allow resident to receive personal calls.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Nancy Cudal. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff. LPA obtained copies of residents file. LPA interviewed R1's family. LPA toured the facility and checked R1's room. LPA observed clean clothing for R1. Based on observation and interviews LPA was unable to determine if there was a time R1 did not have clean clothing. During the course of the visit, LPA observed clean clothing in R1's closet and drawers. Based on record review and interviews, LPA was unable to determine if staff ensures resident attends scheduled appointments. After records review, staff notes show R1 refused a medical appointment on May 7, 2024 which was rescheduled for May 31, 2024. After conducting interviews, it was found R1 does refuse medical appointments sometimes. During today's visit, R1 was at a medical appointment. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240508153114
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff providing care and supervision.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA contacted Administrator Ria Loria via telephone who gave permission for Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela to sign for the report. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA toured the facility. LPA reviewed staff file for S1. LPA obtained a copy of the staff schedule and the resident roster. LPA reviewed staff schedule and found S1 is working in the facility on 4/17/24, 4/19/24 and 4/20/24 and is not associated to the facility. LPA reviewed S1's file, which only consisted of the LIC 501. Facility did not have any other information for S1. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240417130037
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate food service for residents Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela advised the Administrator is currently out of the country. LPA toured the facilty. LPA checked the food and took photos. LPA took photos of the menu. LPA requested staff training for kitchen staff. Facility could not provide staff training documents for food service. LPA interviewed staff. Facility does not have a 2 day pershiable and a 7 day non pershiable food supply. LPA took photos. Facility is serving won ton soup and eggrolls with jello for lunch during visit. LPA oberved a small bowl of soup with 3 wontons in each bowl, 3 egg rolls and 2 small slices of oranges. The menu states liver an onions, mashed potatoes, sweet green peas, dinner rolls, cake and an alternative of roasted chicken. For dinner the menu states chili dog with cheese diced onions, french fries, pickle sCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240116151446
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela advised the Administrator is currently out of the country. LPA toured the facilty. LPA interviewed staff. Facility staff stated R1 did not have a roommate. Resident no longer resides at the facility. LPA requested a copy of R1's file. LPA reviewed the property list. Based on interviews and records review, it is not determined whether or not Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met and if Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240129151358
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not afford residents privacy during phone calls
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff and residents. After conducting interviews, it was found facility phone calls for residents are being transferred to staff's personal cell phones. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of the this report was provided to the Administrator with appeal rights and plan of correction. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240111220531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful evicted.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff. LPA obtained copies of R1 file and medical records showing R1 was in the hospital and then transferred to a higher level of care. Based on LPA's interviews, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging, Unlawful eviction. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, which means it could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231222111549
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are hiding medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced 10 day complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizula. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. Staff Paola Maribel Brizula contacted Administrator Ria Loria via telephone who gave permission for Staff Paula Maribel Brizula to sign for this report. LPA interviewed both medication technicians. Based on interviews, it is not determined whether or not Staff are hiding medications in other substances without the resident's knowledge. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator via email. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240214153005
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela contacted Administrator Ria Loria who gave permission for Staff to sign for this report. LPA interviewed Staff. LPA reviewed medication log and centrally stored log. Centrally stored log was missing medications for R1. Based on interviews, R1 missed the medication for 4 days, 1/1/24 - 1/4/24. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Civil penalty was issued. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240105154108

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's dietary needs are not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility and took photos of the food and the menu. LPA observed lettuce and 1 bag carrots only. LPA did not observe any fresh fruit. Administrator could not provide staff training or qualified staff to create a special diet menu for LPA to view. Facility menu had an old facility name on it "Golden Castle". LPA reviewed resident files. C1 did not have a diagnosis on C1's LIC602. C2 did not have a LIC 602 for this facility. See 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231017081313
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member mismanages residents' medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Ria Loria. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA reviewed C1 and C2's medications and medication records. Facility had a centrally stored log for all medications that came from the Medicine Shoppe pharmacy, however did not have centrally stored log for medications that came from other pharmacys. LPA was unable to determine a start date or review centrally stored logs from the previous month. LPA reviewed the MARS log which was not current. LPA reviewed the medications which were in bubble packs and were administered up until todays date. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of this report was provided to staff with plans of correcCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231004164333
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in soiled diapers/clothes for an extended period of time
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Tracie White. LPA asked staff to contact Administrator Ria Loria. Staff contacted Administrator who advised it would take her 2 1/2 hours to respond to the facility and to have Staff Tracie White assist with the visit. LPA was unable to review resident records due to staff not having access to resident records. LPA interviewed staff and resident ad toured the facility. Based on interviews, staff does not have access to care plans or LIC602's. LPA was unable to review staff training. Based on the Departments interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Article 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. The Department found additional deficiencies during the course of the investigation, which will be addressed and cited on a separate 8CDSS inspection report, September 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230922145354
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Staff Paula Maribel Brizuela. Administrator Ria Loria responsed to the facility and met with LPA. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and obtained copies of residents files. LPA requested a copy of R1's last doctor visit on 7/8/23 through facetime. LPA reviewed R1's progress notes. On 08/05/23, R1 went to the doctor. R1 was diagnosed with a condition that can cause confusion and was placed on antibiotics. Due to this diagnosis, facility will not be evicting R1. Based on interviews and records review, it is not determined whether or not Staff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator. UnCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230710121649
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/ Lack of Care and Supervision resulting in resident being diagnosed with severe dehydration and staff not seeking medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Staff are not properly addressing scabies in the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Staff Baula Maribel Brizuela and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator was not available for the visit. LPA spoke with Staff Oscar Chavez via telephone who assisted with the visit. The Department has investigated the allegationa: Neglect/ Lack of Care and Supervision resulting in resident being diagnosed with severe dehydration and staff not seeking medical attention for resident in a timely manner and Staff are not properly addressing scabies in the facility. According to interviews and records review the Department found, R1 did not recieve medical attention in a timely manner resulting in severe dehydration causing damage to R1's organs and causing other serious medical condtions due to neglect/lack of care and supervision, requiring R1 to be hospitalized. Staff did not seek medical attention for over a month. *Continued on 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 5, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230324154345
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not changing residents bedding Facility a/c is in disrepair Facility laundry machines are in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. I met with Maribel Brizuela, staff and informed her the purpose of the visit. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files and interview of staff relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegations: Staff are not changing residents bedding, Facility a/c is in disrepair, and Facility laundry machines are in disrepair are UNFOUNDED. During the investigation, the file review and interviews indicated Laundry days goes in rotation and are only done on assigned day, A/C and laundry machines are fixed or replaced in a timely manner when they quit working. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff are not changing residents bedding, Facility a/c is in disrepair, and Facility laundry machines are in disrepair). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 24-AS-20220608092801

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator is not at the facility for the required hours Residents are not being changed timely due to insufficient staffing Residents are not getting showered timely due to insufficient staffing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. I met with Maribel Brizuela, staff and informed her the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations.The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Administrator is not at the facility for the required hours, Residents are not being changed timely due to insufficient staffing, and Residents are not getting showered timely due to insufficient staffing. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. During the investigation, there no preponderance of evidence showing inadequate presence of administrator at the facility, residents not being changed and/or showered timely due to insufficient staff. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegatCDSS inspection report, November 1, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211026103936
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident became ill from facility’s food. Staff putting something in resident’s food/drink.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. I met with Maribel Brizuela, staff and informed her the purpose of the visit. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files and interview of staff relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegations: Resident became ill from facility’s food, and Staff putting something in resident’s food/drink are UNFOUNDED. During the investigation, the file review and interviews indicated he wasn't sick from the facility food and/or staff putting anything into his food/drink. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Resident became ill from facility’s food, and Staff putting something in resident’s food/drink). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, November 1, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220404132517
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not administering medication(s) to resident according to physicians instructions. Resident is not being provided bedding while in care. Staff restrained resident in a closet while in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. I met with Administrator, Ria Loria and informed her the purpose of the visit. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files and interviewed persons relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegations: Staff are not administering medication(s) to resident according to physicians instructions, Resident is not being provided bedding while in care, and Staff restrained resident in a closet while in care are UNFOUNDED. Resident R1 was a new resident to the facility and due to her declining health and instability, resulting her making false statements/accusations. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff are not administering medication(s) to resident according to physicians instructions, Resident is not being provided bedding while in care, and Staff restrained resident in a closet while in care). We have found thatCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2022 · control 24-AS-20211005132259
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff abandoned resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette and Vadim Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Ria Loria and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department has investigated the allegation: Staff abandoned resident. LPA interviewed staff and resident. LPA obtained copies of R1's file. R1 is currently residing at the facility. Based on record review and interviews, it is unknown if the facility abandoned R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220503142815
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries while in care. Resident appears unkempt while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette and Vadim Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Ria Loria and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed staff and resident. LPA obtained copies of R1's file and reviewed records. LPA obtained copies of R1's shower schedule. Based on record review and interviews resident did sustain an injury while in care however the facility followed proper procedures by seeking medical attention for R1. Based on records review and interviews, it is undetermined if the resident was left unkept. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220519152727
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff will not allow resident to return to the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette and Vadim Gorban conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Ria Loria and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department has investigated the allegation: Staff will not allow resident to return to the facility. LPA interviewed staff. LPA obtained copies of R1's file. R1 returned to the facility on 5/27/22. R1 is currently residing at another facility as of 8/3/22. Based on record review and interviews, it is unknown if the facility abandoned R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220526090150

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 66 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
36
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
66
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(661) 871-8133
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Quality Care Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.