Oakmont Of North Fresno is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno, Fresno County, California — state license #107209036, licensed for 122 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 39 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Oakmont Of North Fresno

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 122 residents · Fresno, CA · Fresno County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #107209036, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5605 N Gates Ave · Fresno, Fresno County
Phone
(559) 277-5959
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 122 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 122 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 48 times and filed 39 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 15, 2026
Occupancy at the September 12, 2025 visit
77 of 122 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 18, 2023 to September 12, 2025. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 31 of 39 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 9 documents
May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation at the facility. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Martin Valenzuela (S1). Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty was contacted and authorized S1 to meet with LPA and sign the report. During this visit, LPA Conducted a record review, interviewed staff, toured resident apartments in Memory Care (MC) and observed residents in common areas of the MC wing of the facility. This Department investigated the allegations above: Resident (R1’s) Service Plan dated 4/19/25 states R1 requires standby assistance with set up for grooming and other hygiene related Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and R1 often refuses care and assistance. R1’s grooming and hygiene items were observed in R1’s room. Interview with staff confirm R1 often does not want to brush teeth or take a shower. Pictures of R1’s teeth were submitted for the purpose of this investigation. Based on interview andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250905082923
Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff won't allow resident to talk on the phone

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation, LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit and the allegation with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Complaint findings were delivered during this visit. During the visit, LPA obtained resident file documents and conducted staff and resident interviews. Staff interviews were consistent; Memory care residents have access to a community phone and staff assist them to use it when transferred by the front desk. Resident (R1) receives calls and uses the phone often. R1 also chooses not to take calls at times. When asked about receiving phone calls, R1 answered, "yes". This Agency has investigated the allegation listed above. We have found that the allegation is UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the allegation. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250806105545
Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff leave resident soiled causing skin rash Staff do not follow Physician's Orders Staff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are met Staff do not allow resident visitation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During the visit, LPA observed Resident (R1) in the common area. LPA observed R1's apartment, conducted interviews and reviewed records. The Department investigated the allegations listed above: Staff leave resident soiled causing skin rash: Per Service Plan dated 4/19/25 R1 uses incontinence supplies and frequently refuses staff assistance with care including toileting and bathing. Review of Medication Record reveals that R1 refuses taking medications including use of tpoical creams often. Staff interviews have conflicting reporting on R1's compliance with activities of daily living. See LIC9099C for continuation of this report Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250430083718
Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not ensure Physician ordered diets and restrictions were followed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation. LPA spoke to Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty on the phone during the visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit and the elements of the allegations with Marketing Director, Mary Davis. LPA delivered investigation findings to the facility during this visit. This Department investigated the allegation: Facility does not ensure Physician ordered diets and restrictions are followed. Staff interviews were conducted which revealed the facility procedure for communication with chef/kitchen staff. Record Review of Resident Dietary Information was conducted and LPA observed dinner being served in Memory Care. Specific resident information was not provided. Based on interview and record review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250627110501
May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled undergarments for an extended period of time Staff did not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to deliver investigation findings. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. This department investigated the allegation: Staff left resident in soiled undergarments for an extended period of time. Record review of R1's care plan and interviews confirm that Resident R1 is independent in toileting and prefers to wear disposable underware. R1 is not on a toileting program though staff offer to assist R1 who often refuses the help. This department investigated the allegation: Staff did not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. R1 was observed on 9/25/24 and 2/3/25 to be well groomedd, and wearing clean clothess. R1's personal grooming items were also observed on the dates above. An interview with the facility podiatrist confirms that the Dr, attempts to provide treatment with each visit and R1 usually refuses. It was confirmed that the podiatrist visits are covered by Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20240920162946
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell due to staff neglect Staff did not prevent resident from wandering from the facility Facility did not report a resident fall

Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Katie orwn arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Interviews and record review of R1’s hospice care plan and facility documentation reveal that on 3/10/23, R1’s hospice care plan was not followed resulting in R1 falling while being assisted by hospice aid and facility care staff. The care plan (certification period 2/3/23 – 3/30/23) notes that R1 will receive a bed bath. On 10/10/22, Resident (R2) was located by staff after exiting the facility resulting in Absence Without Leave (AWOL). R2 was found walking down the street off facility grounds. R2’s Physician’s Report dated 4/29/22 states R2 cannot leave the facility unassisted. See Lic9099C for continuation of this report Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20230911151045
20236 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of Care and/or supervision Personal Rights Staff does not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff does not record resident's medicaitons in log General Food Service Requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver investigation findings to the facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During this visit, LPA observed Resident (R1's) apartment and lunch dining service. LPA also conducted interviews and obtained documents from R1's facility file for record review. The Department conducted an investigation of the allegations stated above. Interview and record review reveal that R1's inventory list,has been maintained by a family member, not the facility. R1's apartment was toured on 8/9/23, 8/17/23, 11/16/23 and 12/12/23 where blankets, towels and a clean couch cover were observed. Soiled clothing was not observed in R1's closet or drawers on these dates. There are not Housekeeping records to indicate that services were or were not provided as reported. Based on interviews, R1's room and personal items are cleaned up daily tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230809115225
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights Lack of care and/or supervision Violations related to Maintenance and Operation Violations related to Incidental Medical and/or Dental Care Training Requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint investigation. LPA met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Andrea Yescas. During this visit, LPA conducted resident interviews and reviewed staff records. The Department investigated the allegations ablove. LPA conducted multiple visits to the facility during the course of this investigation. R1 was observed each time to be clean and in clean clothing. During these visits, R1 was observed using the public telephone, watching television, participating in group activities or eating in the dining room. R1's room and bathroom were clean during LPA visits. Photos were provided of a brown substance which may have been feces on the toilet and surrounding areas. Staff interviewed state that this may occur due to R1 and R2 using the toilet independently without being able or aware of sufficient cleaning. LPA observed the chairs, tables and floors of the dining room to be clean during vithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230808141453
Nov 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not abide by the terms of resident’s admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial 10-Day complaint investigation. Upon entry, LPA met with Marketing Director (MD) Mary Davis. Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty and Health Services Director (HSD) Nathaniel Domingues arrived shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit and the elements of the allegation. During the visit, LPA conducted record review of Resident (R1's) file as well as interviewed AD and HSD. Interviews reveal a discrepancy in whether proper notification of physician ordered lab work was communicated to R1’s Responsible Party. Facility charting notes and shift report document that a message was left by staff. Interview and record review of the Residence and Service Agreement (RSA) reveal that pharmacy designation is part of the admission process but not an element of the RSA. See Lic9099-C for continuation of this report Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231114150812
Nov 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit. Administrator (AD) was not at the facility for the visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Marketing Director (MD)Mary Davis. During the visit, LPA obtained additional documents from Resident (R1’s) file and conducted a record review.The Department investigated the allegation above. LPA conducted a record review of R1’s Facility Chart Notes, Centrally Stored Medication & Destruction Record (CSMDR) and Medication Administration Records (MAR) during the timeframe of April - August 2023. Based on record review, it was identified that the CSMDR for R1 was not maintained resulting in inaccurate documentation and medication counts. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 9099-D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230801083339
Oct 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Staff leave resident unattended for extended periods of time Staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident Facility is malodorous

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver investigation findings to the facility. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. The Department has investigated the allegations listed above. LPA observed Resident (R1) and R1's room which was found to be clean and odor free on 7/6/23 and 10/16/23. Furniture and assistive devices were stored appropriately and neatly. R1 was observed clean and resting comfortably in bed. LPA observed R1 properly positioned during meals. During this visit, LPA conducted staff and Hospice Nurse interviews. LPA reviewed R1's file including facility's daily Staff Assignment Log for June - October 2023, Housekeeping and staff schedules were also reviewed. Based on observation, interview and record review, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegatiosn may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230630095305
Oct 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not provide adequate assistance to resident in care. Resident room is malodorous.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial 10-Day complaint visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During the visit LPA observed R1's room. R1 was observed clean and resting comfortably in bed. LPA observed R1 again during lunch and interviewed R1. R1's room and bathroom were odor free during the visit. LPA conducted staff and Hospice Nurse interviews and reviewed R1's file. LPA reviewed Staff Assignment sign off sheets for August, September and October 2023. Based on the above, the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with AD, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231010161832
Oct 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility did not conduct an assessment of resident prior to returning from the hospital with a change of condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Resident (R1) fell resulting in a fracture requiring surgery on 5/1/23. Based on interview, it was confirmed that the facility did not conduct an assessment or obtain required updated documentation of R1’s changes in condition or care needs prior to return to the facility on 5/6/23. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were discussed and left with AD, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230516174446
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility did not conduct an assessment of resident prior to returning from the hospital with a change of condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Resident (R1) fell resulting in a fracture requiring surgery on 5/1/23. Based on interview, it was confirmed that the facility did not conduct an assessment or obtain required updated documentation of R1’s changes in condition or care needs prior to return to the facility on 5/6/23. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were discussed and left with AD, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230516174446
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints7typical 2
Total complaints20typical 7
State visits on file48typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026590202577020243312023814320221202021150
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 277-5959

Is Oakmont Of North Fresno licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of North Fresno is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno (Fresno County): California license #107209036, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 122 residents. State records list 39 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of North Fresno care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of North Fresno with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 122 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Oakmont Of North Fresno cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of North Fresno's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of North Fresno accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of North Fresno is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

77 of 122 beds occupied (63%) when the state visited on September 12, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of North Fresno?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 48 state visits and 39 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of North Fresno; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 12, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation at the facility. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Martin Valenzuela (S1). Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty was contacted and authorized S1 to meet with LPA and sign the report. During this visit, LPA Conducted a record review, interviewed staff, toured resident apartments in Memory Care (MC) and observed residents in common areas of the MC wing of the facility. This Department investigated the allegations above: Resident (R1’s) Service Plan dated 4/19/25 states R1 requires standby assistance with set up for grooming and other hygiene related Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and R1 often refuses care and assistance. R1’s grooming and hygiene items were observed in R1’s room. Interview with staff confirm R1 often does not want to brush teeth or take a shower. Pictures of R1’s teeth were submitted for the purpose of this investigation. Based on interview andCDSS inspection report, September 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250905082923
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff won't allow resident to talk on the phone
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation, LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit and the allegation with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Complaint findings were delivered during this visit. During the visit, LPA obtained resident file documents and conducted staff and resident interviews. Staff interviews were consistent; Memory care residents have access to a community phone and staff assist them to use it when transferred by the front desk. Resident (R1) receives calls and uses the phone often. R1 also chooses not to take calls at times. When asked about receiving phone calls, R1 answered, "yes". This Agency has investigated the allegation listed above. We have found that the allegation is UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the allegation. There were no citations issued. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250806105545
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff leave resident soiled causing skin rash Staff do not follow Physician's Orders Staff do not ensure resident's hygiene needs are met Staff do not allow resident visitation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During the visit, LPA observed Resident (R1) in the common area. LPA observed R1's apartment, conducted interviews and reviewed records. The Department investigated the allegations listed above: Staff leave resident soiled causing skin rash: Per Service Plan dated 4/19/25 R1 uses incontinence supplies and frequently refuses staff assistance with care including toileting and bathing. Review of Medication Record reveals that R1 refuses taking medications including use of tpoical creams often. Staff interviews have conflicting reporting on R1's compliance with activities of daily living. See LIC9099C for continuation of this report UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250430083718
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not ensure Physician ordered diets and restrictions were followed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation. LPA spoke to Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty on the phone during the visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit and the elements of the allegations with Marketing Director, Mary Davis. LPA delivered investigation findings to the facility during this visit. This Department investigated the allegation: Facility does not ensure Physician ordered diets and restrictions are followed. Staff interviews were conducted which revealed the facility procedure for communication with chef/kitchen staff. Record Review of Resident Dietary Information was conducted and LPA observed dinner being served in Memory Care. Specific resident information was not provided. Based on interview and record review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegedCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250627110501
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in soiled undergarments for an extended period of time Staff did not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to deliver investigation findings. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. This department investigated the allegation: Staff left resident in soiled undergarments for an extended period of time. Record review of R1's care plan and interviews confirm that Resident R1 is independent in toileting and prefers to wear disposable underware. R1 is not on a toileting program though staff offer to assist R1 who often refuses the help. This department investigated the allegation: Staff did not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. R1 was observed on 9/25/24 and 2/3/25 to be well groomedd, and wearing clean clothess. R1's personal grooming items were also observed on the dates above. An interview with the facility podiatrist confirms that the Dr, attempts to provide treatment with each visit and R1 usually refuses. It was confirmed that the podiatrist visits are covered by RCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20240920162946

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell due to staff neglect Staff did not prevent resident from wandering from the facility Facility did not report a resident fall
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Katie orwn arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Interviews and record review of R1’s hospice care plan and facility documentation reveal that on 3/10/23, R1’s hospice care plan was not followed resulting in R1 falling while being assisted by hospice aid and facility care staff. The care plan (certification period 2/3/23 – 3/30/23) notes that R1 will receive a bed bath. On 10/10/22, Resident (R2) was located by staff after exiting the facility resulting in Absence Without Leave (AWOL). R2 was found walking down the street off facility grounds. R2’s Physician’s Report dated 4/29/22 states R2 cannot leave the facility unassisted. See Lic9099C for continuation of this report SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2024 · control 24-AS-20230911151045

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of Care and/or supervision Personal Rights Staff does not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff does not record resident's medicaitons in log General Food Service Requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver investigation findings to the facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During this visit, LPA observed Resident (R1's) apartment and lunch dining service. LPA also conducted interviews and obtained documents from R1's facility file for record review. The Department conducted an investigation of the allegations stated above. Interview and record review reveal that R1's inventory list,has been maintained by a family member, not the facility. R1's apartment was toured on 8/9/23, 8/17/23, 11/16/23 and 12/12/23 where blankets, towels and a clean couch cover were observed. Soiled clothing was not observed in R1's closet or drawers on these dates. There are not Housekeeping records to indicate that services were or were not provided as reported. Based on interviews, R1's room and personal items are cleaned up daily toCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230809115225
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights Lack of care and/or supervision Violations related to Maintenance and Operation Violations related to Incidental Medical and/or Dental Care Training Requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint investigation. LPA met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Andrea Yescas. During this visit, LPA conducted resident interviews and reviewed staff records. The Department investigated the allegations ablove. LPA conducted multiple visits to the facility during the course of this investigation. R1 was observed each time to be clean and in clean clothing. During these visits, R1 was observed using the public telephone, watching television, participating in group activities or eating in the dining room. R1's room and bathroom were clean during LPA visits. Photos were provided of a brown substance which may have been feces on the toilet and surrounding areas. Staff interviewed state that this may occur due to R1 and R2 using the toilet independently without being able or aware of sufficient cleaning. LPA observed the chairs, tables and floors of the dining room to be clean during viCDSS inspection report, November 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230808141453
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not abide by the terms of resident’s admission agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial 10-Day complaint investigation. Upon entry, LPA met with Marketing Director (MD) Mary Davis. Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty and Health Services Director (HSD) Nathaniel Domingues arrived shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit and the elements of the allegation. During the visit, LPA conducted record review of Resident (R1's) file as well as interviewed AD and HSD. Interviews reveal a discrepancy in whether proper notification of physician ordered lab work was communicated to R1’s Responsible Party. Facility charting notes and shift report document that a message was left by staff. Interview and record review of the Residence and Service Agreement (RSA) reveal that pharmacy designation is part of the admission process but not an element of the RSA. See Lic9099-C for continuation of this report UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231114150812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit. Administrator (AD) was not at the facility for the visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Marketing Director (MD)Mary Davis. During the visit, LPA obtained additional documents from Resident (R1’s) file and conducted a record review.The Department investigated the allegation above. LPA conducted a record review of R1’s Facility Chart Notes, Centrally Stored Medication & Destruction Record (CSMDR) and Medication Administration Records (MAR) during the timeframe of April - August 2023. Based on record review, it was identified that the CSMDR for R1 was not maintained resulting in inaccurate documentation and medication counts. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 9099-D.CDSS inspection report, November 6, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230801083339
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Staff leave resident unattended for extended periods of time Staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident Facility is malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit and deliver investigation findings to the facility. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. The Department has investigated the allegations listed above. LPA observed Resident (R1) and R1's room which was found to be clean and odor free on 7/6/23 and 10/16/23. Furniture and assistive devices were stored appropriately and neatly. R1 was observed clean and resting comfortably in bed. LPA observed R1 properly positioned during meals. During this visit, LPA conducted staff and Hospice Nurse interviews. LPA reviewed R1's file including facility's daily Staff Assignment Log for June - October 2023, Housekeeping and staff schedules were also reviewed. Based on observation, interview and record review, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegatiosn may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence toCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230630095305
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not provide adequate assistance to resident in care. Resident room is malodorous.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived unannounced to conduct the initial 10-Day complaint visit. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. During the visit LPA observed R1's room. R1 was observed clean and resting comfortably in bed. LPA observed R1 again during lunch and interviewed R1. R1's room and bathroom were odor free during the visit. LPA conducted staff and Hospice Nurse interviews and reviewed R1's file. LPA reviewed Staff Assignment sign off sheets for August, September and October 2023. Based on the above, the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with AD, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231010161832
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility did not conduct an assessment of resident prior to returning from the hospital with a change of condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Resident (R1) fell resulting in a fracture requiring surgery on 5/1/23. Based on interview, it was confirmed that the facility did not conduct an assessment or obtain required updated documentation of R1’s changes in condition or care needs prior to return to the facility on 5/6/23. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were discussed and left with AD, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230516174446
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe facility did not conduct an assessment of resident prior to returning from the hospital with a change of condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katie Brown arrived at the facility to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Heidi Setty. Resident (R1) fell resulting in a fracture requiring surgery on 5/1/23. Based on interview, it was confirmed that the facility did not conduct an assessment or obtain required updated documentation of R1’s changes in condition or care needs prior to return to the facility on 5/6/23. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were discussed and left with AD, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230516174446
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Katie Brown and Mariam Flores arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 10-day initial complaint visit. LPAs introduced themselves and explained the purpose of the visit with Nathaniel Dominguez and Administrator Heidi Setty. During the visit, LPAs toured the facility and conducted resident file reviews. LPAs requested and obtained a copy of resident files. Due to insufficient information available at this time, the above allegations NEED FURTHER INVESTIGATION. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Heidi Setty, whose signature confirms receipt of these documents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230516174446

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 48 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
20
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
48
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 277-5959
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of North Fresno? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.