Stonehaven Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fresno, Fresno County, California — state license #100400622, with a licensed capacity of 116, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 37 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

290 homes in view

Stonehaven Senior Living

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Stonehaven Senior Living · licence #107209480

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 116 residents · Fresno, CA · Fresno County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #100400622, held since 1972 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1717 South Winery Avenue · Fresno, Fresno County
Phone
(559) 251-8417
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 116 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR SIX (6).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 43 times and filed 37 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 22, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 22, 2026
Occupancy at the June 18, 2025 visit
76 of 116 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 7, 2023 to June 18, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 37 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

On 6/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce arrived at the facility and met with Administrator Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of investigating and delivering findings on the above complaint allegation. Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. This was in regards to R1's personal cell phone that went missing in April, 2025. There are conflicting stories regarding when and how it was lost. Staff did look diligently for the phone and remembered seeing it with her however, it has not been located. Interviews also revealed conflicting information regarding communication between family, staff and resident regarding the loss. The investigation revealed through interviews that although the above allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250609125641
Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide resident with an admissions agreement Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care

On June 3, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson, Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Facility did not provide resident with an admissions agreement: Documentation and file review revealed that a copy of the Admission Agreement was provided to the family and resident upon entry in July, 2024 and subsequent requests for the same document were provided. Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care: This was in reference to the medication the resdient is taking. Staff provided a prescription list when requested by family and facility doctor has been available to provide information. Resident does not have capacity to understand medical needs or course of treatment but information has been provided to family. Based on investigation which included file review and staff interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met and it was determined that tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250602095556
Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met Staff do not serve residents food of good quality

On June 3, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson, Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met: Investigation revealed that special dietary needs are documented, monitored and honored. Staff do not serve residents good quality food: The food is delivered and coordinated with outside companies: Sysco and US Foods and meets the regulatory standards. The resident's are also offered alternative choices if what is offered is not to their liking. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility documentation relevant to the complaint investigation, as well as conducting inspection of the kitchen, and conducting interviews of residents during the meal service, as well as staff. Based on investigation the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met and it was determined that the above allegations regarding food service are UNFOthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250507095653
Jan 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting resident with medical appointments

On January 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegation. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility documentation relevant to the complaint investigation, including resident file and medical records. Staff and family interviews were conducted. It was determined that the above allegation regarding not assisting resident with medical appointments is UNFOUNDED and Community Care Licensing is therefore dismissing the complaint. The evidence from the investigation indicated that due to the client's dementia/alzhiemers she makes numerous unwarranted requests to go to the hospital/doctor. Her new roommate was not aware of the repetitive behavior and called in the complaint on behalf of the client. Interview with client's daughter aligned with the above information and the client's medical history. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator via emaithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250108083721
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that residents have records of medical assessments prior to acceptance Licensee does not ensure that a record for each resident is maintained at the facility Licensee does not ensure that faucets at the facility deliver hot water Licensee does not ensure that residents' medications have a signed order from a physician on file Licensee does not ensure that care staff have received required training

On 11/04/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban met with Administrator, Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that residents have records of medical assessments prior to acceptance. During this investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed staff and administrator. Based on records review the facility is under new Licensee since March of 2024. Based on records review and interviews resident (R1) medical assessment completed on 11/9/2020, R2 medical assessment completed on 04/10/2024, R3 medical assessment completed on 05/08/2023. When asked, the facility provided medical assessment for review. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that a record for each resident is maintained at the facility. Based on records review and administrator and Licensee interview records are up to date. Department review requested records at the facility and was observed up to date. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240731160140
Oct 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately removed the CCL complaint poster

On October 9, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegation. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation, including resident files and medical records. A tour of the facility provided evidence that the 'See Something- Say Something' infromation poster was appropriately posted throughout the facility. As a result of the inspection, LPA determined the facility did not remove the required poster and has determined that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED and Community Care Licensing is therefore dismissing the complaint. Resident expressed concern that the facility was trying to ensure that no one could complain. While at today's visit, an additional poster will be positioned outside the resident's room so he can easily see it and utilize the complaint line when necessary. A copy of this report was provided to the Admithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241007085706
20233 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in Financial Distress Reporting Requirements

On 10/18/23, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) M. Yang and L. Padgett arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Account Payable Beth Mueller. CEO Kristine Williams was called and unable to attend meeting. LPAs deliver findings via telephone. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records regarding the allegations. The Department was informed by CDPH of the facility’s financial issues after the SNF closed. It was discovered that funds between the skilled nursing facility and assisted living were co-mingled and the assisted living was affected. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited. See citations on the attached LIC. 9099D. Exit interview wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230421161225
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is going through a possible financial crisis

On 10/18/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver finding on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Account Payable Beth Mueller. CEO Kristine Williams was called and unable to attend meeting. LPAs deliver findings via telephone. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records regarding the allegations. The Department was informed by CDPH of the facility’s financial issues after the SNF closed. It was discovered that funds between the skilled nursing facility and assisted living were co-mingled and the assisted living was affected. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted, and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The citation for this allegation was cited on complaint #24-AS-20230421161225 on 10/18/23. This substantiation is for the record. Exit interview was conducted and appethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230703110052
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair. Staff did not assist resident with a dressing change Staff threatened resident and did not treat resident with dignity or respect

An unannounced Complaint visit was conducted on the date & time indicated above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Mcclurg. LPA met with RCFE Operations Manager (OM) Kristine Williams & Program Director (PD) Phylicia Smith, & stated purpose of visit. Allegations reviewed with OM & PD. Facility toured. Resident rooms toured. Rooms appeared & smelled to be clean. Rooms were not observed to be dusty &/or dirty. Floors, walls, ceilings observed to be devoid of debris, significant dirt, or cobwebs. Hot water & AC operational. Incident review regarding dressing change. Care Givers are not allowed to change dressings, only MedTechs. No indication that a MedTech did not change the dressing. No evidence or knowledge of staff threatening or being overtly disrespectful to resident. The Department has investigated the above allegations & determined them to be Unsubstantiated. Exit review done with OM. Report provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230822160113
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file43typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1972.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025560202433020232325220221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Fresno County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Stonehaven Senior Living licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Stonehaven Senior Living in Fresno (Fresno County), California license #100400622, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 116 residents. State records list 37 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 22, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Stonehaven Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Stonehaven Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR SIX (6).

How much does Stonehaven Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Stonehaven Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Fresno County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Stonehaven Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Stonehaven Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Fresno County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

76 of 116 beds occupied (66%) when the state visited on June 18, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Stonehaven Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 43 state visits and 37 dated documents since 2021 for Stonehaven Senior Living; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 18, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce arrived at the facility and met with Administrator Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of investigating and delivering findings on the above complaint allegation. Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. This was in regards to R1's personal cell phone that went missing in April, 2025. There are conflicting stories regarding when and how it was lost. Staff did look diligently for the phone and remembered seeing it with her however, it has not been located. Interviews also revealed conflicting information regarding communication between family, staff and resident regarding the loss. The investigation revealed through interviews that although the above allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided for fCDSS inspection report, June 18, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250609125641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide resident with an admissions agreement Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On June 3, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson, Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Facility did not provide resident with an admissions agreement: Documentation and file review revealed that a copy of the Admission Agreement was provided to the family and resident upon entry in July, 2024 and subsequent requests for the same document were provided. Staff did not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care: This was in reference to the medication the resdient is taking. Staff provided a prescription list when requested by family and facility doctor has been available to provide information. Resident does not have capacity to understand medical needs or course of treatment but information has been provided to family. Based on investigation which included file review and staff interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met and it was determined that tCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250602095556
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents' dietary needs are met Staff do not serve residents food of good quality
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On June 3, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson, Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met: Investigation revealed that special dietary needs are documented, monitored and honored. Staff do not serve residents good quality food: The food is delivered and coordinated with outside companies: Sysco and US Foods and meets the regulatory standards. The resident's are also offered alternative choices if what is offered is not to their liking. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility documentation relevant to the complaint investigation, as well as conducting inspection of the kitchen, and conducting interviews of residents during the meal service, as well as staff. Based on investigation the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met and it was determined that the above allegations regarding food service are UNFOCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250507095653
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting resident with medical appointments
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On January 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, JayCee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegation. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility documentation relevant to the complaint investigation, including resident file and medical records. Staff and family interviews were conducted. It was determined that the above allegation regarding not assisting resident with medical appointments is UNFOUNDED and Community Care Licensing is therefore dismissing the complaint. The evidence from the investigation indicated that due to the client's dementia/alzhiemers she makes numerous unwarranted requests to go to the hospital/doctor. Her new roommate was not aware of the repetitive behavior and called in the complaint on behalf of the client. Interview with client's daughter aligned with the above information and the client's medical history. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator via emaiCDSS inspection report, January 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250108083721

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that residents have records of medical assessments prior to acceptance Licensee does not ensure that a record for each resident is maintained at the facility Licensee does not ensure that faucets at the facility deliver hot water Licensee does not ensure that residents' medications have a signed order from a physician on file Licensee does not ensure that care staff have received required training
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/04/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban met with Administrator, Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegations. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that residents have records of medical assessments prior to acceptance. During this investigation department reviewed facility records, interviewed staff and administrator. Based on records review the facility is under new Licensee since March of 2024. Based on records review and interviews resident (R1) medical assessment completed on 11/9/2020, R2 medical assessment completed on 04/10/2024, R3 medical assessment completed on 05/08/2023. When asked, the facility provided medical assessment for review. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure that a record for each resident is maintained at the facility. Based on records review and administrator and Licensee interview records are up to date. Department review requested records at the facility and was observed up to date. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240731160140
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately removed the CCL complaint poster
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On October 9, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R Bruce met with Administrator, Jay Cee Sanderson for the purpose of delivering findings regarding the above allegation. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation, including resident files and medical records. A tour of the facility provided evidence that the 'See Something- Say Something' infromation poster was appropriately posted throughout the facility. As a result of the inspection, LPA determined the facility did not remove the required poster and has determined that the above allegation is UNFOUNDED and Community Care Licensing is therefore dismissing the complaint. Resident expressed concern that the facility was trying to ensure that no one could complain. While at today's visit, an additional poster will be positioned outside the resident's room so he can easily see it and utilize the complaint line when necessary. A copy of this report was provided to the AdmiCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2024 · control 24-AS-20241007085706

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in Financial Distress Reporting Requirements
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/18/23, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) M. Yang and L. Padgett arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Account Payable Beth Mueller. CEO Kristine Williams was called and unable to attend meeting. LPAs deliver findings via telephone. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records regarding the allegations. The Department was informed by CDPH of the facility’s financial issues after the SNF closed. It was discovered that funds between the skilled nursing facility and assisted living were co-mingled and the assisted living was affected. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8, are being cited. See citations on the attached LIC. 9099D. Exit interview wasCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230421161225
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is going through a possible financial crisis
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/18/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver finding on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Account Payable Beth Mueller. CEO Kristine Williams was called and unable to attend meeting. LPAs deliver findings via telephone. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records regarding the allegations. The Department was informed by CDPH of the facility’s financial issues after the SNF closed. It was discovered that funds between the skilled nursing facility and assisted living were co-mingled and the assisted living was affected. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted, and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The citation for this allegation was cited on complaint #24-AS-20230421161225 on 10/18/23. This substantiation is for the record. Exit interview was conducted and appeCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230703110052
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair. Staff did not assist resident with a dressing change Staff threatened resident and did not treat resident with dignity or respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint visit was conducted on the date & time indicated above by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Mcclurg. LPA met with RCFE Operations Manager (OM) Kristine Williams & Program Director (PD) Phylicia Smith, & stated purpose of visit. Allegations reviewed with OM & PD. Facility toured. Resident rooms toured. Rooms appeared & smelled to be clean. Rooms were not observed to be dusty &/or dirty. Floors, walls, ceilings observed to be devoid of debris, significant dirt, or cobwebs. Hot water & AC operational. Incident review regarding dressing change. Care Givers are not allowed to change dressings, only MedTechs. No indication that a MedTech did not change the dressing. No evidence or knowledge of staff threatening or being overtly disrespectful to resident. The Department has investigated the above allegations & determined them to be Unsubstantiated. Exit review done with OM. Report provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230822160113
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not ensure that food service sanitation practices are being followed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/07/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint inspection. LPA was greeted by Plant Operation Director Daniel Wilson. LPA met with Administrator Sylvia Ramirez and discussed the purpose of the visit and findings for the allegation above. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility kitchen and observed staff with hair net. LPA observed staff putting hair net on upon arrival into facility kitchen. Facility records were reviewed. Facility in-service record provided sanitation and infection control trainings include hair net and/or head covering completely covers all hair should be worn during meal preparation and service. Interviews were conducted staff and residents stated food are properly sanitated when served to residents. Based on interviews conducted, observations and records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230202094257

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 43 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
43
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 251-8417
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Stonehaven Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.