Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Walnut Garden III

Small home·Licensed for 6·Valley Village, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #195850246
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 9, 2026CDSS inspection record

Walnut Garden III is a small care home in Valley Village — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Walnut Garden III

Is Walnut Garden III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Walnut Garden III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Walnut Garden III been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Walnut Garden III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Walnut Garden III cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Walnut Garden III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Yik Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sherman Oaks Hospital is 2.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Walnut Garden III keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Walnut Garden III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WALNUT GARDEN III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #195850246. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Yik Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BDRM #5 FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,300

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,550–$5,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,550–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,650
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$7,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 12802 Collins Street, Valley Village, CA 91607Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 9, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
July 9, 2026
Occupied · January 14, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 14, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025230202411020231102022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 1:32PM. The LPA met with the Licensee Izhak Illouz and Administrator Arlene Ceballos. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 1:37PM, the LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives and cleaning supplies secured. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Medications were stored in a locked cabinet. The kitchen had laundry machines that were in good condition. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Required postings were located on the entryway wall. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit. Night lights were observed throughout the facility. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were seven (7) total bedrooms: six (6) private resident bedrooms and one (1) locked staff bedroom. Bedrooms #3, #5, and #6 have direct exits to the outside, and Bedroom #5 is cleared for one (1) bedridden resident. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Extra linens were stored in a dresser located in the hallway. There were six (6) total restrooms in the facility: five (5) attached private resident restrooms and one (1) common restroom located in the common area. Restrooms were clean, sanitary, and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap, paper products, and displayed hand washing signs. Sink cabinets were locked and contained hygiene products. Hot water was tested and measured between 111.6 degrees F and 117 degrees F, which is within the required range per regulation. OUTDOOR AREA: The surrounding grounds had multiple shaded patio areas equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. There was one (1) emergency exit located on one side of the facility with a self-latching mechanism. The opposite side of the property had an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) that was occupied by tenants unrelated to the facility. The side gate that led to the ADU was locked. All exits and passageways were free of obstructions. The LPA observed one (1) locked shed in the backyard that contained general storage, facility supplies, and emergency water. RECORDS: Record review began at 1:58PM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. Report Continued on LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. Both documents were observed to be complete and reviewed annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last documented drill on 07/02/2026. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 2:45PM and were operational. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility and was last serviced on 01/05/2026. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 12:24PM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in the kitchen. Medications were observed for two (2) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2026
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:37AM. The LPA met with the Licensee Izhak Illouz and Administrator Arlene Ceballos. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:42AM, the LPA and Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is a single story residential home. The following was observed: BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were seven (7) total bedrooms; six (6) private resident bedrooms and one (1) locked staff bedroom. Bedrooms #3, #5, and #6 have direct exits to the outside, and Bedroom #5 is cleared for one (1) bedridden resident. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Extra linens were stored in a dresser located in the hallway. There were six (6) total restrooms in the facility: five (5) attached private resident restrooms and one (1) common restroom located in the common area. Restrooms were clean, sanitary, and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap, paper products, and displayed hand washing signs. Sink cabinets were locked and contained hygiene products. Hot water was tested and measured between 114.4 degrees F and 118.4 degrees F, which is within the required range per regulation. Report Continued on LIC 809-C COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Required postings were located on the entryway wall. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit. During the visit, LPA observed residents participating in their weekly Music Class and the facility stored extra activities in the entertainment center. Night lights and exit signs were observed throughout the facility. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility and was last serviced on 01/03/2025. OUTDOOR AREA: The surrounding grounds had multiple shaded patio areas equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. There was one (1) emergency exit located on one side of the facility with a self-latching mechanism. The opposite side of the property had an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) that was occupied by residents unrelated to the facility. The side gate that led to the ADU was locked. All exits and passageways were free of obstructions. The LPA observed one (1) locked shed in the backyard that contained general storage, facility supplies, and emergency water. KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives stored inaccessible in a locked drawer. Cleaning supplies were stored inaccessible and locked under the sink. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Medications were stored in a locked cabinet. The kitchen had laundry machines that were in good condition. RECORDS: Record review began at 11:03AM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. Report Continued on LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. Both documents were observed to be complete and reviewed annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last documented drill on 04/25/2025. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 12:13PM and were operational. Additionally, the facility does monthly smoke/fire alarm checks and replaces batteries if necessary. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 12:16PM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in the kitchen. Medications were observed for two (2) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandled a resident while in care - (Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fractured wrist, while under facility care) Facility staff failed to provide timely medical care for Resident #1 (R1).

This reports supersedes report issued on 04/03/2024. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegations. During today’s visit, LPA Conway met with Administrator Izhak Illouz and Licensee Arlene Ceballos and explained the reason for the visit. On 03/28/2024, the Woodland Hills North Adult and Senior Care office received a complaint regarding two allegations of Lack of Care and Supervision. The complaint alleged Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fractured wrist and the facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Olivia Spindola. Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated This reports supersedes report issued on 04/03/2024. Continued from LIC 9099 On 04/03/2024, from 10:15 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., LPA Conway conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA Conway met with administrator Izhak Illouz and assistant administrator Arlene Ceballos and explained the reason for the visit. From 11:10 a.m. to 12:54 p.m., the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant, reviewed facility files, obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation, and conducted interviews with facility staff, administrator, and residents. Investigator Spindola conducted interviews on 04/24/2024, at approximately 11:00 a.m., with R1’s resident representative; on 05/14/2024, at approximately 1:00 p.m., with facility assistant administrator; on 06/04/2024, at approximately 9:00 a.m., attempted interviews with staff, left message; on 07/03/2024, from approximately 2:45 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., with administrator, staff, resident and R1’s healthcare case consultant. In addition, the investigator reviewed Encino Hospital Medical Center medical records, radiology results from Professional Imaging Network, and facility file documents related to the investigation. According to the review of the Encino Hospital Medical Center medical records, R1 was brought in by ambulance on 03/27/2024 after a ground level fall at the facility that morning. The records noted R1 had a history of hypothyroidism, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, advanced dementia with psychotic feature, poor mobility, hypercoagulable state, significant dyslipidemia, and chronic low blood pressure. A deformity was noted, and an x-ray revealed left wrist fracture. R1’s resident representative chose not to proceed with surgery and preferred conservative management. Continued on LIC 9099-C This reports supersedes report issued on 04/03/2024. Continued from LIC 9099-C The Department’s investigation revealed that on 03/27/2024, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fall in R1’s bathroom. The facility staff attended to R1 and contacted the assistant administrator who then contacted R1’s healthcare case consultant who in turn notified R1’s resident representative, who requested R1 have x-rays taken of R1’s left wrist at the facility, instead of having R1 hospitalized, if it was not necessary. The x-ray results revealed that R1 sustained a fractured left wrist. On 03/27/2024, during the evening hours, R1’s resident representative then gave approval to the facility staff to send R1 to the hospital for medical care. R1’s resident representative did not have any concerns regarding the care R1 receives at the facility. Based on the above information, the Department did not find sufficient evidence of neglect/lack of care and supervision, therefore, the allegations “Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision: Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fractured wrist, while under facility care” and “Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision: Facility staff failed to provide timely medical care for Resident #1 (R1)” are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240328095338
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit in conjunction with a complaint visit (Complaint Control # 29-AS-20240328095338). The purpose of the visit is to issue citations for deficiencies observed during the initial complaint investigation unrelated to the complaint. During today’s visit, LPA met with Administrator Izhak Illouz and Licensee Arlene Ceballos and explained the reason for the visit. During initial visit, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant. At 10:28 a.m., LPA requested to review facility files, employee’s roster and residents’ files. Additionally, at 10:45 a.m., LPA obtained and reviewed copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Between 11:20 a.m. and 12:54 p.m., LPA conducted interviews with facility staff, Administrator, and residents. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, to ensure there are no health and safety concerns. During the Department’s investigation, the following deficiencies were observed: A review of the staff schedule for March and April 2024 was conducted to assess the allocation and coverage of staff. The schedule was organized into three columns. Each column detailed the coverage for three of the facilities operated by the Licensee, however, shift schedule was not noted. Interviews with the administrator indicate that the facility provides appropriate care for residents during the night shift. According to the administrator, staff conducts constant checks on residents throughout the night. Continued on LIC 9099-C Continued from LIC 9099-C The facility did not submit a Special Incident Report (SIR) to Community Care Licensing (CCL) to notify that Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fall resulting in a fractured wrist on 03/27/2024. Licensee did not update R1’s appraisal needs and services plan to document R1’s change of condition which included behavioral issues and aggression which required medication adjustment. A review of R1’s Physician Report revealed the report was not complete as the physician’s signature and date were missing and the section for authorization for release of medical information was blank. During the initial visit on 04/03/2024, LPA observations and record reviewed revealed that Staff #1 (S1) currently working at the facility however S1 is not fingerprint cleared nor associated to the facility. Furthermore, a review of Guardian system and the staff roster revealed that Staff #2 (S2) is fingerprinted but not associated to the above facility. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 809-D) Exit interview conducted. Citation issued. A Copy of report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 12, 2024

87355: All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: This requierment is not met as evidence by: Based on records reviewed staff #1 has been working at the facility but does not have backround clearance and it is not associated to the facilit, which poses and immediate safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Administratorwill have S1 finguerprinted and associated to the facility and send prof to LPA.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 17, 2025

Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. There is no staff coverage from 7:00pm to 7:00am, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will submit a Personnel Report form LIC500 which reflects 24/7 adequate staff coverage. Also include the administrator’s and designated substitute’s days/hours at the facility. Submit proof to CCL by POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(b) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 28, 2025

87463(b) Reappraisals (b) The reappraisal shall document significant changes in the resident's physical, ..., including those required to be documented as specified in Section 87466, Observation of the Resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not update R1’s appraisal needs and services plan to document R1’s change of condition which included behavioral issues and aggression which required medication adjustment, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will submit a plan describing how you will ensure the resident appraisals are updated when there is a change of condition to reflect the current needs of the resident. Submit proof to CCL by POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 28, 2025

87458(a) Medical Assessment (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a licensed medical professional ... kept in the resident's record. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. R1’s medical assessment was missing physician signature and date, and the section for authorization for release of medical information was blank, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will submit a plan how you will ensure resident documents are complete, including signatures and dates. Submit proof to CCL by POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 28, 2025

87211(a)(1)(B) Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible... events specified in (A) through (D) below….. (B) Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not submit an incident report when R1 fell and fractured wrist, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will submit a plan describing how you will comply with reporting requirements. Submit proof to CCL by POC due date

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Barutyan, Kelly Dulek, and Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:49AM. LPAs met with Licensee/Administrator Izhak Illouz. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 9:54AM, the LPAs, along with Licensee/Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Fire extinguishers are fully charged and recently serviced on 02/06/2024. At 10:15AM, LPAs observed the side gate to be locked at the time of the visit which poses a fire clearance concern. Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 10:55AM and all were functional at the time of the visit. LPAs observed a fire door separating the living room from resident bedrooms which failed to self-close at the time the test was conducted. BEDROOMS: There are 7 (seven) total bedrooms in the facility; 6 (six) are designated as private resident rooms and 1 (one) is utilized as a staff room. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Staff room was observed to be locked. BATHROOMS: There are 6 (six) bathrooms for resident use. 1 (one) is designated for shared resident use and the other 5 (are) are private resident restrooms. Restrooms were observed to contain nonskid mats. Grab bars were observed in the bathrooms. The water temperature was measured in all resident bathrooms and measured between 111.7 and 118.8 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range. Room #7 belonging to resident #1 (R1) was observed to have missing grab bars in the shower and by the toilet. Staff placed temporary suction grab bars which fell off at the time of the visit. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room and dining room areas. LPAs observed common area to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Exit doors contain alarms and were functional at the time of the visit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered patio area with patio furniture including tables and chairs for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear. There were no bodies of water on the premises. An outdoor shed containing emergency water supply was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. KITCHEN/GARAGE: Kitchen was observed to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of seven (7) days non-perishable and two (2) days perishable food. Knife drawer was observed to have a non-functioning lock, however, no knives were observed to be in the drawer at the time of the visit. Cleaning supplies are located in a locked under-sink cabinet. Washer and dryer were observed to be next to the refrigerator. Medications were observed to be in a locked kitchen cabinet. The garage on the property has been converted to a residential unit with a separate address which is not attached to the house. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster plan is updated annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill conducted on 04/05/2024. RECORD REVIEW: Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. 6 (six) staff files observed contained all documents. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. All medications observed were labeled, stored, and properly documented at the time of the visit. INTERVIEWS: During today's visit, LPAs interviewed 2 (two) staff and 2 (two) residents. During today's visit, LPAs obtained a copy of the facility's liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Civil penalty were issued in the amount of $500. Administrator was informed that failure to correct deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, report issued, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County