Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Vintage Residential 1

Small home·Licensed for 6·Bonita, California

Licensed since 2011Licence #374603126
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 13, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 1, 2026CDSS inspection record

Vintage Residential 1 is a small care home in Bonita — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2011. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Vintage Residential 1

Is Vintage Residential 1 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Vintage Residential 1 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Vintage Residential 1 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Vintage Residential 1 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Vintage Residential 1 cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 195 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 195 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Vintage Residential 1 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Vintage Home and Residential Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Vintage Residential 1 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Vintage Residential 1 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “VINTAGE RESIDENTIAL 1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603126. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Vintage Home and Residential Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,700

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,600a month

Likely $3,800–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,800–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,900
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
$6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

16 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 316 Crestview Drive, Bonita, CA 91902Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2011. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
July 1, 2026
Occupied · December 13, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 14, 2022 to December 13, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2011.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026120202511020242202022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Maria Rojas. Facility Administrator, Cynthia Grape arrived at the facility during the visit. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents. Additionally, the facility is approved for a hospice waiver for two (2). During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care and LPA observed (4) residents watching T.V. and one resident was reading and one resident was observed using her computer and iPhone. None of the residents are on hospice services.. LPA and Caregiver Rojas toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents' bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom sink in common bathroom read at 102F and a private resident bathroom read at 103.6F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and kept inaccessible to residents in care. [Continued on LIC 809-C] (Continue from LIC809) No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. A pool exists on the premises and LPA observed the pool to be secured with a surrounding fence required per regulation. Gates were noted to be locked. Additionally, a small water fountain fixture is present at the front yard of the facility. Per Caregiver Rojas, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced June 2026. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staffs and two (2) residents, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA provided technical assistance pertaining to reporting requirements, address in a separate Case Management report. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Grape to whom a copy of this report was provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility. LPA was greeted at the front entrance by Caregiver Rojas, identified herself, and was granted entry into the facility. Administrator Cynthia Grape arrived during the visit. During the visit, LPA discussed Title 22 reporting requirements with the Administrator, specifically the requirement to report unusual incidents involving residents, including changes in condition requiring medical evaluation or treatment, and other incidents required under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 87211, Reporting Requirements. LPA also discussed the facility's responsibility under Section 87466, Observation of the Resident, to monitor residents for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and to ensure appropriate medical evaluation and follow-up when warranted. During the discussion, the Administrator informed LPA that the facility had not been reporting incidents involving residents who experienced changes in condition requiring medical evaluation, including residents exhibiting behaviors that were later determined to be associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs). The Administrator stated that the facility did not believe these incidents were required to be reported because they were not considered medical emergencies. LPA explained that Section 87211 requires the reporting of unusual incidents affecting the health, safety, or welfare of residents, including significant changes in condition requiring medical evaluation, regardless of whether the incident constitutes a medical emergency. (continue at LIC809C) (continue from LIC809) LPA further explained that timely reporting enables Community Care Licensing (CCL) to monitor resident health and safety trends, evaluate the effectiveness of facility interventions, and determine whether additional regulatory action or follow-up is necessary. Following further discussion, the Administrator acknowledged LPA's explanation of the reporting requirements and indicated an understanding of the importance of reporting unusual incidents and changes in condition to CCL in accordance with Title 22 regulations. Technical assistance was provided regarding California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Sections 87211, Reporting Requirements, and 87466, Observation of the Resident. Copies of the applicable regulations were provided to the Administrator. No violations were issued during the visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Cynthia Grape. A copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Maria Rojas. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents. Additionally, the facility is approved for two (2) hospice waivers. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care and LPA observed residents eating a meal together and engage in activities. Executive Director Cynthia Grape arrived later during the visit. LPA and Caregiver Rojas toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom sink in common bathroom read at 105F and a private resident bathroom read at 105.6F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and kept inaccessible to residents in care. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. A pool exists on the premises and LPA observed the pool to be secured with a surrounding fence required per regulation. Gates were noted to be locked. Additionally, a small water fountain fixture is present at the front yard of the facility. Per Caregiver Rojas, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced June 2025. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed one (1) staff and three (3) clients, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Grape to whom a copy of this report was provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator threatened to evict resident Administrator is not allowing essential medical visitors Administrator is interfering with residents' medical care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Caregiver, Maria Rojas, to whom she identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. During the visit LPA spoke with Administrator, Cynthia Grape and explained the reason for the visit. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, and a detailed review of relevant records. On March 22, 2021, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Administrator threatened to evict resident (R1). [a LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident] It was specifically alleged that on or about March 10, 2021, the Administrator informed R1 that they could not continue to live at the facility if they received medical care from an outside agency. (Continue at LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continue from LIC9099) Interviews with R1 indicated that they were never served with an eviction notice. Multiple interviews with staff and outside sources consistently indicated they never witnessed the Administrator or any other staff member threatening R1 or any other resident they would get evicted if they received medical services from an outside agency. Detail review of resident records disclosed other residents living in the facility were receiving medical services from outside agencies. A detailed review of R1’s medical records indicated that R1 began receiving medical services from an outside agency on October 14, 2021. Multiple interviews with staff and outside sources disclosed that R1 continued to live at the facility under the care and supervision of an outside agency with coordinated care provided by facility staff. During multiple interviews with staff and outside sources, it was consistently stated that R1 voluntarily moved out on November 18, 2021, to another licensed facility of their choice. Multiple interviews with R1, staff and outside sources confirmed that the Administrator coordinated efforts with the outside agency to facilitate the relocation to a facility with the ability to provide higher level of care to meet R1’s needs. On December 12, 2024, CCL confirmed R1 was still living at the other licensed facility. The investigation did not yield supporting evidence to corroborate that the Administrator threatened to evict R1. It was also alleged that the Administrator did not allow essential medical visitors. It was specifically alleged that the Administrator did not allow the outside agency to meet with R1 at the facility to discuss medical services. During multiple interviews with staff and outside sources, it was consistently indicated that the Administrator requested the outside agency personnel to coordinate appointments with facility staff before coming to the facility. This would avoid visitors showing up in large numbers at the same time which could potentially interfere with staff's ability to provide care and supervision to other residents in care. Staff also stated that they wanted to be present during medical care meetings to ensure they could coordinate services with the outside agency to meet R1's needs. During interviews, staff and residents consistently stated that they had never witnessed the Administrator or any other staff not allowing essential medical visitors for R1 or any other resident in the facility. In addition, a detailed review of the facility visitor logs for January, February, and March 2021 disclosed more than 160 visitors registered. The facility census was (4) residents this would equate to an average of 40 visitors per resident in 90 days. Based on the interviews and records reviews there was insufficient corroborating evidence found to support this allegation. (continue at LIC9099C) (continue from LIC9099C) Lastly, it was alleged that the Administrator interfered with R1’s medical care. It was specifically alleged that the Administrator insisted on being present during medical care meetings between R1 and the outside agency personnel. As stated in the prior allegation, during interviews, staff indicated they insisted on being present during medical care meetings because they wanted to be informed to ensure R1’s service care needs were being coordinated among both agencies. In addition, during interviews, R1 stated they wanted the Administrator to be present during care meetings to ensure their service care needs were being met Based on the results of the investigation, which consisted of observations, interviews with staff, and outside sources, and a review of pertinent resident and facility records, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Therefore, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. A finding that is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Maria Rojas, to whom a copy of this report, Confidential Names List (LIC 811), and Licensee Appeal Rights (9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210322143050
May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Annual visit. LPA met with Administrator, Cynthia Grape, and we discussed the purpose of the visit. Grape is the certified administrator for the facility, and her Administrator's Certificate expires on 11/3/2024. The facility file was reviewed before the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility is approved for six (6) non-ambulatory residents. Currently, the hospice waiver is approved for two (2) residents. During today’s visit, there were a total of six (6) residents in care, all of whom were non-ambulatory. There were three (3) staff at the facility, all staff had current criminal record clearance and current CPR certificates were on file. The facility was assessed by touring it inside and out. LPA inspected for compliance with safety, maintenance, and operational requirements. LPA interviewed staff, as well as general conversation with residents in care. All residents were observed to be clean, groomed, and free from bad odors. During the visit, five (5) residents were observed to be eating by themselves in the dining area. One resident required assistance with feeding. Administrator Grape indicated that there are no firearms stored on the premises. There were two (2) areas available for dining. Residents eat meals together three (3) meals per day most of the time. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. (continue at LIC809) (continue from LIC809) There is a facility pool, and LPA toured the area. Access to the pool is restricted with fencing, locked accessible only by staff. The door was secured during LPA's visit. Exit doors equipped with alarms. The hot water temperature was measured during the visit (114 degrees F). The appliances in the resident rooms were in working order. Each room observed was clean, sanitary, and in good operating condition. Bathrooms inspected had grab bars installed, by the toilets and shower areas. Cleaning supplies for the housekeeping staff were secured away from residents. Medications were labeled, as required and stored in locked areas. Keys to the medication cabinets were kept and controlled by appropriate staff with responsibility for medication management. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Facility staff conducted an emergency drill in February 2024. LPA discussed with staff the requirement to keep records for all emergency drills conducted, including the date, time, and staff/residents who participated as required. The facility updated its disaster and emergency preparedness plan in 2024 and facility liability insurance was current with an expiration date of January 2025. No violations were observed during the visit. During the visit, an exit interview was conducted with the Administrator, Grape, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private Rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County