Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Veterans Home of California-Redding

Large community·Licensed for 93·Redding, California

Licensed since 2013Licence #455002486
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,700 a monthTypical in Shasta County · likely $3,150–$7,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 93Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit81 of 93 beds occupiedJanuary 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 9, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderCalifornia Department of Veterans AffairsSince 2013 · 4 licensed homes

Veterans Home of California-Redding is a large care community in Redding — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 93 residents since 2013. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Veterans Home of California-Redding

Is Veterans Home of California-Redding licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Veterans Home of California-Redding licensed for?

93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Veterans Home of California-Redding been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.

Is Veterans Home of California-Redding still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Veterans Home of California-Redding cost?

$4,700 a month to start is typical in Shasta County, likely $3,150–$7,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 6 communities with 50 or more beds publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,600 to $5,390 a month, and the middle figure is $4,695 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Veterans Home of California-Redding take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by California Department of Veterans Affairs, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to California Department of Veterans Affairs — at least 4 on the state roster.

Can Veterans Home of California-Redding keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Veterans Home of California-Redding license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA-REDDING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #455002486. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to California Department of Veterans Affairs, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 16 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 93 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 93 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
93 NON-AMBULATORY; ALL OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MCCLOUD BUILDING APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 16.

945 - ADULTS / ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,150–$7,000

From homes this size in Shasta County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,150–$7,100

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,150–$7,000

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 6 communities with 50 or more beds publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,150–$7,100
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$9,850
$6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 6 communities with 50 or more beds publish in Shasta County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 7 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 3400 Knighton Road, Redding, CA 96002Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 2013. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 9, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
16
Most recent visit
September 9, 2026
Occupied · January 7, 2026 visit
81 of 93 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 7 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 30, 2022 to January 7, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 7 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints7typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2013.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020252202024110202344120225502021220

The last 36 months — 7 of 17 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On August 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced and conducted the required 1-year annual inspection. LPA Avila met with Administrator Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila completed the CaresTOOL during the visit. No deficiencies were observed during the visit. LPA reviewed the findings with the facility representative. The facility representative signed the LIC 809, and a copy of the report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2026
Aug 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

On August 26, 2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2026
Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner, resulting in an injury

On January 7, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and a review of records were initiated. California Department of Social Services-Community Care Licensing Division-Investigations Branch obtained and reviewed documents. LPA reviewed facility records. ----- Continued on LIC9099-C ----- Unfounded Complaint alleges “Staff handled resident in a rough manner, resulting in an injury.” LPA interviewed R1 and R1 reported they could not recall if staff handled them in a rough manner. R1 reported they felt jaw pain during their examination. Based on medical records R1 was diagnosed with Temporomandibular Joint Disorder (TMJ) and was treated with a steroid injection. No injury was documented in R1's medical records obtained by the investigation branch. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251029151721
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction

On October 13, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Jessica Kopps and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint was not directed at this facility. The resident does not live at the facility. Resident lives in a skilled nursing facility that is not licensed through the Department. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff are not providing proper catheter assistance to client, Staff are not providing showers to client in need. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251010142057
Aug 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On August 20, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/06/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staff to meet resident needs

On 10/04/2023 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ivan Avila and Jaynae Boyles conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. During the interview process, five staff members and three residents were interviewed. In addition, a staff and resident roster list were reviewed, and a call log history was also reviewed. During the interview process, it was stated that residents have three call buttons in their rooms. Once a resident presses their call button for help, staff respond within a couple of minutes. Resident interviews stated that staff are meeting their needs and there is sufficient staff at the facility but could be better. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230725151536

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

California Department of Veterans Affairs, licensed since 2013, operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Shasta County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Shasta County