Small home · Licensed for 6 · Lancaster
Treasure Heritage
2049 Kalliope Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93536Licensed since 2016
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 3 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH, 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS #1, #2, AND #3 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Treasure Heritage: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,550a month to start
Likely $3,700–$5,600
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,550likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,700–$5,600
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 6 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,800
- $4,550
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
- $7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $5,000
8 homes like this within 6 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$4,500.
- Antelope Valley ManorLancaster · 1.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alexo ManorLancaster · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pink Coral Residence IIPalmdale · 3.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Club Rancho ManorPalmdale · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Beyond A HomeLancaster · 4.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Home CottageLancaster · 4.3 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- 1st Golden Senior Care HomePalmdale · 4.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarah's Care HomeLancaster · 6.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 6 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2049 Kalliope Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93536Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Antelope Valley Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609060 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff providing care to residents. Facility does not have adequate staffing.
On 04/15/2026 at approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Sunday Olowosagba and stated their reason for their visit was to deliver the findings of the complaint. To investigate the allegation(s), on 04/02/2026 at approximately 10:30 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. By 11:00 AM, LPA requested relevant documentation. From 11:00 AM to 1:30 PM, LPA attempted interviews with three (3) residents (R1-R3), two (2) staff members (S1-S2) and conducted record review. (Contiue to LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Regarding the allegation: Unqualified staff providing care to residents. It was alleged that S2 lacked the skills and competence to provide care and supervision to the residents. To investigate the allegations, LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with S2 revealed they are the live-in staff member who cares for the residents and S1 will arrive in the mornings and evenings to assist with medications. When questioned if they could provide information regarding the residents’ diagnosis and needs/services, S2 could not answer. Additionally, upon LPA’s arrival on 4/02/2026, LPA observed S2 to be walking around the neighborhood’s curved sidewalk, away from the facility leaving all three (3) residents alone. Further record review of S2’s file revealed that S2’s First Aid/ Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification was expired (01/2026). LPA’s interview with S1 revealed they would have to seek a new replacement for S2 due to them lacking the compression needed to fulfill their position. When questioned if they could provide S2’s proof of training via documentation showcasing dates and hours of training completed, S1 could not provide LPA with the information requested but instead a sheet dated 10/11/2025 with topics such as: Resident Personal Right, Elder Abuse and Hand washing and Infection Control. The documentation provided documented the length of training to be “2.5 hours”. When questioned where the remainder of S2’s training hours were reflected via documentation showcasing dates and hours of training completed, again S1 could not provide LPA with the information requested. Based on interviews, observations and record review, there is enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Facility does not have adequate staffing. It was alleged that the facility had failed to provide an appropriate level of supervision to ensure resident’s needs are met. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed they arrive both mornings and evenings to assist with residents’ medications. When questioned if they could provide the LIC 500 Personnel Report showcasing staff and their schedule, S1 could not provide LPA with the information requested. LPA’s interview with S2 confirmed they are the only staff member working. S2 stated they receive, “No Breaks”. Additionally, upon LPA’s arrival on 4/02/2026, LPA observed S2 to be walking around the neighborhood’s curved sidewalk, away from the facility leaving all three (3) residents alone. During LPA’s initial visit, LPA observed R3 to call out for assistance from their room while both S1 and S2 were in the kitchen. LPA observed S1 to tell S2 to go assist R3. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed R3’s bedroom to not have any auditory alarms to communicate when they need assistance. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed they have not placed such alarms yet but would. (Continue to LIC 9099-C) Based on interviews, record review and observations, there is enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Citations issued, please refer to LIC 9099-D. No other immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights given, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator. Regarding the allegation: Staff are mismanaging resident’s medication. It was alleged that facility are withholding R1’s medication. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted interviews with three (3) residents and two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with R1 revealed they only care to take two (2) of their medications due to them not knowing what their other medications are for. R1 stated that both S1 and S2 do not give them their medication upon their request and keep their medications locked away with the other residents. R1 stated they can manage their own medication. LPA’s interview with R2 revealed that they have had no issues with their medications being given to them. LPA attempted to interview R3 but due to their inability to validate the questions being asked, LPA terminated the interview. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed that they follow the physician’s orders of R1’s medication and R1 will argue that they need more. S1 stated they were not aware of R1’s addiction to their medication upon their arrival to the facility. S1 stated they have tried to have R1 see their primary doctor but R1 refuses to go. LPA conducted a record review of R1’s medication. The medication in question was reviewed and compared to the Medication Administration Records (MARs) from 3/1/2026 to 4/01/2026. LPA observed the physician’s orders to be prescribed as needed (PRN) and ordered to, “Take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily as needed for pain. May take an additional 1 for breakthrough”. LPA observed R1’s MARs to have morning, afternoon and evening listed for their medication pass. Additional record review of R1’s Physician’s Report documented that they could not store their own medication and needed “supervision” with medication administration. LPA’s supplementary web search on 4/08/2026 of said medication was reviewed to be, “…a controlled substance (Schedule II) with high risk of addiction, dependency…” Further record review of R1’s medication in question was filled on 3/13/2026 and was observed to have been prescribed for a quantity of 75 pills. LPA’s medication count conducted with S1 observed there to be a remainder of 38 pills accounted for. LPA’s review of R1’s MARs (3/13/2026 to 4/01/2026) accounted for 35 pills administered. R1’s medication was not documented as taken for the afternoon and evening of 4/01/2026. R1’s medication was not documented as taken for the morning of 4/02/2026. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed R1’s medication to be centrally stored within the locked medication cabinet. LPA did not observe any discrepancy of R1’s medication. Based on interviews, record review and observation there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (Continue to LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation: Facility is in violation of Fire Safety regulations. It was alleged that the fire alarm pull station was not functioning. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. LPA observed two (2) fire extinguishers to be fully charged and dated 5/29/2025. LPA observed the fire alarms to be interconnected. LPA along with S1 tested the alarms where LPA observed the alarms to be working and in proper condition. LPA observed the carbon monoxide to be in proper condition. LPA along with S1 tested the carbon monoxide and observed it to be working. LPA observed the fire alarm pull station to be intact with business cards located on top of the alarm with electrical contractor’s information. Additional record review of the facility’s Emergency Disaster Plan revealed S1 had reviewed and updated the plan on 2/14/2026. LPA reviewed the plan to entail emergency names and telephone numbers such as: Fire Department and Ambulance/Paramedics. Based on observations and record review, the facility’s fire alarms/carbon monoxide and fire extinguishers were observed to be working and in proper condition. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not ensure facility was kept clean, safe and sanitary. It was alleged the facility did not have adequate pest control. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with two (2) residents and one (1) staff member. LPA’s interview with both residents confirmed the facility has not had any issues with pest such as roaches or rats. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed the facility to be in proper condition. LPA did not observe any pest. However, LPA did observe R1’s bedroom to appear unorganized with an odor omitting from said quarters. LPA’s interview with R1 revealed they do not like the staff entering their room nor do they allow the staff to clean their room. LPA’s interview with R2 correlated R1’s interview. LPA’s interview with S1 confirmed R1 has made it difficult for staff to clean and maintain R1’s bedroom within compliance. Based on interviews and observations, the facility was not observed to have any pest and R1’s confirmation of not allowing staff to clean their room, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260323090432
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2026
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met evidence by: Based on interviews, record review and observations, S2's CPR is expired, training documentation could not be provided and LPA observed S2 to have left all (3) residents alone which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator will review the regulation and email LPA Segovia a statement of understanding additionally a copy of S2's renewed CPR by POC due date. POC due date: 4/16/2026
Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept the resident back to the facility.
On 04/15/2026 at approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation(s). LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Sunday Olowosagba and stated the reason for their visit. At 09:45 AM, LPA requested census, resident, and staff roster. At approximately 09:50 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure the health and safety of the residents. At 10:00 AM, LPA requested pertinent documentation pertaining to the investigation such as but not limited to: Admission Agreement, Re-Appraisals and Physician’s Report. In between 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM, LPA attempted interviews with one (1) resident (R1), one (1) staff member (S1) and conducted record review. (continue to LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff refused to accept the resident back to the facility. It was alleged that S1 refused to accept R1 back to the facility after being discharged from the hospital. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted to interview one (1) resident and one (1) staff member. LPA attempted to interview R1, but they no longer reside at the facility and were not present during LPA’s visit. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed on 4/04/2026, R1 was transported to the hospital due to severe pain. S1 stated they refused to allow R1 to return to the facility due to them, “needing a higher level of care”. When questioned as to what higher level of care R1 needed, S1 stated that R1’s chronic pain is too severe, and they do not have nurses such as “LVNs” (Licensed Vocational Nurses) employed at their facility. S1 stated, R1 needs a rehabilitation center. When questioned if they had provided R1 with a 3-day or 30-day eviction notice, S1 stated, “No”. When questioned if they had submitted R1’s eviction notice to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD), S1 stated, “No”. LPA conducted a record review of R1’s file. LPA’s record review of R1’s Admission Agreement revealed that, “…a written notice that includes specific facts concerning the date, place, witnessed, and circumstances for eviction will be provided to the resident”. Further record review of R1’s Pre- Appraisal documented R1 to have episodes of anxiety, but no documentation of the severity of their chronic pain and/or alcohol abuse were notated. LPA’s record review of R1’s Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary paperwork on 6/14/2025, prior to moving into the facility on 6/19/2025 disclosed various diagnosis relating to R1 such as, “…Alcohol abuse with withdrawal with perceptual disturbance…”. Additionally, LPA did not observe there to be any documentation of Re-Appraisals having been done regarding R1’s change in conditions leading to R1’s hospitalization on 4/04/2026. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed R1’s bedroom to be empty. Based on interviews, record review and observations, there is enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Citations issued, please refer to LIC 9099-D. No other immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights given, and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260406160332
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2026
87224 Eviction Procedures (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed...Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required... This requirement is not met by: Based on interviews, the Licensee/administrator failed to ensure Resident 1 (R1) was given the proper 30 (thirty) day notice for eviction. R1 was not allowed back to the facility after hospitalization discharge. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will ensure to send Community Care Licensing Division a proper thirty (30) day notice regarding R1. The POC due date: 04/16/2026
Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/05/2026 at 9:30 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection at this facility. LPA was greeted by caregiver who granted access. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Caregiver sent the administrator, Sunday Olowosagba a message and informed him LPA was at the facility to conduct an annual visit. A physical plant tour was initiated at approximately 10:00 a.m., and the following was observed: Entrance: LPA observed required postings at the facility's entrance and a sign in sheet for visitors. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher with service date 05/29/2025. Common Areas: These include the two (2) dining areas, living area and a sitting/office area. All common areas were observed clean. There is a television and board games available to residents in the living room. Facility files are kept locked in filing cabinets in the dining area. Kitchen: LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and clear of clutter. LPA observed a fire extinguisher with a service date of 05/29/2025, fully charged. LPA observed, centralized medications locked in a kitchen cabinet. LPA observed a small refrigerator for medication that requires refrigeration locked. LPA observed a 2 day perishable and 7 day non perishable supply of food in the facility. Surrounding Grounds: There is appropriate outdoor seating for residents. Auditory alarms on exit doors were observed on and functioning. Laundry Room/Garage: LPA observed a washer, dryer detergents and cleaning products locked in the laundry room. Through the laundry room is the door to the garage. Garage is used for facility storage. LPA observed a second refrigerator. (Continued to LIC809-C) (Continued from LIC809) Bedrooms: The facility has three (3) bedrooms that may be shared for a total capacity of six (6) residents. Bedrooms are cleared for one (1) bedridden resident each. All resident rooms are furnished with required lighting, dresser, chair, bed, linens, and storage space. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for resident use. One (1) bathroom is located in a shared bedroom for private use. All bathrooms were clean, had grab bars, with non skid flooring. LPA observed a sufficient supply of hand soup, toilet paper, and paper towels. Hot water temperature has been measured at approximately, 119 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident file: At approximately 10:52 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., LPA conducted a file review of five (5) out of five (5) resident records. LPA reviewed resident record to insure compliance of licensing forms. LPA's review of Resident #2's (R2's) records revealed from 09/02/25 to 12/24/25 the facility had documented ongoing behavioral concerns and medical concerns. On one occasion on 08/18/25 R2 left the facility without assistance. LPAs review of Community Care Licensing (CCL) records revealed no unusual incident/injury reports regarding R2 have been submitted by the facility. LPA's review of Resident #3's (R3's) records revealed no TB results on file. Staff Files / Facility records: At approximately 12:30 p.m. LPA also conducted a file review of two (2) staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and in compliance with licensing forms. At 12:45 p.m., LPA met with the administrator. LPA reviewed infection control plan, liability insurance and emergency disaster plan (LIC610E). LPA observed smoke detectors through out the facility, they are interconnected and hard wired. LPA observed a functioning carbon monoxide detector on a wall by the bedrooms. At approximately 12:47 p.m. the administrator tested the smoke alarms and they were observed operational. LPA observed fire doors close automatically. Deficiencies were observed during todays visit (refer to LIC809-D). Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights provided. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/09/2024 at 12:40 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPA was greeted by the administrator, Sunday Olowosagba who granted access. LPA explained the reason for the visit. The facility is licensed for six (6) non ambulatory residents of which three (3) may be bedridden with a total capacity of six (6) residents. Facility has a Hospice wavier for 2. The inspection care tool was used to complete the visit. A physical plant tour was conducted at approximately 12:50 p.m. along with the administrator and LPA observed the following: Entrance: LPA observed proper postings by the facility entrance. Common Areas: These include the dining areas, and living rooms. All common areas were observed, clean and clear of clutter. Furniture appeared clean and in good repair. There is an electric fire place not in use properly secured with a screen. Kitchen: LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and clear of clutter. All appliances were operative. Knives are kept locked under the kitchen sink, inaccessible to residents in care. Cleaning supplies were observed locked under the kitchen sink. LPA observed there to be sufficient supply of 7-day non-perishable foods and 2-day perishable foods; properly stored. LPA observed a fire extinguisher with a service date of 06/08/2023, fully charged. LPA observed, resident medications will be locked in a kitchen cabinet inaccessible to residents. LPA observed a small refrigerator for medication that requires refrigeration. Surrounding Grounds: There were no visible hazards, and passageways were free from obstruction. There is appropriate outdoor seating for residents. Auditory alarms were on and functioning at time of visit. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms three (3) are designated for resident use. Resident bedrooms are shared. (Continued to LIC809-C) (Continued from LIC809) All resident rooms are furnished with required lighting, dresser, chair, bed, linens, and closets for storage. LPA observed a hallway closet with extra linens. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for resident use. One (1) bathroom is located in resident's' bedroom for private use. All bathrooms were clean, had grab bars, and trash bins with lids. LPA observed a sufficient supply of hand soup, toilet paper, and paper towels. Hot water temperature has been measured at approximately, 116 degrees Fahrenheit within regulation. Laundry Room/Garage: Laundry room is kept locked. LPA observed a washer and dryer that appeared operative. LPA observed detergent locked in the laundry room. Through the laundry room is the door to the garage. Garage is used for facility storage. LPA observed smoke detectors through out the facility, they are interconnected and hard wired. LPA observed a carbon monoxide detector on a wall by the bedrooms. At approximately 12:55 p.m. the administrator tested the smoke alarms and they were observed operational. Resident file: At approximately 1:02 p.m. LPA conducted a file review of one (1) out of one (1) resident record. LPA reviewed resident record to insure compliance of licensing forms. New resident was admitted Saturday, 12/07/2024. LPA discussed pre-admission procedures, appraisal and needs and services, safeguards for property and valuables and centrally stored medication destruction records (CSMDR) with administrator. Staff Files / Facility records: At approximately 1:20 p.m. LPA also conducted a file review of one (1) staff record to insure forms and training are up to date and in compliance with licensing forms. LPA found administrator's name on pending administrator certificate list. LPA reviewed infection control plan, liability insurance and emergency disaster plane (LIC610E) with administrator. No deficiencies were observed during todays visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2024
Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/04/2024 at 1:15 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPA was greeted by staff #1 (S1) who granted access. Administrator Sunday Olowosagba met LPA shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit. The facility is licensed for 6 non ambulatory residents of which 3 may be bedridden with a total capacity of six (6). Facility has a Hospice wavier for 2. The inspection tool was used to complete the visit. A physical tour was conducted at approximately 1:40 p.m. along with the administrator and LPA observed the following: Entrance: LPA observed proper postings by the facility entrance. LPA observed hand sanitizer and masks were available. Common Areas: These include the dining areas, and living rooms. All common areas were observed well lit, clean and clear of clutter. Furniture appeared clean and in good repair. There is an electric fire place not in use properly secured with a glass screen. Kitchen: LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and clear of clutter. All appliances were operative. Knives are kept locked in a kitchen drawer inaccessible to residents. Cleaning supplies were observed locked under the kitchen sink. LPA observed there to be sufficient supply of 7-day non-perishable foods and 2-day perishable foods. LPA observed a fire extinguisher with a serviced date of 06/08/2023. Surrounding Grounds: There were no visible hazards, and passageways were free from obstruction. There is appropriate outdoor seating for residents and a large umbrella is used to provide shade. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms three (3) are designated for resident use. Residents' bedrooms are shared. All resident rooms are furnished with required lighting, dresser, chair, bed, linens, and closets for storage. LPA observed a hallway closet with extra linens and PPE. (Continued to LIC809-C) Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for resident use. One (1) bathroom is located in the shared bedroom for private use. All bathrooms were well lit, clean, had grab bars, and trash bins with lids. LPA observed a sufficient supply of hand soup, toilet paper, and paper towels. At approximately 1:48 p.m. hot water temperature in one (1) out of the two (2) bathrooms was measured at 117.1°F. Laundry Room/Garage: Laundry room is kept locked. LPA observed a washer and dryer that appeared operative. LPA observed detergent and extra water for the facility. Through the laundry room is the door to the garage. The garage door was observed locked. LPA observed smoke detectors through out the facility, they are interconnected and hard wired. LPA observed a carbon monoxide detector on a wall by the bedrooms. At approximately 1:50 p.m. the administrator tested the smoke alarms and they were observed operational. Resident file: At approximately 1:51 p.m. LPA conducted a file review of three (3) out of three (3) resident records. LPA reviewed resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. LPA observed one (1) out of three (3) residents was missing examination for communicable tuberculosis. Administrator requested from Hospice Nurse who was present at the time to provide documentation of TB exam for resident #2 (R2) as soon as possible. Hospice nurse said they would. Resident record review also revealed resident #1 (R1) with hearing impairment documented on physician's report did not have the Telecommunication Device Notification on file. Staff Files: At approximately 2:49 p.m. LPA also conducted a file review of two (2) staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: At approximately 3:00 p.m. LPA observed, resident medications locked in a kitchen cabinet inaccessible to residents. Facility keeps medical administration records (MAR) for residents. Deficiencies were observed during todays visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report and appeals provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 3 documents
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/07/2022 at 12:40 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPA was greeted by staff #1 (S1) who was wearing a mask and granted access to the facility. S1 called administrator Sunday Olowosaga and Administrator met us shortly after. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A physical tour was conducted at 12:45 p.m. and LPA observed the following: Infection control: LPA was prompted by S1 to sign-in the visitor’s log. LPA observed hand sanitizer was available upon entrance. A fire extinguisher was observed by the front door with a service tag, last serviced 03/21/2022 Common Areas: These include the dining areas, and two (2) living rooms. All common areas were observed well lit and clean. LPA observed books and puzzles on the tables available for residents to use. Furniture appeared clean and in good repair. There is an electric fire place in one (1) of the living rooms. LPA observed the thermostat at a comfortable temperature of 74°F. Kitchen: LPA observed the kitchen to be clean and clear of clutter. All appliances appeared operative. Knives and cleaning supplies are kept locked in a kitchen cabinet inaccessible to residents. LPA observed there to be sufficient stock of 7-day non-perishable foods and 2-day perishable foods. A 2nd fire extinguisher was observed in the kitchen with a service tag, last serviced on 03/21/2022. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for resident use. One (1) bathroom is located in one (1) of the shared bedrooms and the other bathroom is located in the hallway outside the three bedrooms accessible to all the residents. Both bathrooms were well lit, clean, had grab bars, and had hand washing signs. LPA observed a sufficient supply of hand soup and paper towels. At approximately 1:04 p.m. water temperature in one (1) out of the two (2) bathrooms was measured at 105°F. Bedrooms: There are three (3) bedrooms designated for resident use. Two (2) out of the three (3) bedrooms are shared bedrooms. All resident rooms are furnished with required lighting, dresser, chair, bed, and linens. Laundry Room/Garage: Laundry room is kept locked. LPA observed a washer and dryer that appeared operative. Detergents are kept in a cabinet above the washer and dryer. Through the laundry room is the door to the garage. The garage was observed to store, PPE and two (2) fridges with resident's food. Medications/ Resident file: LPA observed, resident medications locked in a kitchen cabinet inaccessible to residents. Resident files were observed in a filing cabinet located in one (1) of the dining areas. Surrounding Grounds: There were no visible hazards, and passageways were free from obstruction. Side gate on side of the house was closed but unlocked. LPA observed smoke alarm through out the facility, they are interconnected and hard wired. At 12:54 p.m. all smoke alarms were tested and functioned properly. LPA observed one carbon monoxide alarm in the hallway that appeared operational. No deficiencies were observed during todays visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2022
Oct 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff member was not wearing a mask.
On 10/6/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Ruiz arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced complaint investigation. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff (S1) and S1 was observed to not be wearing a mask. At 12:30 p.m., LPA conducted a tour of the facility to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. S1 contacted administrator and LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with administrator. Allegation: Facility staff member was not wearing a mask. It is alleged that on 9/28/22, a credible witness visited the facility and the facility Administrator, Sunday Olowosagba and was observed to not be wearing a mask. LPA interviewed the Administrator, to which he confirmed that sometime around September 2022, a random visit was made by a credible witness who observed facility staff were not wearing masks and not screened upon entry. Administrator admitted that a verbal conversation with the credible witness took place regarding these observations. Based on interview with administrator, this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Report was signed and delivered. Deficiencies were issued per CA code of Regulations Title 22 on LIC9099-D with this report. Appeal rights issued. Report signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221004100310
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87570(c)(1)(F) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 8, 2022
87470(c) Infection Control Requirements shall be developed by the licensee... (1) The Infection Control Plan shall include: (F) Staff shall demonstrate knowledge... appropriate to the job assigned and.. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and an interview with the Administrator, Administrator did not ensure staff complied with the section cited above by not wearing masks which poses a potential Health and Safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to provide in house training with all staff regarding Infection Control Requirements and COVID Protocol. A written statement signed by all staff regarding such training shall be emailed to LPA no later than 10/8/22.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that hazardous materials were inaccessible to residents.
At 10:07 am, Licensing Program Analysts Melissa Ruiz and Joscelyn Martinez arrived at the facility mentioned above to conduct an unannounced complaint visit. Upon entry, LPAs were greeted by staff member, Adesuyi Aruwajoye. The Administrator, Sunday Olowosagba was not available at this time, therefore staff member Adesuyi was designated to sign this report. The purpose of this visit was explained to the Administrator telephonically. It is alleged that Licensee did not ensure that hazardous materials were inaccessible to residents. LPAs conducted a tour of the facility. Upon touring the facility, at 10:24 am, a cleaning chemical was observed to be accessible to residents in one of the bathrooms. LPAs also conducted interview with the Administrator at 10:50 am. Substantiated The Administrator did state that he is aware that cleaning solutions have been left accessible to residents in the past. LPAs also interviewed staff member Adesuyi, who stated cleaning solutions have been left accessible to residents. Based upon LPAs witnessing a cleaning chemical accessible, and interviews conducted, this allegation is substantiated at this time. Deficiencies and Civil penalties were issued per CA code of Regulations Title 22 or Health and Safety Code. See 809D's included with this report. Appeal rights issued. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211007135308
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 16, 2021
87309(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Cleaning agents and chemicals were found to be accessible to residents. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct in-house training with all staff to keep cleaning solutions and chemicals inaccesible to residents and proof of training will be sent to LPA by due date.
2 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 15, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Olowosagba Sunday Benjamin, licensed since 2016.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Treasure Heritage
Is Treasure Heritage licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Treasure Heritage licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Treasure Heritage been cited?
2 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Treasure Heritage still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Treasure Heritage cost?
$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 6 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Lancaster that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $4,250 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Treasure Heritage take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Olowosagba Sunday Benjamin, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Antelope Valley Medical Center is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Treasure Heritage keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Treasure Heritage license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “TREASURE HERITAGE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609060. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Olowosagba Sunday Benjamin, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,195 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County