Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sunset Residential Care I

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #374604607
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$6,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $5,350–$8,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 15, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 25, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sunset Residential Care I is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sunset Residential Care I

Is Sunset Residential Care I licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sunset Residential Care I licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sunset Residential Care I been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Sunset Residential Care I still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sunset Residential Care I cost?

$6,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $5,350–$8,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Sunset Residential Care I take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by American Partners in Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UC San Diego Health La Jolla - Jacobs Medical Center & Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sunset Residential Care I keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sunset Residential Care I license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SUNSET RESIDENTIAL CARE I”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604607. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to American Partners in Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$6,500a month to start

Likely $5,350–$8,000

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$6,500a month

Likely $5,350–$8,150

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,500likely $5,350–$8,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,350–$8,150
$6,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,150–$11,100
$8,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,800–$9,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2707 Nansen Ave, San Diego, CA 92122Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 25, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
February 25, 2026
Occupied · February 15, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated February 15, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202434120231102022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Licensee Yanet Puentes Lopez . The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for six (6). During today’s inspection there were four (4) residents in care. LPA and Licensee toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Two (2) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the LIC 809-D pages). Plans of Correction were jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Yanet Puentes Lopez. A copy of this report, the LIC 809-D pages, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Feb 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to caregiver and Romelia Solis and private caregiver Maria Del Rio. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents. The facility is also approved for six (6) hospice residents. During today’s inspection there were three (3) residents in care. LPA and Caregiver Damian Ordaz Arencibia toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. Administrator Yanet Puente Lopez joined later in the visit. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom sink was 105F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and secured. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] During the tour, LPA noticed the doorway from the kitchen to the garage was not secured, presenting a risk for residents in accessing toxic chemicals and poisons kept in the garage. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per caregiver Damian, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed (2) staff and (0) clients, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents, and it was revealed a private caregiver was present and working at the facility without a criminal background clearance. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Two (2) deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Yanet Puente Lopez to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation Inspection. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Yanet Puentes. The facility was licensed for capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, and approved for a hospice waiver for six (6) residents. During the annual visits the facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, and stored in locked areas. No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per staff, no firearms, nor ammunition were kept at the facility. A carbon monoxide detector, facility telephone, and fire extinguisher were present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. Technical advised was provided and deficiencies noting missing documents were cited in an LIC 809D. A plan of correction was jointly formulated with the administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Puentes, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Plan Of Correction (POC) visit. The LPA introduced himself, and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Yanet Puentes. During the visit, the LPA reviewed records, cleared a POC, and provided the administrator a Plan of Correction Letter. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Puentes, to whom a copy of this report, and Applicant/Licensee Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Lizbeth Razo. Administrator Yanet Puentes arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. During today’s visit, The LPA toured the facility, and reviewed staff and resident records. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Due to time constraints, a return visit on a subsequent day is needed to complete the annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Puentes, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024
Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff Staff do not have required training

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregivers Lizbeth Razo and Diana Parra. Administrator Yanet Puentes arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with internal and external sources. It was alleged the facility employed uncleared staff. I was reported to the Department the facility had staff that did not have a criminal background clearance. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed there were two staff, Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2), who had worked at the facility for several months. Interviews revealed that S1 and S2 had provided supervision and assistance to residents with activities of daily living, including assistance with medication, assistance with getting out of bed, and assistance with bathing. Substantiated A review of the facility’s personnel roster along with the Guardian System confirmed S1 and S2 were not associated to the facility. Additionally, an interview with the administrator revealed S1 and S2 had been to the facility on multiple occasions and had shadowed staff to increase their knowledge of what the job entailed. It was alleged staff did not have the required training. Review of records along with an interview of the administrator, revealed staff trainings were not documented and kept at the facility, as required per California Code of regulations Title 22. Additionally, the administrator confirmed S1 and S2 were not trained, but instead S1 and S2 only shadowed staff to familiarize themselves with the work. This was done to determine if S1 and S2 wanted to apply for employment in the future. Training records for Staff #3 (S3), Staff #4 (S4), and Staff #5(S5) were also not produced for the LPA to review. Based on the evidenced obtained throughout the investigation, the alleged violations were Substantiated and cited in an LIC 9099D. A civil penalty was also assessed during the visit. A plan of correction was jointly formulated with Administrator Puentes. An exit interview was conducted with Puentes, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 811 Confidential names list, LIC 421 BG, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Puentes, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240109135721

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 15, 2024

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on review of records and interviews, the Licensee did not ensure two staff, S1 and S2, obtained a California Clearance prior to working, which posed an immediate Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to 5 of 5 person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to not have S1, and S2 work at the facility, nor volunteer, until S1 and S2 obtained a criminal background clearance. POC was cleared on today's date, as the LPA witnessed S1 and S2 were not at the facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 15, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69- This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on review of records and interviews, the Licensee did not ensure staff (S3,S4, and S5) did not received initial and annual training, which posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Adminitrator agreed to provide the LPA documentation of staff trainings for S3, S4, and S5, by 3/15/24.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County