Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

St. Francis Home for the Elderly

Small home·Licensed for 6·Cypress, California

Licensed since 2011Licence #306004289
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,200 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMay 21, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 21, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderSt. Francis Home for the Elderly, Inc.Since 2011 · 2 licensed homes

St. Francis Home for the Elderly is a small care home in Cypress — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2011. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about St. Francis Home for the Elderly

Is St. Francis Home for the Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is St. Francis Home for the Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has St. Francis Home for the Elderly been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 4 state visits over the same years.

Is St. Francis Home for the Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does St. Francis Home for the Elderly cost?

$5,200 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Cypress that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,425 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does St. Francis Home for the Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by St. Francis Home for the Elderly, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to St. Francis Home for the Elderly, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UCI Health-Los Alamitos is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can St. Francis Home for the Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

St. Francis Home for the Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ST. FRANCIS HOME FOR THE ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306004289. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to St. Francis Home for the Elderly, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2011, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 4 state inspection visits since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 4 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2011, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 21, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,200a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $5,200–$5,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,200this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,200–$5,800
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,200–$9,300
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

16 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,150–$6,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5335 Canterbury Drive, Cypress, CA 90630Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 4 documents for this home, and its records count 4 visits since 2011. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 21, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
4
Most recent visit
May 21, 2025
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated May 21, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2011.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202522120241102022110

The last 36 months — 3 of 4 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident has multiple pressure injuries, including at least one unstageable pressure injury.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegation mentioned above for the purpose of delivering findings. LPA met with Staff Anita De Ala and explained the purpose of the inspection. Adminstrator (AD) Runette Catibog was contacted by phone at 8:55 a.m. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Licensee Osvaldo “Oz” Santa Ana, AD, staff, and witnesses. By all accounts, Resident 1 (R1) had a prior working relationship with Licensee and AD, as R1’s sister had been a previous resident at the facility before passing away. Prior to October 11, 2021, R1 was still living at home and on October 11, 2021, R1 was admitted into the facility. At the time of R1’s arrival to the facility, they did not have any ulcers or redness on their Coccyx area and only had a small sore to their left toe. After about a month, R1 began to exhibit fits of anger toward staff and would not cooperate with being moved for regular rotation and cleaning. (Cont.LIC9009-C) Substantiated Staff would contact R1’s Responsible Party (RP) often, who would then come to the facility to try and calm R1 to get them to comply with staff. At one point during an outburst of anger, R1 punched a staff member in the abdomen. During their interview, AD stated that is when R1 developed some redness on their buttocks area. AD stated R1’s RP was notified about the change in demeanor and the redness, and R1’s RP informed AD they would talk with R1’s doctor. Per Green Meadows Home Health Care Medical Records dated November 3, 2021, Home Health did an initial interview and check of R1 and found no skin injuries or problems on November 3, 2021. On November 22, 2021, the Home Health nurse noticed redness around the Coccyx region and instructed facility staff to rotate R1 more often in order to avoid a skin ulcer. On December 6, 2021, Home Health came to the facility again to check R1’s wound. R1 became combative and would not allow Home Health nurse to inspect their Coccyx area. On December 9, 2021, R1’s RP contacted R1’s doctor who instructed R1 be transported via 911 to the hospital. Upon arrival at the hospital R1’s injury of an unstageable ulcer was discovered. During their interview, R1’s RP stated they were very involved with the care R1 was receiving while at the facility. R1’s RP stated they would be informed of R1’s verbal and physical outburst, and their resistance in allowing staff to provide care. Per R1’s RP, they asked R1 not be transported to the Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital or by emergency ambulance if avoidable. R1’s RP stated they did not want R1 to go to the VA hospital for care for personal reasons and did not want R1 to be transported by ambulance to limit expenses that are associated with emergency care. Per R1’s RP, both they and the facility could have made better decisions for R1’s care. R1’s RP stated staff at the facility did their best to assist R1 and to comply with their requests but subsequently caused delay in care that would have helped prevent R1 from developing an unstageable pressure injury. During their interview, AD stated they attempted to have R1 transported to the hospital when their mental status changed, and R1 showed redness to his Coccyx area, however, R1’s RP convinced AD to delay in transporting R1 for personal and financial reasons. Per AD, although they felt otherwise, they conceded with RP’s requests. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Based upon staff interviews, and record review of associated medical records there is evidence to corroborate the allegation that R1 developed an unstageable pressure injury due to Neglect/Lack of care and supervision. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of regulations. (see LIC9099-D) and an Immediate $500 Civil Penalty is being assessed (see LIC421IM). Additional Civil Penalty is pending determination as per Health & Safety Code 1569.49(f). An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 22-AS-20211213162011

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 22, 2025

Basic Services (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (6) Arrangements to meet health needs, including arranging transportation, as specified in Section 87465, Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services Based on staff interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as medical treatment for R1 was delayed, resulting in R1 developing an unstageable pressure injury, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025

Plan of correction: AD stated staff training regarding basic services and arrangements to meet residents' health needs including arranging transportation will be conducted and proof will be provided to LPA via email by POC date.

May 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On May 7, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA was greeted by staff and granted entry after stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator (AD) Runette Catibog was present to assist with the facility inspection on today's date. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents with approved hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Currently, there are zero (0) Hospice residents present during today’s visit. This is a single story home with attached garage facility. The facility has five bedrooms (two shared resident rooms, two private resident rooms and one staff room), and two full bathrooms. At around 12:50PM, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant accompanied by Administrator Catibog, and the following was observed: Facility has an a pool with secured gate on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in operational condition, lighting was provided, and storage for the client's personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were available during the visit. Bathrooms were operational with water temperature measured at 109.0 degrees F. A comfortable temperature of 76 degrees F. was maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected, and sufficient perishable and non-perishable food was maintained adequately. Facility has emergency food and water supply. Facility has one fire extinguisher which was mounted and fully charged. CONTINUED ON 809C During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, and sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed the facility has a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). All mandated inspection control posters were posted. LPA observed First Aid Kit was maintained. A working landline phone was operational. The last fire drill was conducted on 3/11/2025. The facility had operational smoke and carbon monoxide in bedrooms and common areas. The facility has current liability insurance on file effective 11/24/2024 – 11/24/2025. A review of six residents (R1-R6) service files and two staff (S1-S2) personnel files revealed to be complete. The facility has the current administrator's certification on file for Runette Catibog Expiration 10/26/2025. No deficiencies during this inspection visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Catibog,, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility caregiving staff after introducing himself and stating the reason of the visit. Administrator Runette Catibog was notified of the visit and arrived later to assist. During the inspection, LPA and administrator conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the following: The facility is a one-story home with four resident bedrooms, one staff room and two bathrooms. All resident bedrooms had the required furnishings. LPA observed all beds had linens and blankets and an adequate additional supply is present. The backyard has a shaded area and the route of egress is free of clutter and obstructions. There are currently six residents in care at the facility, two of which are receiving hospice care. Residents are observed to be clean and appear well taken care of. Bathrooms faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature was verified to be within acceptable range. LPA observed emergency disaster plan with means of exiting and emergency phone numbers listed and posted. LPA observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations. Combined smoke and carbon monoxide detectors tested operational. There is a fire extinguisher present which was observed to be fully charged with up-to-date maintenance. Medication, sharp items and cleaning supplies were confirmed to be inaccessible throughout the physical plant. The staff room and laundry area were observed to be locked by facility staff. The medication central storage was also observed to be secure and reviewed for accuracy during the visit. LPA reviewed six resident files and five staff files. LPA conducted or attempted six resident and two staff interviews. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

St. Francis Home for the Elderly, Inc., licensed since 2011, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County