Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Solaris 28
Small home·6 while this license was open·Poway, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 9, 2025 · not a current opening
- Licence holderWealthplus Management Group LLCSince 2017 · 6 licensed homes
Solaris 28 in Poway held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2017. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Solaris 28
Is Solaris 28 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Solaris 28 licensed for?
6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Solaris 28 been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Solaris 28 still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
What does Solaris 28 cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Poway that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,250 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Solaris 28 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by Wealthplus Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Can Solaris 28 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Solaris 28 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SOLARIS 28”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603813. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- This license was held by Wealthplus Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 9, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,650–$6,850
From homes this size in San Diego County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,000a month
Likely $3,650–$6,950
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 175 small homes publish in San Diego County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,800
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 175 small homes publish in San Diego County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 14528 Garden Rd, Poway, CA 92064Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
A map position is not on file for this address.
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- June 9, 2025
- Occupied at that visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated June 9, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents
Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee has abandoned the facility. Licensee has lost control of property. Licensee did not report sale of facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted a virtual meeting on Microsoft Teams with Licensee Xiaoqing “Leslie” Wang to deliver complaint findings. LPA stated the purpose of the meeting with Leslie. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews and a records review. On January 30, 2025, it was alleged that the Licensee had abandoned the facility. A Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) from the Department conducted an unannounced Health & Safety check on January 31, 2025. The LPA observed that there were caregivers present, changing residents and preparing dinner for the residents. The LPA also observed that the facility was clean. Interviews with the current acting Administrator revealed that in June 2024, two Administrators had quite and left the residents with care staff. Interviews with three (3) care staff who worked at the facility during June 2024, revealed that even though the Administrators quit, care staff remained working at the facility until the Licensee came soon after to manage the facility. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (CONTINUED FROM PAGE LIC 9099) An interview with the Licensee revealed that in June 2024, as soon as they were informed that the Administrators quit, the Licensee returned to the facility to check on the residents and manage the facility. There was not enough evidence to support this allegation. It was also alleged that the Licensee had lost control of the property and did not report the sale of the property. A records review revealed that a Property Management Agreement provided by the Licensee, dated September 20, 2019, and with expiration date of September 20, 2029, demonstrated that the property is leased to Solaris Capital Group Inc. An interview with the Licensee revealed that they still act as property manager for the property via Solaris Capital Group Inc. The interview also revealed that the property owner has no intention of selling the property at this moment. An interview with the current Administrator, who represents a new management group, revealed that they are in current negotiations with the Licensee/Property Manager to take over the lease and have applied for a license with Community Care Licensing Division. There was not enough evidence to support these allegations. The allegations that the Licensee had abandoned the property, had lost control of the property and did not report the sale of the property are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. LPA Silveira conducted an exit interview with Leslie. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided via email. Confirmation via email by Linda confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250130151822
Mar 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an Case Management visit to respond to observations and interviews from a visit conducted on 3/14/2025. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Jushua "Justin" Mendoza. During today’s visit, LPA observed Staff #1 open a non-locking drawer in the facility’s kitchen, which contained the keys to the locked medication cabinet and proceed to unlock mediation cabinet. LPA also interviewed the administrator and he explained the open non-locking facility kitchen drawer is where the keys are normally stored. After the observation was made LPA was able to observe Staff#1 place keys in their pocket and LPA advised Staff#1, as well as the administrator, keys to the centrally stored medication cabinets should never be made accessible to clients or guests in the home. Based on the inspection, deficiencies were observed in the areas evaluated, and observed deficiencies are listed on the LIC 809-D pages. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed with Administrator Mendoza. A copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (01/2016) were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit, and his signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 14, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: “(h)(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication.” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, Licensee did not ensure that centrally stored medicines were kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to 6 of 6 residents (R1 through R6) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025
Plan of correction: During today's visit, LPA observed employee remove keys from kitchen drawer and keep on their person. This resolved the immediate risk. Licensee agreed to retrain all current staff on expectations regarding safe storage of centrally stored medications, and to E-mail the training sign-in sheet to LPA by 04/14/2025.
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to respond to observations and interviews from a visit conducted on 2/08/2025. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Jushua "Justin" Mendoza. During visits on 2/08/2024 and 2/26/2025, LPA toured the facility and observed resident in care. During the facility tour on 2/08/2025, LPA observed resident's medications were stored in medication cups, cups were stored in a sectioned off plastic container with daily times for medication and not in their original container. LPA explained to Administrator Mendoza that they were to immediate stop pre-pouring medications and dispense medication according to (community care licensing (CLL) guidelines. (Continued on 809-C) (Continued form 809) On 2/08/2025 LPA observed a pathway exiting from kitchen to common backyard blocking access to residents in care. Pathway was blocked by washer and dryer placed outside the common backyard exit/entrance door. On 2/08/2025 LPA Observed uneven threshold in three doorways,(bathroom # 1 and Bedroom #4 and #5) bathroom #1 sink was not draining, cobwebs in all bathrooms and all bedrooms. All resident doors had fingerprints and splotches of dirt. All Bathroom shelves have brown splotches and brown spots. The kitchen cabinets had inside and outside debris/dirt and grease. The oven vent was greasy and had debris/dirt. The back yard shed was in disrepair and had a door hanging to the side. The back yard fence in disrepair: missing pieces of fence and lattice is hanging off top of fence. Based on the inspection, deficiencies were observed in the areas evaluated, and observed deficiencies are listed on the LIC 809-D pages. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed with Administrator Mendoza. A copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (01/2016) were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit, and his signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following....medications which are centrally stored: (5) Each resident's medication...stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 4 of 5 [R1,R2,R3, R4, R5] resident's medications are stored in a medication cups, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Plan of correction: LPA spoke with Administered on 2/7/2025 regarding the pre-pour of medications. LPA instructed Administrator to cease immediately the pre-pouring of medications and to instruct caregivers to give resident medications directly from the pill bottle and not from the pillbox and to not pre-pour medication.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 12, 2025
The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance... for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the licensee did not ensure the facility was in good repair for 5 out of 5 [R1-R5] residents, due to uneven threshold in two doorways, bathroom sink not draining, cobwebs in bathrooms and bedrooms, inside and outside debris/dirt and greasy cabinets, greasy debris/dirt stove vent, back yard shed in disrepair, back yard fence in disrepair which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Plan of correction: LPA spoke as well as toured the property with Administrator on 2/7/2025. Administrator was instructed by LPA to clean and repair the inside of the facility as well as the repair of backyard fencing and outside storage shed. LPA observed a clean and in good repair facility on 3/12/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025
(d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This was evidenced by: Based on observation ,the licensee did not ensure the facility passageways were kept free from obstruction for X of X [R1-R5] residents, due to the washer and dryer placed outside the common backyard exit/entrance door, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which posed a potential health and safety risk to xx persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Plan of correction: LPA spoke as well as toured the property with Administrator on 2/7/2025. Administrator was instructed by LPA to clean area and remove the washer and dryer outside the common backyard exit/entrance door. LPA observed the exit/entrance clear from obstructions on 2/26/2025.
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Justin Mendoza, Administrator& Arceli Songco, Administrator LPA briefly toured the facility, performed a health and safety welfare check. There are 6 residents at this facility at this time. LPA Rodgers spoke with staff and residents. No deficiencies were observed or cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Arceli Songco, Administrator to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Justin Mendoza, Administrator. LPA briefly toured the facility, performed a health and safety welfare check. There are four residents at this facility at this time. LPA Rodgers spoke with staff and residence. No deficiencies were observed or cited on this date. No heath and safety concerns at this time. An exit interview was conducted with Justin Mendoza, Administrator, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2025
May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Anafe Rivera. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, of whom six (6) may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of six (6) clients in care. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Anafe Rivera, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. There was at least 2 days supply of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters observed available to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (CONTINUED ON LIC809-C) (CONTINUED FROM LIC809) No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Anafe Rivera also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection.. An exit interview was conducted with Anafe Rivera to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/AppealRights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024
Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to conduct a Health & Safety Welfare Check. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Site Manager Anafe Rivera. During today’s visit, LPA performed a facility tour / welfare check, collected and reviewed select resident care records, and interviewed staff. Staff interviews corroborated to show: a) On 02/10/2024 during the overnight shift, Resident #1 (R1) closed the drain of their sink in their private bathroom, and then let the sink faucet run continuously. [See LIC811 Confidential Names List for a description of person identifiers use in this report.] Staff, who were not required to be awake at this time, were not immediately aware of the problem. The result was that water spilled onto the facility’s floor, flooding R1’s bedroom, two adjacent bedrooms and their corresponding bathrooms, and one edge of the facility’s dining room. Multiple staff spent a few hours cleaning up the water. None of the facility’s residents needed to be relocated. Per LPA review of CCLD’s database, the Department did not receive a written report from Licensee describing this incident, as was required to be submitted within seven (7) days of occurrence. b) On 02/16/2024, R1 passed away at the facility, under the concurrent care of a hospice agency. Per LPA review of CCLD’s database, the Department did not receive a written report from Licensee describing R1’s death, as was required to be submitted within seven (7) days of occurrence. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] During records review, LPA observed, and staff interviews confirmed: Licensee did not possess a written Absentee Notification Plan (or an equivalent missing resident policy) as part of the written record of care for R1 or any of the five (5) current residents of the facility. Licensee did not possess written evidence of a negative Tuberculosis (TB) test result for Resident #2 (R2), which was required before they moved in. Also, two (2) residents, Resident #3 (R3) and Resident #4 (R4), were formally diagnosed with dementia. However, LPA observed that Licensee’s staff had manually turned off / disabled staff alert devices on its exterior doors. Four (4) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and one (1) deficiency was cited per California Health and Safety Code (refer to the attached LIC 809-D pages). Plans of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Rivera, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D pages, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
87211 Reporting Requirements: "(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency…within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified...(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident." This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, there was an incident which threatened their welfare of 6 of 6 residents (R1 through Resident #6), and Licensee did not submit a written incident report for it to the licensing agency within seven days of incident occurrence. This posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to compose an LIC624 Incident Report describing the February 2024 sink-flooding incident, and to send a copy of the LIC624 to the CCLD San Diego Regional Office (CCLASCPSanDiegoRO@dss.ca.gov). Licensee agreed to utilize a third-party source to retrain its facility managers on Regulation 87211 Reporting Requirements. Licensee agreed to E-mail LPA the training sign-in sheet by the POC due date. Licensee also agreed to arrange for a third-party licensed mold inspector to examine the facility and provide a formal recommendation as to whether remediation repairs are required. Licensee agree to E-mail the mold inspector's report to LPA, by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
87211 Reporting Requirements: "(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency…within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified...(A) Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred…” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, Licensee did not submit a written report to notify the licensing agency of the death of 1 of 6 residents (R1) in care, within seven days of their death. This posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to compose an LIC624A Death Report describing R1’s death and the circumstances leading up to it, and to send a copy of the LIC624A to the CCLD San Diego Regional Office (CCLASCPSanDiegoRO@dss.ca.gov). Licensee agreed to utilize a third-party source to retrain its facility managers on Regulation 87211 Reporting Requirements. Licensee agreed to E-mail LPA the training sign-in sheet by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.317 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
1569.317 Absentee Notification Plan for Missing Residents: “Every residential care facility for the elderly…shall…develop and comply with an absentee notification plan…The plan shall include…a requirement that an administrator of the facility, or his or her designee, inform the resident’s authorized representative when that resident is missing from the facility…and the circumstances in which [they] shall notify local law enforcement.” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, licensee’s staff did not develop an absentee notification plan for 6 of 6 residents (R1 through Resident #6), which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to write an Absentee Notification Plan/policy meeting the requirements of CA H&S Code 1569.317, and to train all its staff on it. Licensee also agreed to place a copy of said Absentee Notification Plan in the care file for every current and future client in care, right next to (i.e., as an addendum to) that client’s Needs and Services Plan. Licensee agreed to E-mail the Plan and the training sign-in sheet to LPA, by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87705(j) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia: “(j) The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits, if exiting presents a hazard to any resident.” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, during today’s visit, Licensee did not have continuously active auditory devices or other staff alert features to monitor exits, which posed a potential safety risk to 2 of 5 residents (R3 and R4) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: During today’s visit: Licensee activated (turned on) the auditory alarms at each exterior door (other than the lobby front door). Licensee agreed to retrain its staff to keep all such alarms activated 24/7. Licensee agreed to E-mail a copy of the staff training sign-in sheet to LPA, by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
87458 Medical Assessment: “(b) The medical assessment shall include…: (1) A physical examination of the resident…and results of an examination for communicable tuberculosis…” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records review and manager interview: Licensee did not ensure that the medical assessment for 1 of 5 residents (R2) included the results of an examination for communicable tuberculosis, which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Per staff interviews and corroborated by LPA observation, R2 has not recently shown any symptoms consistent with tuberculosis (TB). Licensee agreed to coordinate with R2’s physician and/or responsible party, as needed, to have R2 tested for tuberculosis. Licensee agreed to place written proof of a negative TB test result in R2’s care chart, and to E-mail a copy of the proof to LPA, by the POC due date. Licensee also agreed to retrain all facility staff who are directly involved with the admissions/move-in process on Regulation 87458, titled “Medical Assessment,” and to submit the training sign-in sheet to LPA, by the POC due date.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Wealthplus Management Group LLC, licensed since 2017, operates 6 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Mariposa Manor · Escondido
- Solaris 30 · Poway
- Solaris 36 · Poway
- Solaris 48 · Poway
- Solaris 34 · Poway
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes in San Diego County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
A Caring Heart Residence
Chula Vista · Small home
$6,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Quiet Sunset
El Cajon · Small home
$5,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Winsome Assisted Living Community
Bonita · Small home
$4,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Abuelo's Villa
Chula Vista · Small home
$5,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Acorn Oaks Manor I
San Diego · Small home
$5,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Acorn Oaks Manor II
San Diego · Mid-size home
$5,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate