Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cunningham Residential Care Home II

Mid-size home·Licensed for 12·Riverside, California

Licensed since 2003Licence #336408394
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 12Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit10 of 12 beds occupiedJanuary 8, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 8, 2026CDSS inspection record

Cunningham Residential Care Home II is a mid-size care home in Riverside — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 12 residents since 2003. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cunningham Residential Care Home II

Is Cunningham Residential Care Home II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Cunningham Residential Care Home II licensed for?

12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Cunningham Residential Care Home II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Cunningham Residential Care Home II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Cunningham Residential Care Home II cost?

$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size in Riverside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,925 to $4,725 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Cunningham Residential Care Home II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Crch Enterprises Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Crch Enterprises Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital Riverside is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Cunningham Residential Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Cunningham Residential Care Home II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CUNNINGHAM RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #336408394. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 12 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Crch Enterprises Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY AND 6 AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2. SIDE CHAIN LINK GATE MAY BE LOCKED IN EVENINGS. NO LOCK ON WOODEN SIDE GATE.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,150a month to start

Likely $3,250–$5,450

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,150a month

Likely $3,250–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,250–$5,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,600
$4,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,650
$6,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,700–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4972 Sierra Vista, Riverside, CA 92505Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2003. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 8, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
January 8, 2026
Occupied at that visit
10 of 12 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 20, 2025 to January 8, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2003.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252202024110202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff leave resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time. Staff are not feeding resident. Staff mismanage residents medications. Staff consumes alcohol at the facility impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents.

On 1/8/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation for the allegations stated above. LPA met with Facility Staff Reden Layman and granted entry to the facility. Facility Administrator-Alicia Cuningham was been contacted and arrived during the visit, LPA Singh explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, LPA Singh conducted interviews with residents, conducted interviews with staff, and requested documents. First Allegation: - Staff leave resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time. LPA Singh interviewed Five (5) residents and two (2) staff. Five out of five residents interviewed reported that they are never left in soiled clothing and confirmed that staff consistently assist them with their hygiene needs. Two (2) staff members were interviewed, Two out of two staff stated that residents are provided with prompt hygiene assistance and are not left in soiled attire. The testimonial evidence from both residents and staff consistently refuted the allegation, indicating that the facility maintains appropriate hygiene standards. Unsubstantiated Second Allegation: - Staff are not feeding residents. LPA Singh interviewed five residents and two (2) staff. Five (5) out of five (5) residents and two (2) out of two (2) Staff stated that staff feed residents daily. During the investigation, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Singh conducted interviews with five residents and two staff members. Five out of five residents and two out od two staff interviewed consistently reported that staff actively monitor resident food intake to ensure they have eaten. Furthermore, the interviews confirmed that residents are provided with various meal choices, including homemade dishes and takeaway options. Third Allegation: -Staff mismanage residents’ medications. LPA Singh interviewed five residents and two (2) staff. In a series of interviews regarding facility operations, both residents and staff provided unanimous reports of proper medication management. Five(5) out of five residents and two (2) out of two staff members interviewed confirmed that medications are administered accurately and on schedule, with no instances of mismanagement reported. Fourth Allegation: - Staff consume alcohol at the facility impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents. LPA Singh interviewed five residents and two (2) staff. Five out of five residents and two (2) out of two staff members interviewed provided unanimous feedback regarding the facility's operations. The findings indicate a high standard of professional conduct and resident care. Five Residents confirmed that staff members do not consume alcohol while at the facility. Residents and staff collectively reported that the residents are well cared for and receive attentive supervision. Residents and family of R#1 stated a consistent and safe environment where staff maintain clear professional boundaries and prioritize the well-being of those in their charge. During the investigation, LPA Singh was not able to find sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations that Staff leave resident in soiled diaper/clothing for an extended period of time, Staff are not feeding resident, Staff mismanage residents medications, Staff consumes alcohol at the facility impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to residents. LPA Singh interviewed Responsible party, family and staff stated that facility providing adequate care to R1 at the facility and denied the allegations listed above. Statements, records, and interviews obtained did not provide sufficient information to corroborate the allegation. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and this report LIC 9099, LIC 9099C was discussed and a copy was provided to Facility administrator Alicia Cunningham.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260107090444
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/03/2025 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Beena Singh met with Staff-Reden Layman and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff present, and four (4) residents present. Facility Administrator Alicia Cunningham was contacted and arrived during the visit. The facility is a seven (7) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room and garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twelve (12) residents of which (6) can be non-ambulatory residents and six (6) ambulatory residents. The facility has two (2) Hospice Waiver and side chain links may be locked in evenings. The current census is four (4) residents. LPA Beena Singh was accompanied by Facility- Administrator Alicia Cunningham to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA Beena Singh observed no obstructions to outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night-stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed non-skid mat or strips in the resident bathrooms. LPA Beena Singh observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Beena Singh measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 117 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Personal rights and the Ombudsman poster, CCL complaint poster disaster plan were posted in a common area. Moreover, during the tour of the facility, LPA observed that there was a designated storage space for resident/staff files and a cabinet with the resident’s medications locked. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable food and three (3) days perishable food supply were observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has an administrator present in the facility. LPA Beena Singh observed enough staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. The files were complete with updated physician’s reports, admissions agreements, and Pre-placement appraisals and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. LPA found that all staffs have CPR training, staff are properly trained in medication, dementia care, and basic training required for an RCFE. Liability Insurance Valid through 05/2025-05/2026. Fire/Earthquake/Disaster Drill was conducted on 09/11/2025. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report were discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Alicia Cunningham.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2025
Feb 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: First Allegation: Staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation.

On 02/20/2025 at 11:34 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Singh was greeted and granted entrance by a staff member and LPA Singh met with Facility Staff Redden Casela Layman. LPA Singh identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation with Staff Reden Casela Layman The investigation was conducted by LPA Beena Singh. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation. During the investigation, LPA Singh did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with Client#1s family also indicated that this facility is very clean, Client#1 loves this place and family stated that they have never seen any roaches or bugs while visiting the facility or Client#1 has never reported seeing any bugs infestation in this facility. Unsubstantiated Interviews with six (6) of ten (10) residents indicated that they did not see any roaches in the facility. During the facility visit on 11/07/2024 and 01/23/2025. LPA Singh toured the facility and observed resident’s bedrooms, lounge, Kitchen, and dining area were clean and free of any bugs or roaches’ infestation. Based on the evidence, the allegation that staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099C were discussed and provided to Staff Redden Casela Layman.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250123084659
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Beena Singh met with Staff and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and six (6) residents present. Administrator Alicia Cunningham was contacted and arrived during the visit. The facility is a seven (7) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room and garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twelve (12) residents of which (6) can be non-ambulatory residents and six (6) ambulatory residents. The facility has two (2) Hospice Waiver and side chain links may be locked in evenings. The current census is ten (10) residents. LPA Beena Singh was accompanied by Staff #2 (S2) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA Beena Singh observed no obstructions to outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night-stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed non-skid mat or strips in the resident bathrooms. LPA Beena Singh observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Beena Singh measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 115 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Personal rights and the Ombudsman poster, CCL complaint poster disaster plan were posted in a common area. Moreover, during the tour of the facility, LPA observed that there was a designated storage space for resident/staff files and a cabinet with the resident’s medications locked. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable food and three (3) days perishable food supply were observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has an administrator present in the facility. LPA Beena Singh observed enough staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed ten (10) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. The files were complete with updated physician’s reports, admissions agreements, and Pre-placement appraisals and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA found that all staffs have CPR training, staff are properly trained in medication, dementia care, and basic training required for an RCFE. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report were discussed and provided to Administrator Alicia Cunningham.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/13/2023 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with Staff #2 (S2), was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and six (6) residents present. Administrator Alicia Cunningham was contacted and arrived during the visit. The facility is a seven (7) bedroom, three (3) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room and garage. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twelve (12) residents of which (6) can be non-ambulatory residents and six (6) ambulatory residents. The facility has two (2) Hospice Waiver and side chain links may be locked in evenings. The current census is ten (10) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Staff #2 (S2) to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA Brown observed no obstructions to outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed non-skid mat or strips in the resident bathrooms. Also, LPA Brown observed Resident #5 (R5) with full bed rails and Administrator Alicia Cunningham reported to LPA Brown that R5 is not on Hospice Care and no written order from the physician was observed indicating the need for postural support/full bed rail. LPA Brown observed no exception letter submitted and approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) for R5's full bed rails. Deficiency will be issued. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** To add to that, LPA Brown observed Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), and Resident #9 (R9) have half bed rails but no written order from R1, R2 and R9 physician indicating the need for postural support explaining R1, R2 and R9 needed assistance for mobility maintained in R1, R2 and R9 record. Deficiencies will be issued. LPA Brown observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 116 degrees F. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Personal rights and the Ombudsman poster were observed but no CCL complaint poster and the no disaster plan were posted in a common area. Deficiencies will be issued. LPA Brown observed no available Monthly Activity Calendar at the facility. Deficiencies will be issued. Moreover, during the tour of the facility, LPA Brown observed that there was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a cabinet with the majority of the resident’s medications locked. However, LPA Brown found medications pre-poured in a partitioned container for the day, up to bedtime medication for each resident at the facility. LPA Brown explained that no medications shall be pre-poured and transferred between containers. The facility will be issued deficiencies for pre-pouring residents medications for the day up to bedtime as this pose immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to residents in care. Food Service: Seven (7) days non-perishable food and three (3) days perishable food supply were observed at the facility. Care & Supervision: The facility has an administrator present in the facility. LPA Brown observed sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA reviewed ten (10) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. The files were complete for eight (8) residents with updated physician’s reports, admissions agreements, and Pre-placement appraisals and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. However, LPA Brown observed missing Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan for Resident #7 (R7) and Resident #8 (R8). Deficiency will be issued. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA found that all staffs have CPR training, staff are properly trained in medication, dementia care, and basic training required for an RCFE. However, LPA Brown observed Staff #3 (S3) criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility. S3 reported to LPA Brown that S3 started working at the facility 11/28/2023. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** LPA Brown informed Administrator Cunningham that deficiency will be issued and civil penalty of $500.00 will be issued during the visit as this pose potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care. Furthermore, LPA Brown observed no Fire Drill and Earthquake Drill Log or record at the facility and no Infection Control Plan at the facility. Deficiencies will be issued. Also, LPA Brown observed no current edition of a first aid manual approved by American Red Cross, the American Medical Association or a state or federal health agency at the facility. Technical Violation will be issued. Medications/Medication Administration Records (MARs) records were audited and LPA Brown observed that medications were dispensed for R1 and R9 without record, no December 2023 MAR available for R1 and R9. LPA Brown requested for any record that the facility have for dispensing R1 and R9 December 2023 medications per R1 and R9 physician's order but S3 and Administrator Cunningham reported to LPA Brown that no available record of dispensed medication per R1 and R9 at the facility. Deficiency will be issued. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, eleven (11) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC421BG, LIC9102 forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Alicia Cunningham.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023

The state marks this report as 54 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 10. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County