Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sen's Caregiving

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sacramento, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #342700570Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 4, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitSeptember 17, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sen's Caregiving is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sen's Caregiving

Is Sen's Caregiving licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sen's Caregiving licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sen's Caregiving been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Sen's Caregiving still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sen's Caregiving cost?

$3,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,046 to $4,461 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Sen's Caregiving take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Babasiga Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Sacramento is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sen's Caregiving keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sen's Caregiving license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SEN'S CAREGIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700570. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Babasiga Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. WAIVER GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (2).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,900a month to start

Likely $3,200–$4,800

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,900a month

Likely $3,200–$5,000

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,900likely $3,200–$4,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,000
$3,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,200
$5,900
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,400–$3,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5250 Shortway Dr, Sacramento, CA 95823Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 17, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
14
Most recent visit
September 17, 2026
Occupied · December 4, 2025 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 7, 2023 to December 4, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025341202411020233512022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Sep 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On September 17, 2026, at 2:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sulma Lopez arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA Lopez met with Administrator Ekshay Sen and explained the purpose of today's visit. The Administrator holds current certificate #7022154740 and expires on March 24, 2028. The facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents. There are currently 4 residents who reside at this facility. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for two (2). One (1) out of the two (2) hospice placements are occupied. At 3:00PM, LPA conducted record reviews of two (2) staff and two (2) resident files. The staff files were observed to contain Health Screening Reports, TB Test records, and current first aid certificates. Resident files were observed to contain Physician's Reports, Needs and Services Plans, and Centrally Stored Medication Records. The facility contains current Infection Control Plans and Emergency and Disaster Plans which are reviewed and updated on a yearly and as needed basis. At 3:30 PM, LPA Lopez toured the facility with the administrator. LPA Lopez inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms, facility bathrooms, laundry room, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. The facility was clean, safe, and in good repair. The facility temperature was 78 degrees. The facility’s hot water temperature was 107 degrees. The facility’s fire extinguishers were last inspected on January 22, 2026. The facility carbon monoxide and fire alarms were located on ceilings. Continued on LIC 809-C. The facility kitchen was observed to be clean and free of hazards. The facility contained perishable foods for at least 2 days, and at least 7 days worth of non-perishable foods. The kitchen appliances were observed to be in good working condition. Sharps and medications were stored in locked kitchen cabinets. LPA toured the facility's garage which contained equipment for laundry services, additional food supply, and storage items such as incontinence pads. The dining room and living room areas were clean and free of hazards. LPA observed enough seating available for the current census. The facility contained a weekly menu posted on the dining room wall. The resident bedrooms were clean and free of odors. Bedding was observed to be clean. Bedrooms were furnished with beds, dressers, closets, and night stands which were in good repair. The facility bathrooms were clean and sanitary. Hand washing supplies, non-slip mats, and grab bars were available to ensure resident safety. LPA toured the exterior of the facility. The walkways were free of obstructions. The perimeter fence and exit gates were in good repair. The backyard contained a covered patio with outdoor furniture. The LPA requested the following documents to be mailed/ faxed to the Regional Office within 15 days: - LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 308 Designation of Facility Representative, LIC 610E Emergency and Disaster Plan. As a result of this annual inspection, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility. Staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff.

On 12/5/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo made an unannounced inspection to the Sen’s Care giving to open and conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Tamayo met with Administrator, Prasad Indra Sen (S1) and Ekshay Sen (S2) Sen, and Parmila Prasad (S3) and together discussed the complaint details. LPA requested the following records for review: • LIC 500 • LIC 9020 • LIC 9999 Allegation: Staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility. It was alleged that staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. Unsubstantiated S1-S3 stated no staff sleep in the common areas nor have any staff been "live-in staff". S1-S3 stated they decided to have S4 go on a temporary leave due to awaiting their background clearance being resolved via Guardian. S2 stated they spoke with Guardian Operator 91, Jennifer, whom told them it will take a couple of days to update S4's status. LPA interviewed R2 and R3 whom stated they have not seen staff sleep in common areas such as the living room. Based on the interview statements and record review obtained during the investigation process, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegation that staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility occurred and is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff: It was alleged that Staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff, the investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. S1-S3 stated they work variable schedules Monday thru Sunday between 8:00 AM-7:00 PM. S2 stated S4 has not worked at the facility since 12/1/25 but they have not slept at the facility and their hours worked accurately reflects documentation of staff hours worked (LIC 500). Based on the interview statements and record review obtained during the investigation process, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation that staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff occurred and is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations that staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility is unsubstantiated and staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff, are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies noted or cited per California Code Regulation, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with the facility administrator and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251201151746
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not maintain an adequate amount of food supply to provide residents in care.

On 11/20/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo made an unannounced inspection to the Sen’s Care giving to open and conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Tamayo met with Administrator, Prasad Indra Sen (S1) and Ekshay Sen (S2) Sen, and Parmila Prasad (S3) and together discussed the complaint details. The census was four residents in care and four staff. One resident was out for a doctor’s visit. It was alleged that Licensee does not maintain an adequate amount of food supply to provide residents in care. The investigation consisted of staff interviews and LPA observations. Four out of four staff present stated groceries are purchased for the facility once, sometimes twice per week based on need. S2 stated they do not over buy food inventory in order to prevent food from going bad. CONTINUED ON 9099-D Substantiated S2 stated they are the responsible staff member to complete grocery shopping and they were going to go food shopping today. S1 and S3 stated one residents receives nothing by mouth (NPO) via G-tube three times per day. LPA observed there were nine boxes of “compleat” peptide in which one box contains 24 peptides. The residents family assists with replenishing peptide inventory every other week. Additionally, one resident receives pureed meals following their physicians orders. S1-S3 assisted LPA with a tour of the refrigerator, pantry, and supplemental food supply that is kept in the garage. LPA observed there is not sufficient food inventory to accommodate for seven-day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies for four residents in care; which would consist on a minimum of 84 non perishable meals and 24 perishable meals plus snacks available at the facility at all times. Based on the interview statements and observations obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of the home is not often maintained with an adequate supply of food. The deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251117142427

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 27, 2025

87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirment was not met, as evidenced by interviews and observations in which it was leared the facility did not have one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days for four residents maintained on the premises this poses a potential/ immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025

Plan of correction: By POC due date, the licensee shall ensure that there is a sufficient amount of food supply at all times. Licensee stated a food shopping will be completed for the facility by 11/21/25. A copy of the food receipt as well as a photo of food supply shall be sent to the LPA by11/20/25 Licesee also agreed to submit a statement of review and undestandin of regualtion 87555 and a plan to ensure there is a minimum of two days for four residents

Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/20/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo made an unannounced inspection to the Sen’s Caregiving to follow up via a case management. LPA Tamayo met with Administrator, Prasad Indra Sen (S1) and Ekshay (S2) Sen, and Parmila Prasad (S3) and together discussed the complaint details. The current census was four residents and four staff. Although LIS and guardian database show staff 4 (S4) criminal background clearance is still "In Process", Staff record review show the facility received letter from Department of Justive on 5/21/25, stating that S4 has been " there is no information meeting dissemination criteria pursuant to California law on the above names individual". Administrator will follow up with DOJ and/or Guardian to ensure S4 clearance is updated/processed reflecting "eligible clearance". A 9102 Technical Violation has been issues to the facility. licensee agrees to ensure all current and future staff are eligble cleared before starting to work at the facility. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no other deficiencies cited during this case management visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025
Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived unannounced to conduct a Required 1 Year inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Indra Prasad (S1) and staff Ekshay Sen(S2) explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator current certification expires on 11/13/26 for S1 and on 3/24/26 for S2. Current census is 3. LPA toured the facility with S2. LPA toured the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, garage, laundry area, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA observed required furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. The hot water temperature was measured at 115.1 *F which was within the required range of 105-120*F. The temperature inside the facility measured at 78*F which was within the required range of 68-85*F. LPA observed the centrally stored medications area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the fire extinguisher(s) and first aid kits were up to date. Smoke and carbon monoxide detector(s) in the facility were in good repair. The last fire drill was conducted in May 2025. Continued on 809-C LPA requested resident and staff files for review. LPA reviewed (3) staff files and (3) resident files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA verified staff training for staff file reviews. The following forms and documents were collected during this inspection and will be added to the facility file. LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 500 Personnel Report, Copy of Administrator Certificate, LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan and Proof of Current Liability Insurance. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/6/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection visit. LPA met with Administrator Indra Prasad explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator current certification expires on 11/13/2024. Current census is 2. LPA toured the facility with Indra Prasad and staff Ekshay Sen. LPA toured the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, garage, laundry area, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed the facility is clean and in good repair. LPA observed required furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. The hot water temperature was measured at 113.7*F which was within the required range of 105-120*F. The temperature inside the facility measured at 78*F which was within the required range of 68-85*F. LPA observed the centrally stored medications area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the fire extinguisher(s) and first aid kits were up to date. LPA observed smoke and carbon monoxide detector(s) in the facility were in good repair. Continued on 809-C LPA requested resident and staff files for review. LPA reviewed (2) staff files and (2) resident files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA verified staff training for staff file reviews. The following forms and documents were requested to be submitted within 15 days: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 500 Personnel Report, Copy of Administrator Certificate, LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan and Proof of Current Liability Insurance. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County