Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Safe Haven Oakdale

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oakdale, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #502701433
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 24, 2026CDSS inspection record

Safe Haven Oakdale is a small care home in Oakdale — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Safe Haven Oakdale

Is Safe Haven Oakdale licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Safe Haven Oakdale licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Safe Haven Oakdale been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Safe Haven Oakdale still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Safe Haven Oakdale cost?

$3,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 13 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size across Stanislaus County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,900 to $4,950 a month, and the middle figure is $3,400 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Safe Haven Oakdale take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Safe Haven Oakdale LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Oak Valley Hospital District is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Safe Haven Oakdale keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Safe Haven Oakdale license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SAFE HAVEN OAKDALE LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #502701433. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Safe Haven Oakdale LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR SIX (6).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,900a month to start

Likely $3,200–$4,800

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,900a month

Likely $3,200–$5,000

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,900likely $3,200–$4,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 13 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,000
$3,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,200
$5,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 13 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 13 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2912 Westport Circle, Oakdale, CA 95361Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 21, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
6
Most recent visit
August 24, 2026
Occupied · May 21, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 10, 2025 to May 21, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020254402024110

The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure staff assisted resident with ADLs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Caregiver Emilie Carnicar and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund spoke with Facility Manager Ryan Alejo who gave permission for Caregiver Emilie Carnicar to sign required paperwork. Census: 5 Facility did not ensure staff assisted resident with ADLs - Based on records reviewed, Oakdale Police report OP26-00201, interviews with staff, witnesses and residents in care. LPA Lund reviewed Appraisal/Needs and Service plan dated 11/15/2025 for resident (R1) which states R1 has a history intermittent episode of confusion, forgetfulness and difficulty managing day to day tasks. R1 has difficulty in Self-Care and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interviewing witness stated that their residents in care were getting their ADLs met by staff and had no concerns. Unsubstantiated . Staff interviewed stated that R1 would refuse to take showers and didn’t have much clothing to meet her needs and would have to wash them constantly. Oakdale Police investigated (Neglect) based on statements provide and other residents stating they are taken care of, it was determined no crime had occurred at this time when reviewing report. Based on records reviewed, Oakdale Police report OP26-00201, interviews with staff, witnesses and residents in care, and staff the information provided, it was unclear if facility did not ensure staff assisted resident with ADLs was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. Exit interview was conducted with and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260123122247
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:45 AM on 8/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Triel Ellen Lindstrom arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by a caregiver. The LPA identified herself, explained the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator (DFA). The LPA spoke with the DFA on the phone. The DFA authorized her representative, designated on the LIC308, to assist and accompany the LPA on a tour of the facility and records review. The designated representative arrived at the facility at 10:30 AM. This facility is licensed to serve six non-ambulatory residents. It has a hospice waiver for six residents. Its fire clearance was issued by Oakdale Fire Department Station 27 on 04/10/2024. The census was four residents at the time of this inspection. There was one caregiver on duty. The LPA toured the inside of the house, including four resident bedrooms, the kitchen, two bathrooms, dining room, living room, and garage. The entire house was clean, odor-free, and pest-free. The windows and window screens were in good repair. The required documents were posted in the entry way, including the license, current administrator certificate, personal rights, complaint hotline poster, and ombudsman information. The LPA inspected three smoke detectors, a carbon monoxide detector, and fire extinguisher. The smoke detectors were in the bedroom hallways and were an interconnected system. Staff tested one smoke detector and all three detectors sounded an alarm. Staff tested the carbon monoxide detector and it sounded an alarm. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 3/28/2025 by Assured Fire Extinguisher Service. The LPA observed documentation of quarterly disaster drills. This report continues on LIC809-C, page 2. Each bedroom contained the required furniture, including bed, bedside table, lamp, dresser, and chair. The bedrooms and their closets were clean, organized, and odor-free. The bedroom hallway had a nightlight and contained storage cabinets with extra linens. One bedroom contained a full bathroom. A second bathroom was located in the bedroom hallway. Both bathrooms contained grab bars and non-slip mats. Both bathrooms were clean and odor-free. The LPA measured the water temperature at a bathroom sink, which was 113 degrees Fahrenheit. The LPA toured the kitchen. The kitchen was clean, the appliances were operable, and the trashcan had a lid on it. There was a seven-day non-perishable and two-day perishable supply of food located in the kitchen refrigerator-freezer, cabinets, and pantry. Sharp objects were kept locked in a lower kitchen cabinet. The LPA observed chemical cleaners in an unlocked lower cabinet under the kitchen sink. Staff stated that the lock was broken. Staff immediately moved the chemicals to a locked staff office. The LPA toured the dining room and living room, which contained enough furniture for all residents, including a dining table and chairs and six recliners. There is artwork on the walls and large windows that let in natural light. The LPA toured the garage. The garage contained an extra refrigerator-freezer, water heater, washing machine and dryer, and storage cabinets. The LPA observed additional perishable food in the refrigerator-freezer and extra supplies for residents in the storage cabinets. The LPA observed chemical cleaners in an unlocked storage cabinet in the garage. Staff immediately locked the access door that led from the house to the garage with a key that only staff had. The LPA toured the back yard, which included a large, wooden shade structure with a table and chairs under it. The concrete patio and walkways on the side of the house are free of obstructions and the surrounding fence is intact and sturdy. This report continues on LIC809-C, page 3. The LPA inspected the central medication storage area. Residents’ medication was kept in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. Each resident’s medication was stored separately in its original containers with intact labels. The LPA observed the electronic-based medication administration record, which was complete and up-to-date. There was a first aid kit in the medication cabinet that contained all the required items. The LPA reviewed records for four residents and two staff and found the records to be complete. Both staff had criminal background clearances and current first aid/CPR certifications. The Administrator’s certificate was valid (#7026256740) and expires 2/14/2027. The LPA requested that updated copies of these documents be submitted to Licensing by 8/27/2025 at ellen.lindstrom@dss.ca.gov. (1) LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility (2) Copy of a current Administrator Certificate (3) LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan (4) Proof of Liability Insurance (5) LIC 500 Personnel Report (6) LIC 309 Administrative Organization As a result of this annual visit, one deficiency was cited (see LIC809-D). The facility was not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation. An exit interview was conducted with the designated staff and a copy of the LIC 809, LIC 809-D, and appeal rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2025
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff mismanaged resident's medications.

On 07/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell went to the Safe Haven Oakdale LLC residential home for the elderly to deliver a complaint that was filed with the department on 3/5/2025: Facility staff mismanaged residents’ medication Based on a review of the MAR report and interview with S1, the allegation could not be substantiated as there was no indication that medication had been shared with another resident and S1 denied sharing a resident’s medication with other residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There are no deficiencies noted or cited per California Code Regulation. An exit interview was conducted with the House Manager Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facilit Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250305161401
Mar 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived unannounced to open a complaint investigation. During the course of that investigation, LPA Campbell discovered other deficiencies unrelated to the complaint allegations, which will be addressed in this case management report. LPA Campbell met with Caregiver, Chyl-c Anaviso and Emilie Carno, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Campbell conducted a review of resident Medication Administration Records (MAR) and observed that Staff 1(S1) had not initialed the form for medication dispersal for five days in a row. Per regulation 87465(a), the facility is to establish 'a plan for incidental medical care' to 'encourage routine medical and dental care.' LPA Campbell observed missing staff initials for Resident 2 (R2) and R3 for five days from March 6 to March 11. When questioned, S1 admitted that they had not filled out the form as required in the plan established by the facility and they reported that they had been tired and busy with a resident. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency is being cited on the attached 809-D during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and copies of the report and appeal rights left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the facility medication administration record (MAR) and Controlled Medication Administration Record, it was observed that required names/initials for medication dispersal were not filled out which poses/posed an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2025

Plan of correction: The lincensee will establish a procedure for auditing the MAR to ensure established procedures are followed and read and present a memorandum of understanding for regulation 87465.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

On 01/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a post-licensing inspection. LPA Campbell met with Vince Popanes and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is a single story facility licensed for 6 non-ambulatory and hospice residents over 60. There are 4 bedrooms. Of the 4 bedrooms, 2 are shared rooms and 2 are private rooms. One of the shared rooms has an en suite bathroom. Occupants of the rest of the rooms use the bathroom in the hallway. There is no body of water found on the facility. The facility sketch shows no alterations in comparison to the building during the visit. Upon Entry, LPA Campbell observed a sign in sheet in the entry. A See Something, Say Something poster and Ombudsman poster were on the wall. Certificate #6060598740 for administrator Aileen Poquiz was framed as well. It expires on 02/14/2025. The facility was odor free and free of debris. The fire extinguisher was last inspected on March 21, 2024. LPA Campbell conducted a tour of the premises that included but was not limited to the dining room, bedrooms, bathrooms, common area and backyard. The dining rooms and common areas were furnished appropriately. Bedrooms contained the appropriate items including beds, chests, closets, chairs, night stand and lamp. The thermostat was observed at 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Water was measured at 115 degrees F. The Pantry contained enough food to last the residents seven days. Perishable foods were observed to be enough to last residents 3 days. The outside area and the pathway to the fire exit was free of obstacles. A shaded area was observed with seating and a table. The smoke alarm was tested and found to be functioning. Knives were observed to be locked in a lower cabinet in the kitchen. Of the 6 residents, 4 of their files were reviewed and found to be complete. No staff files were found at the facility. When copies of files were requested, the administrator offered to email the records. However, they could not be provided within a reasonable amount of time and had not arrived by 2:00 pm. Based on today's inspection, per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, deficiencies were observed or cited and noted on LIC 809D. Note that failure to correct any deficiencies will result in additional civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 27, 2025

87355(e)(1) Criminal Record Clearance. Prior to working,... in a licensed facility, all individuals subject to a criminal record review shall obtain a clearance or criminal record exemption. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not ensure a criminal record clearance was obtained for 1 of 2 staff members (S2) present in the facility, which poses an immedicated Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Effective Immediately, but no later than 01/17/2025; the Administrator shall remove S2 from the facility and have all employees fingerprinted, complete a health screening and TB test prior to returning to work by POC date. Written certification is required to show Administrator has read regulation by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87412(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 27, 2025

87412 (g) All personnel records shall be maintained at the facility and shall be available to the licensing agency for review. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA and staff were unable to find complete staff files on premises for review. Of the one file found, the paperwork is incomplete.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure staff files are present, complete and easily available to staff and LPA for review by POC date.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 7/18/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at 524 E Union St in Modesto announced to continue a pre-licensing inspection related to a change in ownership. LPA Jensen met with current Licensee Maria Acedo and applicant Aileen Grimesey, LPA Jensen received photographic evidence that the doors connecting resident rooms have been equipped with a locking mechanism to allow for passage from room to room. LPA Jensen received an updated copy of the Plan of Operation with all requested revisions made. The applicant has agreed that no surveillance cameras will be used in the interior of the facility unless a waiver is requested and approved by the Department which details a compelling health and safety reason for use. The current owner is sending formal written notification of transfer of the business today and providing a 60 day notice. LPA Jensen reviewed the notice and determined it to be compliant. The applicant has passed the pre-licensing inspection and component III was conducted however licensure will require a 60 day waiting period so that residents or resident representatives have an adequate period of time for consideration. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County