Mid-size home · Licensed for 46 · Van Nuys
Paradise in the Valley
13530 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91405Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 46: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 46 residents
- Hospiceup to 10 residents
- Bedriddenup to 10 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 46 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL ROOMS ARE APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Paradise in the Valley: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,750a month to start
Likely $2,950–$4,950
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,750likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,750likely $2,950–$4,950
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,950–$5,100
- $3,750
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,600–$8,300
- $6,250
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $7,500
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,800.
- Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 2.3 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 3.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 3.4 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 4.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors' HavenBurbank · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The LighthouseToluca Lake · 4.8 mi · Mid-size home$2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Ardenville Home Care IBurbank · 4.8 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hollywood Healthy LivingSun Valley · 4.9 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
13530 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91405Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama CityHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609982 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 14 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 9:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:38 a.m., the Administrator Yehuda Cohen met with the LPA. RECORD REVIEW: Between 9:47 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review for five (5) residents and five (5) staff. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: care plans, medical assessments, admissions agreement, consent forms. Resident records were in order. Five (5) personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and training documentation. Personnel files were in order. The LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding required annual training and provided additional information. Facility fire and disaster drill was last conducted on 01/24/2026. The LPA observed documentation for the Infection Control Plan and Emergency and Disaster Plan. Administrator certificate is current and valid until 05/26/2026. During today’s visit, the LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, emergency disaster plan, resident roster, surety bond and liability insurance. At 12:50 p.m., the LPA along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. The facility's smoke alarms are hard wired, and the facility is equipped with sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler inspection (5-Year) was completed on 02/16/2022. Annual fire alarm test was conducted on 04/21/2025 and passed. During the time of the visit, the LPA and Administrator tested carbon monoxide alarms, which functioned properly. Continued on LIC 809-C. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives are stored in the kitchen area and remain inaccessible to residents. The LPA observed sufficient seating for all residents. A waiver was granted on 02/28/2025 for the food to be prepared in the neighboring facility, Grand Valley Health Center. The LPA observed snacks and beverages being available to residents. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed five (5) randomly selected resident rooms throughout facility. Rooms were furnished with clean linens, appropriate furniture and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed restrooms in five (5) resident units and common area restroom. All restrooms were fully stocked with supplies. Restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces in the bathing units. Water temperature was tested throughout the visit and measured within the required range, ranging between 113.5 and 118.4-degree F. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/10/2025. The LPA observed required postings on the wall near the entrance. The LPA observed cameras installed in the hallways, and at exterior of the building. The Administrator explained that the facility is going to update the cameras. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the janitor closet. The laundry units are located inside near the Administrator’s office. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the courtyard, which has a covered outdoor area for residents’ use. There are multiple emergency exits located throughout the facility. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There were no bodies of water noted. The LPA observed a locked shed in the courtyard area. Additionally, there is a detached building used for storage containing a supply of emergency water, food, Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), first aid kits and other emergency supplies. Starting at 1:07 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for four (4) residents and observed that medications were properly documented and assisted with as prescribed. Medications and first aid kits are located in a locked medication room. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a Case Management visit at the above facility at approximately 2:45pm to verify the relocation of Resident #1 (R1) to this facility and to confirm their health and safety following the transition. LPA met with staff Abriiana Thomas. Staff contacted the Executive Director (ED) Yehuda Cohen. LPA spoke with ED and explained the purpose for the visit. At approximately 3pm, LPA Chochian and staff conducted a tour of the physical plant to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations, which included a tour of R1’s room. During the tour, R1 was observed to be in the activity room. The LPA met with R1 privately in their respectful room. R1 appeared groomed, alert and happy at the time of LPA's visit. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed during the visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs 2. Staff are not serving residents food of good quality 3. Staff spoke inappropriately to resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations and was let into the faciity by Abriiana Thomas, Business Office Manager. Judah Cohen, Administrator, was contacted by telephone and he arrived at 11:13am to conduct the visit. The reason for today's visit was explained On today's visit, LPA Yee conducted an interview with the Administrator at 11:18am, Staff #1 at 11:45pm, Resident #1 at 12:26pm, Resident #2 at 1:11pm, Resident #3 at 1:55pm, Resident #4 at 2:22pm, Resident #5 at 2:37pm and reviewed this week's menu. LPA Yee also reviewed the food supply at the skilled nursing facility locate next door at 2:05pm. Per interviews conducted regarding allegation #1, Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs, Unsubstantiated Resident #1 who is diabetic, is supposed to be on special diet consisting of low fat, low carbohydrate and low sugar. Per interview with the Administrator, he has had multiple discussions with Resident #1 about the resident's special diet option but resident #1 has continued to choose the regular meal offered to all residents. Per the Administrator, they had and have offered Resident #1 a special diet option but cannot stop a resident from eating what they want. Per interview with Resident #1, they do no not like some of the food that they serve, especially pasta and won't eat it. Resident #1, who loves fruits, would order a fruit plate as a replacement meal for dinner. Per the Administrator, he will speak with the food director next door about adding more alternatives for those on special diets and those who do not like the featured meal being offered. Per the Administrator, in addition to the 3 meals, the facility also serves 3 snacks to residents. Based on the information received, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs, therefore the allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation #2, staff are not serving residents food of good quality, per information received from interviews conducted, on 4/8/25, the day before the complaint was filed, Resident #1 had requested a plate of fruits for dinner at lunch time since they did not like the featured dinner. Per Resident #1, the fruit tasted old and had no flavor. They ate the cantaloupe and gave away the watermelon to Resident #2. Per Resident #2, they ate the watermelon but it was old. Per interview with Resident #4, who was present at dinner, they stated that the rinds were still on the melon but, it was not juicy and it looked okay to her. The facility meals are prepared in the skilled nursing facility located next door and delivered to the facility for plating. LPA Yee reviewed the food supply at the nursing home at 2:05pm and observed frozen meats, frozen vegetables in the freezer and canned foods in the pantry. Fresh vegetables and fruits were observed stored in the refrigerators. LPA Yee did not observe any spoiled vegetables or fruits during the review of the food supply. Based on interviews conducted and review of the food supply, LPA Yee was not able to obtain sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff are not serving residents food of good quality. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Per investigation into Allegation #3, staff spoke inappropriately to resident, Staff #1 denies speaking inappropriately or yelling at the Resident 1 to "get out of my kitchen" Per Staff #1, she asked the resident to step out of the kitchen as the resident could slip in the kitchen. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250409105136
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)s Valeria Conway and Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility at 9:15 A.M., for an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPAs met with Evelyn Pena, Wellness Director and at this time the reason for the visit was explained. Administrator Yehuda Cohen was contacted via telephone and arrived at 10:20 A.M. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 11:05 A.M., the LPAs along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Initial test (5-Year) fire sprinkler inspection was completed on 02/16/2022. Fire permit completed on 1/4/2025 and valid through 12/31/2025. Fire safety concerns were noted by Fire Inspector Benjamin Guzman on 01/29/2025. Facility is licensed for 46 ambulatory residents, of which 10 may be bedridden. Fire extinguishers throughout the building were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/09/2024. At 11:10 A.M., dining room carbon monoxide alarm was tested but not functioning; at 11:35 A.M. hallway carbon monoxide alarm was tested and properly functioned at the time of the visit. Technical violation (TV) issued. The Facility does handle cash resources for some of the clients. Surety Bond is current. This facility doesn’t have a staff room, facility will provide 24/7 care. Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809 BEDROOMS: A random selection of 6 (six) resident rooms were observed. All rooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, and sufficient lighting. LPA Conway observed a bed not to have fitted sheets. Technical violation (TV) issued. LPAs observed bathrooms with grab bars and slip resistant mats. LPAs observed one shared bathroom not to have a shower head and shower curtain. Between 11:41 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. hot water temperature was checked in multiple randomly selected rooms and measured within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. COMMON AREAS: The facility is a one-story building. The facility contains multiple common areas, which were all observed to be clean, furnished appropriately and in good condition at the time of the visit. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. All required postings were observed in the common area. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees. LPAs observed cameras throughout the common areas only. Administrator states that cameras are not functioning at the time of the visit. Additionally, next to the dining room, LPAs tested a delayed egress system at 12:10 P.M. which functioned properly at the time of the visit. Facility provides sufficient space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. OUTSIDE AREA: The LPAs and Administrator toured the outside areas of the facility. The LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for resident use. LPAs observed a locked shed containing emergency food. LPAs inspected can foods for expiration dates. LPAs observed expired food items. Expired items were discarded at the time of the visit. Additionally, there is a detached building belonging to the skilled nurse facility next door where a sufficient supply of emergency water was observed. LPAs observed a fenced back patio with a double locked gate. There were no bodies of water noted. KITCHEN AND DINING ROOM: LPAs observed the kitchen and dining room. Food is prepared in the neighboring facility, Grand Valley Health Center. On 03/05/2024, Administrator submitted an offsite kitchen waiver to LPA Yee, which is still under review. Facility dining room and commercial kitchen were inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C RECORD REVIEW: Starting at 12:07 P.M., LPAs reviewed 6 (six) staff files and 6 (six) resident files. Files were reviewed for, but not limited to: Physician's Reports, Personal Rights, Admission Agreements, staff training records, health screenings, TB tests, and background clearance. Record review of resident files revealed that Resident #1’s (R1)’s physicians report, dated 02/12/2025 indicating R1 not having capacity for selfcare and R1 is neither under hospice care nor have an approved exception on file with the Department. Additionally, LPAs observed two (2) out of six (6) residents to be non-ambulatory. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 1:30 P.M. Medications are stored a locked med room inside the medication cart. LPA Conway observed medications for 7 (seven) residents. During medication audit it was observed that five (5) out of seven (7) medication bubble packs contained extra doses of medication. The Wellness Director was unable to provide an explanation as to why the medications were not administered to residents at the prescribed times. Furthermore, the Wellness Director confirmed that there are currently no residents refusing their medication. LPAs also reviewed the facility's Emergency Disaster Plan, which was observed to be complete and updated on 2/3/2025. Emergency Disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 12/14/2024. During today’s visit LPAs obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, surety bond and liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handle residents in a rough manner. Staff yell at residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Mr. Yehuda Cohen, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 05/20/2024, Community Care Licensing Division received the above complaint allegations. Information was provided that the staff (names unknown) are pulling residents and cursing at the residents. Following is a summary of the investigation finding: On 05/28/2024, between 3:40pm-5pm, LPA toured the facility physical plant areas, interviewed four (4) staff and eight (8) residents. Staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have not handled any resident roughly or witnessed any resident being handled roughly at the facility. (Continue to Lic9099c) Unsubstantiated Staff reported that no resident made such allegations of “staff handle residents in rough manner or staff yelling/cursing at residents in care. Residents interviewed did not report any mistreatment by any staff. Residents interviewed denied being handled roughly by staff and denied being yelled at by staff. Resident also reported that no staff have ever cursed at them. Residents interviewed also reported that they have not witnessed any staff yell/curse at any other resident or handle any resident roughly. residents interviewed reported being satisfied with the services provided by the caregiving staff. Several attempts were made to contact reporting party on 05/28/2024, 05/30/2024 and 05/31/2024, however no response was received. Based on the above information gathered, although the allegation may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the above allegations “Staff handle residents in a rough manner” and “Staff yell at residents in care” are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240520170140
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced subsequent required Annual Inspection and used the complete CARE Inspection Tool. LPA Yee met with Yehuda Cohen, Administrator and the reason for the visit was explained. On today's visit the following domains of the Care Inspection Tool were reviewed: Infection Control, Operational Requirement, Staffing, Resident Rights/Information, Planned Activities, Food Service, Incidental Medical and Dental, Resident Records/Incident Reports and Disaster Preparedness. The following areas are pending clarification: the facility fire clearance and the liability insurance coverage limits. Deficiencies observed during the review were cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Any deficiencies not addressed on today's visit will be addressed on a return visit. Exit interview was conducted, Appeals Rights were discussed and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024
Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection using the complete CARE Inspection Tool and initially met with Abriiana Thomas, Staff. Yehuda Cohen, Administrator was contacted by staff and he arrived at 10:11am to conduct the visit. The reason for today's visit was explained. The facility is a single storey commercial building consisting of a industrial sized kitchen, dining room, a library/activities room, a front office, a medication room and 28 resident rooms. Each of the resident rooms are equipped with a toilet and some rooms have showers. There is a total of 2 common bathrooms. The facility is fire cleared for 36 AMBULATORY and 10 BEDRIDDEN. The facility also has a sprinkler system. On today's visit, LPA Yee reviewed 10 residents files, 6 staff files, Emergency Disaster Preparedness Plan, and completed the Resident Record-Incident Report domain. Due to time constraints a return visit is needed to complete the other 11 domains not reviewed. Deficiencies cited California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Immediate Civil Penalties were assessed. Any deficiencies not cited on today's visit will be addressed on the return visit. Exit interview was conducted APPEALS RIGHTS discussed and a copy was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 7 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Mar 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Staff dislocated resident's arm 2. Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect 3. Facility is not kept clean 4. Facility is infested with scabies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced complaint visit and intially met with Evelyn Pena, Wellness Director until Yehuda Cohen, Administrator arrived. The reason for today's visit was explained. Face to face interviews were conducted with the Administrator at 9:43am, Staff #1 at 11:48am, Staff #2 at 12:20pm and an attempted interview with Resident #2 at 11:34am. Telephone interviews were conducted with Resident #1 at 9:42am and Staff #3 at 12:54pm. Per interviews conducted regarding Allegation #1 - Staff dislocated resident's arm - per staff, they do not manually transfer Resident #1 to and from the bed. Resident #1 is too Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated heavy to manually transfer, even with a two men assist. Staff have to use a Hoyer lift to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to the wheelchair. Staff are not aware that Resident #1 ever sustained a dislocated shoulder. Resident #1 did not complain or mention any shoulder pain while living at the facility. Per interviews conducted regarding Allegation #2 - Staff do not treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff stated that they do not call residents names, cuss at them or tell then that they are annoying. Staff treat residents with respect. In fact, staff all stated that Resident #1 would scream, call them names and cuss out the staff if they told Resident #1 not to smoke drugs in the bedroom or if Resident #1 brought homeless people back to the facility for overnight stays or exchanged drugs in return for televisions and refrigerators from the other residents. Resident #1 would call staff "stupid" and "dumb." Staff got to the point where they did not know how to deal with Resident #1. Three staff have quit as a result of Resident #1's behavior. Regarding Allegation #3 - Facility is not kept clean. Per interviews conducted with staff, the bedrooms are cleaned daily and they all stated that Resident #1 was a hoarder. Resident #1 would have so many things that there was barely room to walk sometimes. Staff would clean Resident #1's bedroom and immediately after it was cleaned, Resident #1 would dirty the room. Resident would throw cigarette butts on the floor, clothing and other items. . Regarding Allegation #4 Facility is infested with scabies. Per information obtained from staff interviews, Resident #3 went to the hospital for a fall and Resident #4 due to lack of appetite in January 2023. The facility was notified by the hospital staff that Resident #3 had scabies and that all the residents should be treated for scabies as a precautionary measure. A physicians order was obtained for Elimite and the residents were treated. The scabies incident was reported to the Health Department but no visit was conducted by the health department nurse as a result of the single case of scabies. Based on the information received, the above allegations are all Unsubstantiated Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230327161826
Mar 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Staff did not prevent resident from assaulting another resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an inital complaint visit to investigate the above allegation and initially met with Evelyn Pena, Wellness Director. Yehuda Cohen, Administrator arrived at 10:07am to conduct the visit. The reason for today's visit was explained. LPA Yee conducted face to face interviews with Evelyn Pena at 10:01am, Administrator at 10:26am, Resident #1 at 10:51am and conducted telephone interviews with Staff #1 at 12:29pm, Staff #2 at 2:31pm and Witness #1 at 11:26am. Facility files were reviewed and copies of files requested from 11:45am - 12:25pm, Resident #1's room and area directly in front of the room was toured at 1:30pm. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Per information received from interviews conducted with the Administrator, Wellness Director, Staff #1 and Resident #1, on 2/28/23 around 7:00pm screaming was heard coming from the area where Resident #1's room is located. Resident #3 also came to get Staff #1 in the dining room and gestured to staff to hurry. Staff #1 followed Resident #3 around to the other side of the building and found Resident #2 standing over Resident #1. Resident #2 was beating and dragging Resident #1 in the hallway directly outside their shared bedroom. Staff #1 intervened and told Resident #2 to let Resident #1 go. With the assistance of Staff #1, Resident #1 was able to get away. Resident #2 attempted to hit Staff #1 and succeeded in hitting staff on the collar bone. Resident #2 also attempted to choke Staff #1. Staff #1 was screaming for assistance and trying to calm the resident down. Staff #1 wanted to know why Resident #2 was acting that way. Staff #2 had also heard the screaming and ran towards the screaming just in time to see Staff #1 being hit by Resident #2. Resident #2 also attempted to hit Staff #2 and a caregiver hired from an agency. Resident #2 was very agitated. Staff #2 contacted family to assist Resident #2 calm down but the phone was disconnected by resident so 911 was called. When the paramedics arrived, Resident attempted to attack Staff #1 a third time but the paramedic's intervened. Resident #1 refused to be transported to the hospital to be checked on the day of the incident. Resident sustained injury to both elbows and to the top right side of face and to the back of the right ear. First aid was rendered by the paramedics. However, Resident #2 was transported to the hospital and is currently still under observation. Two days later, Resident #1 agreed to be transported to the hospital for a CT scan. No internal injuries were noted. Per interviews conducted with staff and Resident #1, all indicated that Resident #2 is very calm and is not aggressive. Everyone indicated that this was not Resident #2's normal behavior. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the finding for the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and a copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230307132101
Jan 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angel Ascencio conducted a Case Management - Incident Visit to the facility above. LPA met with Wellness Director Evelyn Pena at 10:15 a.m. This visit was regarding an incident report to Community Care Licensing (CCL) that was received on 12/29/2022, indicating that a staff member has been abusive toward residents. LPA Ascencio spoke to Administrator Yehuda Cohen on 12/30/2022. Administrator added that they received a call from staffing agency manager stating that various staffing agency personnel observed a staff member be verbally and physically abusive towards residents. Administrator added that the staff member in question has been placed on administrative leave pending an internal investigation. Administrator added they are waiting for a written statement from the caregiver agency with additional details. On 01/05/2023, LPA spoke to Administrator regarding the incident. Administrator stated that the staffing agency did provide a written statement but could not provide sufficient information on the dates, times and residents involved. On 1/13/2023, starting at 11: 20 a.m., LPA spoke to staffing agency manager regarding the allegation. Agency manager stated that multiple agency staff members observed a staff member hit residents on the head, violently grab residents, and not thoroughly shower them. Agency manager added that their staff did not want to provide names or dates and times the alleged incidents happened. Later that same day, LPA interviewed four (4) facility staff members beginning at 10:51 a.m.. Interview with staff revealed that staffing agency personnel are providing care in the evening and night. Further interviews revealed that the staff have not observed or heard of any staff being physically or verbally abusive to residents. Staff interviews also revealed that if they were to hear of any misconduct from staff or residents, they would directly notify their manager, community care licensing or the ombudsman office. Interview with six (6) residents, starting at 11:38 a.m. revealed that staff are very pleasant and respectful toward resident. Resident added that they have not observed or heard of any type of abuse within the facility. Lastly, resident feel safe and comfortable around the staff that are currently present at the facility. Based on evidence gathered, there was no citation made during today’s visit. A copy of the report was provided to the Wellness Director and Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2023
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 20, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angel Ascencio conducted an unannounced required annual visit to the above facility. LPA Ascencio met with the Administrator Yehuda Cohen and explained the reason for the visit. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. At 1:25 p.m., LPA, along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. BEDROOMS: All resident rooms are set up with beds, night stands, lamps, chests of drawers, chairs and closet space. The beds are furnished with box springs, comfortable mattress and clean linen; which includes, a mattress pad, top and bottom linens, pillowcases, blanket (if needed) and a bedspread. Lighting in the rooms appeared adequate. The bedrooms were large enough to allow for easy passage between the beds. The facility has a total of 28 bedrooms - 17 are shared bedrooms, and 9 are private. RESTROOMS: There are about 20 total bathrooms at the facility. The resident bathrooms consist on a sink and toilet. There are 4 shower rooms with non-skid materials. Hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility and was within normal ranges between 105.0 F and 120.0 F. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, common seating area and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Chairs were observed to be at least 6 (six) feet apart for social distancing. Continued on LIC 809 - C The LPA observed the required postings in the common hallway. Fire extinguishers were observed to be serviced within the last year. The facility smoke alarm system and carbon monoxide detector was tested and operated normally at the time of visit. The medication room was observed to be locked and contained at least 30 days of worth of medication. A locked staff room was observed that contained the laundry room and laundry supply. The outdoor patio has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. The There are no bodies of water noted. KITCHEN: Kitchen knives are stored in a cabinet in the kitchen. The supply of dishes, utensils, pots, pans and drink ware is adequate. The freezer was maintained at zero degrees Fahrenheit (0*F) and the refrigerator was maintained at 40*F. The supply of perishable and nonperishable food is adequate. There are no pesticides (poisons) or toxins stored in any food storage area or preparation area with utensils. Appliances in the kitchen were clean and all appeared functional. Trash cans had tight fitting lids. Kitchen, laundry and house cleaning supplies are stored in a locked staff room. No flies or other vermin were observed INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with Administrator regarding the facility’s infection control practices at 2:15 p.m. There is 1 entry into the facility. The LPA noted that the facility is allowing visitors for both indoor and outdoor visitation. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility does not have a confirmed case of COVID-19 at this time. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. No citations were issued during today’s visit. Recommendations: - Upon entry, continue to symptom screen staff, resident and visitors per PIN guidelines. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report provided to Admin via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2022
Nov 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not wearing PPE
On 11/17/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the allegation named above. LPA Urena arrived at the facility at 1:30 p.m., met with Business Office Manager, Aubriana Thomas, and spoke via phone with the administrator Yudah Cohen (323-806-0786), and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Urena conducted a brief interview with the administrator over the phone, and asked about the staff’s use of face coverings/masks, and if any outside agencies had observed staff not wearing masks. The administrator stated that an outside agency had visited the facility, and that the agency representative had brought to their attention the use of the face coverings/masks. Continues on LIC 9099 C... Substantiated Regarding the allegation, ‘Staff are not wearing PPE’, it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that the facility has not been safeguarding residents by not practicing proper infection control. Upon arrival the LPA was allowed into the facility by a staff member wearing a mask. The office staff were found to be wearing a mask as well. At 1:45pm. and the LPA conducted the tour of the facility, and noticed caregivers and other staff wearing a mask. Additionally, the LPA asked staff if an outside agency had visited the facility recently, and had brought to their attention wearing personal protective equipment (PPE)? The staff stated that 'yes' an outside agency had visited the facility. Based on the LPA’s interview with the administrator, and staff, and based on the information provided by a credible witness, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the 'Facility was not following COVID-19 health, and safety protocol’. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview was conducted with facility representative, a copy of the report, and Appeal Rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022 · control 29-AS-20221115114033
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 28, 2022
87468.1(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, and interviews conducted, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, staff did not wear mask/face covering, while providing care and supervision to residents in care, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022
Plan of correction: Submit staff training sign in sheet and supporting documentation on Infection Control Practices- PIN 21-38-ASC regarding masks wearing in the facility to LPA by 11/30/2022.
Feb 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Salia Walker arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required Annual visit. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with Designee Sonia Aquino at 2:00 p.m., and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside with the Designee at 2:07 p.m., to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. Kitchen: The kitchen area appeared clean and sanitary. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food, and has an arranged meal delivery contract with ‘Grand Valley Health Care Center.’ Food in the refrigerator/freezer were properly labeled. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be properly stored and locked at time of visit. Hot water measured 115.9 degrees Fahrenheit at 2:20 p.m. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms which were furnished with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Restrooms: Each resident restroom is designed as a ½ bathroom; the facility has designated shower rooms throughout the facility. The resident bathrooms and shower rooms are properly equipped with grab bars and shower rooms are equipped with non-skid material. Hot water was randomly tested throughout the facility inspection; temperatures ranged between 105.0 – 119.8 degrees Fahrenheit in common/ private restrooms. Common Areas: Five (5) Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility fully charged, with an annual Maintenance expiration date of 09/22/2024. The building is a one-level facility, which consists of offices, an activity room, a library, medication room, laundry room, multiple supply closets, staff room, kitchen/dining room, and multiple shower rooms. The LPA observed common areas, including furniture and activity equipment, to be clean and in good condition. Continue on LIC 809C.. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. Medication room: First aid kit, medications, and medication records are kept in the medication room. The First Aid Kit was complete with a thermometer, scissor, tweezers, bandage and a first aid manual. BACKYARD: The patio has covered outdoor areas equipped with furniture for resident use. There were no bodies of water noted. INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator via telephone at 3:56 p.m. regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility had a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility does not have a confirmed case of COVID-19 at this time, and the LPA reviewed facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Aug 12, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Salia Walker arrived unannounced to conduct a joint Case Management- Incident visit in lieu of COVID-19 Positive outbreak at the above facility. In attendance included LA County Public Health Nurse Ovsanna Dermenjyan, LA County Physician Specialist Cammy Babaie MD and Administrator Yehuda Cohen. The purpose of the visit had a specific emphasis on infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for signing in, symptom screening, and temperature checks. The facility has appropriate signs in the common spaces to promote proper hand hygiene, physical distancing, and symptom reporting. Staff and residents were observed wearing masks throughout the common spaces. Hand sanitizer was available throughout the common spaces for resident and staff use. During today's visit, a discussion was held regarding the current status of Covid-19 positive residents and staff, testing, communication to staff and families, symptom screening, and adjusted procedures around visitation and excursions. The community is not experiencing any issues with staffing or obtaining Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) at this time. Cleaning and disinfectant protocol is adequate. No health and safety hazards noted during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was emailed for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2021
36 of 46 beds were occupied at the April 15, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Paradise in the Valley LLC, licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 5
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 5 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Paradise in the Valley
Is Paradise in the Valley licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Paradise in the Valley licensed for?
46 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Paradise in the Valley been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Paradise in the Valley still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Paradise in the Valley cost?
$3,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,950–$4,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Paradise in the Valley take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Paradise in the Valley LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Paradise in the Valley keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Paradise in the Valley license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PARADISE IN THE VALLEY LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609982. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 46 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Paradise in the Valley LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County