Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Noble CareLicense #197608760 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareNoble CareLicense #197608760 · 13300 Arminta Street, North Hollywood, CA · (818) 616-2427Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/North Hollywood/Noble Care
Map · 13300 Arminta Street

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,950/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 616-2427

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

NC

Call Noble Care

North Hollywood · Licensed for 6

(818) 616-2427

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · North Hollywood

Noble Care

13300 Arminta Street, North Hollywood, CA 91605 · Licensed since 2015

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Noble Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,950 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Noble Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,950a month to start

Likely $3,200–$4,850

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,950likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,200–$4,850

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,050
$3,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,800–$8,300
$6,450
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500

$3,000$7,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,000.

  • Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 3.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hollywood Healthy LivingSun Valley · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ardenville Home Care IBurbank · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Seniors' HavenBurbank · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaga HomesNorthridge · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

13300 Arminta Street, North Hollywood, CA 91605Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama CityHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197608760 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 10 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the continuation of the required annual visit at 11:13 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 11:23 AM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. The following was observed: RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:25 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Four (4) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained all required documents and trainings. Five (5) resident files were reviewed. All resident files contained all required documentation and signatures. No deficiencies were observed during record review. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 12:56 PM. Medications for five (5) of five (5) residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 07/16/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. The residents interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The residents interviewed had no concerns with the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. The staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse No deficiencies were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual visit at 02:11 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 02:23 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 02:24 PM, the LPA, along with the facility Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured drawer to contain knives and other sharp objects. LPA observed a secured cabinet located under the sink to contain cleaning supplies. BEDROOMS: There are five (5) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) resident bedrooms are dual occupancy rooms and two (2) resident rooms are single occupancy rooms. One (1) bedroom is designated as a staff room. LPA and facility Administrator toured all four (4) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. The staff room was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms at the facility. Two (2) bathrooms are designated as shared resident bathrooms, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a staff bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in resident showers and near resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 112.8 and 113.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. The staff bathroom was observed to be clean and appliances appeared to be in good condition. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining room The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating, a television, and activities for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet to contain extra care supplies. LPA observed cameras in the common areas of the facility, LPA confirmed with the Administrator that audio is not recorded. LPA observed the dining room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining room contained a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. All furniture throughout the facility was observed to be clean and in good repair. The facility’s combination fire and carbon monoxide alarms and fire door were tested at 02:52 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. GARAGE: LPA observed the garage to be inaccessible to clients in care. The garage contained a washer and dryer, emergency water supplies, and extra care supplies. LPA observed a storage room attached to the garage to contain an extra refrigerator and freezer and an adequate emergency food supply. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located in the front yard; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed an appropriately fenced off pool that was inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed cameras throughout the outdoors of the facility. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct file review, medication review, and interviews. During today’s visit LPA obtained copies of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Staff do not ensure resident is provided fluids. Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time. Staff isolates resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility at 09:04 AM. LPA met with the facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan the reason for the visit was explained and entrance interview was conducted. During today’s visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed residents, interviewed facility staff, interviewed the facility Administrator and conducted file review between 09:05 AM and 11:36 AM. The allegation of “Staff do not properly feed resident in care” alleges that facility staff do not provide enough food to Resident #1 (R1) to meet their dietary needs. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and observed the facility’s pantry and refrigerator to be fully stocked. LPA observed a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Continued on LIC 9099C. Unsubstantiated At 09:05 AM LPA observed facility staff delivering breakfast to residents in care. R1’s family member (Witness #1) was interviewed via telephone call. W1 had no concerns with the amount or quality of food being served to R1. LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1). S1 stated that residents get three (3) meals a day with snacks in between if requested, S1 has never denied a request from a resident for additional food. LPA reviewed R1’s medical records which contained no information to indicate malnutrition. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that they get enough food. Based on the information obtained during the physical plant tour, record review, and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff do not ensure resident is provided fluids” alleges that facility staff do not ensure that R1 is provided with a sufficient amount of fluids. During the physical plant tour LPA observed the refrigerator to be stocked with juices and other drinks. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that they get enough juice when they ask. LPA interviewed Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3). Both residents stated that they receive enough fluids and that drinks are provided by staff when requested. During breakfast LPA observed the trays to contain juice and/or coffee. During S1’s interview they confirmed that residents are provided with liquids when requested. Based on the information obtained during the physical plant tour and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time” alleges that facility staff do not move R1 from their bed for extended periods of time. During the physical plant tour LPA observed R1 in their bed. The facility Administrator approached R1 to introduce LPA prior to the interview. The facility Administrator attempted to move R1’s arm and R1 exclaimed, “Don’t move me!” LPA then interviewed R1 who stated that they do not like to be moved. R1 stated that they wish facility staff would leave their head alone as they do not like it when staff attempt to reposition their neck. LPA asked R1 if they ever ask staff to take them out of bed and R1 replied, “I don’t want to get out of bed.” Continued on LIC 9099C. LPA spoke with W1, they stated that they wished R1 would be moved more but they expressed understanding that R1 does not wish to be moved and stated that they know movement causes R1 pain. During LPAs interview with S1 they stated that R1 has never asked them to be moved from the bed. S1 confirmed that they reposition R1 in bed every three (3) hours. LPA interviewed the facility Administrator, they confirmed that R1 does not like being moved. The Administrator stated that in the past they have moved R1 from their bed to a recliner located in the living room via Hoyer lift. R1 would only sit in the chair for a minute before requesting to be placed back in their bed due to pain. The Administrator stated that R1 complains every time they attempt to move or reposition them. R2 is R1’s roommate. R2 stated that they have observed facility staff attempting to move R1 in the past. R2 stated that R1 tells facility staff not to move them often. Based on the information obtained during observation and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff isolates resident in care” alleges that facility staff isolate R1 for extended periods of time. During the investigation LPA observed facility staff attending to R1 and other resident’s needs. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that their family is allowed to visit them. R1 stated that facility staff attend to them enough to take care of them. During the interviews with R2 and R3 both residents stated that the facility staff are kind and attentive to their needs. Neither resident had concerns about being isolated. S1 stated during their interview that they attend to all residents throughout the day and respond to resident requests quickly when called. The facility Administrator denied isolating the resident. The Administrator stated that they respond to the resident’s requests when asked and they allow family to visit whenever they want. W1 has never been denied from visiting R1 and did not express any concerns about R1 being isolated. Based on the information obtained during interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff isolates resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies were cited during today’s investigation. A copy of the report was printed and exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241017092856
Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a continuation of the required annual visit at 12:34 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility administrator Armine Tagaryan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 01:42 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, interviews, and medication review. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) resident and two (2) staff between 12:45 PM and 01:05 PM. The resident interviewed stated that the staff are nice and are attentive to their needs. The resident had no concerns with the facility. Both staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedure for suspected abuse. Both staff interviews were conducted with the assistance of the administrator acting as a translator. MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 01:06 PM LPA and the facility administrator conducted medication review for five (5) of five (5) residents. All medications reviewed were documented properly on their centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet. Medications are stored centrally and securely in a storage cabinet in the staff office. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. No deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 12:58 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility administrator Armine Tagaryan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 01:05 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 01:05 PM, the LPA, along with facility administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured drawer to contain knives as well as a secured cabinet located under the sink which contained cleaning supplies. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; one (1) is a dual occupancy room and two (2) are single occupancy rooms. One (1) bedroom is designated as a staff room. LPA and facility administrator toured all three (3) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Two (2) resident beds were observed to contain full bed rails. Auditory alarms were observed on facility exits and all were functional at the time of the visit. The staff room was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms at the facility. Two bathrooms are designated as shared resident bathrooms, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a staff bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in resident showers and near resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 108.7 and 114.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. The staff bathroom was observed to be clean and appliances were observed to be in good condition. COMMON AREAS/GARAGE: This includes the living room and dining room. LPA observed the dining room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining room contains a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating and activities for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet to contain extra care supplies. LPA observed the garage to contain a washer and dryer, emergency water supplies, and extra care supplies. LPA observed cameras in the common areas of the facility, LPA confirmed with the administrator that audio is not recorded. The facility’s combination fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 02:48 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located in the front yard; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed an appropriately fenced off pool that was inaccessible to residents in care. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 01:47 PM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, TB tests, consent forms, and personal rights. Three (3) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained the required documents and trainings. Five (5) resident files were reviewed all resident files contained all required documentation. No deficiencies were observed during record review. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 09/05/2024. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) resident. the resident interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The resident had no concerns with the facility. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct medication review and staff interviews. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and liability insurance. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection at 10:00 a.m. The LPA met with Administrator Armine Tagaryan and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA, and the administrator toured the inside and outside of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 75 degrees. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. One fire extinguisher was fully charged and was last serviced 08/30/2023. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. KITCHEN: Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents, and two staff. The hot water temperature measured at 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. BEDROOMS: Facility has four (4) bedrooms. One bedroom is shared, and three (3) bedrooms are private. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings, bedding, and sufficient lighting. BATHROOMS: The facility has three (3) bathrooms. Two bathrooms are for residents, and one bathroom for staff, and visitors. The shower areas were in clean condition with grab bars and non-skid mats available. Soap, and paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing signs were displayed.The hot water temperature measured at 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Continues on LIC 809C... OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the backyard of the facility to be free of clutter and debris. Outdoor furniture and a shaded area are available for residents. There is a pool which is fenced in, and inaccessible from residents. RECORDS: Records review began at 11:45 a.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 12:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a file cabinet in the office area; medications are labeled and were checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023

20222 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 8, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required Annual visit at 11:00 a.m. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with Administrator Armine Tagaryan, and explained the reason for the visit. INFECTION CONTROL: Upon entry, the facility has a sign in book and sanitizing gel. Infection Control signage was visible at entrance. Temperature was taken by administrator, and the LPA was asked to sign in. Staff were wearing masks. The LPA, and the administrator toured the inside and outside of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At 11:15 a.m., the LPA, and the administrator toured the living area and common area and found them to be appropriately furnished and in good condition. Kitchen: At 11:20 a.m., the LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents, and two staff. Continues on LIC 809C... Bedrooms: At 11:25 a.m., LPA inspected the residents’ bedrooms. Facility has four (4) bedrooms. Two bedrooms are shared, and two bedrooms are single occupancy. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings, bedding, and sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: At 11:45 a.m., the LPA inspected the residents’ bathrooms. The facility has three (3) bathrooms. Two are for residents, and one bathroom for caregivers, and visitors. The shower areas were in clean condition with grab bars and non-skid mats available. Soap, and paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing signs were displayed. Outdoor Space: At 12:25 pm, the LPA observed the backyard of the facility to be free of clutter and debris. There is a pool which is fenced in, and inaccessible from residents. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. No deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. Signatures obtained. A copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2022
May 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unable to communicate residents needs due to language barrier. Call button not accessible to resident. Staff does not follow food menu for residents. Staff does not provide nutritious meals for residents. Breakfast is not served in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. The LPA arrived at the facility at 9:37 a.m. and met with administrator Armine Tagaryan. The LPA explained the reason for the visit. On 10/18/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA Urena arrived at the facility at 2:05pm, and met with the Administrator Armine Tagaryan at 2:15pm and explained the purpose of the visit. At 2:30 pm, LPA Urena and the administrator conducted a brief tour of the facility, inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Unsubstantiated Staff unable to communicate residents needs due to language barrier. It is alleged that there is a language barrier between facility staff, and residents, and that residents have a hard time asking for assistance. To investigate this allegation, the LPA interviewed residents, staff, and the Administrator. The interviews were conducted on 10/18/2021 between 2:45 p.m. and 3:30 p.m. The LPA interviewed the Reporting Party (RP) on 10/18/2021 at approximately 11:32 a.m. The interviews revealed that five out of five residents can communicate their needs to staff, and that staff understands the residents’ requests. The residents stated that the basic daily needs of the residents are understood by staff. The LPA interviewed the RP, and the RP stated that they were able to understand staff when they communicated at the facility, and added that R1 is hard of hearing which may contribute to the communication concern. The LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to respond to the questions. The LPA interviewed staff at 3:05 p.m., and staff was able to comprehend, and answer the questions asked throughout the interview. The administrator stated that they are present during the day, and night at the facility to provide assistance with care. Based on the observations, and the information gathered through the interviews for the above allegation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a language barrier, which causes staff to be unable to communicate residents' needs. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Call button not accessible to resident. It is alleged that there is no call button accessible to call for assistance, and residents must yell out for assistance. To investigate this allegation, the LPA conducted residents’ and staff interviews on 10/18/2021, from 2:45 P.M. to 3:30 p.m. On 10/18/202, at 2:35 p.m., the LPA and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility’s bedrooms and observed that there was no signal system/device present in the bedrooms for residents to call for assistance. The residents' interviews revealed that residents call out to staff if in need of help, by calling out the name of the staff, and that the staff check on them throughout the day, when residents are in their room. Bedrooms doors are kept open throughout the day. Staff interviews revealed that staff check on residents every 10 to 15 minutes, when the residents are in their bedrooms. The LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 was not responding to the questions. Staff interviews revealed that residents spend a portion of the day in the common area watching television, walking throughout the facility or sitting in the patio area. On 5/18/2022, at 3:25 p.m., the LPA interviewed the administrator about the call button or a signal system. The interview revealed that the administrator had used in the past, a battery operated signal system, however the signal system device used was too loud, and it was disturbing the rest of the residents, consequently the device was removed. Additionally, the administrator stated that they would be looking into a signal system device that will be less intrusive, and that will allow for residents to summon staff without disturbing the rest of the residents. Based on the observations, and the information gathered through the interviews for the above allegation, although there was no call button in place in each bedroom, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that residents could not summon the assistance of staff. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff does not follow food menu for residents. It alleged that staff do not follow the menu for residents. To investigate this allegation the LPA requested copies of sample menus and interviewed residents, staff and administrator. On 10/18/2021, the LPA reviewed sample menus and observed that the sample menus are posted in the kitchen area. The menus have a variety of foods listed for different days of the week. On 10/18/2021, at 2:45 p.m., the LPA interviewed residents about the menu of the facility. The residents’ interviews revealed that the residents are not aware of the menu. However the residents stated that they liked the food served to them, and that there was plenty of food served. The residents stated that they get soups, fresh fruits, snacks and vegetables. The LPA attempted to interview R1 about the menu, but R1 was unable to respond to the questions. The LPA and the administrator observed the refrigerator to have a two-day supply of perishable foods, vegetables and fresh fruits, bananas, apples and oranges. On 10/18/2021 the LPA interviewed the administrator about the menu and the meal items on the menu. The administrator stated that staff follows the menu as closely as possible, but sometimes may substitute the meal items within the same food grou Based on the observations, the information gathered through the record review, and interviews for the above allegation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff does not follow the menu. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff does not provide nutritious meals for residents. It is alleged that staff does not provide nutritious meals, and that residents are not provided with meat, eggs, rice, vegetables, juice. To investigate this allegation, on 10/18/2021, the LPA conducted residents’, staff and administrator interviews from 2:45 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. At 2:45 p.m., the LPA interviewed residents about the meals served at the facility. The following is a summary of the meals served as described by residents, and is not verbatim: Pancakes, oatmeal, cake, apple, and banana slices, strawberries, chicken, coffee, chocolate milk, tea, eggs, cereal, rice, soups, hash brown, salads, sandwiches, and pizza. The LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to respond to the questions. On 10/18/2021, at 3:05 p.m., the LPA interviewed the administrator about the meals and food served to residents. The administrator stated that the soups served are varied in content, and that the soups provide all the food components, because the soups contain meat, vegetables, and grains. The soups are easier for the residents to eat and digest. On 10/18/2021, and 05/18/2022 at 11:30 a.m., the LPA reviewed the sample menus which showed a variety of meals. The sample menus reviewed indicate that the menus meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council. Based on the observations, the information gathered through the record review, and interviews for the above allegation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff does not provide nutritious meals for residents. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Breakfast is not served in a timely manner. It is alleged that breakfast is not served in a timely manner, and that breakfast was not served till 9:00 a.m. To investigate this allegation, the LPA conducted record review, and interviews. On 10/28/2021, between 2:45 p.m. and 3:30p.m., the LPA interviewed residents, staff and administrator about the meals served throughout the day. At 2:45 p.m.,the residents’ interviews revealed that they get breakfast in the morning, but could not tell the LPA the exact time. The residents stated that it was served in the ‘morning’. The LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to respond to the questions. At 3:05 p.m., the LPA interviewed staff about breakfast time, and staff indicated that they start serving breakfast at 8:00 a.m., but sometimes the residents are not yet awake, and they may wait a bit longer to start getting them ready for breakfast. However, breakfast is ready by 8:00 a.m. On 5/18/2022, at 2:30 p.m., the LPA interviewed the administrator, and the administrator stated that staff have breakfast ready by 8:00 a.m., but wait for residents to wake up, if residents don't wake up, then staff starts to get residents cleaned and ready for breakfast. On 10/18/2021, and 05/18/2022, the LPA reviewed the posted menus. The menus are posted in the kitchen area. The menus have the times when the meals are served. Breakfast is served between 8:00 a.m to 8:30 a.m., lunch between 12:00 p.m., to 12:30 p.m.,and dinner between 5:30 p.m and 6:00 p.m. Two snacks are provided between meals. The investigation revealed that no more than fifteen (15) hours elapse between the third and the first meal of the day. Based on the observations, the information gathered through the record review, and interviews for the above allegation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that breakfast is not served in a timely manner. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted with the administrator. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2022 · control 29-AS-20211014122432

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 18, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not providing assistance to resident(s) in a timely manner.

On 10/18/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA Urena arrived at the facility at 2:05pm, and met with the Administrator Armine Tagaryan at 2:15pm and explained the purpose of the visit. At 2:30 pm, LPA Urena and the administrator conducted a tour of the facility, inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The indoor and outdoor of the facility was found to be in working condition. Four out of four bedrooms had adequate furnishings, bedding, personal space and lighting. Two out of two bathrooms were found in clean condition with paper towels for hand drying and signs for washing hands. Kitchen was found to be in clean condition, knives were propertly locked. There was perishable and non perishable food available for six residents and three staff. Continues on LIC 9099-C... Unsubstantiated During the tour of the facility the LPA and Administrator observed residents ask for assistance and caregivers attended promptly to their call. LPA Urena interviewed five out of five residents from 2:45pm to 3:30pm about staff assisting residents in the facility in a timely manner. Interviews revealed that five out of five residents confirmed S3 is providing care and supervision to the residents in a timely manner (at night). Residents stated that when they need assistance they call out for assistance, and staff come to attend their needs. Bedroom doors are kept open at all times of the day and night. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, today's report was reviewed with administrator. Signatures were obtained, report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2021 · control 29-AS-20211014122432
Sep 24, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 1:25 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at facility, to conduct an unannounced required annual inspection visit. The LPA introduced herself to administrator Armine Tagaryan and explained the reason for the visit. INFECTION CONTROL: Upon entry, the facility has a sign in book and sanitizing gel. Infection Control signage was visible at entrance. Temperature was taken by caregiver and the LPA was asked to sign in. The LPA toured the inside and outside of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At 1:45pm, the LPA toured the living area and common area and found them to be appropriately furnished and in good condition. Kitchen: At 1:50 pm, the LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents and two staff. Bedrooms: At 2:15 pm, LPA inspected the residents’ bedrooms. Facility has four (4) bedrooms. Two bedrooms are shared, and two bedrooms are single occupancy. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings, bedding, and sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: At 2:30 pm, LPA inspected the residents’ bathrooms. The facility has three (3) bathrooms. Two are for residents, and one bathroom for caregivers and visitors. The shower areas were in clean condition with grab bars and non-skid mats available. Soap, and paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing signs were displayed. Outdoor Space: At 2:45 pm, the LPA observed the backyard of the facility to be free of clutter and debris. There is a pool which is fenced in and inaccessible from residents. Facility Records: At 3:00 pm, the LPA observed records for residents and staff to be complete and accurate at the time of this visit. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. No deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. Signatures obtained. A copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2021

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 23, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Aa High Quality Home, Inc., licensed since 2015.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
9
Total complaints
2
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints20

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Noble Care

Is Noble Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Noble Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Noble Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Noble Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Noble Care cost?

$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Noble Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Aa High Quality Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Noble Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Noble Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “NOBLE CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197608760. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Aa High Quality Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 25, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    North Hollywood · 0.1 mi

    Golden Years Boarding Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · under 0.1 mi

    Impressive Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · under 0.1 mi

    Hollywood Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · 0.1 mi

    Sunlight Room and Board 1

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · 0.1 mi

    Sunlight Room and Board

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    North Hollywood · 0.1 mi

    My Lovely House

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
NC

Call Noble Care

North Hollywood · Licensed for 6

(818) 616-2427

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Noble Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages