Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Noble Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·North Hollywood, California

Licensed since 2015Licence #197608760Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,100–$4,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 23, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitSeptember 25, 2025CDSS inspection record

Noble Care is a small care home in North Hollywood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2015. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Noble Care

Is Noble Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Noble Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Noble Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Noble Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Noble Care cost?

$3,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,100–$4,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Noble Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Aa High Quality Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Noble Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Noble Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “NOBLE CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197608760. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Aa High Quality Home, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 25, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,800a month to start

Likely $3,100–$4,700

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,800a month

Likely $3,100–$4,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,800likely $3,100–$4,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,100–$4,900
$3,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,650–$8,100
$5,800
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 13300 Arminta Street, North Hollywood, CA 91605Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2015. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 25, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
September 25, 2025
Occupied · October 23, 2024 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 18, 2021 to October 23, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2015.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024330202311020222202021220

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the continuation of the required annual visit at 11:13 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 11:23 AM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. The following was observed: RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:25 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Four (4) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained all required documents and trainings. Five (5) resident files were reviewed. All resident files contained all required documentation and signatures. No deficiencies were observed during record review. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 12:56 PM. Medications for five (5) of five (5) residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 07/16/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. The residents interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The residents interviewed had no concerns with the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. The staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse No deficiencies were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual visit at 02:11 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan. The Administrator arrived to the facility at 02:23 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 02:24 PM, the LPA, along with the facility Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured drawer to contain knives and other sharp objects. LPA observed a secured cabinet located under the sink to contain cleaning supplies. BEDROOMS: There are five (5) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) resident bedrooms are dual occupancy rooms and two (2) resident rooms are single occupancy rooms. One (1) bedroom is designated as a staff room. LPA and facility Administrator toured all four (4) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. The staff room was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms at the facility. Two (2) bathrooms are designated as shared resident bathrooms, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a staff bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in resident showers and near resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 112.8 and 113.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. The staff bathroom was observed to be clean and appliances appeared to be in good condition. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining room The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating, a television, and activities for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet to contain extra care supplies. LPA observed cameras in the common areas of the facility, LPA confirmed with the Administrator that audio is not recorded. LPA observed the dining room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining room contained a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. All furniture throughout the facility was observed to be clean and in good repair. The facility’s combination fire and carbon monoxide alarms and fire door were tested at 02:52 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. GARAGE: LPA observed the garage to be inaccessible to clients in care. The garage contained a washer and dryer, emergency water supplies, and extra care supplies. LPA observed a storage room attached to the garage to contain an extra refrigerator and freezer and an adequate emergency food supply. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located in the front yard; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed an appropriately fenced off pool that was inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed cameras throughout the outdoors of the facility. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct file review, medication review, and interviews. During today’s visit LPA obtained copies of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Staff do not ensure resident is provided fluids. Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time. Staff isolates resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility at 09:04 AM. LPA met with the facility Administrator Armine Tagaryan the reason for the visit was explained and entrance interview was conducted. During today’s visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed residents, interviewed facility staff, interviewed the facility Administrator and conducted file review between 09:05 AM and 11:36 AM. The allegation of “Staff do not properly feed resident in care” alleges that facility staff do not provide enough food to Resident #1 (R1) to meet their dietary needs. LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and observed the facility’s pantry and refrigerator to be fully stocked. LPA observed a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Continued on LIC 9099C. Unsubstantiated At 09:05 AM LPA observed facility staff delivering breakfast to residents in care. R1’s family member (Witness #1) was interviewed via telephone call. W1 had no concerns with the amount or quality of food being served to R1. LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1). S1 stated that residents get three (3) meals a day with snacks in between if requested, S1 has never denied a request from a resident for additional food. LPA reviewed R1’s medical records which contained no information to indicate malnutrition. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that they get enough food. Based on the information obtained during the physical plant tour, record review, and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff do not ensure resident is provided fluids” alleges that facility staff do not ensure that R1 is provided with a sufficient amount of fluids. During the physical plant tour LPA observed the refrigerator to be stocked with juices and other drinks. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that they get enough juice when they ask. LPA interviewed Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3). Both residents stated that they receive enough fluids and that drinks are provided by staff when requested. During breakfast LPA observed the trays to contain juice and/or coffee. During S1’s interview they confirmed that residents are provided with liquids when requested. Based on the information obtained during the physical plant tour and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff do not properly feed resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time” alleges that facility staff do not move R1 from their bed for extended periods of time. During the physical plant tour LPA observed R1 in their bed. The facility Administrator approached R1 to introduce LPA prior to the interview. The facility Administrator attempted to move R1’s arm and R1 exclaimed, “Don’t move me!” LPA then interviewed R1 who stated that they do not like to be moved. R1 stated that they wish facility staff would leave their head alone as they do not like it when staff attempt to reposition their neck. LPA asked R1 if they ever ask staff to take them out of bed and R1 replied, “I don’t want to get out of bed.” Continued on LIC 9099C. LPA spoke with W1, they stated that they wished R1 would be moved more but they expressed understanding that R1 does not wish to be moved and stated that they know movement causes R1 pain. During LPAs interview with S1 they stated that R1 has never asked them to be moved from the bed. S1 confirmed that they reposition R1 in bed every three (3) hours. LPA interviewed the facility Administrator, they confirmed that R1 does not like being moved. The Administrator stated that in the past they have moved R1 from their bed to a recliner located in the living room via Hoyer lift. R1 would only sit in the chair for a minute before requesting to be placed back in their bed due to pain. The Administrator stated that R1 complains every time they attempt to move or reposition them. R2 is R1’s roommate. R2 stated that they have observed facility staff attempting to move R1 in the past. R2 stated that R1 tells facility staff not to move them often. Based on the information obtained during observation and interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff isolates resident in care” alleges that facility staff isolate R1 for extended periods of time. During the investigation LPA observed facility staff attending to R1 and other resident’s needs. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that their family is allowed to visit them. R1 stated that facility staff attend to them enough to take care of them. During the interviews with R2 and R3 both residents stated that the facility staff are kind and attentive to their needs. Neither resident had concerns about being isolated. S1 stated during their interview that they attend to all residents throughout the day and respond to resident requests quickly when called. The facility Administrator denied isolating the resident. The Administrator stated that they respond to the resident’s requests when asked and they allow family to visit whenever they want. W1 has never been denied from visiting R1 and did not express any concerns about R1 being isolated. Based on the information obtained during interviews there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of Staff isolates resident in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies were cited during today’s investigation. A copy of the report was printed and exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241017092856
Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a continuation of the required annual visit at 12:34 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility administrator Armine Tagaryan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 01:42 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, interviews, and medication review. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) resident and two (2) staff between 12:45 PM and 01:05 PM. The resident interviewed stated that the staff are nice and are attentive to their needs. The resident had no concerns with the facility. Both staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedure for suspected abuse. Both staff interviews were conducted with the assistance of the administrator acting as a translator. MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 01:06 PM LPA and the facility administrator conducted medication review for five (5) of five (5) residents. All medications reviewed were documented properly on their centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet. Medications are stored centrally and securely in a storage cabinet in the staff office. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. No deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 12:58 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted facility administrator Armine Tagaryan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 01:05 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 01:05 PM, the LPA, along with facility administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured drawer to contain knives as well as a secured cabinet located under the sink which contained cleaning supplies. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; one (1) is a dual occupancy room and two (2) are single occupancy rooms. One (1) bedroom is designated as a staff room. LPA and facility administrator toured all three (3) resident rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Two (2) resident beds were observed to contain full bed rails. Auditory alarms were observed on facility exits and all were functional at the time of the visit. The staff room was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms at the facility. Two bathrooms are designated as shared resident bathrooms, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a staff bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in resident showers and near resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 108.7 and 114.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. The staff bathroom was observed to be clean and appliances were observed to be in good condition. COMMON AREAS/GARAGE: This includes the living room and dining room. LPA observed the dining room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining room contains a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating and activities for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet to contain extra care supplies. LPA observed the garage to contain a washer and dryer, emergency water supplies, and extra care supplies. LPA observed cameras in the common areas of the facility, LPA confirmed with the administrator that audio is not recorded. The facility’s combination fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 02:48 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates located in the front yard; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed an appropriately fenced off pool that was inaccessible to residents in care. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 01:47 PM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, TB tests, consent forms, and personal rights. Three (3) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained the required documents and trainings. Five (5) resident files were reviewed all resident files contained all required documentation. No deficiencies were observed during record review. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 09/05/2024. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed one (1) resident. the resident interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The resident had no concerns with the facility. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct medication review and staff interviews. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and liability insurance. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection at 10:00 a.m. The LPA met with Administrator Armine Tagaryan and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA, and the administrator toured the inside and outside of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 75 degrees. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. One fire extinguisher was fully charged and was last serviced 08/30/2023. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. KITCHEN: Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents, and two staff. The hot water temperature measured at 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. BEDROOMS: Facility has four (4) bedrooms. One bedroom is shared, and three (3) bedrooms are private. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings, bedding, and sufficient lighting. BATHROOMS: The facility has three (3) bathrooms. Two bathrooms are for residents, and one bathroom for staff, and visitors. The shower areas were in clean condition with grab bars and non-skid mats available. Soap, and paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing signs were displayed.The hot water temperature measured at 110.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Continues on LIC 809C... OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the backyard of the facility to be free of clutter and debris. Outdoor furniture and a shaded area are available for residents. There is a pool which is fenced in, and inaccessible from residents. RECORDS: Records review began at 11:45 a.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 12:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a file cabinet in the office area; medications are labeled and were checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County