Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea

Small home·Licensed for 6·Clovis, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #107208813
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,000 a monthTypical in Fresno County · likely $2,950–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 18, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderThe Brice Group Inc.Since 2017 · 2 licensed homes

Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea is a small care home in Clovis — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea

Is Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea cost?

$4,000 a month to start is typical in Fresno County, likely $2,950–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Fresno County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size across Fresno County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,150 to $5,525 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by The Brice Group Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to The Brice Group Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation Hospital is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Mrs Scott's Where Heart Is Homes-Carmel by the Sea license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MRS SCOTT'S WHERE HEART IS HOMES-CARMEL BY THE SEA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #107208813. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to The Brice Group Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,000a month to start

Likely $2,950–$5,500

From homes this size in Fresno County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,000a month

Likely $2,950–$5,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,000likely $2,950–$5,500

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Fresno County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,950–$5,650
$4,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,700–$8,600
$6,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 small homes publish in Fresno County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 7 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 292 W Trenton Ave, Clovis, CA 93619Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 18, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
July 3, 2026
Occupied · December 18, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 10, 2023 to December 18, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints6typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024440202333020221102021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure staff has a background clearance to provide care to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the purpose of delivering the finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator - Phoeun Marez. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation, as well as conducting interviews. It was determined that the above allegations: Licensee does not ensure staff has a background clearance to provide care to residents is found to be UNFOUNDED. Staff per both visits were documents on staff roster. Interviews do not reveal any other names of workers working in the facility there are not associated to facility. Based on the investigation it has been determined the allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened or are without a reasonable basis. The complaint has therefore been dismissed. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to Administrator - Phoeun Marez. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251105162206
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced at the above facility to conduct an Annual Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and requested to meet with the Administrator. Facility staff informed LPA that the Administrator was not present in the facility and was granted entry to the facility. Facility staff contacted Administrator - Phoeun Marez, who arrived a short time later. Facility tour conducted with Administrator - Phoeun Marez. LPA observed signs promoting hand washing, social distancing, and cough/sneeze etiquette throughout facility. LPA toured the facility kitchen. LPA observed an adequate supply of food. LPA observed a 30-day supply of PPE and cleaning supplies. Inspecting kitchen LPA observed the required 7-day supply of non-perishable food and 2- day supply of fresh perishables to be properly stored. An emergency disaster supply was observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 06/30/2025. All residents’ bedrooms were observed to be with comfortable temperature. Facility overall temperature was at 75 degrees F. Water Temperature in Restroom 1 measured at 117.5 Degrees F. Residents’ bathroom was observed, hand washing signs posted, trash receptacles did not have lids. Medications observed to be locked in a cabinet in the kitchen. An outdoor seating area was observed accessible residents in care. LPA reviewed Staff and Resident files. Resident files observed to have update information. Continuation on LIC 809C LPA is requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 10/03/2024: Current copy of Administrator Certificate, Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Liability Insurance, Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC 500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for (LIC 9020A) no deficiencies observed and no citations issued. A signed copy of this report was provided to Administrator - Phoeun Marez for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Vega arrived unannounced at the above facility to conduct an Annual Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and requested to meet with the Administrator. Facility staff informed LPA that Director was not present in the facility and was granted entry to the facility. Facility staff contacted Director Grace Petil, who arrived a short time later. Facility tour conducted with Tirso. Pathways in the back of the facility were obstructed. LPA observed signs promoting handwashing, social distancing, and cough/sneeze etiquette throughout facility. LPA toured the facility kitchen. LPA observed an adequate supply of food. LPA observed a 30-day supply of PPE and cleaning supplies. Inspecting kitchen LPA observed the required 7-day supply of non-perishable food and 2- day supply of fresh perishables to be properly stored. An emergency disaster supply was observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 08/29/2024 All residents’ bedrooms were observed to be with comfortable temperature. Residents’ bathroom was observed, hand washing signs posted, trash receptacles did not have lids. Medications observed to be locked in a cabinet in the kitchen. Cleaning supplies were observed to be exposed and unlocked in the laundry room and restrooms. An outdoor seating area was observed accessible residents in care. LPA reviewed Staff and Resident files. Resident files observed to have update information. LPA is requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 10/03/2024: Current copy of Administrator Certificate, Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC 308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Liability Insurance, Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC 500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for (LIC9020A) Based on observation, Deficiencies were cited in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached 809Ds, Technical Violations and Technical Advisories. Exit interview conducted and a plan of correction was reviewed and developed with Director. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Director Grace Petil, the report was signed and copy of this report was provided to Director for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024

The state marks this report as 13 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are overmedicating a resident while in care Staff are leaving a resident unattended

This is an amended report On 09/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Grace Petil, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegation. Allegation: Staff are overmedicationg a resident while in care. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, staff training, interviewed staff and Administrator, and observed the staff and residents during facility visits. Records review revealed that medications were provided to residents as prescribed. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff are leaving resident unattended. During the facility visits on 7/30/24 and 9/3/24 based on observations, record reviews and interviews revealed that staff were present at the facility. During observations on both visits all residents were in common area with staff present. Records review revealed that facility is staffed and during interview no concerns reported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240509140647
Jul 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow resident's diet Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner Staff took resident's personal items Uncleared staff working at the facility

On 07/30/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Grace Petil, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegation. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner, Staff took resident's personal items, Uncleared staff working at the facility. Staff did not follow resident's diet. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, staff training, interviewed staff and Administrator, and observed the staff and residents during facility visits. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Report continues on attached LIC9099-A Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with their medication. Based on interviews conducted and records review it was revealed that on multiple occasions, 01/06, 01/07, and 01/08 R1 was not provided medications by staff as ordered. Based on staff interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report with appeal rights provided to Administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240304102705

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 2, 2024

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on witnesses interviews and records review R1 was not provided care to injured right foot. The facility staff failed to offer resident medical evaluation to the injured right foot which poses potential threat to health and safety of the residentts in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator and staff will ensure facility staff are following with family and close monitoring residents all day around, keeping family and updating social worker on residents health. Also provide training to LPA by POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 2, 2024

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not observed as evidenced by: Based on witnesses interview and records review R1 did not receive medications as prescribed. Which poses potential threat to health and safety of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure facility staff are monitoring medications refill and following medications orders. Also provide staff training to LPA by POC due date

Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are unable to effectively communicate with resident.

On 3/07/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Grace Petil, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegation. Facility was taken care of 6 residents, two of them was under hospice care. Allegation: Staff are unable to effectively communicate with resident. During complaint investigation department reviewed facility records, staff training, interviewed residents, staff, and Administrator. During resident's stay facility employed interpreter to communicate with resident with communication barrier. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy of this report provided to Administrator for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240109112324
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

The Brice Group Inc., licensed since 2017, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Fresno County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Fresno County