Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Monument Park Manor

Small home·Licensed for 6·Perris, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #331800091
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,700 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Monument Park Manor is a small care home in Perris — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Monument Park Manor

Is Monument Park Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Monument Park Manor licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Monument Park Manor been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Monument Park Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Monument Park Manor cost?

$3,700 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 160 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 160 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Monument Park Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 3 Pines RCFE LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Menifee Global Medical Center is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Monument Park Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Monument Park Manor license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MONUMENT PARK MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331800091. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to 3 Pines RCFE LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,700a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,700a month

Likely $3,700–$4,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,700this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$4,300
$3,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,700–$7,800
$5,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 175 Muir Woods Road, Perris, CA 92570Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 29, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
July 29, 2026
Occupied · September 17, 2025 visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated September 17, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025550202411020231102022110

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 7/29/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kyle Wellington arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver, Teresita Mendoza. LPA met with Administrator (Admin), Carlos Magistrado, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The census at the facility is three (3) residents. There were two (2) staff and three (3) residents at the facility during the visit. LPA received a resident and staff roster from Admin. LPA toured the inside and outside of the facility with Admin. LPA conducted an observation and record review for the inspection. Facility Overview: Facility is a one story house with staff room, four (4) resident bedrooms, three (3) resident bathrooms, kitchen, 2 dining rooms, family room, laundry room and attached garage. There are no pools, bodies of water or firearms at the facility. Facility has a fire clearance for six (6) non-ambulatory adults. Infection Control: LPA observed hand sanitizers and soap dispensers throughout the facility. Cleaning equipment and cleaning supplies were kept in the locked garage and available for regular facility maintenance. LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan which met the department’s requirements. Physical Plant: LPA observed the inside and outside of the facility to be clean, safe and well kept. The floors, windows and doors were clean and well maintained. The family room and dining room furniture was in good repair. The residents’ bedrooms were neat, organized and contained the required bedding, lighting and furniture. Bathrooms were clean, tidy and had paper towels, soap, grab bars and non-slip floors in the showers. Extra linen was kept in the laundry room. Laundry equipment appeared to be in good working condition. Laundry supplies were kept in a locked cabinet in the laundry room. The one (1) fire extinguisher was charged and last tested on 10/7/25 which was within the last year. LPA tested the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and found them to be hard-wired and operational. The backyard was free of hazards and contained outdoor furniture and shaded area for the residents. Kitchen/Food Service: LPA observed the kitchen to be sanitary, organized, and well maintained. The kitchen had the ability to prepare and store food in a safe and clean environment. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in good working condition. All sharp objects were kept in a locked drawer in the kitchen inaccessible to residents. Cleaning supplies were kept in a locked cabinet under the kitchen sink inaccessible to residents. Facility has over a two day supply of perishable foods and over a seven day supply of non-perishable foods. Care & Supervision: LPA observed two (2) staff and three (3) residents at the facility. Facility has sufficient staff to supervise the residents. Administration: LPA observed facility sketch, personal rights, emergency and disaster plan, complaint procedures, long-term care ombudsman information and visiting policy posted in the hall. Admin holds a current Administrator Certificate, CPR/First Aid Certificate and a Criminal Record Clearance. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed the records of three (3) resident files and two (2) staff files. Staff present have criminal record clearance and are associated with the facility. The files contained all the required documentation and paperwork. The staff and client files were kept in a locked cabinet in the dining room inaccessible to unauthorized individuals. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: LPA observed clients' medications were centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen inaccessible to residents. First aid kit was kept in a locked cabinet in the kitchen and it contained all the required items. LPA reviewed three (3) residents' medications to the facility’s medication log to make sure all medication was accounted for and dispensed correctly. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan. It is current and up to date. Fire drills are done quarterly and last done on 4/30/26. Facility's property and liability insurance is current and expires on 3/29/27. All facility exits had signage and were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator, Carlos Magistrado, and a copy of this report was given to Administrator, Carlos Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not provide a safe environment for resdient in care. Staff member inappropriately handled resident in care.

On 09/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility. LPA met with staff, Noel Gonzalez, who contacted Administrator Carlos Magistrado, and the Licensee, who later joined the visit. LPA explained that the purpose of this visit is to complete the investigation and deliver the findings regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA was granted access to the facility. Investigation included: On 09/17/25, LP interviewed the Administrator (A1), the Licensee, three Residents (R4-R4), one staff member (S1), and two witnesses (W1), (W2). LPA review and obtained the following documents: Resident roster, personnel roster, service records for (S1), facility staff in-service trainings, and other relevant records related to this complaint, including (R1’s) Admission Agreement (dated 02/06/22), Identification And Emergency Information (dated 02/06/22), Physician Report LIC 602A (dated 02/07/22), Needs of Service Plan (dated 02/10/22), And Physician Report for Residents #2-4 (R2-R4) (dated 02/02/, 06/07, 10/09/24). Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099 Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Facility does not provide a safe environment for residents in care. The complaint alleges that residents feel unsafe living at the facility. On September 17, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed the Administrator, who denied the allegation and stated that the facility has staff available 24 hours a day from Monday to Sunday. The Administrator also mentioned that two caregivers are assigned to assist Resident 1 (R1) at all times. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Licensee during the same time frame, who also denied the allegation. Additionally, three residents (R2-R4) were interviewed between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM. They all denied feeling unsafe and expressed that they feel secure living at the facility, noting that staff are always present to assist them. On September 17, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, the LPA interviewed Staff Member #1 (S1), who denied the allegations. S1 stated that the facility has a 24-hour caregiver available. S1 mentioned that when S1 worked at night, they checked on the residents before bedtime and during the night to ensure that everyone was okay. Additionally, on September 17, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, the LPA interviewed Witness #1 (W1), who also denied the allegations, affirming that the facility provided a safe environment for Resident #1 (R1). Later, at 12:30 PM on the same day, the LPA interviewed Witness #2 (W2), who similarly denied the allegations, reiterating that the facility ensured a safe environment for R1. W2 explained that R1 did not return to the facility because R1 required a higher level of care following hospitalization. Unfortunately, the LPA was unable to interview R1 due to R1’s passing in April 2023. On September 17, 2025, records reviewed by LPA regarding employee schedules (dated July 30, August 30, and September 30, 2025) indicated that residents receive care and supervision 24 hours a day, every day of the week. Additionally, the LPA reviewed records of employee fire drills and emergency drills conducted between January 30 and April 15, 2025. During the visit on September 17, the LPA observed that the residents were very active and interacted with the administrator, licensee, and staff with laughter. Based on the information collected, record reviews, and interviews, the department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned in this complaint. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation that the facility does not provide a safe environment for residents in care is Unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff members inappropriately handled residents in care. The complaint alleges that a staff member was torturing the client by punishment, by having the client lie at the edge of the bed. On September 17, 2025, between 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation. A1 stated that the client never mentioned that any of that had happened. A1 emphasized that all staff receive training in residents' rights and that any staff member found to have violated a Resident’s rights would be terminated immediately, regardless of the circumstances. On September 17, 2025, between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) interviewed the Licensee, who denied the allegations. During the same time period, the LPA also interviewed three residents (R2-R4), all of whom denied the allegations and stated that the staff had never mishandled or punished them. They described the staff as always being very nice and helpful. Additionally, the LPA interviewed one staff member (S1) between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, who also denied the allegations. S1 emphasized that residents have rights and that staff should never mishandle or punish them. At 12:30 PM on the same day, the LPA interviewed a witness (W1), who likewise denied the allegations, asserting that the facility did not mishandle Resident 1 (R1) and that R1 was very happy living there. Another witness (W2) confirmed during their interview that the facility took good care of R1, explaining that R1 did not return to the facility because R1 required a higher level of care. It is important to note that the LPA was unable to interview R1 due to R1's passing in April 2023. On September 17, 2025, the LPA reviewed staff training records, which included: 20 Hours of Caregiver Training (dated 01/30/25), Catheter Care, Wound Care (dated 01/30/25), Employee Orientation Training, Aging Progress, Physical Needs, Resident Rights (dated 06/09/25). On 09/17/25, the LPA observed that the residents were very active and interacted with the Administrator, Licensee, and staff with laughter. Based on the information collected, record reviews, and interviews, the department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned in this complaint. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation staff member inappropriately handled the resident in care is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Carlos Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 18-AS-20220420145745
Sep 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 09/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management visit to deliver an Immediate Exclusion order for Staff, Ismael Loyola. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver, Noel "John" Gonzales who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Caregiver Lolita Laurente was also present during the visit along with three (3) residents. During the visit, Administrator Carlos Magistrado arrived to the facility to meet with LPA and was also informed of the purpose of the visit. Upon arrival to the facility, LPA observed Staff Loyola present in the facility. LPA handed Staff Loyola and Administrator Magistrado the Immediate Exclusion orders dated 09/09/2025 and Staff Loyola immediately left the premises. LPA toured the facility with Administrator Magistrado and did not observe any additional imminent health or safety concerns. No deficiencies were issued during today’s visit. Administrator Magistrado was strongly advised to comply with the Immediate Exclusion order for Staff Loyola, which he agreed to. An exit interview was conducted and this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025
Aug 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 08/29/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced health and safety visit to the facility. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver, Noel Gonzales. Administrator, Carlos Magistrado arrived to the facility to meet with LPA. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of documentation. Administrator Magistrado was advised to ensure that all individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) obtain a criminal record clearance or exemption prior to working, residing or volunteering in the facility as required by the Department. LPA also provided a copy of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 regulation section 87355 Criminal Record Clearance for their records. During today's visit, LPA did not observe any imminent health or safety concerns. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Administrator Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2025
Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

This Case management– Deficiencies inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Abdoulaye Zerbo and Javina George for the purpose of issuing citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation into Complaint Control No. 18-AS-20250812102840. LPAs met with Licensee Carlos Magistrado and explained purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPAs confirmed with Licensee that an Incident report was not sent to Licensing after the event that occurred on 06-25-25. Based on observations, record review and interview, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to licensee Carlos Magistradothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case (D)Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. Licensee did not report to the Department the incident that occurred on 06-25-25 involving staff member being arresting at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct staff training on the reporting requirements and provide proof of training and training material to LPA by the plan of correction date.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by Caregiver Noel Gonzales, notified them of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Licensee Carlos Magistrado joined the visit at a later time. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with four(4) residents bedrooms, 1 staff room, three (3) bathrooms, a dinning room, an office, a kitchen and a garage. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department's requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in the kitchen and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were in good working condition. Water temperature was measured at 121.1 meeting the department's requirement. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department's requirements and with an expiration date of October 07, 2025. Continued 809-C...... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise residents during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate with expiration date of June 05, 2027 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of January 30th, 2027 Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for two(2) staff members, confirming criminal clearance, updated training, health screening, and CPR/First Aid certification. Two (2) residents' files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed first kit to be available. The residents and staff files were kept locked and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All residents' medications were securely locked in a cabinet and located in the kitchen area. LPA reviewed medications for two (2) residents, confirming that all medications were listed and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on April-15-2025, which met the department's requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee Carlos Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a 1 year required visit/annual inspection. LPA George met with and informed Administrator's Genefer Gabana and Carlos Magistrado and informed them of the purpose day's visit. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff and two (2) residents present. Below is a summary of what was observed during today’s inspection: Physical Plant: LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and observed that there a sufficient bedrooms and bathrooms for both staff and residents. The facility was observed to have the required furniture and linen to be present and in good condition inside the occupied resident bedrooms. The exits are free from obstruction. The facility was observed to have operable flashlights. There are no pools or bodies of water on the premises. There is a shaded patio, for the residents to enjoy and to promote socialization. Staff Records Review: LPA observed that there are sufficient staff present to meet the needs of residents. LPA George additionally confirmed that there is an Administrator present. LPA George confirmed staff have criminal record clearance and were associated to the facility and have training to perform their required duties. Staff present were observed have current CPR/First Aid Certification. Resident Records Review: A review of all three (3) files was conducted and revealed that the files have the required information present in their files, including Physician's Report, Admissions Agreement, and current Needs & Services Plan. There is one resident where the 602 was requested, but has not been received. Administrator will follow up on the request. Food Services: The kitchen and dining area to be maintained in a clean and healthful manner. LPA George observed the facility to have the required amount of 7 day supply non-perishable and a two supply perishable food items. The facility was observed to have five (5) recently (6/1/24) expired canned goods that were discarded at the time of LPAs visit, therefore no citation issued. Medication: Resident medication was observed to be stored in a locked cabinet leading to the hallway. The medication were inaccessible to residents. A review of medication revealed that the medication is being given as prescribed as evidenced by the Medication Authorization Record (MAR) and medication (bubble packs and or pill bottle). Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan on file. The last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 5/29/24 .The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and were found to be operable. The facility was observed to have a fully charged fire extinguisher. There is a total of four (4) firearms on the premises that is locked in a DOJ gun locker . Per Administrator Carlos there is no ammunition here at the facility. Note that LPA did not observe any ammunition, inside the locker. The gun locker is stored in a locked/secured area. The hot water was tested and was found to be within regulatory limit measuring at 109.7-113.3 degrees Fahrenheit. The sharps and hazardous chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Based on today's inspection there were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, were provided to Administrator's Genefer Gabana and Carlos Magistrado.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County