Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 28, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 20, 2026CDSS inspection record
Mary's House #2 is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Mary's House #2
Is Mary's House #2 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Mary's House #2 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Mary's House #2 been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Mary's House #2 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Mary's House #2 cost?
$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Mary's House #2 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Mendoza, Rosana F., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San Jose is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Mary's House #2 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Mary's House #2 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “MARY'S HOUSE #2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435202912. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Mendoza, Rosana F., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN BDRM #4. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,100a month to start
Likely $3,350–$5,050
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,100a month
Likely $3,350–$5,250
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
- $4,100
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
- $6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,600–$4,200.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Constantin's Care HomeSan Jose · 2.3 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oak Grove Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pendar's Residential CareSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sandy's Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 3.0 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Safe Haven Villa Care HomeSan Jose · 3.0 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Saint Michael Residential HomeSan Jose · 3.1 mi · Small home$2,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mayflower Care HomeSan Jose · 3.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Real Elderly CareSan Jose · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonhomie ISan Jose · 4.7 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 324 Burning Tree Dr, San Jose, CA 95119Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 20, 2026.
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 7
- Most recent visit
- August 20, 2026
- Occupied · September 28, 2024 visit
- 4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated September 28, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents
Aug 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year visit and met with Armando Guba, Administrator. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. There were locked cabinets for sharp objects and cleaning supplies. The first aid kit was observed and found to be complete. LPA toured two out of two resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured at 108 F and 119 F. LPA toured four out of four resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPA tested the smoke detectors in four out of four resident rooms and in the hallways and all detectors functioned properly when tested. Two out of two fire extinguishers have service tags dated 08/18/2026. LPA toured the outdoor area of the facility. Both outdoor exits were clear of obstructions. During visit, staff S1 was found to be background cleared but not associated to the facility. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA reviewed the Centrally Stored Medication Records (CSMDR) for residents R1-R6. R1's CSMDR was missing four medications, R2's CSMDR was missing one medication, R3's CSMDR was missing six medications, R4's CSMDR was missing one medication, R5 did not have a CSMDR on file, and R6's CSMDR was missing six medications. LPA reviewed the resident records of residents R1-R6. R1's, R3's, R4's, R5's, and R6's resident records were missing an Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. R5's resident record was also missing a Consent for Medical Treatment Form and an LIC613C Personal Rights Form. LPA reviewed the staff records and found them to be complete. The Emergency Disaster Drill Log indicates the last drill occurred on 06/01/2026. LPA Marrufo requests that the following documents be updated and copies sent to the department by 08/27/2026: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibilities LIC610E Emergency Disaster Drill Log Liability Insurance Administrator Certificate Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D pages for more information. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $200 ($100 per day x 2 days = $200) for staff S5 working in the facility without association. This report was reviewed with Administrator Armando Guba and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2 END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2026
(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that staff S5 was associated to the facility during visit, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to associate S5 to the facility and submit an updated LIC500 Personnel Report to the department by 08/27/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 27, 2026
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that R1's Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR) was not missing four medications, R2's CSMDR was not missing one medication, R3's CSMDR not missing six medications, R4's CSMDR was not missing one medication, R5 did have a CSMDR on file, and R6's CSMDR was not missing six medications, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit completed and accurate copies of R1-R6’s current Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records by 08/27/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 27, 2026
Resident Records 87506(a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that R1's, R3's, R4's, R5's, and R6's resident records were not missing an Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, and R5's resident record was not missing a Consent for Medical Treatment Form and LIC613C Personal Rights Form, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plans for residents R1, R3, R4’s, R5’s, and R6’s and R5’s Consent for Medical Treatment Form and LIC613C Personal Rights Form to the department by 08/27/2026.
Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Kabariti arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's requires - 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Armando Guba. During visit, LPA toured the facility to include the resident bedrooms, bathrooms, living room, kitchen, garage and backyard. All fire exit routes were free and clear of obstruction. There were 2 staff present to 3 residents. 2 out of 3 residents are under hospice care. The 2 staff present are fingerprint cleared, but 1 out of the 2 staff are not associated to the facility. Administrator admitted that 1 staff member was not associated to the facility as the staff was added to the schedule last minute. The Administrator immediately submitted the LIC9182 form to the Department to associate the staff to the facility roster. A technical violation was provided per Section 87355(e)(3) reminding the facility to ensure all staff working are requested a transfer of a criminal record clearance prior to work. Facility temperature maintained at 78 degrees F. Fire extinguisher last serviced on 08/01/2025. Emergency lighting observed in the hallway. Smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector was tested and observed operable. Bathroom hot water temperature maintained at 117.8 degrees F. The bathroom shower observed with non-slip mats and grab bars. Facility has at least 2 days worth of perishables and 7 days worth of non-perishables foods. Refrigerator temperature maintained at 35.6 degrees F. Freezer temperature maintained at -4 degrees F. Page 1 of 4. Sharp objects, chemicals, disinfectants, and medications were not locked during the visit but the staff was present in the kitchen area. LPA advised the staff to ensure these items are locked when staff leave the area. Staff immediately locked the cabinets and drawers during visit. Resident bedrooms equipped with proper furniture, lighting, night stand, and dresser. 1 resident who is under hospice care observed using oxygen. Oxygen in use sign observed posted on the door. 1 resident (R1) bedroom observed with full bed rails. The resident is not under hospice care. Based on review of the facility's file, the facility did not submit any exception regarding the use of full bed rails. LPA reviewed the resident's records and did not observe a physician's order for the full bed rails. LPA observed a letter from the resident's responsible party supporting the use of full bed rails as the resident is fall risk. Administrator was advised of Title 22 regulation Section 87608. A type A deficiency was cited today per Section 87608(a)(5)(B) wherein 1 resident who is not under hospice care is utilizing full bed rails without prior approval from the Department. LPA observed the garage is being used as a sleeping quarters for 2 staff members (S1 - S2). Photographs of the garage were taken. Based on the facility sketch and fire clearance, the garage is not approved to be used as a living quarter for staff. Staff stated there was a total of 3 live-in staff members. The other staff member (S3) is using the living room couch as a sleeping area. A type A deficiency was cited today per Section 87307(a) wherein the live-in staff are residing in the garage and living room which is not related to the facility's functions per the facility sketch. LPA reviewed 3 resident files. 3 out of 3 resident files were not complete and up to date. 3 resident files contained an admission agreement, consent form, personal rights, and identification and emergency contact information. However, 1 resident (R1) did not have a medical assessment on file prior to admission. Resident (R2) has dementia and the last medical assessment was last completed on 09/08/2023. Resident (R3) who was placed under hospice care on 12/27/2024, medical assessment was last completed on 08/08/2022. A type B deficiency was cited today per Section 87463(h) wherein 1 resident did not have a medical assessment on file and 2 resident's medical assessments were not updated within the last 12 months. Page 2 of 4. 2 out of 3 residents did not have a reappraisal completed. 1 out of 3 residents had a reappraisal, however the reappraisal was not signed by the resident and/or resident's responsible party. A type B deficiency was cited today per Section 87463(a) wherein 2 residents reappraisals was not updated as necessary and 1 resident's reappraisal was not signed by the resident/resident responsible party. LPA reviewed 3 residents centrally stored medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA observed that 3 residents centrally stored medication records were not complete as there was 16 medications from R1 - R3 that were not written in the centrally stored medication record (CSMR). A type B deficiency was cited today per Section 87465(h)(6) wherein there was 16 medications from R1 - R3 that was not maintained in the resident's CMSR. LPA observed that that residents require PRN medications at the facility. Based on the facility's record review and confirmed by the Administrator, the facility does not have a PRN log in the resident's records to include the date/time PRN was taken, dosage, and resident's response to the PRN. A technical violation was provided per Section 87465(c)(3). LPA reviewed 4 staff members files. 4 out of 4 staff members has a fingerprint clearance. 4 out of 4 staff members does not have a 1st aid certification. A type B deficiency was cited today per HSC 1569.618(c)(3) wherein 4 staff members does not have a 1st aid certification. 3 out of 4 staff members does not have a TB result. A type A deficiency was cited today per Section 87411(f) wherein 3 staff members does not have a complete health screening to include a TB result on file prior to working in the facility. 4 out of 4 staff members does not have any initial or annual training provided per Title 22 regulations. A type B deficiency was cited today per Section 87411(c) wherein 4 staff members who assist residents with activities of daily living has not received initial and annual training. Page 3 of 4. The facility has not completed any emergency disaster drills. A type B deficiency was cited today per HSC 1569.695(c) wherein the facility has not conducted any emergency drills. The following documents were requested by 08/26/2025 to be sent to the licensing general email to include: LIC500, emergency disaster plan, LIC308, and Administrator certificates. Deficiencies were cited today per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809D. Advisory note provided. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Armando Guba and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Page 4 of 4.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025
The state marks this report as 13 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 11. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Resident did not have a complete annual assesment Facility neglected residents dental care needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator, Armando Guba and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 8/24/2023, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 9/1/2023, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 2. Unfounded Page 2 of 2. Resident did not have a complete annual assessment. It was alleged the facility did not complete an annual assessment for R1. Based on review of R1’s Physician's Report dated 12/20/2021, R1 does not have neurocognitive disorder wherein R1 would require an annual assessment. Based on interview of facility staff, R1 did not have a change of condition which would require facility staff to assess the resident. Based on facility records, R1's file did contain Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 1/20/2022. Facility neglected residents dental care needs. It was alleged R1 was not taken to a dental appointment. On 9/1/2023, the Department interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). Four of the four staff stated R1’s family is responsible to call the doctor and dental appointments. S3 and S4 stated R1’s responsible party is setting up dental appointment and transporting R1 to the dental appointments. On 9/1/2023, the Department interviewed 2 residents (R1-R2). Two out of two residents stated the facility staff provides dental care needs and their responsible parties arrange for dental appointments. R1 and R2 stated they do not have any concerns about the staff assisting them with dental care needs. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Armando Guba and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2. Facility neglected residents grooming and hygiene needs. It was alleged the facility staff did not provide R1 grooming and hygiene needs. On 9/1/2023, the Department interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). S2 stated three out of four residents are seen by the podiatrist that comes to the facility. R1’s responsible party is responsible to find a podiatrist and R1 has routine appointment to see podiatrist set up by R1’s responsible party. S3 stated the residents are bathed three times a week. On 9/1/2023, the Department interviewed 2 residents (R1-R2). Two out of two residents stated the facility provides grooming and hygiene needs and they do not have any concerns about the staff. Based on review of R1’s Functional Capability Assessment dated 5/2/2022 and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 1/20/2022, R1 needs help with bathing and toileting and staff will encourage R1 to call for assistance for toileting needs. Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Armando Guba and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230824110123
Aug 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) David Marrufo and Santino Fortes conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Armando Guba, Administrator. During visit, LPAs toured the facility inside and out. LPAs toured the facility kitchen area. LPAs observed a prescription inhalation mediation left unsecured on the kitchen island surface. Staff placed the unsecured medication in the locked medication storage cabinet during visit. LPAs observed an uncovered container containing a cut lemon and another food item inside the refrigerator. Staff removed the uncovered container from the refrigerator during visit. LPAs observed the locked cabinet where sharp objects are stored. LPAs observed the locked storage cabinet used to store medications and records. LPAs observed the first aid kit and found it to be complete. LPAs toured 2 out of 2 resident bathrooms and observed each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The showers in each bathrooms had grab bars and anti-slip mats. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measures at 118 F and 115 F. LPAs toured 5 out of 5 resident bedrooms and found each bedroom to have working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPAs tested the smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors in the hallways and each resident rooms and found them to function properly when tested. LPAs toured the outside area and found the exits were clear of obstructions. LPAs reviewed the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDRs) for 4 out of 4 residents. Resident R1 had 2 medications missing from the CSMDR. Resident R2 had 2 medications missing from the CSMDR. R3 had 5 medications missing from the CSMDR and 2 medications did not have a prescription label. R4 had two medications missing from the CSMDR. LPAs reviewed 4 out of 4 staff records. R1-R4 were missing Safeguard for Property and Valuables Forms and R3-R4 were missing Pre-Appraisal Forms. LPAs reviewed 1 out of 1 staff records and found it to be complete. See LIC809-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. During visit, Administrator Armando Guba stated that volunteer V1 did not have a health statement or health screening form on record. Advisory Notes were issued. See LIC9102 pages for more information. Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D pages for more information. This report was reviewed with Administrator Armando Guba and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: (A) The name of the resident for whom prescribed. (B) The name of the prescribing physician. (C) The drug name, strength and quantity. (D) The date filled. (E) The prescription number and the name of the issuing pharmacy. (F) Instructions, if any, regarding control and custody of the medication. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that 4 out of 4 reviewed resident Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records did not have centrally stored medications that were not recorded. R1 had 2 unrecorded medications, R2 had 2 unrecorded medications, R3 had 5 unrecorded medications, and R4 had 2 unrecorded medications, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (4) All centrally stored medications shall be labeled and maintained in compliance with state and federal laws. No persons other than the dispensing pharmacist shall alter a prescription label. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that resident R3 did not have two medications that did not have a prescription label, which poses a potential safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
(b) Personnel records shall be maintained for all volunteers and shall contain the following: (1) A health statement as specified in Section 87411(f). (2) Health screening documents as specified in Section 87411(f). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that Volunteer V1 had a health statement and health screening on record, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
(b) Each resident’s record shall contain at least the following information: (16) Records of resident's cash resources as specified in Section 87217, Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that residents R1-R4 had Safeguard for Property and Valuables Forms in their resident records, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
(b) Each resident’s record shall contain at least the following information: (17) Documents and information required by the following: (A) Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal; This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that residents R4 and R5 had Pre-Admission Appraisal forms in their resident records, which poses an potential safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Martinvale Rch
San Jose · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A's Home Care for Elderly
San Jose · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Everly Care Home
San Jose · Small home · 1.1 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Lilly's Care Home
San Jose · Small home · 1.3 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Constantin's Care Home
San Jose · Small home · 2.3 mi away
$2,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Marcel's Memory Care
San Jose · Small home · 2.6 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate