Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Maryam RCFELicense #374604078 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareMaryam RCFELicense #374604078 · 4930 Maiden Lane, La Mesa, CA · (619) 825-7398Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Diego County/La Mesa/Maryam RCFE
Map · 4930 Maiden Lane

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,950/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (619) 825-7398

    From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

MR

Call Maryam RCFE

La Mesa · Licensed for 6

(619) 825-7398

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · La Mesa

Maryam RCFE

4930 Maiden Lane, La Mesa, CA 91942 · Licensed since 2019

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Maryam RCFE

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,950 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050 See costs

No openings reported

  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

State approvals not on file: wheelchair, dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026

As needs change

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Maryam RCFE: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,950a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,050

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,950likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,950likely $4,050–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,250
$4,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,450
$7,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $6,500

$4,000$6,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,550–$6,000.

  • Peppertree Guest Home IILa Mesa · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Renaissance LivingLa Mesa · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Right Choice Senior Living LLC - La MesaLa Mesa · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lake Murray Health Care CenterSan Diego · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Green VillaSan Diego · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oasis Village CareLa Mesa · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Silvercreek Home CareSan Diego · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Acorn Oaks Manor IIISan Diego · 2.6 mi · Small home
    $5,800Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 5, 2026
  • Casa Del CieloSan Diego · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lucie's Shady RestSan Diego · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

4930 Maiden Lane, La Mesa, CA 91942Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Grossmont HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #374604078 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 11 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by House Manager Maria Lerma, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection.. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six ambulatory elderly residents: ages 60 and above. LPA was accompanied by House Manager Maria Lerma, during a tour of the facility, which was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident bedrooms, common area, dining area. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Resident’s room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens, towels, and washcloths. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings and appropriate lighting to ensure the comfort and safety of residents. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Non-skid mats are present in the showers. Facility has a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Medications are locked in a locked closet, not accessible to residents. Medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. LPA interviewed staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. No deficiencies were observed or cited at the time of visit An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 03/22) was provided to the , Maria Lerma Administrator whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026
Mar 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not treat resident's with dignity. Staff do not treat resident's with respect. Licensee is not providing supervision of resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Leeda Dost, Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, Outside Sources, and a review of relevant records. On 9/9/24, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the facility staff do not treat resident's with dignity. LPA interviewed 3 staff members, including caregivers and administrative personnel. All staff consistently stated they have not witnessed or engaged in inappropriate communication with residents. Staff reported they receive ongoing training on resident rights, dignity, and respectful communication as required by Title 22. Staff demonstrated knowledge of facility policies regarding supervision and personal rights. Unsubstantiated LPA interviewed residents and they reported they feel respected and treated with dignity by staff. None of the residents interviewed reported hearing staff speak inappropriately or disrespectfully. Residents stated staff respond promptly to their needs and provide supervision when assistance is required. LPA contacted an outside source 1 (OS1). OS1 did not report any concerns regarding staff communication or supervision. They stated the facility maintains regular communication and provides updates on resident care. During the visit, LPA observed staff interacting with residents in a calm and professional manner. No inappropriate language or disrespectful behavior was observed. Residents appeared comfortable and engaged in activities. LPA reviewed staff training records, resident care plans, and supervision logs. Documentation confirmed staff completed training on personal rights and supervision requirements. Staff schedules indicated adequate coverage to meet residents’ needs. On 9/9/24, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the facility staff do not treat resident's with respect. LPA interviewed staff members regarding their interactions with residents. All staff stated they are trained to uphold residents’ personal rights and treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff described examples of how they provide choices in daily activities, maintain privacy during personal care, and communicate respectfully. No staff admitted or reported observing any disrespectful behavior toward residents. LPA interviewed residents. Residents consistently reported feeling respected and valued by staff. Residents stated staff address them by their preferred names, listen to their concerns, and provide assistance in a courteous manner. None of the residents reported any incidents of humiliation, neglect, or disrespect. LPA contacted OS1 and they expressed satisfaction with the care provided and did not report any concerns regarding staff treatment of residents. They confirmed that residents appear comfortable and well cared for during visits. During the visit, LPA observed staff interacting with residents in a professional and respectful manner. Staff were seen assisting residents with activities of daily living while maintaining privacy and dignity. No inappropriate or disrespectful behavior was observed. LPA reviewed staff training records and confirmed completion of courses related to resident rights, dignity, and respectful communication as required by Title 22 and Health & Safety Code. Facility policies reinforce these principles. On 9/9/24, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the Licensee is not providing supervision of residents while in care. LPA interviewed staff members regarding supervision practices. Staff stated they are assigned to specific areas of the facility to ensure residents are monitored and assisted as needed. Staff reported that supervision is maintained through scheduled rounds, activity monitoring, and prompt response to call systems. No staff reported any lapses in supervision. LPA interviewed residents. Residents stated they feel safe and adequately supervised. Residents reported staff are available when assistance is needed and respond promptly to requests. None of the residents reported being left unattended or without supervision. OS1 did not express concerns regarding supervision. They stated residents appear well cared for and staff presence is evident during visits. During the visit, LPA observed staff present in common areas and actively engaging with residents. Residents were participating in activities and appeared supervised. No residents were observed unattended in areas that could pose a safety risk. LPA reviewed staff schedules, supervision logs, and facility policies. Documentation confirmed adequate staffing ratios and supervision practices. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in a resident being touched inappropriately. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Leeda Dost, Administrator. to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026 · control 08-AS-20240909090201

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. LPA Domingo was granted entry into the facility by House Manager Maria Lerma, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. Leea Dost the Licensee arrived during the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six ambulatory elderly residents: ages 60 and above. LPA was accompanied by House Manager Maria Lerma, during a tour of the facility, which was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident bedrooms, common area, dining area. The last disaster drill was conducted in January 2025. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. A fireplace with appropriate screening was observed in the main area of the building. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Resident’s room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens, towels, and washcloths. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings and appropriate lighting to ensure the comfort and safety of residents. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Non-skid mats are present in the showers. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued on 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Medications are locked in a locked closet, not accessible to residents. Medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. LPA interview with staff indicates the facility is providing assistance to meet necessary incidental medical and dental needs. This includes arranging or assisting in arranging transportation. LPA interviewed staff and a client. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. No deficiencies were observed or cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 03/22) was provided to the Licensee Leeda Dost, whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025
Apr 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. The residents were all at program and the staff were not available.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Apr 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by Care Giver Magida Houaoura, after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. Administrator Maria Lerma later joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six ambulatory elderly residents: ages 60 and above. LPA was accompanied by Administrator Maria Lerma, during a tour of the facility, which was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident bedrooms, common area, dining area. The last disaster drill was conducted in January 2024. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. A fireplace with appropriate screening was observed in the main area of the building. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Resident’s room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens, towels, and washcloths. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings and appropriate lighting to ensure the comfort and safety of residents. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Non-skid mats are present in the showers. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued on 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Medications are locked in a locked closet, not accessible to residents. Medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. LPA interview with staff indicates the facility is providing assistance to meet necessary incidental medical and dental needs. This includes arranging or assisting in arranging transportation. LPA interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. No deficiencies were observed or cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 01/16) was provided to the Administrator Maria Lerma, whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager Maria Lerma. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom must be ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of six (6) clients in care, and per medical records, all were ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was 74 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Kitchen sink was 103 F, Bathroom #1 sink was 103 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 103 F. Refrigerator temperature was 35 F and freezer temperature was 0 F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher was serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance and surety bond. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Maria Lerma to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2023

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 30, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident as requested

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Majida "Maggie" Houaoura. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff did not seek medical attention for a resident as requested. Interviews and review of Client 1’s (C1) medical records revealed that C1 has a history of physical aggression, yelling, cursing, slamming doors, and throwing and breaking items. San Diego Regional Center has advised staff to ask C1 to talk through C1’s frustrations and redirect C1 to participate in other activities. Review of C1’s medical documents revealed that C1 is able to communicate their needs. Interviews and record review revealed that around 12:30pm on 4/22/2020, C1 began becoming agitated. Staff attempted to redirect and deescalate C1 by asking C1 if C1 wanted to go on a walk, water plants, or watch television. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiated Interviews with the Licensee revealed that around 3pm, C1 became more agitated and began throwing things, made threats of self-harm, and made verbal threats against staff and clients. While C1 was agitated, C1 injured Staff 1’s (S1’s) finger. The facility staff called the La Mesa Police Department and Psychiatric Emergency Response Team (PERT). Interviews with the Licensee revealed that it did not take long for PERT to arrive and PERT took C1 to the hospital. C1 was not admitted and was discharged on the following day on 4/23/2020. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on observation, record review, interviews, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Majida "Maggie" Houaoura, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via hard copy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200428172657
Apr 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with caregiver Majida "Maggie" Houaoura. House Manager Morena "Maria" Lerma arrived later during the visit. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and observed the staff and residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control program, LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Lerma. A copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail to Lerma and administrator Leeda Dost.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2022
Mar 22, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Physical abuse by staff towards resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was met and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Maria Lerma to whom was explained the purpose for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff and outside source interviews . The investigation also included facility, client, and outside source records reviews, observations and interactions with clients in care, and a facility tour. It was alleged that on March 17, 2020 Client1 (C1) (See Confidential Name List LIC 811) sustained bruising by a Staff (S1) member who grabbed C1 by the arm pulling them back into the facility from the facility balcony. An interview with facility staff revealed C1 was upset after an argument with another client and began hitting and scratching themselves out on the facility balcony. Facility staff redirected and coaxed C1 back into the facility. C1 continued to act out and make suicidal threats. Staff called 911 and C1 was transported to the hospital and placed on observation. Unsubstantiated A review of facility records review, as well as interviews with facility staff and outside sources revealed there was not a staff member (S1) working at the facility by the name identified as the alleged suspect. A review of outside source records revealed C1 had a chronic problem of fabricating stories, such as abuse by staff and/or clients, to deflect blame onto others, it was also noted in records that placement facilities should be aware of this behavior due to serious allegations C1 has made in the past, all determined to be unfounded or unsubstantiated. Records also revealed C1 displayed re-occurring self-harm behaviors and suicide threats. An interview with an outside source and facility staff corroborated C1’s tendency to fabricate stories and also corroborated C1 had several incidents of self-harm, including hitting and scratching themselves. An interview with another outside revealed they have recently, since discharge of C1, conducted visits to the facility on a regular basis. The Interview revealed never witnessing any issues or signs of abuse by staff, the clients in care always appeared well cared for and happy. The interview also revealed the clients are outspoken and have good relationships with the Licensee and Caregiver Lerma, and felt if there were any issues clients would not have any hesitation with reporting them. Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the findings regarding the above allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegation may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Lerma and Licensee Dost, who joined during the exit interview via telephone. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) will be provided to Caregiver Lerma and Licensee Dost via email at the conclusion of the visit. An electronic email read receipt confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200317143554

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member records residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes arrived at the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Janet Acosta, Caregiver. LPA previously conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on August 26, 2020, and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff member records residents. Interviews revealed that Staff #1 (S1) did record C1 while at the facility. Interviews revealed it was mentioned to mangement and management asked S1 why they recorded the client. Interviews revealed there was an incident when S1 recorded C1 because they were sitting on the balcony talking about the buildings and S1 asked C1 if anyone had touched their stuff. C1 responded to S1 that another staff went into their room and touched their stuff. Management wrote S1 up for recording C1. Interviews revealed S1 thought that they could show management the recording of C1 so management could see what C1 was saying. **Amended report from 06/23/2021** Substantiated It was alleged staff member neglects residents' basic care needs. Interviews revealed that residents needs are met and anytime they need assistance they receive it. Interviews revealed staff check on residents frequently. Staff provides meals and assistance to the residents several times on a daily basis. The residents receive assistance with bathing and dressing. Interviews with outside sources states the staff provides quality care to the clients in care. Clients needs are met according to their care plans There were no witnesses to prove staff neglects residents basic care needs. It was alleged that staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect. Interviews revealed that staff talk and treat the residents kindly. Interviews revealed staff respect the residents needs and their wants. Interviews revealed there haven't been any instances when staff have been rude or disrespectful at any time. Interviews with clients revealed that staff are nice and clients have a good rapport with them. Interviews with outside sources states that there have been no complaints of staff not treating clients with dignity and respect. There were no witnesses to prove staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect. This agency has investigated the complaint allegations of staff member abuses residents, staff member neglects residents' basic care needs and staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect. Based on interviews conducted, the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Janet Acosta, Caregiver, and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided to Licensee, Leeda Dost via email. An electronic email read receipt confirms the documents were received. Interviews revealed that staff are not supposed to use their phones when working with the residents. There were witnesses to prove staff records residents. Based on interviews conducted, the allegation is substantiated. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff member records residents. We have found the allegation happened and the preponderance of evidence has been met. An exit interview was conducted with Janet Acosta, Caregiver and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided to Licensee, Leeda Dost via email. An electronic email read receipt confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2021 · control 08-AS-20200821103147

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 24, 2021

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Interviews revealed 1 out of 4 clients were being recorded while in care at the facility by staff. This poses a potential safety risk to clients in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee will provide training on personal rights of clients to all staff from Medicine Camp Pharmacy. Documents/materials and sign in sheet will be provided to CCL by POC date of 09/24/2021

Jun 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member abuses residents and staff Staff member neglects residents' basic care needs Staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes arrived at the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Sahym Meza, Caregiver. LPA previously conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on August 26, 2020, and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged staff member abuses residents and staff. Interviews did not reveal any physical or emotional abuse by staff. Staff 1 (S1) (see LIC811 Confidential Names List) in question denies abusing any residents or staff. S1 does not speak rudely or mean to the other staff or residents. S1 admits to doing the best they can on their job. There were no witnesses to prove staff member abuses residents and staff. Continued... * This is an amended report from 06/23/2021 Unsubstantiated It was alleged staff member neglects residents' basic care needs. Interviews revealed that residents needs are met and anytime they need assistance they receive it. Interviews revealed staff check on residents frequently. Staff provides meals and assistance to the residents several times on a daily basis. The residents receive assistance with bathing and dressing. There were no witnesses to prove staff neglects residents basic care needs. It was alleged staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect. Interviews revealed that staff talk and treat the residents kindly. Interviews revealed staff respect the residents needs and their wants. Interviews revealed there haven't been any instances when staff have been rude or disrespectful at any time. There were no witnesses to prove staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect. Based on interviews conducted, the allegations are unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff member abuses residents and staff, staff member neglects residents' basic care needs and staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect We have found the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Sahym Meza, Caregiver and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided to Licensee, Leeda Dost via email. An electronic email read receipt confirms the documents were received. ** This is an amended report from 06/23/2021**the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2021 · control 08-AS-20200821103147

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 2, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Maryam RCFE, licensed since 2019.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
7
Total complaints
1
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints10

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Maryam RCFE

Is Maryam RCFE licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

How many residents is Maryam RCFE licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Has Maryam RCFE been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Maryam RCFE still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Maryam RCFE cost?

$4,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 198 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 198 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Maryam RCFE take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Maryam RCFE, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Grossmont Hospital is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Maryam RCFE keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Maryam RCFE license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MARYAM RCFE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604078. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • Licensed to Maryam RCFE, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    La Mesa · 0.1 mi

    Grossmont Gardens Memory Care

    Large community · licensed for 64

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Mesa · 0.6 mi

    Grossmont Gardens Senior Living

    Large community · licensed for 425

    Starting rate

    $2,195 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Mesa · 0.9 mi

    Casa De Vida Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Mesa · 0.4 mi

    Mesaview Senior Assisted Living

    Mid-size home · licensed for 40

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$6,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Mesa · 0.9 mi

    Peppertree Guest Home II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    La Mesa · 1.1 mi

    Divine Light Care Home

    Mid-size home · licensed for 7

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$7,450

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Diego County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
MR

Call Maryam RCFE

La Mesa · Licensed for 6

(619) 825-7398

From the state licensing record · October 25, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Maryam RCFE

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages