Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lavender Hills Assisted Living II

Mid-size home·Licensed for 25·Redding, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #455002027
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,500 a monthTypical in Shasta County · likely $3,500–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 25Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit22 of 25 beds occupiedJune 18, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 26, 2026CDSS inspection record

Lavender Hills Assisted Living II is a mid-size care home in Redding — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 25 residents since 2008.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lavender Hills Assisted Living II

Is Lavender Hills Assisted Living II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Lavender Hills Assisted Living II licensed for?

25 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Lavender Hills Assisted Living II been cited?

1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is Lavender Hills Assisted Living II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Lavender Hills Assisted Living II cost?

$4,500 a month to start is typical in Shasta County, likely $3,500–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Shasta County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lavender Hills Assisted Living II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Lavender Hills Assisted Living, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Lavender Hills Assisted Living LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Shasta Regional Medical Center is 3.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Lavender Hills Assisted Living II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Lavender Hills Assisted Living II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LAVENDER HILLS ASSISTED LIVING II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #455002027. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 25 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Lavender Hills Assisted Living, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 25 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 25 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
25 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 25 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 10.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,500

Covelight’s researched range for Shasta County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,500–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,500–$5,500

    Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Shasta County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,700
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,850
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few homes publish a rate here, so this is the middle of Covelight’s researched range for assisted-living communities in Shasta County (compiled June 2026). This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 7 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 1750 Collyer Drive, Redding, CA 96003Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 14 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2008. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 26, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
15
Most recent visit
June 26, 2026
Occupied · June 18, 2024 visit
22 of 25 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 25, 2022 to June 18, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020252202024340202322120222202021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 14 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Marisa Chiarelli and Kayla Adkison arrived on 06/26/2026 for an unannounced inspection to follow up on a case management visit regarding a substantiated allegation as the result of an incident report investigation. On April 15, 2024, the Department concluded an investigation following an incident report regarding the elopement and unwitnessed fall of a resident (R1) who required mobility assistance. The licensee was cited for California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Section 87705(c)(4)- Care for Persons with Dementia. At the time of the case management inspection on April 15, 2024, an immediate civil penalty of $500.00 was issued and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. Continued on 809 - C The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that a civil penalty is warranted for serious bodily injury. The Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.67 defines serious bodily injury as "an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation.” This is evidenced by the facility failing to prevent R1 from eloping and falling, resulting in a hip fracture, hospitalization, hip surgery, and physical therapy rehabilitation. Today, 06/26/2026 the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as a serious bodily injury in the amount of $ 10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on April 15, 2024, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9,500. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal rights provided. Signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2026
Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/23/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisa Chiarelli arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met administrator Jennifer Boss and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Chiarelli and administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to, residents bedrooms, bathrooms, and kitchen. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medication is kept in a locked room. LPA Chiarelli reviewed three residents medications. The common area was clean, odor-free and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. The bathrooms were clean and in good repair. The kitchen was clean and in good repair. Sharps are kept in a locked drawer. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors sound directly to the fire department. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. No pools/bodies of water are on the premises. No firearms are on premises. No deficiencies are being cited on today's inspection, exit interview conducted and copy of report left with the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026
Feb 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On February 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison arrived at the facility unannounced for a case management visit. LPA met with Jennifer Boss, Administrator and Natasha Peerman, assistant administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, there were four (4) staff providing care and 19 residents in the facility. LPA made visual observations of the facility and interviewed Administrator and Assistant Administrator regarding an incident that occurred in April 2024. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided, via email, to Jennifer Boss, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An non-compliance conference was conducted at 2:00pm on June 31, 2025, with Sacramento North Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this non-compliance conference meeting is to address a citation issued on 4/15/2024. The following Licensing staff were present: Sacramento North Regional Manager Alycia Rayner, Licensing Program Manager Lauren Crocket, Licensing Program Analyst Sarah Benson. The following facility representatives were present: Licensee Janet Coulter, Administrator Jennifer Boss, Administrator Naitasha Peerman. The following topics were discussed during today's meeting: Summary of Complaint filed against this facility. Summary of Complaints filed against this facility. Care of Persons with Dementia, Elopement Safety issues Staff training Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities Care for Persons with Dementia TSP offered as a resource Door chime, who answers Activities offered Continued on LIC809-C Compliance Plan: The Licensee will provide a document with the programs implemented with regards to: 1. Ensuring how staff plan to prevent eloping., 2. A list of preventative steps taken and when implemented. 3. Training's and ongoing training's, how often. 4. Quality assurance, how management is ensuring plan is actually happening, 5. Process to ensure staff are adhering to the policy. 6. List of the processes. The licensee understands and acknowledges that the Department, at its discretion, will make unannounced case management visits to monitor the licensee’s compliance with this Compliance Plan. Completing the Non-Compliance Conference does not deprive the Department of its authority to take formal legal action under the Health and Safety Code if such action is deemed necessary by the Regional Manager. This conference does not in any manner excuse past problems or resolve the Department’s case against the licensee if the problems are not corrected. The Non-Compliance Conference may be the last step prior to initiating administrative action following unsuccessful attempts by the Department to gain compliance. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report will be provided to the facility via email. A copy must be signed and returned to the Department.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025
Apr 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On April 3, 2025, at 1:15 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met administrator Naitasha Peerman (cert #6074069740 exp.01/15/2027) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator certificate is current. LPA Adkison and administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to four (4) resident rooms, common areas, (5) bathrooms, kitchen, medication room and facility exterior. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medication is kept in a locked room. The common area was clean, odor-free and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. The bathrooms were clean and in good repair. The kitchen was clean and in good repair. A 5-week menu is posted. Sharps are kept in a locked drawer. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors sound directly to the fire department. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. There is a schedule of activities posted for the clients. No pools/bodies of water are on the premises. No firearms are on premises. The last disaster drill was conducted and documented on January 18, 2025, the facility has been conducting drills every (3) three months. The facility is in compliance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator, Nataisha Peerman.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staff/Lack of supervision.

On 06/18/24 Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 01/30/24. LPA Gurriere met with Natasha Peerman, Asst. Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Insufficient staff/Lack of supervision. During the interview process, the administrator and three staff persons were interviewed. Attempts were made to interview two other staff persons; however, they were not available. In addition, documents were obtained and reviewed to include the resident’s Physician’s Report and staff persons telephone numbers. continued Unsubstantiated During the investigation, it was reported that paramedics arrived at the facility to follow up on a resident and stated that the staff person working, appeared to be disheveled. It was stated by the staff that were interviewed that they were not aware of the incident and overall, it was reported that there is sufficient staff during the nighttime shift to meet the needs of the residents. Although the above allegation mentioned may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the above finding is Unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240130141806
Jun 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff drugged resident in care. Staff smoke marijuana in the facility premises. Staff locked resident in care. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Centrally stored medications are made accessible to residents in care. Staff are not following proper reporting requirements. Staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents in care.

On 06/18/24 Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 03/12/24. LPA Gurriere met with , Natasha Peerman, Asst. Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Staff drugged resident in care. Staff smoke marijuana in the facility premises. Staff locked resident in care. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Centrally stored medications are made accessible to residents in care. Staff are not following proper reporting requirements. Staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents in care. continued Unsubstantiated During the interview process, the administrator and six staff persons were interviewed. Two staff persons were no longer working at the facility; however, they were still interviewed. The facility is a memory care unit; thus, the residents were not interviewed. Contact information received, included staff telephone numbers and staff work schedule. During the investigation process, it was noted that many of the allegations are in relation to specific residents; however, the names of the residents were not provided and therefore the allegations could not be thoroughly explored. Overall, it was reported that the staff were not familiar with the allegations alleged. It is noted that the exact same allegations were stated for the sister facility. Although the above allegations mentioned may have happened, or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and all of the above findings are Unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240312155426
Apr 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 4/15/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaynae Boyles arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management to follow up on a recent AWOL at the facility. LPA met with facility Administrator Jennifer Boss and explained the purpose of the visit. The incident occurred on 4/11/2024 where a resident, who was deemed unable to leave facility unassisted at around 4pm, had eloped in the afternoon without any staff knowing. While out the resident had an unwitnessed fall resulting in the resident sustaining a broken hip. A community member found the resident on the sidewalk and contacted 911. The facility was informed by resident's son later that afternoon at around 4:28pm. As a result of the incident, the Department is issuing a citation on the attached LIC 809-D, per Title 22 Regulations. Also attached to the deficiency is an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500, which is assessed for a violation of California Code of Regulations Section 87705(c)(4). The licensee was informed that an Enhanced Civil Penalty is under review and may be assessed at a future date according to Health and Safety Code 1569.49. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report has been issued. Appeal Rights provided. Jennifer Boss signature on this report acknowledges receipt of these reports. .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2024

87705(c)(4) Care of Persons with Dementia-Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring: There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs. Based upon observation and interview the Licensee failed to provide enough care staff to ensure the safety and health care needs of 1 of 1 residents who went AWOL. This poses an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to create and implement a policy and procedure to ensure accountability of individual staff to ensure they are conducting wellness checks. Policy due to CCL no later than COB on 04/16/2024 Civil Penalty assessed in the amount of $500

Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/07/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaynae Boyles, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-Year Required Annual Inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Boyles and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, backyard, shed, and common restrooms. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. LPA observed the resident bedrooms to have the required furniture, light fixtures and windows with screens. LPA observed eleven (11) resident bedrooms which were clean, tidy and odor free. LPA observed resident rooms with four (4) beds to have half bed rails, LPA observed the laundry room to have locks on the toxic chemical cabinet but it was not being utilized and it was left unlocked. LPA observed the medication room to be locked and inaccessible to residents. However, the locks on the medication cabinet are not being utilized. LPA observed each bathroom to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring or shower chair, paper towels, trash can with lids. Facility has a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable amount of food and sharps to be locked. Hot water temperature was measured within the required range. LPA observed several fire extinguishers, fire detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors within the facility. LPA observed the first aid kit to be complete and ready for use. LPA reviewed a total of six (6) residents' files and four (4) staff files. Staff files contained all the the required documentation. Of the six (6) resident files, two (2) residents were missing an annual physical for residents with dementia. Of the files reviewed, three resident had bed rails with no order from a physician. Deficiencies cited from Title 22 Regulations and or the California Health and Safety Code. Several topics were discussed. An exit interview was conducted, and Plans of Corrections were reviewed and developed collaboratively. A copy of this report, LIC 809-D, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Shasta County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Shasta County