Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Happy Home Care Sidlee
Small home·Licensed for 6·Thousand Oaks, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 6, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 6, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderHappy Homecare, Inc.Since 2023 · 5 licensed homes
Happy Home Care Sidlee is a small care home in Thousand Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Happy Home Care Sidlee
Is Happy Home Care Sidlee licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Happy Home Care Sidlee licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Happy Home Care Sidlee been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Happy Home Care Sidlee still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Happy Home Care Sidlee cost?
$5,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,450–$6,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Happy Home Care Sidlee take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Happy Homecare, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Happy Homecare, Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center is 0.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Happy Home Care Sidlee keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Happy Home Care Sidlee license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HAPPY HOME CARE SIDLEE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #565850316. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Happy Homecare, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY. LICENSED IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS. DEMENTIA PLAN SUBMITTED. NO BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS ALLOWED.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,450a month to start
Likely $4,450–$6,700
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,450a month
Likely $4,450–$6,850
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,450likely $4,450–$6,700
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,450–$6,850
- $5,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,200–$9,900
- $7,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
11 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Colony of Thousand Oaks at VenusThousand Oaks · 0.7 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Enduring Oaks Assisted LivingMoorpark · 4.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Heartland Senior Living at SunnydaleSimi Valley · 7.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Nurturing TouchOak Park · 7.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Via EsmeraldaCamarillo · 8.3 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookhaven AlCamarillo · 8.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ocean Breeze at BeechwoodCamarillo · 10 mi · Small home$5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau Le Petite IIIWoodland Hills · 13 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- My Home of AgingWoodland Hills · 14 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- 4Th Generation Senior LivingWest Hills · 14 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 14 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 174 Sidlee Street, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 6, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- August 6, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 8, 2026 to August 6, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents
Aug 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not respond appropriately during an emergency Facility did not maintain resident's emergency documents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above listed allegations. Upon arrival at approx. 10:22 a.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator to inform them of the visit. The facility Designee / Assistant Administrator (AA), Karina Antig arrived shortly after and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. On 04/24/2026 the department received a complaint regarding the following allegations Facility staff did not respond appropriately during an emergency and Facility did not maintain resident's emergency documents. On 05/05/2026 LPA Mosley conducted the initial 10 day visit starting at 9:40 a.m. LPA and staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no immediate health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Starting at 10:09 a.m. and throughout the visit LPA conducted four (4) staff interviews, attempted to interview Resident #1 (R1), a file and record review for R1 and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... Unsubstantiated (PAGE 2) Report continued from LIC 9099... During today's visit starting at 10:33 a.m. LPA and staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no immediate health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At 2:50 p.m. conducted a telephonic interview with the power of attorney (POA) of Resident #1 (R1). At 3:16 p.m. conducted an interview with R1 at 3:30 p.m. conducted an interview with Resident #2 (R2). On the allegation, Facility staff did not respond appropriately during an emergency, it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that the facility staff were unable to effectively communicate with emergency personnel. To investigate this complaint, LPA conducted in person interviews, file and record review and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Staff interviews revealed that during the time frame of the complaint, R1 was experiencing a change in condition and was transported to the hospital via ambulance on 04/23/26. R1 returned from the hospital on 04/26/26, and their POA brought them home without providing any discharge paperwork. The following morning, on 04/27/26 at approximately 7:00 a.m., R1 appeared lethargic and was unresponsive, prompting staff to call 911. Staff stated they were able to communicate with paramedics; however, they were unable to provide specific information regarding R1’s recent hospitalization because the POA retained the discharge documents. Staff reported they responded appropriately during the emergency with the information they had. Interview with R1 revealed that due to cognitive decline, they are unable to recall the specific event. R1 stated that the facility staff treat them well. R1 is able to communicate effectively with all staff in English and reported having no concerns. Interview with R2 revealed that the facility staff treat them well. R2 stated they have no issues communicating with any of the staff and are able to communicate effectively in English. R2 expressed no concerns regarding the care they receive and reported that, based on their observations, staff have acted appropriately during emergency situations. Interview with the POA revealed that they are able to communicate with facility staff and have no difficulty doing so. The POA stated they believe the facility staff acted appropriately during the emergency involving R1. Record reviews, including but not limited to the staff schedule, revealed that on the day of the incident, LPA was able to communicate with all three (3) staff listed on the schedule. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation of Facility staff did not respond appropriately during an emergency is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 3... (PAGE 3) Report continued from LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... On the allegation Facility did not maintain resident's emergency documents it is the concern of the reporting party that that facility did not have R1’s accurate emergency information. To investigate this complaint, LPA conducted in person interviews, file and record review and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Staff interviews revealed that during the time frame of the complaint, R1 was experiencing a change in condition and was transported to the hospital via ambulance on 04/23/26. R1 returned from the hospital on 04/26/26, and their POA brought them home without providing any discharge paperwork. The following morning, on 04/27/26 at approximately 7:00 a.m., R1 appeared lethargic and was unresponsive, prompting staff to call 911. Staff stated they were able to communicate with paramedics; however, they were unable to provide specific information regarding R1’s recent hospitalization because the POA retained the discharge documents. Staff reported they responded appropriately during the emergency with the documentation and information they had. Interview with the POA revealed that on the evening of 04/26/26, they brought R1 back to the facility after R1 was discharged from the hospital. The POA did not leave the discharge paperwork with facility staff as typically requested. The POA stated that the Facility Designee later called and requested that important paperwork, such as hospital discharge documents, be left at the facility in case of emergencies. Record review and files, including but not limited to R1’s file, revealed that R1 has a complete file. This includes an identification form (LIC 601), which is typically used for emergency personnel. Additionally, the facility maintained copies of R1’s ID, insurance card, and medication list. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation of Facility did not maintain resident's emergency documents is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No citations issued at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260427135616
Jul 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure staff are providing a safe environment for residents Staff do not adequately supervise residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the above listed allegations. Upon arrival at approx.09:30 a.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA met with Designee Karina Antig and reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. On 06/30/2026, the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegations, Licensee does not ensure staff are providing a safe environment for residents and Staff do not adequately supervise residents. During today's visit LPA and Designee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no immediate health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Starting at 10:10 a.m. and throughout the visit LPA conducted six (6) interviews, three (3) staff and three (3) residents and attempted one (1) resident interview, file and record review for Staff #1 (S1) and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... Unsubstantiated (PAGE 2) Report continued from LIC 9099... On the allegation, Licensee does not ensure staff are providing a safe environment for residents it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that Staff #1 (S1)’s child who resides at the facility roams unattended and on two (2) occasions turned off residents oxygen. To investigate this complaint, LPA conducted in person interviews, telephonic interviews, file and record review and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) revealed that they worked at the facility for approximately three (3) years as live-in staff. S1 resided on the facility grounds with their mother, who is also a staff member, and their seven-year-old child. S1 primarily worked the night shift, while their mother worked the morning shift, ensuring the child was always supervised. S1 reported they resigned from the facility on Monday, 07/06/2026. S1 stated they consistently ensured the safety of both the residents and their child, noting the child was always supervised. S1 reported they only heard of the alleged incident involving their child turning off a resident’s oxygen but did not personally witness it. S1 stated that when they asked the child whether they had touched residents’ oxygen tanks or entered any resident rooms, the child responded “no” and appeared unaware of the allegation. S1 reported their child knows not to enter resident rooms or roam the facility. S1 acknowledged that the child was occasionally in the kitchen with them or their mother but was always supervised. S1 stated residents are provided a safe environment and have not disclosed concerns regarding their surroundings. Interview with the Facility Designee revealed that, to their knowledge, residents are provided with a safe environment and have not reported concerns or complaints. The Designee stated a staff member reported that S1’s child turned off a resident’s oxygen, prompting an internal investigation; however, the allegation was determined to have no merit. The Designee explained that the staff involved in the accusation were “fighting and not in good terms,” and the report appeared to be made “in retaliation.” The Designee stated S1 was spoken to about the allegation, but when they interviewed the resident involved, the resident was unaware of any such incident. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 3... (PAGE 3) Report continued from LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... Interview with Staff #2 (S2) revealed that they claimed to have witnessed S1’s child turn off a resident’s oxygen; however, S2 could not provide specific dates or times. S2 stated they reported the incident to their supervisor and that S1 was reprimanded. S2 reported that the facility is safe and provides adequate care for its residents. Interview with Staff #3 (S3) revealed that they did not witness S1’s child turn off a resident’s oxygen and stated they do not believe the child is capable of such behavior. S3 reported the child generally stays in their room and does not roam the facility. Resident Interviews revealed that residents feel safe at the facility and believe staff provide a secure environment. Residents reported no concerns regarding S1’s child, stating they occasionally see the child briefly when looking for S1 but do not observe the child roaming the facility. Residents stated they were not aware of any incident involving oxygen being turned off, and none reported that S1’s child tampered with their oxygen. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation of Licensee does not ensure staff are providing a safe environment for residents is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation, Staff do not adequately supervise residents it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that facility staff do not adequately supervise residents due to taking care of the child. To investigate this complaint, LPA conducted in person interviews, telephonic interviews, file and record review and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) revealed that they primarily worked the night shift while their mother worked the morning shift, ensuring that the child was always supervised. S1 stated they resigned from the facility on Monday, 07/06/2026. During their employment, S1 reported that they consistently ensured the safety of both the residents and their child, noting that the child was always accompanied by an adult. S1 stated that residents were adequately supervised and cared for by all facility staff. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 4... (PAGE 4) Report continued from LIC 9099-C PAGE 3... Interview with the Facility Designee indicated that residents are adequately supervised and that no concerns have been reported by residents or their families. The Designee stated that staff routinely check on residents to ensure their safety. They noted, “The staff are not perfect; we make mistakes, but we always do our best.” The Designee further reported that the facility conducts continuous in-service training to support ongoing improvement and development. Interviews with Additional Staff revealed that they provide adequate supervision and have not received any concerns regarding resident care. Staff reported that they respond promptly to resident requests and conduct regular checks to ensure residents are clean, repositioned, and dry. Resident Interviews revealed no concerns regarding staff performance. Residents reported feeling safe and adequately supervised. They expressed satisfaction with staff responsiveness, stating that staff assist promptly when help is needed. Residents acknowledged that while staff are not perfect, they are attentive, supportive, and overall “good.” Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation of Staff do not adequately supervise residents is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No citations issued at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260701093959
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit and entered the facility at 9:30 a.m. Upon arrival, LPA Mosley was greeted by staff who called the Administrator to inform them of the visit. The facility Designee, Karina Antig arrived shortly after and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. This is a single story facility in a residential neighborhood. The LPA and Designee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. INTERVIEWS: Starting at 10 a.m. three (3) staff and three (3) resident interviews were conducted. Staff interview revealed that staff are knowledgeable in Resident rights, different forms of abuse, and reporting procedures. Resident interviews revealed that no concerns were noted or voiced at the time of the visit. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, and dining room. At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. At 12:05 p.m., hardwire combination of smoke / carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguisher was observed and fully charged on 06/19/2026. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted in every room. The emergency telephone numbers are posted in the common hallway. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 05/18/2026 and are conducted quarterly. Activities were observed in the common areas. The fireplace in the living room was adequately screened. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Auditory alarms at the entrances and exits were observed and functional at the time of the visit. LPA observed surveillance cameras installed in the common areas of the facility. The Administrator presented the live monitoring screen to the LPA, confirming that all cameras were functioning properly and that none of them were equipped with audio capability. Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 2... (PAGE 2) Report Continued from LIC 809... BEDROOMS: There are seven (7) total bedrooms in the facility; six (6) bedrooms are designated as private, single occupancy, resident rooms and one (1) staff room. The staff rooms is kept locked at all times. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. During todays visit LPA observed an additional resident bedroom that was addressed in last years annual inspection detailing that they added a dry wall in the living room that created an additional bedroom after licensure. The Administrator presented evidence that the Application -LIC 200 form and the revised facility sketch reflecting the addition were submitted to CCLD on July 15, 2024, at 9:56 p.m. LPA communicated with Ventura County Fire Department (VCFD) inspector requesting an update regarding the inspection that was conducted. LPA was informed by the inspector that an initial inspection was conducted on 07/29/2025 and a subsequent visit was required. LPA has attempted to contact VCFD on multiple occasions regarding the subsequent visit however has been unsuccessful. Designee called Licensee representative Michael Rosales at 12:18 p.m. to inform LPA that a subsequent visit was conducted by VCFD and the facility was cleared however they are unable to access the documentation at the moment. RESTROOMS: There are four (4) restrooms. Two (2) are designated as shared / common restrooms, one is designated at private resident restroom, and one (1) is designated as a staff restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be equipped with slip resistant flooring. Grab bars were observed in the restrooms. The restrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured all resident restrooms and ranged between 107.6-110.5 degrees Fahrenheit, all within the required range LAUNDRY: The laundry area is adjacent to the staff room and staff bathroom. The laundry area is an open concept with shelves above the washer and dryer. The laundry area is accessible through the kitchen area. Laundry detergent and chemicals are stored inaccessible in a large cabinet to the right of the washer and dryer. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency water. Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 3... (PAGE 3) Report Continued from LIC 809-C PAGE 2... KITCHEN: The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at. Knives and sharps were observed in a locked cabinet. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. Two (2) refrigerators and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates. The kitchen faucet was measured for hot water temperature, and it measured 107.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies and other chemicals are kept in a locked under the sink inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency food and water. LPA observed medications to be in a locked cabinet in the kitchen to the left upon entry from the main home entrance. BACKYARD/GARAGE: The entire property is fenced. The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. All passageways were observed to be clear. LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. There is a locked storage shed in the back yard inaccessible to residents. The garage is not accessible to residents. Due to time constraints the LPA will return to complete the annual at a later date. LPA will conduct the file review and medication audit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit and entered the facility at 9:30 a.m. Upon arrival, LPA Mosley was greeted by staff who called the Administrator to inform them of the visit. The Administrator, Karen Rosales arrived shortly after and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. INTERVIEWS: Starting at 9:40 a.m. two (2) staff and three (3) resident interviews were conducted. Staff interview revealed that staff are knowledgeable in Resident rights, different forms of abuse, and reporting procedures. Resident interviews revealed that no concerns were noted or voiced at the time of the visit. The LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. BEDROOMS: There are seven (7) total bedrooms in the facility; six (6) bedrooms are designated as private, single occupancy, resident rooms and one (1) staff room. The staff rooms are kept locked at all times. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. During todays visit LPA observed an additional resident bedroom that was addressed in last years annual inspection detailing that they added a dry wall in the living room that created an additional bedroom after licensure. The Administrator presented evidence that the LIC200 form and the revised facility sketch reflecting the addition were submitted to CCLD on July 15, 2024, at 9:56 p.m. Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 2... (PAGE 2) Report Continued from LIC 809... RESTROOMS: There are four (4) restrooms. Two (2) are designated as shared / common restrooms, one is designated at private resident restroom, and one (1) is designated as a staff restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be equipped with slip resistant flooring. Grab bars were observed in the restrooms. The restrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured all resident restrooms and ranged between 109.6-112.5 degrees Fahrenheit, all within the required range LAUNDRY: The laundry area, with a washer and dryer is behind the kitchen area, directly across from the designated staff room. Laundry detergent and chemicals are stored inaccessible in a large cabinet to the right of the washer and dryer. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency water. KITCHEN: The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at 10:13 a.m. Knives and sharps were observed in a locked cabinet under the sink along with cleaning solutions and other chemicals. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. Two (2) refrigerators and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates. The kitchen faucet was measured for hot water temperature, and it measured 106.7 degrees Fahrenheit at 10:14 a.m. Cleaning supplies and other chemicals are kept in a locked cabinet under the sink inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency food and water. LPA observed medications to be in a locked cabinet in the kitchen to the left upon entry from the main home entrance. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. At 12:18 p.m., hardwire combination of smoke / carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguisher was observed and fully charged on 05/20/2025. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted in every room. The emergency telephone numbers are posted in common hallway. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 07/14/2025 and are conducted quarterly. Activities were observed in the common areas. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Report Continued on LIC 809-C PAGE 3... (PAGE 3) Report Continued from LIC 809-C PAGE 2... BACKYARD/GARAGE: The entire property is fenced. The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. All passageways were observed to be clear. LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. There is a locked storage shed in the back yard inaccessible to residents. The garage is not accessible to residents. INFECTION CONTROL / EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control practices and the facilities emergency disaster plan. The facilities policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control and emergency planning are satisfactory. RECORDS: Record review began at approx. 10:22 a.m. Resident Records were reviewed beginning at 10:22 a.m. and Personnel Records at 11:27 a.m. Six (6) Resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. Four (4) Personnel files including the Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at approximately 12:20 p.m. Medications are in a locked cabinet in the kitchen to the left upon entry from the main home entrance. Medications for four (4) residents were reviewed. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. Medications reviewed were found to be self-administered as prescribed and documented on the centrally stored medication and destruction records. No errors observed during review. DOCUMENTS: LPA obtained the following documents - Resident Roster - LIC 9020, Staff Roster - LIC 500,a copy of the Limited Liability insurance, Application - LIC 200, Updated Facility Sketch, Plan of Correction (POC) for 87202 (a)(2), 87305 (a), and forwarded email with POC from 07/12/2024 visit. No deficiencies were cited during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025
Jul 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a Required annual inspection visit. The LPA met with staff and assistant Administrator Marina Karina Antig. At approximately 12pm., the LPA and Ms. Antig toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: Kitchen knives are stored locked and inaccessible in the kitchen cabinet under the sink. The supply of perishable and nonperishable food is adequate. The supply of dishes is adequate. Appliances in the kitchen were clean and appeared functional. There is a sufficient supply of emergency food and water. Ms. Antig was advised to separate the emergency food supply from their daily supply use. BEDROOMS: There are (7) seven bedrooms in the facility; the facility licensed with four (4) private bedrooms for resident use, (1) shared bedroom for resident use and (1) one staff room. During todays visit LPA observed an additional resident bedroom. Ms. Antig explained that they added a dry wall in the living room. main This room and created an additional bedroom after licensure. All resident rooms have direct access to the outside except for the newly added room. Lighting in the rooms appeared adequate; rooms were set up with all required furniture. BATHROOMS: There are (2) two full bathrooms and (1) one half bath for resident use; the half bathroom near the entrance of the main hallway at the entrance of the home is designated for and guests. The bathroom located in the hallway observed ceiling in needed of patching and paint; also the base board in this bathroom also need to be repaired/painted (rusted/in disrepair). Staff have a private staff bathroom located next to the Staff room. COMMON AREA: The common areas were appropriately furnished, and the lighting was adequate. There is a television and other entertainment equipment in the living room area. The facility smoke alarm system is hard wired; the smoke detectors were operable at the time of the visit. Fire extinguisher observed fully charged and last serviced in 05/2024. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. Emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted. Emergency telephone numbers are posted in hallway bulletin board.Other required postings are also posted in the main hallway bulletin board. LAUNDRY: The laundry area is behind the kitchen area, directly across from the designated staff room. Laundry detergent and chemicals are stored inaccessible in a large cabinet to the right of the washer and dryer. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: At approximately 2pm, a review of the staff files was conducted. Staff lack complete medication training and shadowing by skilled medical professional; Required 40 hour training was not complete for (2) staff present during todays visit. Record Review: At 3pm. a review of facility resident files was initiated. The LPA reviewed six (6) out of six (6) resident files. The following was observed: Two out six residents did not have a pre-placement appraisal (LIC 603), or appraisal/needs and services plan (LIC625). Per assistant administrator resident 2 and 3 are identified as bedridden. Per the fire clearance, the facility does not have a bedridden fire clearance at this time; also failed to notify LPA and obtain fire clearance for newly added resident bedroom. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is assessed, due to a violation of the fire clearance. MEDICATIONS reviewed at approximately 4:30pm: Medications are in a locked cabinet in the kitchen to the left upon entry from the main home entrance. The first aid supplies were complete, including a first aid manual. They were stored in the medication cabinet. Centrally stored medication records for residents is not maintained accordingly (missing start dates); PRN authorization not on file for resident #3. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2024
The state marks this report as 16 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 9. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Happy Homecare, Inc., licensed since 2023, operates 5 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Happy Home Care · Newbury Park
- Happy Home Care II · Thousand Oaks
- Happy Home Care 3 · Thousand Oaks
- Erten Home Care · Thousand Oaks
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Colony of Thousand Oaks at Sidlee West
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.0 mi away
$5,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Colony of Thousand Oaks at Sidlee
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.0 mi away
$5,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Legacy Collection at Sidlee
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.0 mi away
$5,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
143 West Sidlee
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$5,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Select Senior Living IV
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Select Senior Living II
Thousand Oaks · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate