Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Golden Manor Retirement CenterLicense #197606171 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGolden Manor Retirement CenterLicense #197606171 · 1109 West Beverly Blvd., Montebello, CA · (323) 724-3870Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Montebello/Golden Manor Retirement Center
Map · 1109 West Beverly Blvd.

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,050/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $2,350–$3,850 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (323) 724-3870

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GM

Call Golden Manor Retirement Center

Montebello · Licensed for 160

(323) 724-3870

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 160 · Montebello

Golden Manor Retirement Center

1109 West Beverly Blvd., Montebello, CA 90640 · Licensed since 2005

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Golden Manor Retirement Center

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,050 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $2,350–$3,850 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 160: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 64 residents

Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE 64 NON-AMBULATORY AND 96 AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 2ND FLOOR IS APPROVED FOR AMBULATORY RESIDENTS ONLY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Golden Manor Retirement Center: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,050a month to start

Likely $2,350–$3,850

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,050likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,050likely $2,350–$3,850

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,350–$4,050
$3,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,950–$7,400
$5,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,500 to $10,995

$1,500$10,995

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,600–$6,950.

  • Brookdale Uptown WhittierWhittier · 5.1 mi · Large community
    $3,015Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • California Mission InnRosemead · 5.2 mi · Large community
    $3,000Listed on its own website · san gabriel suite · seen October 5, 2026
  • Savant of AlhambraAlhambra · 5.3 mi · Large community
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Greenleaf Court Senior LivingWhittier · 5.7 mi · Large community
    $2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • La PosadaWhittier · 5.7 mi · Large community
    $4,495Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Downey Retirement CenterDowney · 5.8 mi · Large community
    $1,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oakmont of WhittierWhittier · 6.1 mi · Large community
    $4,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Silverado Senior Living - The HuntingtonAlhambra · 6.2 mi · Large community
    $8,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lakewood GardensDowney · 6.5 mi · Large community
    $7,225Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Hollenbeck PalmsLos Angeles · 6.5 mi · Large community
    $6,357Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sakura Gardens at Los AngelesLos Angeles · 6.5 mi · Large community
    $3,420Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Prospect ManorSouth Pasadena · 7.4 mi · Large community
    $5,500Listed on its own website · assisted living, semi-private · seen October 5, 2026
  • Ivy Park at San MarinoSan Gabriel · 7.7 mi · Large community
    $3,995Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
  • Arcadia Gardens Retirement HotelArcadia · 7.8 mi · Large community
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Morningstar of PasadenaPasadena · 8.1 mi · Large community
    $6,825Listed on its own website · assisted living starting rate · seen October 27, 2026
  • Arcadia Retirement VillageArcadia · 8.3 mi · Large community
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Discovery Commons WhittierWhittier · 8.5 mi · Large community
    $3,970Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Del Mar ParkPasadena · 8.6 mi · Large community
    $3,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Regency Park Oak KnollPasadena · 8.7 mi · Large community
    $5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Coral Oaks Care LivingLynwood · 8.7 mi · Large community
    $1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Whittier Glen Assisted LivingWhittier · 9.1 mi · Large community
    $1,550Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Woodruff Care HomeBellflower · 9.2 mi · Large community
    $1,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at CerritosCerritos · 9.4 mi · Large community
    $7,395Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Villa GardensPasadena · 9.5 mi · Large community
    $10,995Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1109 West Beverly Blvd., Montebello, CA 90640Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Adventist Health White Memorial MontebelloHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197606171 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 9 of 27 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Apr 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to complete the required inspection. LPA Trueman toured the facility along with Staff Robert Blanco today 04/13/2026 at 10:30 AM and the following was observed: Facility contains 80 Bedrooms and 80 Bathrooms for residents, dining room, 2 TV rooms , and outdoor patio area.. LPA inspected 10 Rooms which included on the 1st Floor # 3, 16, 20, 26 and 31 and on the 2nd Floor # 47, 51, 61, 63 and 70. Hot water temperature measured between 105 F. and 120 F. meeting Title 22 Regulations. Room 3 (111.3), Room 16 (111.9), Room 20 (110.4), Room 26 (113.5) and Room 31 (115.5). Room 47 (105.5), Room 51 (107.0), Room 61 (112.8), Room 63 (112.8) and Room 70 (114.0), Required Annual inspection included Infection Control Practices, Operational Requirements, Physical Plant/ Environmental Safety, Staffing, Personnel Records/ Staff Training, Resident Records/ Incident Reports, Resident Rights/ Information, Planned Activities, Food Service, Incidental Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. LPA observed sufficient supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non perishables. All staff were cleared and associated. Visitation signage was posted along with signage for hand washing and proper sanitizing. Staff responsible for providing care and supervision received training in First Aid. Licensee maintained an individual admission agreement for each client. Fire Clearance has been maintained. Each client has personal rights free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, ridicule, coercion, threats, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature. Program site was clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at all times for the safety and well being of clients, employees and visitors. Medication was reviewed for 7 Resident's. 7 Resident Files and 7 Staff Files were reviewed. No deficiencies. Exit interview conducted and copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2026
Jan 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman conducted an unannounced case management visit in response to Special Incident Report (SIR) that describes the incident of Resident R1 that occurred on 01/17/2026. LPA met with Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Interviewed Administrator Maria Jacobo during the visit and reviewed Resident R1's file. Facility submitted R1's Identification and Emergency Information, Physician's Report dated 10/2/2025, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan dated 2/15/25, Medication Log for January 2026, and Admission Agreement. SIR stated that there was a loud noise and 2 staff ran outside and observed a police car had crashed into the street light in front of the facility and on the floor was Resident R1. Resident did not respond when staff called out R1's name. 911 was called and ambulance came within seconds. R1 was taken to L.A. USC County Hospital and is currently still there. Administrator Maria Jacobo confirmed that R1 was hit by the police car just steps in front of the facility. Also stated that R1 was still in the hospital and is receiving updates from family member of R1 and will also notify Licensing of R1's status going forward. Physician's Report dated 10/2/2025 is checked off Yes for being able to leave the facility unassisted. No deficiencies. Exit interview conducted and copy provided. .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026

20254 state visits · 5 documents

Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report resident's incident to appropriate parties Staff failed to take action on change of condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff S1 and explained the reason for the visit. Today's visit is a subsequent visit to conduct additional Interviews in regards to the above allegations. Shortly thereafter Administrator Maria Jacobo arrived. The initial visit was conducted on 05/23/25 and included the following: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/23/2025 Administrator Maria Jacobo was interviewed. Staff S1 was interviewed. Resident and Staff Roster submitted. File was reviewed for Resident R 1 and VA Medication List, MAR Log for May 2025, Physician's Report , Special Incident Report (SIR) and ID page submitted. At today's visit 12/18/25 interviews were conducted with Client's C2-C9. Unsubstantiated Interviews were conducted with the Administrator and Staff S1 and Staff S2. In regards to the allegation Staff did not report resident's incident to appropriate parties, based on interviews conducted and information gathered LPA did receive Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 05/12/25 which states that at 9:15PM 05/11/25 Client C1 left the facility to go to a friends house and would return later. Following day 05/12/25 C1 had not returned back to the facility. Report was made to Law Enforcement on 05/12/25 at 3:30PM Case #25-2841 and Case Manager from VA and Conservator for Client C1 were informed. Staff interviewed all stated that Special Incident Report (SIR) was sent on 05/12/25 to Licensing and that Case Manager from VA was notified. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff failed to take action on change of condition, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed upon observation of Medication Log from the VA dated 04/23/2025 that there was no physician's order for Clonozepam and therefore was not on the Medication list. MAR's Log also for the month of 05/25 did not have Clonozepam on the list of medications. Client's C2-C6 all are with the VA and stated the staff does a great job assisting them on VA appointments and transportation and that they have received all doses of their medication and it has always gone smoothly. Client's C7- C9 said they are assisted with all their medications and it has always gone smoothly. Stated staff are great and also assist with food service and any other needs they may have. Staff all stated that Client C1 was admitted on 03/19/25 and had never been prescribed Clonozepam. All said that Client C1 had not refused taking any medication. Physician's Report under listed medications does not have Clonozepam listed, All staff stated that Client C1 never had a change in condition. It should be noted that Client C1 no longer resides at the facility as of 05/11/25. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview with Administrator Maria Jacobo conducted and copies of the report provided..the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250516113955
Nov 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct additional interviews and gather additional information in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit interviews were conducted with the Administrator,and Staff S1-S3. The initial visit was conducted on 10/27/2025 and included the following: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit the following was done: On 10/27/2025 Staff Carmen Virrueta was interviewed. Staff S1 and Staff S2 were interviewed. Resident and Staff Roster submitted. Unsubstantiated Resident's R2-R8 were interviewed. Interview conducted with family member of Resident R1. File was reviewed for Resident R 1 and VA Medication , Physician's Report , Special Incident Report (SIR) and ID page were submitted. In regards to the allegation Staff abandoned resident, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the family member of Resident R1 who stated that the facility did nothing wrong and that they are nice people. Stated R1 makes false accusations and was physically aggressive at the facility. Said R1 walked to the donut shop up the street and they called 911. He ended up at Whittier Hospital and family member said it was him who took R1 to the VA and it's not true that R1 was abandoned. Case Manager at the VA for R1 stated that it definitely wasn't abandonment in regards to R1. R1 was very aggressive and a danger to staff and residents. Said R1 wanted to go to the hospital saying was sick. Has had multiple ER visits. Spoke with staff who stated that the family member of R1 had taken him to the VA and thus it is not true about being abandoned. Family member told them it's too much with his behaviors so he would take to the VA Hospital. Resident's R2-R8 all stated that staff are really good. Said they are treated well. Said staff aren't inappropriate that it is resident's inappropriate toward staff. Resident R6 and R8 stated that R1 was screaming that he hates it here, throwing tables, chairs, library books and scaring alot of resident's. Stated that staff did a good job of calming down R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Illegal eviction based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the family member of Resident R1 who stated that the facility did nothing wrong and that they are nice people. Stated that R1 makes false accusation's saying they stole his wallet, but the hospital called saying they had it. Told him they stole his boots and then they were found. Said R1 has memory problems and also was physically aggressive to staff and resident's. Said it is not true that it was an eviction. Case Manager at the VA for R1 stated that it definitely wasn't an eviction in regards to R1. Stated it was R1 who didn't want to return and was a danger to himself and others at the facility. R1 was very aggressive and a danger to staff and residents. Said R1 wanted to go to the hospital saying was sick. Has had multiple ER visits. Spoke with staff who stated that the family member of R1 had taken him to the VA . Family member told them it's too much with his behaviors so he would take to the VA Hospital. Stated R1 wanted to go back to the Ridgecrest area and kept screaming I hate it here. Resident's R2-R8 all stated that staff are really good. Said they are treated well. Said staff aren't inappropriate that it is resident's inappropriate toward staff. Resident R6 and R8 stated that R1 was screaming that he hates it here, throwing tables, chairs, library books and scaring alot of resident's. Stated that staff did a good job of calming down R1 and never did staff threaten R1 with eviction. It should be noted that the findings will remain Unsubstantiated after additional interviews were conducted and information gathered. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251022084029
Oct 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident Illegal eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit the following was done: On 10/27/2025 Staff Carmen Virrueta was interviewed. Staff S1 and Staff S2 were interviewed. Resident and Staff Roster submitted. Resident's R2-R8 were interviewed. Interview conducted with family member of Resident R1. File was reviewed for Rsident R 1 and VA Medication , Physician's Report , Special Incident Report (SIR) and ID page were submitted. In regards to the allegation Staff abandoned resident, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the family member of Resident R1 who stated that the facility did nothing wrong and that they are nice people. Unsubstantiated Stated R1 makes false accusations and was physically aggressive at the facility. Said R1 walked to the donut shop up the street and they called 911. He ended up at Whittier Hospital and family member said it was him who took R1 to the VA and it's not true that R1 was abandoned. Case Manager at the VA for R1 stated that it definitely wasn't abandonment in regards to R1. R1 was very aggressive and a danger to staff and residents. Said R1 wanted to go to the hospital saying was sick. Has had multiple ER visits. Spoke with staff who stated that the family member of R1 had taken him to the VA and thus it is not true about being abandoned. Family member told them it's too much with his behaviors so he would take to the VA Hospital. Resident's R2-R8 all stated that staff are really good. Said they are treated well. Said staff aren't inappropriate that it is resident's inappropriate toward staff. Resident R6 and R8 stated that R1 was screaming that he hates it here, throwing tables, chairs, library books and scaring alot of resident's. Stated that staff did a good job of calming down R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Illegal eviction based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the family member of Resident R1 who stated that the facility did nothing wrong and that they are nice people. Stated that R1 makes false accusation's saying they stole his wallet, but the hospital called saying they had it. Told him they stole his boots and then they were found. Said R1 has memory problems and also was physically aggressive to staff and resident's. Said it is not true that it was an eviction. Case Manager at the VA for R1 stated that it definitely wasn't an eviction in regards to R1. Stated it was R1 who didn't want to return and was a danger to himself and others at the facility. R1 was very aggressive and a danger to staff and residents. Said R1 wanted to go to the hospital saying was sick. Has had multiple ER visits. Spoke with staff who stated that the family member of R1 had taken him to the VA . Family member told them it's too much with his behaviors so he would take to the VA Hospital. Stated R1 wanted to go back to the Ridgecrest area and kept screaming I hate it here. Resident's R2-R8 all stated that staff are really good. Said they are treated well. Said staff aren't inappropriate that it is resident's inappropriate toward staff. Resident R6 and R8 stated that R1 was screaming that he hates it here, throwing tables, chairs, library books and scaring alot of resident's. Stated that staff did a good job of calming down R1 and never did staff threaten R1 with eviction. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251022084029
May 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit and was greeted by Staff Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to complete the required inspection. Shortly thereafter Administrator Maria Jacobo arrived. LPA Trueman toured the facility along with Staff Robert Blanco today 05/23/2025 at 9:00AM and the following was observed: Facility contains 80 Bedrooms and 80 Bathrooms for residents, dining room, 2 TV rooms , and outdoor patio area.. LPA inspected 11 Rooms which included on the 1st Floor # 8, 16, 23, 32, and 70. On the 2nd Floor #35, 45, 46, 66, 72, and 77. Hot water temperature measured between 105 F. and 120 F. meeting Title 22 Regulations. Room 8 (107.9), Room 16 (112.4), Room 23 (113.5), Room 32 (114.2) and Room 70 (112.8). Room 35 (106.2), 45 (109.2), Room 46 (110.4), Room 66 (107.2), Room 72 (112.2) and Room 77 (105.0) Required Annual inspection included Infection Control Practices, Operational Requirements, Physical Plant/ Environmental Safety, Staffing, Personnel Records/ Staff Training, Resident Records/ Incident Reports, Resident Rights/ Information, Planned Activities, Food Service, Incidental Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. LPA observed sufficient supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non perishables. All staff were cleared and associated. Visitation signage was posted along with signage for hand washing and proper sanitizing. Staff responsible for providing care and supervision received training in First Aid. Licensee maintained an individual admission agreement for each client. Fire Clearance has been maintained. (cont. on 809 c ) Each client has personal rights free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, ridicule, coercion, threats, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature. Program site was clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at all times for the safety and well being of clients, employees and visitors. Medication was reviewed for 7 Resident's. 7 Resident Files and 5 Staff Files were reviewed. Interviews were conducted with 5 Resident's and 3 Staff. During tour of the facility it was observed in Resident Room 35 Screen in the sliding door and Room 45 that there is a tear in the window screen. In Room 77 the Resident's mattress had a very large tear in the middle of the mattress. Deficiencies to be cited on a new 809 Case Management - Deficiencies which contains the specific citations which are not located in the Care Tools. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025
May 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

The purpose of this report is to issue deficiencies that were observed during the 2025 Annual Inspection. The specific deficiencies to be cited are not located in the Care Tools. During tour of the facility the following was observed. In Resident Room 35 sliding door screen has a tear and Room 45 there is a tear in the window screen. In Room 77 the Resident's mattress had a very large tear in the middle of the mattress. Deficiencies cited on the 809 D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2025

Maintenance and Operation All window screens shall be clean and maintained in good repair. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Facility failed to have window screens in good repair in resident room 35 sliding door screen and Room 45 window screen which posed a potential Health and Safety Risk to residents care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility to submit proof of repair of window screens by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

Maintenance and Operation The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Facility failed to have the resident's mattress in good repair in Room 77 which posed a potential Health and Safety Risk to residents care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility to submit proof of repair of resident's mattress by POC due date.

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff at facility failed to properly store medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff Robert Blanco and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegation. At today's visit the following was done: On 10/03/2024 Resident and Staff Roster submitted. Interviews were conducted with the Administrator and Staff S1 and Resident's R2, R3, R5 and R6.. Resident R1 and R4 were unable to be interviewed because of being hospitalized. File for Resident R1 was reviewed and Admissions Agreement and Physician's Report were submitted. LPA conducted a tour along with Staff S1 which included Rooms 3, 12, 13, 14, 17 and 27. LPA reviewed doctor's orders for Resident R2- R6. In regards to the allegation Staff at facility failed to properly store medication, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed by the Administrator and Staff S1 that they were informed during a tour of Resident R1's room by a Veteran Affairs (VA) Representative that there was an inhaler in the room of Substantiated Resident R1..Both staff confirmed that the inhaler was in Resident R1's room and that a doctor's order was needed and Resident R1 did not have a doctor's order. Interview with VA Representative stated that inhaler was found in Resident R1's room and that there was not a doctor's order allowing it to be in the room. Physician's Report for Resident R1 dated 08/19/24 listed under Medication Management, ls able to administer own Prescription Medications it states no. Also listed for Resident R1 under able to administer own PRN medications it states no. Interviews were conducted with Resident's R2, R3, and R6 who all stated taht they use the inhaler and they take on their own and have had no issues. All 3 had a doctor's note for the inhaler to be in their room. Resident R5 also had a doctor's note for Tylenol and stated it has gone smoothly. Resident R1 and R4 are both hospitalized. There was a doctor's order for Resident R4 to have an inhaler in their bedroom. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240926144908

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 3, 2024

Incidental Medical and Dental Care The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to ensure that medication was kept in a safe and locked space with inhaler observed in R1's room which posed an Immediate Health and Safety concern.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility to submit by POC due date training regarding medication management and submit signed log of who had attended. Administrator at visit submitted a Training Log pertaining to medication management that was conducted on 10/02/24. Deficiency cleared.

Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted an unannounced Required 1-year visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Maria Jacobo, administrator for the facility, and was granted entrance. There are seventy-six (76) total residents residing in the facility, six (6) of which are non-ambulatory and seventy (70) of which are ambulatory. The following 12 (CARE) tool domains were observed and reviewed: Infection Control, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Operational Requirements, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Resident Rights/Information, Resident Records/Incident Reports, Food Service, Planned Activities, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. Infection Control: · Infection control practices and Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) were observed. · Infection control plan is on file. Physical Plant/Environment Safety: · The facility is a two-story building located in a residential neighborhood. It is licensed for a capacity of sixty-four (64) non-ambulatory residents and ninety-six (96) ambulatory residents, and the second floor of the facility is approved only for ambulatory residents. The facility consists of a kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a television room, eighty resident bedrooms, a public resident restroom, and two outdoor patio areas that contain a shaded area. LPA checked seven (7) resident bedrooms and found that they had all the required furnishings and fixtures, and LPA also measured the hot water temperature in the public bathroom, along with the bathrooms of resident rooms #10, 11, 23, 27, 37, 55, 58, 61, 63, and 70, all of which fell within the required range of 105 – 120 Degrees Fahrenheit. The facility was observed to be in good repair. ·The interior and exterior physical plant was inspected. Exit doors are free of any obstruction. The facility has multiple fully charged fire extinguisher located throughout the facility. · Water temperature readings were within the required range of 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Operational Requirements: · The Program Design was reviewed. · Fire clearance was approved by LA County Fire Department for a capacity of sixty-four (64) non-ambulatory residents and ninety-six (96) ambulatory residents, and the second floor of the facility is approved only for ambulatory residents. · Care and supervision to meet the clients’ needs was observed. Staffing: · Twenty-one (21) full-time staff members provide care and supervision to the clients. Personnel Records/Staff Training: · Seven (7) staff files were reviewed for criminal background clearance and training. · Seven (7) staff records reviewed have health/TB screenings. · The administrator’s certificate expires on 11/2/2025. Resident Rights/Information: · Physician orders were reviewed for seven (7) resident files. · Medications were also reviewed for seven (7) residents. Resident Records/Incident Reports: · Seven (7) resident files were reviewed containing admission agreements, Physician's Report, medical/functional assessments, Needs and Services Plans, TB clearance, Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, personal rights, medical consent, and medication records were reviewed. Food Service: · The kitchen was inspected and has sufficient supply of 2-day perishable & 7-day non-perishable food. Kitchen, food preparation area, and storage areas were observed to be clean and sanitary. Incident Medical and Dental: · All residents have an Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan on file. · Staff training was on file. Disaster Preparedness: · Emergency and Disaster Plan was publicly posted and found within the facility. · The last emergency and disaster drill was conducted on 2/14/2024, which is not within the requirement that the drill be conducted quarterly. Planned Activities: · Sufficient Space is provided to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. · Sufficient equipment and supplies are provided to meet the requirements of the activity program. Residents with Special Health Care Needs: · There is an adequate number of staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her appraisal. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiency observed during the visit is documented on the LIC809D. Exit interview held and a copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 18 documents

20238 state visits · 8 documents

Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a safe environment for residents. Facility is not in good repair. Facility has bedbugs. Facility does not provide meals and snacks for diabetic diet. Facility does not provide adequate food service. Resident is not receiving mail. Resident did not get 60-day notice of rent increase. Facility does not provide activities.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a subsequent complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Maria Jacobo, and explained the purpose of the visit. On 7/8/21, LPA Glenn Trueman conducted the initial visit and interviewed the administrator and a resident. On 10/30/23, LPA Chan toured the facility and randomly selected 8 rooms (rooms #4, #11, #23, #26, #36, #44, #51, and #68) to inspect. Interviews were held with the administrator, 5 Staff, and 8 Residents. LPA also reviewed 5 resident files. The investigation revealed the following: 1. Allegation - Staff did not maintain a safe environment for residents. It was alleged that the staff allow people to smoke inside their rooms, allow to sell marijuana, and have registered sex offenders at the facility. LPA interviewed administrator, staff, and residents. Unsubstantiated The administrator stated the residents could smoke outside in the patios or outdoors but not in their rooms. She had not heard of any residents selling marijuana in the facility nor do they hire staff or admit residents who are registered sex offenders. Staff stated they do not allow residents to smoke in their rooms. They have not witnessed any residents selling marijuana or other drugs either. 7 out of the 8 residents interviewed stated the residents do not smoke in their rooms. They go outside to the patio where it is allowed. They have not seen or heard of any residents selling marijuana at the facility. They stated they feel safe residing here. 2. Allegation - Facility is not in good repair. It was alleged that the air conditioner was not working for almost 2 years, the elevators are frequently breaking down, and the ceiling had leaks. Per the administrator and staff, when things are not working properly, the maintenance personnel will try to fix it immediately. She stated the facility is an older building and they are maintaining the physical plant as best as they could. When the elevator is in disrepair, she contacts the outside elevator technician and they come right away to repair it. During the tour today, LPA observed the elevator and air conditioners working properly. The rooms inspected did not have any water leaks from ceiling. 3 out of 8 residents stated the elevator breaks down at time but they will fix it right away. One reported the elevator has been down for 10 months. The rest did not have any issues with things in disrepair. 3. Allegation - Facility has bedbugs. Administrator and staff stated they have not seen or received any reports of bedbugs from residents. LPA obtained the pest control report which was last serviced on 6/6/23. Per administrator, the maintenance staff has been performing the pest inspections and spraying the facility. Staff stated the maintenance person conducts random room checks every week to observe for pests. 7 out of the 8 residents interviewed had not seen any bedbugs in their rooms. During the visit today, LPA inspected 8 rooms and found a dead bed bug with blood stain in room #36. Although a bed bug was discovered, the facility does not have an infestation of pests nor has not been neglectful. The maintenance staff has been inspecting rooms weekly to ensure there are no bugs. 4. Allegation - Facility does not provide meals and snacks for diabetic diet. Administrator and staff stated their meal plans are created and meets the dietary needs of the residents. The foods are cooked with minimal salt and offer sugar-free desserts. LPA also interviewed the dietitian via telephone, who stated a visit is conducted monthly to ensure there is adequate food supplies, cleanliness of the kitchen, and the menu is appropriate for residents’ diets. At the visit today, LPA observed serving of foods that meet the different food groups. They had rice, chicken, soup, vegetables, and jello. 7 out of 8 residents stated the facility serves foods that are appropriate for those who are diabetics or have dietary restrictions. One stated he/she cooks own food and does not eat the food served at the facility. 5. Allegation - Facility does not provide adequate food service. It was alleged the facility rarely serve the foods reflected on the menu. Per administrator, the cook will replace an item in the menu if it is not available that day and stated it does not occur often. The cook stated the menu is generated ahead of time and they will ensure there is sufficient items. Cook will also follow the menu and cook with less salt/sugar. They also have alternatives if residents do not want the main course. 6 out of the 8 residents interviewed stated the facility serve the foods according to the menu. 6. Allegation - Resident is not receiving mail. Administrator stated mails are received usually in the mornings and are distributed to the residents while they are having lunch or are brought to the resident rooms. Staff stated they are sometimes asked to deliver their mails and do not open their mails. LPA interviewed 8 residents, and all stated they receive their mails unopened. 7. Allegation - Resident did not get 60-day notice of rent increase. The administrator stated the rent increases as the Social Security office increases the SSI amount. A notice is provided to the person who pays the rent, which is either the resident or family member. The letter is given ahead of time and when the facility receives notification of increase for SSI recipients only. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and observed they have signed admission agreement acknowledging the increased rates. One resident refused to accept the rent increase and did not sign form. 3 of the 8 residents interviewed stated they will receive notification before the rent increases, while one indicated the facility did not provide notice. The rest of the residents either have not had an increase of rent at the moment or someone else pays their rent. 8. Allegation - Facility does not provide activities. LPA toured the facility and observed an activity calendar. There are board games and books available for residents to use. The ping pong table is available when requested. Administrator and staff stated they provide activities to residents daily. The residents interviewed stated there are some types of activities provided daily, but some do not wish to participate. They also have board games, coloring, and books available. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with administrator Jacobo. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210629134833
Sep 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bruising at the facility. Facility is not maintained clean. Residents are not fed nutritious foods at the facility. Residents do not have access to healthcare while at the facility. Facility house-keeping staff is bathing residents at the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera made an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility and met Administrator Maria Jacobo, the purpose for todays visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/23/21 LPA Glenn Truman conducted the initial 10 day visit and interviewed Resident's 1-6 and Staff 1-2, toured dining room, observed dinner meal being served and obtained copies of Resident and Staff Rosters. LPA Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent on 9/21/23, obtained a copy of the Staff/Resident rosters, copies of the 4 rotating food menus, toured the facility with Administrator Maria Jacobo, observed lunch being served for day, interviewed 6 Staff and 8 residents, and obtained copies of staff trained to assist residents with Activities of Daily Living. (continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Resident sustained bruising at the facility. It is alleged that residents at the facility have complained about physical abuse and there are claims of having photos to prove alleged abuse. LPA’s Herrera and Truman conducted a total of 13 interviews combined and 12 out of 13 residents deny the above allegation and state that they have never been abused or bruised by staff. Resident 1 (R1) provided photos of bruising to LPA Herrera although the photos do contain bruising on ankle, hand, and other unknown areas, it could not be determined that the bruising was caused by staff as there were no other witnesses or video footage of incident. Interviews with staff present during alleged abuse incident (Staff 1, 3 and 4) denied causing injury or bruising to R1 and state they were unaware of any bruising and do not know how resident sustained bruises and/or injuries. LPA observed police report provided by R1, however, report does not indicate bruising or supportive evidence that the officers observed the alleged injuries. Allegation: Facility is not maintained clean. It is alleged that the facility is visibly filthy. LPA toured both floors of facility during todays visit including common areas, kitchen and 5 resident rooms. Facility appeared to be clean and sanitary, beds were made, floors in rooms were clean and trash within rooms were empty. LPA observed house keepers cleaning and moping resident rooms during tour. 12 out of 13 residents interviewed denied the above allegation, stated that the facility is cleaned daily, rooms get a deep cleaning weekly, housekeepers make beds and take out residents trash within rooms daily. 6 out of 6 staff interviewed denied the above allegation and stated that the facility is cleaned regularly during each shift and as needed, deep cleaning in residents rooms are scheduled for once weekly, however, housekeeping makes beds and takes out residents trash within their rooms daily. Allegation: Residents are not fed nutritious foods at the facility. It is alleged that the facility provides a poor nourishment to the residents in care. LPA toured kitchen and meal served during lunch hour, the kitchen had proper food supply to meet regulations. Meal was observed to be of proper nutrition and included fruit, vegetable, meat and bread, alternate lunch was also observed. LPA reviewed monthly menu, facility has 4 different month menus that are rotated. (Continued on 9099-C) 11 out of 13 residents interviewed denied the above allegation and state that the food served is of proper nutrition and satisfying. 6 out of 6 staff interviewed stated that the facility follows menu schedule, they offer alternative menu options and meals are of proper nutrition. Allegation: Residents do not have access to healthcare while at the facility. It is alleged that the facility provides residents with a lack of proper access to health care. No additional information was provided. 6 out of 6 Staff interviews revealed that some residents are independent and prefer to handle their own medical needs, however, there is an in house primary physician and psychiatric doctor who visit with residents on a monthly basis, this option is offered upon admission and the facility provides transportation for residents who need to see doctors outside of the facility. 12 out of 13 residents deny the above allegation and state that the facility provides access to in house visits with the facilities primary doctor and/or psychiatric doctor monthly, those who are independent and handle their own medical appointments stated that the facility provides them with the transportation needed to visit with their doctor. Allegation: Facility house-keeping staff is bathing residents at the facility. It is alleged that the facility house-keeping staff is assisting with bathing residents. No additional information was provided. 6 out of 6 interviews with staff revealed that all staff are trained in assisting with residents activities of daily living (ADL’s) which include bathing, incontinence care and grooming. LPA reviewed training logs for staff and observed staff listed as “house-keeping” and "kitchen staff" have received the proper training to assist residents with ADL’s. Of the 8 interviews conducted during todays visit only 1 resident requires assistance with bathing and stated that a caregiver is who assists with their bathing and grooming. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/clients, review of training records and LPA observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Maria Jacobo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023 · control 28-AS-20211222080952
Sep 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries while in care. Staff allowing residents access to medication room.

The purpose of the visit is to add additional details to the 9099 A and 9099 D. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The visit is a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations and deliver findings. The initial visit was conducted on 06/30/2021 and the following was done: The purpose of the visit is to conduct a Health and Safety check. Tour of the facility was conducted at 2:00 PM with LPA and Administrator and included the following: 1st floor rooms 1-32 and 2nd floor rooms 33-80, dining room, kitchen, activity room, library, med room, nurses room and 2 outdoor patios. LPA Trueman conducted interviews with the Administrator and S 1 from 2:25 PM to 2:50 PM. At today's visit 08/17/2023 from 8:45 AM to 9:15 AM Staff S 2- S 4 were interviewed. From 9:15 AM to 10:40 AM Resident's R2- R 11 were interviewed. In regards to Resident sustained injuries while in care, based on interviews conducted and information gathered interviews with 10 out of 10 resident's who all stated they had not witnessed or heard of staff Unsubstantiated harming or injuring resident's in any way. 10 of 10 resident's stated that staff are doing a good job and carry out all their responsibilities and have not witnessed staff treating resident's badly in any way. Staff interviewed stated that S 2- S 4 had gone to R 1's room to discuss the rent raise. Stated that they had handed the letter to R 1 with the rent increase and R 1 was the one to cause injury by slamming the door on S 2's foot. Law Enforcement did arrive at the facility and there were no charges against facility staff. There is no evidence provided to support that facility staff caused the injuries to R 1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff allowing residents access to medication room, based on interviews conducted and information gathered 10 out of 10 resident's stated that staff does a good job assisting them with their medication. Stated that the med-tech is in the med- room to assist with all their medications and that the resident's do not have access to the med room. All 10 stated staff is always there and if not the door is always locked. Staff interviewed stated that resident's definitely do not have access to the med room and it is always locked or staff are in the med room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Rent was to be increased commencing 01/01/2021. LPA observed facility letters of rent increase dated 11/01/2020, 02/16/2021, and 06/24/2021. Interviews conducted revealed that Staff confirmed that Resident R 1 was the only resident that was informed by 3 staff in person. Based on LPA's observations, and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found Substantiated. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Maria Jacobo Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210629154733

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 24, 2023

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews conducted licensee failed to ensure that resident's be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, with 3 staff harassing R1 by going to their room about the rent which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility to review regulation regarding Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities and conduct a staff training regarding personal rights and submit a signed log of those who attended by POC due date.

Sep 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow mask use guidelines. Facility staff did not have adequate PPE. Facility is not cleaning and disinfecting as needed to prevent spread of infection.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations. Upon arriving at the facility, LPA met with Assistant Administrator - Carmen Virrueta and Administrator Maria Jacobo who later assisted with the visit, the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/16/2021 LPA Glenn Trueman conducted the initial visit and interviewd 3 Staff, due to insufficient information available at the time further investigation was needed. During todays visit LPA Herrera obtained the following documents: Resident/Staff Roster, Infection Control Plan, Covid-19 Mitigation Plan Report, and training logs for ongoing Covid training. Observed sinage thoughout the facility for disinfection, cough ettiquette, and hand washing procedures, along with a storage room filled with PPE supplies that included: masks, disposible gowns, face shields, gloves, hand sanitizer, and antigen Covid tests. Interviewed 8 Residents and 5 Staff (all of which were living/employed at facility during pandemic). (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility did not follow mask use guidelines. It is alleged that at the time the order was given to wear masks at all times residents were not prompted to do so, only time they were was when taking a Covid test. Review of training logs showed ongoing training of Covid guidelines for mask use. During interviews with Staff 5 out of 5 Staff stated that during the Covid period staff tried their best efforts to mandate the masking requirements, although sometimes residents would not wear their masks and give some push back, Staff would continuously remind them to put on their mask and wear them properly at all times, after the reminders the residents would cooperate. During interviews with residents 8 out of 8 residents denied the above allegation and stated that they were constantly encouraged and reminded to wear masks and if a resident wasn't wearing a mask staff would ask them to put one on or provide them with a mask and have them put it on. Allegation: Facility staff did not have adequate PPE. It is alleged that PPE supplies was not readily available until after a quarantine was issued. LPA observed the PPE supply during todays visit, there was a storage room that had cabinets filled with masks, gowns, shield, gloves, Lysol and hand sanitizer. LPA interviewed Staff and 5 out of 5 Staff all stated that the facility has maintained sufficient PPE supplies since the start of the pandemic and that supplies were provided regularly by the city, licensing and purchased by facility as well. Staff also stated that there were PPE supply stations throughout the facility so that it was readily available when needed, and would be refilled when running low. During interviews with Residents 8 out of 8 residents interviewed denied the above allegation. Residents interviewed stated that they never had issues with getting any masks or sanitizer during that time or now, they also stated that masks were always readily available and if they didn't have a mask or other PPE supplies they could ask for some at the front desk and supplies were provided right away. Allegation: Facility is not cleaning and disinfecting as needed to prevent spread of infection. It is alleged that there is insufficient deep cleaning and disinfection done at the facility. LPA interviewed 5 Staff and 5 out of 5 Staff stated that the cleaning was increased once the pandemic hit, disinfection and cleaning was done hourly and even in-between as needed, and staff are still practicing the disinfection procedures. Review of training logs showed ongoing training of Covid guidelines for disinfection and (Continued on 9099-C) cleaning. LPA interviewed 8 Residents and 8 out of 8 denied the above allegation and stated that they noticed Staffs increase of cleaning and disinfecting. Residents interviewed stated they feel that staff was cleaning all the time and all throughout the day. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff and residents, and review of training and Infection Control Plan, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Maria Jacobo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20211208141338
Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the activities calendar was posted Staff are not providing activities to residents in care Staff did not ensure the menu was up to date and posted

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit the following was done: On 08/31/2023 Resident and Staff Roster submitted. Interviews were conducted with Administrator and Resident's R1-R 6 from 1:10 PM to 2:20 PM. In regards to the allegation Staff did not ensure the activities calendar was posted, based on interviews conducted and information gathered 6 of 6 residents stated that the activities calendar has not been posted. Interview with Administrator who confirmed that activities calendar was not posted when Ombudsman had visited the facility on 3 different occasion's. At today's visit LPA did not observe the Activity calendar posted. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Substantiated Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. In regards to the allegation Staff are not providing activities to residents in care, based on interviews conducted and information gathered 6 of 6 resident's stated that there are no group activities done by a facility staff member on a daily basis. All 6 stated that they do no activities other than only Bingo on Tuesday's. Said they just watch television and hang out all day. Interview with Administrator who stated that they do Bingo and there is not 1 full time staff member responsible for doing activities with the resident's. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. In regards to the allegation Staff did not ensure the menu was up to date and posted, based on interviews conducted and information gathered, at today's visit LPA saw the menu was posted, but it was dated 08/20 to 08/26 which was for the previous week. Interviews with 2 of 6 resident's who stated that the menu posted is not accurate. Interview with Administrator who confirmed that at Ombudsman's visit the menu was outdated and then staff brought current one. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230823145835

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(d) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 1, 2023

Planned Activities In facilities licensed for seven (7) or more persons, notices of planned activities shall be posted in a central location readily accessible to residents, relatives, and representatives of placement and referral agencies. Copies shall be retained for at least six (6) months. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to post activities calendar as confirmed by 6 of 6 resident's, observation by LPA and confirmation by administrator which poses an Immediate Health and Safety Concern to resident's in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility to post Activity's calendar and submit by POC due date proof that it is posted.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(f) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2023

Planned Activities In facilities licensed for fifty (50) persons or more, one staff member shall have full-time responsibility to organize, conduct and evaluate planned activities, and shall be given such staff assistance as necessary in order for all residents to participate in accordance with their interests and abilities. The program of activities shall be written, planned in advance, kept up-to-date, and made available to all residents. The responsible employee shall have had at least one year of experience in conducting group activities and be knowledgeable in evaluating resident needs, supervising other employees, and in training volunteers. This requirement is not as evidenced by: Licensee failed to have one staff member having full time responsibility to organize, conduct and evaluate planned activities with 6 of 6 resident's stating there are not group activities being done which poses an Immediate Health and Safety Concern to resident's in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility to submit to Licensing by POC due date staff member to have full time responsibility of activities and submit verification of 1 year experience in conducting group activities and be knowledgeable in evaluating resident needs, supervising other employees, and in training volunteers.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2023

General food Service Requirements The following food service requirements shall apply: In facilities for sixteen (16) persons or more, menus shall be written at least one week in advance and copies of the menus as served shall be dated and kept on file for at least 30 days. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility at today's visit had menu posted dated 08/20 to 08/26 which is not the current week which poses an Immediate Health and Safety Concern to resident's in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator to self-certify that all menus posted will be current and submit by POC due date.

Aug 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries while in care. Staff allowing residents access to medication room.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The visit is a subsequent visit to investigate the above allegations and deliver findings. The initial visit was conducted on 06/30/2021 and the following was done: The purpose of the visit is to conduct a Health and Safety check. Tour of the facility was conducted at 2:00 PM with LPA and Administrator and included the following: 1st floor rooms 1-32 and 2nd floor rooms 33-80, dining room, kitchen, activity room, library, med room, nurses room and 2 outdoor patios. LPA Trueman conducted interviews with the Administrator and S 1 from 2:25 PM to 2:50 PM. At today's visit 08/17/2023 from 8:45 AM to 9:15 AM Staff S 2- S 4 were interviewed. From 9:15 AM to 10:40 AM Resident's R2- R 11 were interviewed. In regards to Resident sustained injuries while in care, based on interviews conducted and information gathered interviews with 10 out of 10 resident's who all stated they had not witnessed or heard of staff Unsubstantiated harming or injuring resident's in any way. 10 of 10 resident's stated that staff are doing a good job and carry out all their responsibilities and have not witnessed staff treating resident's badly in any way. Staff interviewed stated that S 2- S 4 had gone to R 1's room to discuss the rent raise. Stated that they had handed the letter to R 1 with the rent increase and R 1 was the one to cause injury by slamming the door on S 2's foot. Law Enforcement did arrive at the facility and there were no charges against facility staff. There is no evidence provided to support that facility staff caused the injuries to R 1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff allowing residents access to medication room, based on interviews conducted and information gathered 10 out of 10 resident's stated that staff does a good job assisting them with their medication. Stated that the med-tech is in the med- room to assist with all their medications and that the resident's do not have access to the med room. All 10 stated staff is always there and if not the door is always locked. Staff interviewed stated that resident's definitely do not have access to the med room and it is always locked or staff are in the med room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210629154733

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 24, 2023

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews conducted licensee failed to ensure that resident's be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, with 3 staff harassing R1 by going to their room about the rent which caused an immediate health and safety concern to resident's in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023

Plan of correction: Facility to review regulation regarding Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities and conduct a staff training regarding personal rights and submit a signed log of those who attended by POC due date.

Jun 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit and was greeted by Staff Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to complete the required inspection. Shortly thereafter Administrator Maria Jacobo arrived. LPA Trueman toured the facility along with Staff Carmen Virrueta today 06/29/2023 at 11:15 AM and the following was observed: Facility contains 80 Bedrooms and 80 Bathrooms for residents, dining room, 2 TV rooms , and outdoor patio area.. LPA inspected 10 Rooms which included on the 1st Floor # 3, 20, 25, 26 and 31 and on the 2nd Floor # 36, 55, 61, 73 and 78. Hot water temperature measured between 105 F. and 120 F. meeting Title 22 Regulations. Room 3 (108.1), Room 20 (111.7), Room 25 (113.5), Room 26 (114.6) and Room 31 (115.5). Room 36 (116.2), Room 55 (114.4), Room 61 (114.4), Room 73 (116) and Room 78 (117.1). Required Annual inspection included Infection Control Practices, Operational Requirements, Physical Plant/ Environmental Safety, Staffing, Personnel Records/ Staff Training, Resident Records/ Incident Reports, Resident Rights/ Information, Planned Activities, Food Service, Incidental Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Residents with Special Health Needs. LPA observed sufficient supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non perishables. All staff were cleared and associated. Visitation signage was posted along with signage for hand washing and proper sanitizing. Staff responsible for providing care and supervision received training in First Aid. Licensee maintained an individual admission agreement for each client. Fire Clearance has been maintained. Each client has personal rights free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, ridicule, coercion, threats, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature. Program site was clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at all times for the safety and well being of clients, employees and visitors. Medication was reviewed for 7 Resident's. 7 Resident Files and 7 Staff Files were reviewed. Interviews were conducted with 5 Resident's and 3 Staff. No deficiencies. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2023
Jan 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to complete the required inspection. LPA Trueman toured the facility along with Administrator Maria Jacobo today 01/25/2023 at 1:30 PM and the following was observed: Facility contains 80 Bedrooms and 80 Bathrooms for residents, dining room, 2 TV rooms , and activity room. Required Annual inspection included Infection Control Domain and check of the food supply, medications and criminal clearance check. LPA observed sufficient supply of 2 day perishables and 7 day non perishables. All staff were cleared and associated. Visitation signage was posted along with signage for hand washing and proper sanitizing. Temperature checks are conducted 2x a day and logged. Staff have been trained in hand washing. Staff are sufficient with no shortages and there is a plan to replace workers if ill. There are rooms available if isolation is needed. Staff wear masks, gloves and face shields. Bathrooms have proper signage for hand washing. There are multiple stations for hand sanitizing. Social distancing is implemented. Meal times are sanitized after each meal. Facility has sufficient supply of PPE. Facility has a specific plan to ensure proper cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces and laundry; commonly touched surfaces are cleaned and disinfected at least once every shift . Plan when to notify medical provider if symptoms develop or COVID-19 exposure or when to call 911 for severe respiratory distress. No deficiencies. Exit interview conducted with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2023

20227 state visits · 7 documents

Dec 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are forcing resident to take medicine. Staff are withholding resident's money.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit the following was done: On 12/23/2022 from 9:45 AM to 11:15 AM Administrator, Staff S1 and Resident's 1-8 were interviewed. Resident and Staff Roster submitted. File was reviewed for Resident R 9 and Medication Sheet and Physician's Report submitted for Resident R 9. In regards to the allegation Staff are forcing resident to take medicine, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed that 8 of 8 residents that were interviewed all have been administered their medication correctly without error and have never been forced to take medication. Stated staff have done a good job and get it correct all the time. Residents interviewed range from 5 to 14 years residing at the facility. Unsubstantiated Staff interviewed stated that medication has always been given correctly and they have never forced any resident to take medication. Documentation from the Medication List for R 9 shows from 12/1-12/22 that R 9 has refused medication. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff are withholding resident's money, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed that 8 of 8 residents that were interviewed all stated that on the 1st of the month they have received $154 and the facility has always given that amount without missing and without error. Residents interviewed range from 5 to 14 years residing at the facility. Staff interviewed stated that $154 is always given the 1st of the month and there have been no errors. Stated that R 9 has always received the $154. Administrator provided copies of R9's monthly checks from County of Los Angeles Public Administrator in the amount of $1231.77 and $154. Client/Resident Cash Sheet was observed with signatures of residents receiving the monthly $154. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2022 · control 28-AS-20221219122950
Aug 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff sedated resident with meds causing resident to pass out Staff not making sure resident is given enough water

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Assistant Administrator Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegations. At today's visit 08/05/22 at 9:30 AM S1 was interviewed. Staff S1 stated Resident R1 was not a resident at this facility and resides at another licensed facility. LPA spoke with S2 staff at another licensed facility who confirmed that R1 is a resident at that facility. Resident Roster was submitted at today's visit and it does not list R1 as a resident. Based on interviews conducted and review of rosters it was determined that R 1 does not reside at this facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegations are deemed UNFOUNDED. A finding of UNFOUNDED means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220728164752
Jun 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not safeguard resident's personal items

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegation. At today's visit the following was done: Interviews were conducted with Resident's R1-R 7 from 9:15 AM to 10:15 AM. Interviews were conducted with Administrator and Staff S1 from 8:45 AM to 9:15 AM. Tour of Resident 1's Room # 35 was conducted with LPA and Administrator. In regards to the allegation Staff does not safeguard resident's personal items, based on interviews conducted and information gathered Resident R 2 stated that a brand new pair of pants that were left in her room were missing. Stated she had told the Administrator about it. Interview was conducted with the Administrator who confirmed that the resident had told her about the item missing and that the facility will replace the item. R 2 also stated that about a year ago she had been at the hospital and when she returned to the facility Substantiated her fur coat, a jacket and purses were missing. It should be noted that on tour of R1's room container to make coffee was inside the room and wasn't missing. There was no flashlight observed in the room. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220616113336

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87218(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 27, 2022

Theft and Loss (a) The licensee shall ensure an adequate theft and loss program as specified in Health and Safety Code Section 1569.153. A licensee who fails to make reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property, shall reimburse a resident for or replace stolen or lost resident property at its current value. The licensee shall be presumed to have made reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property if there is clear and convincing evidence of efforts to meet each requirement specified in Section 1569.153. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Resident #2's new pants were missing from her room which was confirmed by the Administrator in which it was not included in the residents personal property, or valuables which causes an Immediate Health safety Risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2022

Plan of correction: The licensee will ensure to help monitor and safeguard all of the residents property and valuables while in care. The licensee/Administrator will replace residents #2's item that is missing and submit receipt by POC due date..

Jun 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is threatening other residents.

Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Maria Jacobo Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 11/17/21 LPA Flores interviewed administrator, resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4), requested staff/resident roster, incident reports for the last month, face sheets, physician's reports, medication sheets, and needs/care appraisal. On 6/6/22 LPA Flores requested a copy of current resident/staff roster, interviewed staff #2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5), Resident #5(R5),#6(R6), #7(R7),#8(R8), and requested copies of R5,R6,R7,R8 identification and emergency sheet, physician's report, medication sheets, needs/care appraisal, and incident report dated 12/21/21. (CONTINUED ON LIC9099C) Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Resident is threatening other residents. It is alleged R1 tried to throw a bottle at R2 and that R1 was going to harm R2. Interviews with residents revealed 5 out of 8 residents interviewed stated to have observed residents get into verbal arguments and residents use threats toward other residents during those verbal arguments and staff have not intervene on such instances. 2 out of 8 residents have not observed residents involved in verbal arguments or residents threatening other residents. 1 out of 8 residents refused to be interview. Interviews with staff revealed 4 out of 5 staff interviewed have observed residents involved in verbal arguments but no threats have been heard. 1 out of 5 stated to have not observed residents get into any arguments. 5 out of 5 staff stated to intervene and/or notify the office staff when residents are observed engaging in arguments. Administrator stated steps are taken when such behaviors are not resolved after speaking with the residents. Documents reviewed revealed 8 out of 8 residents are ambulatory. 5 out of 8 residents required assistance with handling medication and 3 out of 8 residents handle their own medication. Medication sheets for the 5 residents receiving assistance show resident were taking their medications daily. Incident reports revealed, R1 went out to hospital on 11/17/21 and choose not to return to the facility and R2 went out to the hospital on 12/21/21 and R2's family decided that upon discharge R2 will move to a facility closer to family. Based on LPA's observations, and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found Substantiated. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Maria Jacobo Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211110122839

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted licensee did not ensure residents are not threating at facility as 5 out of 8 residents have observed residents threating other residents which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk of persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide in-service training to staff and residents on section 87468.1 and submit a copy of the agenda and sign in log to the department by 6/13/22.

Mar 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is financially abusing resident while in care. Staff left resident soiled for an extended period of time. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver the findings from the original complaint dated 3/8/22. At initial visit the following was done: Resident #1's file was reviewed at 1:15 PM. On 3/17/2022 from 2:00 to 3:00 PM Resident's # 1-6 and Staff Maria Jacobo, Robert Blanco and Fernando Castillo were interviewed. Physician for Resident #1 was interviewed at 1:40 PM. In regards to the allegation Staff is financially abusing resident while in care, based on review of financial records the facility did deposit into an account for Resident 1 the amount of $1200 on 6/3/2020 and $1400 on 4/7/21 which were the amounts for the different stimulus payments. From 6/15/21 to 12/3/21 withdrawals for Resident #1 were made totaling $1887. Administrator had stated that payments had been made to Resident #1 a year ago and were kept by home Unsubstantiated office and the resident will make weekly withdrawals. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff left resident soiled for an extended period of time, based on interviews conducted and information gathered Physician's Report dated 1/5/22 stated that Resident 1 can care for his own toileting needs and is able to leave the facility unassisted. Interview conducted with Medical Doctor for Resident 1 stated that he considers him independent and has never seen him incontinent. Stated he is on Oxybutin to control the bladder. Review of the Medication Log shows that Oxybutin 5mg. had been administered for morning and evening dose and there were no doses missed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items, based on interviews conducted and information gathered staff interviewed stated that any clothes brought into the facility for residents are put on an inventory list. Admission Agreement states that facility will only inventory and provide the resident or responsible party with a copy of the resident's personal properties/valuables as inventoried items if said items are entrusted to the facility and are stored in a secured area. Based on interviews conducted clothes that were reported missing had not been entrusted with the facility and inventoried. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220308100453
Mar 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents smoke inside of facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver the findings from the original complaint dated 2/18/22 At initial visit the following was done: On 2/24/2022 from 12:45 PM to 2:15 PM Resident's 1-9 and Staff Maria Jacobo were interviewed. In regards to the allegation Residents smoke inside of facility, based on interviews conducted and information gathered it was revealed that there are residents smoking pot on the outside courtyard. Four of the residents stated they have witnessed residents smoking pot and also have smelled it on courtyard. One resident confirmed that he does smoke pot on the facility courtyard. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220218111751

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2022

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by; During the visit conducted on 2/24/212, LPA Trueman toured the courtyard of the facility facility and based on statements obtained, LPA learned that residents have been observed smoking marijuana in the courtyard area. This poses an immediate Health and safety Risk to residents iin care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will review Title 22 Regulations Section 87468.1 on Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities and develop a written Plan of Correction (POC) to ensure compliance. Written POC must be submitted to CCL by the POC due date.

Mar 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: When resident was diagnosed with COVID, the facility staff refused to care for him. Staff are complaining to the resident about family concerns. Staff are taking things out of the residents room.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings from the original complaint dated 1/27/22. Initial visit was conducted 2/3/22 and from 10:35 AM to 12:05 PM Staff 1-3 and Resident's 1-5 were interviewed In regards to the allegation When resident was diagnosed with COVID, the facility staff refused to care for him, based on interviews and information gathered resident's interviewed stated that if residents had Covid they were brought to a convalescent hospital so they can isolate for 14 days. Stated that staff are good handling the care of Covid resident's. Staff interviewed stated Resident 1 was weak so he was taken to hospital and residents will have a choice where to quarantine. Stated staff are sufficient to provide care and supervision for Covid resident's. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated In regards to the allegation Staff are complaining to the resident about family concerns, based on interviews and information gathered resident's stated there has not been any situations where staff told them that their family or visitors are bothering them about their concerns. Staff interviewed stated that they have not complained to any residents about their family or visitors concerns. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff are taking things out of the residents room, based on interviews conducted and information gathered residents stated that there has not been anything taken from their rooms. They have not seen or heard of staff doing this. Staff interviewed stated that Resident 1 had moved out of his room and there was trash still there and a radio was left behind. Staff stated they did not know that it belonged to Resident 1, but once made aware returned it. He had thought it was Resident 1's roommate who had passed away. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220127161150

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 16, 2022

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees, and visitors. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the elevator is currently not working which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure the elevator is in good repair/operable and submit proof of invoice showing the repairs made. The POC must be submitted to CCL by the due date of 03/16/22.

20213 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's sliding door is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to conduct a 10 day complaint visit in regards to the above allegation. At today's visit the following was done: On 12/16/2021 at 12:15 P.M. Administrator Maria Jacobo was interviewed. At 12:30 P.M. Maintenance Staff Fernando Castillo was interviewed. At 12:40 P.M. to 1:15 P.M. Resident 1 - Resident 3 was interviewed. At 1:15 P.M. LPA Trueman along with Maintenance Staff Fernando Castillo toured Rooms 1, 2, 3 and 12. In regards to the allegation Resident's sliding door is in disrepair, during tour LPA observed in Room 1 that the sliding door would not open and the door was not able to move at all through the track on the floor. There also was an open space where air from the outside could come into the room when the door was closed. In Room 3 the sliding door did not move smoothly though the track on the floor. Interview was conducted with Client 1 who said the door was hard to close. Substantiated Maintenance Staff interviewed said that dirt and rain can go into track and make it hard to close the door. Stated that in Room 1 the door has not been used, but it is not sliding open. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211206122909

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2021

Maintenance and Operation The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to have the facility in good repair at all times with Room 1 having a sliding door that was inoperable and didn't slide open which caused an Immediate Health and Safety Risk to residents in care,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021

Plan of correction: Facility to submit proof by POC due date that sliding door in Rooms 1 and 3 are fully operable and in good repair.

Nov 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being illegally evicted from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Staff Carmen Virrueta and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is a subsequent visit and to deliver findings in regards to the above allegation. The initial visit was conducted on 10/12/2021 and the following was done: At 9:45 A.M. Staff Robert Blanco was interviewed. At 10:00 A.M. Resident 1 was interviewed. At 10:30 A.M. Administrator Maria Jacobo was interviewed. At 10:50 A.M. Maintenance Staff Fernando Castillo was interviewed. At today's visit 11/23/2021 Resident 2 was interviewed at 1:45 P.M. In regards to the allegation Resident is being illegally evicted from the facility, based on interviews conducted with staff and residents and documents reviewed from the file of Resident 1 it was revealed by Resident 1 that her family member did come into the facility office and grab a key and throw it at the Administrator. Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 8/17/2021 was submitted by the facility stating that family member of Resident 1 threw office keys at the Administrator and 911 was called. Police were called . Unsubstantiated Staff interviewed stated that family member of Resident 1 had cursed out another resident recently and wanted to fight that resident. Resident 2 stated that family member of Resident 1 had cursed at him and spit on him. Staff said family member would fight with Resident 1 and curse at her. LPA witnessed a video of family member pushing Resident 1 in front of the facility. Admission Agreement dated 06/27/2019 under Eviction procedures states that upon 30 day written notice in writing can evict for failure of resident to comply with general policies of the facility. Said general policies must be in writing. In Admissions Agreement under House Rules it states that no resident may have family/visitors that are abusive to other residents/staff nor upset the general facility population. Title 22 Regulations 87224(a) states the following: The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in section 87224 (a)(1) thru (5). Notated in (3)- Failure of the resident to comply with general policies of the facility. Said general policies must be in writing, must be for the purpose of making it possible for residents to live together and must be made part of the admission agreement. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and copy to be provided via e-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021 · control 28-AS-20211008094807
Aug 25, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by Administrator Maria Jacobo and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings from the original complaint dated 8/18/2021. The initial visit was conducted on 8/19/2021 and the following was done: LPA Trueman conducted interviews with the Licensee ,Administrator, Staff S 1-3 and Resident's R 1-8 from 12:45 PM to 2:00 PM. LPA along with Maintenance Staff toured the facility and inspected Rooms 14, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31,34 A, 37, 46, and 74. In regards to the allegation facility has bed bugs, based on interviews conducted and information gathered all clients interviewed stated that there have been no bed bugs that they have seen in their room or in the facility. Staff interviewed stated that there has been no bed bugs. Maintenance staff stated they have turned over mattresses and washed bedspreads and have not seen any bed bugs. Facility submitted Pest Control Documentation from visits to the facility 7/23,7/30, 08/06 and 08/13. Unsubstantiated LPA along with Maintenance Staff toured the facility on 8/19/2021 and inspected Rooms 14, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31,34 A, 37, 46, and 74.. Upon inspection there were no bed bugs observed in the rooms toured. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and copy to be provided via e-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210818111726

79 of 160 beds were occupied at the December 18, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

1109 West Beverly Blvd., LLC, licensed since 2005.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2005, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
30
Total complaints
17
Substantiated allegations
10
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
9

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2005, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations91
Substantiated allegations102
Total complaints176

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Manor Retirement Center

Is Golden Manor Retirement Center licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Manor Retirement Center licensed for?

160 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Golden Manor Retirement Center been cited?

1 Type A and 9 Type B citations since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 30 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Manor Retirement Center still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Golden Manor Retirement Center cost?

$3,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,350–$3,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 133 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,306 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 133 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Golden Manor Retirement Center take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 1109 West Beverly Blvd., LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Adventist Health White Memorial Montebello is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Manor Retirement Center keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Golden Manor Retirement Center license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN MANOR RETIREMENT CENTER”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606171. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 160 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to 1109 West Beverly Blvd., LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 30 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 9 Type B citations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 30 state visits in that period.
  • 17 complaints and 10 substantiated allegations on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Monterey Park · 3.1 mi

    Chalet Terrace Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $6,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Monterey Park · 2.1 mi

    Grandridge Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $6,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Monterey Park · 2.4 mi

    Palomino Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,500–$8,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Montebello · 0.9 mi

    CMNB Homes

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,050–$7,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Montebello · 0.9 mi

    Gayane's Safe Heaven

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,850–$7,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Downey · 4.1 mi

    The Palazzo of Downey

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GM

Call Golden Manor Retirement Center

Montebello · Licensed for 160

(323) 724-3870

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Golden Manor Retirement Center

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages