Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Golden Age VI

Small home·Licensed for 6·Modesto, California

Licensed since 2014Licence #507005492
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,550
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMay 12, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 12, 2026CDSS inspection record

Golden Age VI is a small care home in Modesto — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2014. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Age VI

Is Golden Age VI licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Age VI licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Golden Age VI been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Age VI still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Golden Age VI cost?

$3,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,000–$4,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Modesto that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $4,900 a month, and the middle figure is $3,400 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Age VI take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Marinela Placintar, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Memorial Medical Center is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Age VI keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Golden Age VI license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN AGE VI”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #507005492. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Marinela Placintar, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE AGE 60 YEARS AND OLDER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3 (THREE).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,700a month to start

Likely $3,000–$4,550

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,700a month

Likely $3,000–$4,750

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,700likely $3,000–$4,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$4,750
$3,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,550–$8,000
$5,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2008 Damask Court, Modesto, CA 95355Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2014. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 12, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
May 12, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 22, 2025 to May 12, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252312024110202322020223302021220

The last 36 months — 7 of 12 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff providing care to the residents

On 05/12/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Marinela Placintar and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 6. A brief interview with FDA Placintar. It was alleged that there is an uncleared staff member providing care to the residents. Based on information gathered, the determination of the exclusion order of S1 is still pending, however S1 is able to be present in the facility at this time. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. An Exit Interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260326164957
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced. To deliver ORDERS TO INDIVIDUAL FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM ALL FACILITIES. S1 was not present at the time of this visit and was not on the Personnel Report dated 11/20/2025. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective today. S1 is excluded and prohibited from being a licensee, owning a beneficial ownership of 10% interest or more in a licensed facility, or being an Administrator, officer, director, member, or manager of a licensee or entity controlling a licensee. S1 cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed and cited. Exit interview held, Copy of report giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2025
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not report incident

On 09/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Venice Andrews and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Current census was 6. A brief interview with FDA Andrews was conducted. It was alleged that the facility did not report an incident. Based on interviews conducted, it was admitted that the incident report regarding R1 for an incident that occurred on 07/12/2025 was not sent to the department. In addition, the department did not receive an incident report until 08/06/2025. Based on the information gathered, the facility did not report incident. Based on observations, review of records and information gathered through interviews, the above allegations were SUBSTANTIATED meaning that there was a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred as alleged. The following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulation. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report and appeals rights were provided to the facility at the end of this visit. Substantiated According to staff, R1 approached them, pulled their hair, and struck them in the face while they were still assisting R2. In an effort to release R1's grip, the staff member attempted to hold R1’s hands. Additionally, during an interview, R1’s responsible party confirmed that R1 has a history of being physically aggressive toward facility staff. However, the responsible party denied any allegations that a staff member bit a resident. Based on the information gathered, it is unclear if the staff bit resident. Allegation: Staff took residents phone away. It was alleged that the facility staff took residents phone away. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) consistently attempted to contact emergency services using their personal phone. It was determined that both R1’s responsible party and emergency services agreed that R1 should use the facility phone when seeking assistance. This agreement helped reduce the frequency of unnecessary calls to emergency services. R1’s responsible party also denied any claims that facility staff had taken away R1’s personal phone. Based on the information gathered, it is unclear if the facility staff took residents phone away. Based on information provided through interviews and records reviewed, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove that the allegation occurred as reported. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the 9099 and 9099-C was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250729092521

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 22, 2025

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee shall send in an statement of correction to this LPA by POC date.

Sep 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Staff Member (SM), Paulette Williams and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA asked SM Williams to call the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) Venice Andrews to inform them that CCL was present. Shortly after, LPA met with FDA Venice Andrews and explained the purpose of the visit. There was one other staff member present during the course of this visit, Raffy Corla. Current census was 6. A brief interview with FDA Andrews was conducted. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and 3 staff files. All files were complete and up to date. The Facility Designated Administrator, Venice Andrews, does have an active administrator certificate. A tour of the facility was conducted. A tour of the living room, dining room, and other areas intended for resident use were conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be in good repair and meet the residents needs. Kitchen area was toured. LPA observed a sufficient amount of 2 day perishable and 7 day non-perishable food supply to meet the residents needs. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents in care. A tour of the garage was conducted. Additional storage for supplies were identified. Additional food supply was identified. A tour of the laundry room was conducted, laundry detergent, bleach and all other cleaning supplies were made inaccessible to the residents at this time A tour of the resident bedrooms was conducted. Resident furniture was observed to be sufficient to meet the resident needs at this time. A tour of two staff bedrooms were also conducted. A tour of the bathrooms were conducted. Hot water temperature was taken to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. A medication cabinet was located in the kitchen. Along with the Facility Designated Representative, LPA observed, compared, and reviewed medication with medication dispensing logs. First aid kit was reviewed and had all the required components. Fire extinguisher was observed and was last serviced by Jorgenson Co on and is in compliance at this time. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide was observed to be in working condition. The exterior of the physical plant was in good repair with no hazards present. Perimeter fence was observed to be stable and gates were in good repair. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL. -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610 As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were observed or cited during this annual visit. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the 809 and 809-C was provided to the facility at the end of this visit. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided in-person.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Staff Member (SM), Paulette Williams and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA asked SM Williams to call the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) to inform them that CCL was present. Shortly after, LPA met with Licensee Marinela Placintar and explained the purpose of the visit. There was one other staff member present during the course of this visit, Raffy Corla. Current census was 5. A brief interview with Licensee Placintar was conducted. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 3 staff files. 3 out 5 resident files were not complete and up to date. 3 out 3 staff files were complete and up to date. The Facility Designated Administrator, Traian Oancea, does not have an active administrator certificate at this time. There is not an active administrator to this facility. A tour of the facility was conducted. A tour of the living room, dining room, and other areas intended for resident use were conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be in good repair and meet the residents needs. Kitchen area was toured. LPA observed a sufficient amount of 2 day perishable and 7 day non-perishable food supply to meet the residents needs. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents in care. A tour of the garage was conducted. Additional storage for supplies were identified. Additional food supply was identified. A tour of the laundry room was conducted, laundry detergent, bleach and all other cleaning supplies were made inaccessible to the residents at this time A tour of the resident bedrooms was conducted. Resident furniture was observed to be sufficient to meet the resident needs at this time. A tour of two staff bedrooms were also conducted. A tour of the bathrooms were conducted. Hot water temperature was taken to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. A medication cabinet was located in the kitchen. Along with the Facility Designated Representative, LPA observed, compared, and reviewed medication with medication dispensing logs. First aid kit was reviewed and had all the required components. Fire extinguisher was observed and was last serviced by Jorgenson Co on 05/10/2024 and is in compliance at this time. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide was observed to be in working condition. The exterior of the physical plant was in good repair with no hazards present. Perimeter fence was observed to be stable and gates were in good repair. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL. -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610 Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) – Title 22 – Division 6, Chapter 6, deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Citations can be found on the LIC 809 – D. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights were provided to facility. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided in-person and sent via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2024
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Kenroy Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on a Decision and Order in regards to S1 who was deemed to be excluded from being present, employed, or have any contact with any licensed facility by the Department. It was learned that S1 was asked to leave the facility on 11/12/2023 and has not been present in this facility since that date. A tour of the facility was conducted to confirm S1 was not present. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2023
Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/24/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Staff Member (SM), Farah Bailey and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA asked that SM Bailey call the Facility Designated Administrator to inform them that CCL was present. Shortly after, LPA met with Facility Designated Representative (FDR), Kenroy Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. There was one other staff member present at the facility, Raffy Corla. Shortly later, LPA met with Licensee, Marinela Placintar. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and 3 staff files. 5 out 6 resident files did not have a complete 602, Pre-Apprasial, and Needs and Services Plan. 3 out 3 staff files were complete and up to date. It was learned that the facility does not have an administrator that does not have a current administrator certificate. A tour of the facility was conducted. A tour of the kitchen was toured. Knives were observed to be locked and made inaccessible. Food supply was observed to ensure that there was a 2 day supply of perishable food supply and 7 day non-perishable food supply. The refrigerator was observed to have a flat of eggs, 2 loafs of bread, a gallon of milk, 2 half empty containers of juice, half a bell pepper, half of a onion, and a head of lettuce. A tour of the backyard was conducted. LPA observed the cement walkway was lifted about 5 inches off the original pavement. It was observed by the LPA that there were miscellaneous items such as floss, receipts, batteries, bottle caps all throughout the fences and front of the facility. A tour of the garage was conducted. An additional regriferator unit was observed. Additional hygiene items were identified. A tour of the laundry was conducted. Toxins, laundry supplies, and other cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible. A tour of the resident bedrooms was conducted. LPA observed a strong smell of urine in 3 out of 4 bedrooms. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be in good repair and meet the residents needs. A tour of the bathrooms were conducted. Hot water temperature was taken to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. A medication cabinet was located in the kitchen. Along with the Facility Designated Representative, LPA observed, compared, and reviewed medication with medication dispensing logs. First aid kit was reviewed and had all the required components. Fire extinguisher was observed and was last serviced by Jorgenson Co on 02/27/2023 and is in compliance at this time. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide was observed to be in working condition. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610 -Liability Insurance Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) – Title 22 – Division 6, Chapter 6, deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Citations can be found on the LIC 809 – D. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights were provided to facility. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided in-person and sent via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County