Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Garden Creek

Large community·Licensed for 72·San Luis Obispo, California

Licensed since 1999Licence #405800467
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Typical starting rate$4,700 a monthTypical in San Luis Obispo County · likely $3,150–$7,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 72Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit61 of 72 beds occupiedOctober 7, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitOctober 7, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderThe Village Pacific Management Group, LLCSince 1999 · 2 licensed homes

Garden Creek is a large care community in San Luis Obispo — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 72 residents since 1999. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Garden Creek

Is Garden Creek licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Garden Creek licensed for?

72 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Garden Creek been cited?

0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is Garden Creek still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Garden Creek cost?

$4,700 a month to start is typical in San Luis Obispo County, likely $3,150–$7,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 communities with 50 or more beds publish in San Luis Obispo County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Luis Obispo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,635 to $7,114 a month, and the middle figure is $4,695 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Garden Creek take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by The Village Pacific Management Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to The Village Pacific Management Group, LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Adventist Health Sierra Vista is 0.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Garden Creek keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Garden Creek license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GARDEN CREEK”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #405800467. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 72 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to The Village Pacific Management Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 7, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 43 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 43 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
43 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 43 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4. BEDRIDDEN ON FLOORS #1 AND #2.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,700a month to start

Likely $3,150–$7,000

From homes this size in San Luis Obispo County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,700a month

Likely $3,150–$7,100

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,150–$7,000

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 communities with 50 or more beds publish in San Luis Obispo County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,150–$7,100
$4,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$9,850
$6,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 5 communities with 50 or more beds publish in San Luis Obispo County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 7 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 73 Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 16 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 1999. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 7, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
15
Most recent visit
October 7, 2025
Occupied at that visit
61 of 72 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 8 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 31, 2021 to October 7, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 8 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 2
  • Total complaints6typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1999.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253412024221202334020223422021220

The last 36 months — 7 of 16 documents

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed

At 9:30am, on 10/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to the allegation of this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Audie Sherberg, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. On the allegation, staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed. It was alleged that facility staff failed to bring a resident their medication timely, and when the medication was later brought, the staff also left a cup of another resident’s medications in the room, which was returned to staff. LPA record review and interviews revealed that 49 of 60 residents at the facility receive assistance with medication management from the facility staff and multiple residents who receive this assistance take the medication carbidopa-levodopa for Parkinson’s disease, including Resident #1 (R1). (Continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiated Staff interviews revealed the facility has a policy to provide residents with their medications as timely as possible but with a window of one hour before and one hour after the scheduled time. Staff stated it is known that medications for Parkinson’s disease should be given on time per the physician’s order to avoid worsening symptoms. The physician order for R1’s carbidopa-levodopa states it is to be administered at 2:00am, 5:00am, 7:30am, 11:30am and 3:30pm. Interviews revealed on one occasion staff did not bring R1 their morning medications. R1 notified staff to remind them and when staff brought R1 their medications, staff also left a cup of medications in R1’s room intended for another resident. R1 returned this medication to facility staff. Other residents interviewed stated they have not had medications left in their room intended for another resident, and staff interviewed are not aware of a time medications intended for one resident were left in another resident’s room. Interviews and record review revealed there was a day in July 2025 when R1 used their pendant to remind the medication technician on duty, Staff #1 (S1), for their carbidopa-levodopa scheduled at 5:00am. R1 went looking for S1 and found S1 sleeping on a couch outside the medication room on the second floor. After R1 woke up S1, S1 provided R1 their medications. A verbal warning given to S1 was documented by the Administrator and after additional disciplinary actions for other reasons S1’s employment was terminated by the facility. During staff interviews one other staff member admitted they administered R1’s medication scheduled at 2:00am approximately 75 minutes after 2:00am, and an additional interview confirmed this. Resident interviews revealed there have been times when they did not receive their medications timely and they needed to alert staff to remind them they had not received their medications at the scheduled time. Record review revealed the facility medication technicians are not current on the required medication training per California Health and Safety Code. This was addressed during the facility annual inspection conducted by the LPA during the same visit. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Based on all interviews conducted and documents obtained, at this time the above allegation was found to be substantiated, due to staff delaying the administration of time sensitive medication with specific hours of administration scheduled by the resident’s physician. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited on LIC9099-D page, report signed, and report provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250911081035

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 21, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical... care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall... provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4)The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not dispense medications as prescribed delaying the administration of time sensitive medication with specific hours of administration scheduled by the resident'sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator states they will create a policy that ensures time sensitive medications are passed in a way not to cause delay. All staff that handle medications will be trained in this policy. The policy, training and signed staff roster will be emailed to the LPA on or before 10/21/2025. physician which poses a potential Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At 9:30am, on 10/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Annual Continuation to continue the annual inspection started on 9/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator Audie Sherberg, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. LPA and the Administrator in Training Erika Consebida and the Maintenance Supervisor conducted a full tour of all three floors of the facility. The first floor contains the main lobby, staff room, administrative office spaces, kitchen, dining room (with communal, private and outdoor dining areas), an activities room, seventeen resident bedrooms, and an outdoor courtyard in the middle with seating and shade for residents and visitors. The second floor has a beauty salon, medication room, a common area with seating and a full kitchen for cooking activities, twenty-six resident bedrooms, the laundry room through a locked door for resident safety and an outdoor patio space overlooking the central courtyard with seating and shade. The third floor includes, an activity room, twenty-one resident bedrooms, and an outdoor terrace overlooking the east side of the surrounding area with seating areas. All resident bedrooms have an on-suite bathroom and a kitchenette. LPA tested facility hot water in several bedrooms throughout the facility ranging from 109.5 - 115.6*(f), within regulation temperatures 105*-120* (f). The main kitchen faucets are not used by residents and deliver water hotter than 125*(f) and the faucets are marked with signage indicating the hot water per regulation. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods in the main kitchen. Each floor has community use restrooms. The facility has two elevators, serviced on 6/27/2025 and emergency evacuation chairs at the top of the two stairwells. LPA noted that the facility is in good repair with no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. (Continued on LIC9099-C) The facility offers activities to all residents in care. Daily activities are displayed on a white board next to the reception desk and a monthly activity schedule is provided in print to the residents. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records (CSMR), finding eleven medications of the five resident CSMRs reviewed not documented. Staff stated if the LPA audited all the resident CSMRs who receive medication administration assistance from the facility the LPA would find more medications not documented per regulation. The facility employs approximately 67 staff and 1 Administrator. Staff records are kept confidential. LPA reviewed a sample number of staff files for current 1st Aid/CPR, Health screening with TB results, training and fingerprint clearance. Administrator has current certification. While reviewing medication technician training required by the California Health and Safety Code (HSC) the facility could not provide the required annual training documentation for any of the medication technicians and the Vice President of Operations Lisa Hulse stated they do not have their current required training. Lisa stated the facility is currently working with a new training company to provide all required initial and annual staff training. The facility keeps separate files on each resident confidentially. LPA reviewed a sample number of resident files for signed Admission Agreements and Appraisals/Reappraisals. LPA and Administrator conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. Citations issued at this time. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on the LIC809-D page, report signed, and report provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025

The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 8:45am, on 9/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Administrator Audie Sherberg, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. This is a three story facility with 64 resident rooms. LPA noted a large lobby space when entering the front door with a grand piano for residents and visitors to play, an area to sit near a self-contained fireplace, a set of stairs leading to the second floor, fresh fruit and snacks for residents to enjoy freely across from the reception desk and an area with board games, puzzles, books and a computer for resident use. Next to the game area are administration offices. The facility has wired smoke detectors in each room that were tested by Alpha Fire & Security Alarm on 11/13/2024. There is a battery operated carbon monoxide detector next to the fireplace in the lobby that is functioning normally. LPA observed fire extinguishers throughout the facility tagged current and in the green compression range, serviced on 4/3/2025. Medications are locked in a med room on the second floor in medication carts. LPA was not able to complete the annual inspection and may return at a later time to finish. There were no deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted, report signed, and report provided to Administrator Audie Sherberg.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
Jun 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not meeting resident’s care needs.

On 6/10/2025 at 08:50am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Resident Roster, Staff Roster, and Resident 1's (R1's) preadmission appraisal, current physician report and care plan. From 09:34am to 11:54am LPA conducted interviews with staff and R1. On allegation: Facility staff are not meeting resident’s care needs. It was alleged R1 requires more care than staff thought and staff are unable to provide R1 water or check on R1 overnight and therefore R1 frequently wakes up dehydrated, and was recently sent to the hospital, but later released because of dehydration. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated LPA interviews with staff revealed many of the residents are relatively independent and do not require much hands-on assistance. Staff stated R1 requires the most assistance out of all residents currently and resists staff assistance at times. Staff stated, R1's family hired an outside caregiver just after their admission to the facility to assist facility staff due to increased care needs. Staff stated R1 prefers to stay in bed, but it does take 2 care staff to provide some care to R1. When the outside caregiver is not there staff stated they can radio for help from medication technicians or another available care staff and they receive support form the other staff. Staff stated they are able to meet the residents needs, but feel R1's level of care is too high to reside in the facility. Staff interviews revealed R1 uses a pendant to call staff regularly for assists inlcuding to drink fluids. Staff interviews also revealed that facility caregivers (Personal Care Attendants) do not have a way to review each residents care needs. Staff stated care needs are relayed at shift change meetings, but only medication technicians have access to care plans and resident appraisals. During LPA interview with R1, R1 stated they prefer to stay in bed, the staff provide assistance when needed, including providing R1 fluids. R1 stated they just want to sleep and not get out of bed. LPA interview with Lisa Hulse, Vice President of Operations, and resident file review revealed the facility contacted R1's primary care physician regarding R1's change in condition on 5/9/2025, the day after admission, and the physician visited R1 on 5/13/2025. Lisa stated R1 received additional assistance upon admission through home health care agency Central Coast Home Health and after R1's first hospitalization was transitioned to palliative care through the same agency. LPA record review revealed R1 has been to the hospital two times since in care at the facility and neither visit had a discharge diagnosis of dehydration. Record review revealed three appraisals of R1 were completed prior to R1's admission, a reappraisal due to updated care needs for R1 has not been completed as of today's visit. Based on all interviews conducted and documents obtained, at this time the above allegation was found to be unsubstantiated, meaning that the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted, no citation was given at this time and report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250609084320
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for resident after a fall Facility failed to report incident to Residents responsible party and Licensing Facility failed to report resident death to Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Liza Hix, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Resident Roster, Staff Roster, All incident reports on R1, Death report for R1, Procedure or policy for Reports, falls, discharge and extra care after discharge of residents at the facility, admission agreement for R1, refund of rent paid and refunded for R1, disciplinary report for staff, hospital discharge paperwork, and notes or charting for R1. The facility was able to provide resident roster, staff roster, staff schedules for December 2023, R1's admission agreement, Refund of rent paid and refund issued, staff email to supervisor/managers reporting R1 going to Hospital. Facility was not able to provide any other records requested. LPA De Leon conducted interviews with staff at 10:15am, 10:45am, 11:04am, 12:40pm, 12:50pm, 1:28pm, 2:06pm, 2:14pm, and 2:45pm, Substantiated On the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for resident after a fall. LPA conducted interviews with staff and witness that revealed Resident 1 (R1) did have a fall in the early morning, R1 was not wearing R1's pendant to call for help, R1 was on the floor calling for help for an unknown amount of time, and the facility did not call 911 or seek medical attention for R1. R1 had another fall that afternoon and 911 was called to transport R1 to the ER. Based on the evidence this allegation is Substantiated at this time. On the allegation: Facility failed to report incident to Residents responsible party and Licensing. LPA conducted interviews with staff which revealed no 911 or medical visit was made for R1 after the 1st fall, R1's 2nd fall was reported immediately to R1's family. Incident report for either of R1's falls on12/30/2024 were not reported to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Witness 1(W1) interviewed revealed a call was made to W1 in the late morning 12/30/2024 regarding a fall for R1, R1 was fine, got cleaned up and taken down to breakfast. W1 stated later that afternoon W1 was immediately called about R1 having another fall and was being transported to the hospital. Based on the evidence and lack of facility records provided this allegation is Substantiated at this time. On the allegation: Facility failed to report resident death to Licensing. LPA conducted interviews with staff and requested records of death report for R1. The facility was unable to provide a copy of the death report. W1 stated the facility staff was told about R1's death in the hospital within the days proceeding the death of R1, W1 cleaned out R1's room and gave away some of R1's belongings so certain staff knew of R1's death at that time. W1 stated R1's death was reported to management within the week of R1's passing. Based on the lack of records provided and CCL not having a death report on file this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited, copy of report and appeal rights printed for administrator. On the allegation: Facility denied care and supervision services after resident was discharged from the hospital. LPA interviewed staff which revealed no staff denied care or supervision services after a residents discharge, Staff stated they would provide the services immediately and let business staff know to up date care services on resident 1 (R1). Staff stated they understand the procedure to provide care immediately and business office sends a letter to resident and responsible parties of care fee increase. Witness 1 stated after discharge a staff told W1 they could not provide additional care services to R1 until the next business working day W1 would have to sign up for additional care services at that time. LPA reviewed R1's Admission Agreement and in Appendix A there is a clause that states Additional "Round the Clock" care the facility would provide the service for a fee of $25.00, the fee would be billed to the family on a weekly basis and will be expected to be paid within three days of receipt. Based on the lack of evidence this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241107133319

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2024

(2) The licensee shall provide assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs. This includes transportation which may be limited to the nearest available medical or dental facility which will meet the resident's need... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews the Licensee did not comply with the regulation above, Staff did not seek medical attnetion for R1's fall which posses a potential Health, saefty and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to train all care staff and med-techs on facilities policies for falls and calling 911, regulation 87465 and provide proof of training with staff signatures and an up to date LIC 500 for staff to CCL 11/21/2024.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2024

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...:(1)...(B)Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirment was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the Licensee did not comply with the regulation above, the facility did not report R1's falls on an incident report to CCL and did not report the first fall timely to R1's family which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to train all staff in reporting procedures/policy and regulation 87211 and provide proof of training with staff signatures and an up to date LIC 500 for staff to CCL 11/21/2024.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2024

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports...:(1)...(A)Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred,...This requirement was not met as evidneced by: Based on record review the Licensee did not comply with the regulation above, CCL did not receive a death report for R1 which poses a potential Health, safety and personal rights risk to reisdents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrtor agreed to train all staff in reporting procedures/policy and regulation 87211, reporting time/date for deaths and provide proof of trianing with staff signatures and an up to date LIC 500 for staff to CCL 11/21/2024.

Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:45am on 10/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. This facility has 64 bedrooms/bathroom. This facility is 3 stories, the first floor there is a large waiting and entrance way with front desk. There is an enclosed center courtyard, there is a kitchen and dining room, resident rooms, mail room, storage rooms and facility offices. The second floor has a beauty salon, storage rooms, central medication room, activities room and resident suites. The 3rd floor has resident rooms, locked storage closets, and an activities/library room. The grounds also have independent living facilities located next door and plenty of outside seating and walking ways for residents. There is a designated smoking area in the back parking lot of the grounds. Administrator and LPA conducted a tour of the facility, LPA observed, all floors, kitchen, dining room, all activities rooms, medication room and 10 residents rooms. LPA noted that there are fire extinguishers placed throughout the facility all in the green and currently tagged for service. LPA noted that the facilities walkways and exits were free and clear of debris or obstructions. LPA noted that the food supply met regulations for 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables for more than 46 residents. LPA conducted an audit of medications, medications was stored in original container, no medications were expired and no labels were altered. LPA reviewed 5 staff files, all required forms were present. LPA reviewed 5 resident files, all required forms were present. No other violations, or citations were discovered during this annual inspection. LPA interviewed 3 staff and 2 residents. Exit interview, copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:50am on 11/17/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual inspection. LPA signed in at the front desk and had Maintenance Staff (S1) contact the Administrator. Administrator Kirk Klotthor arrived at 10:10am, LPA announced who he is and the reason for the visit. This facility has 64 bedrooms/bathroom suites, currently the rooms occupied are all single occupancy at this time. This facility is 3 stories, the first floor there is a large waiting and entrance way with front desk. There is an enclosed center courtyard, there is a kitchen and dining room, resident rooms, mail room, storage rooms and facility offices. The second floor has a beauty salon, storage rooms, central medication room, activities room and resident suites. The 3rd floor has resident rooms, locked storage closets, and an activities/library room. The grounds also have independent living facilities located next door and plenty of outside seating and walking ways for residents. There is a designated smoking area in the back parking lot of the grounds. Administrator and LPA conducted a tour of the facility, LPA observed, all floors, kitchen, dining room, all activities rooms, medication room and a sample of residents rooms. LPA noted that there are fire extinguishers placed throughout the facility all in the green and currently tagged for service. LPA noted that the facilities walkways and exits, were free and clear of debris and obstruction. LPA noted that Alpha Fire conducted a comprehensive 5 year evaluation of the facilities sprinkler system on 11/14/2023 with no issues. LPA noted that the food supply met regulations for 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables for more than 51 residents. LPA noted that there were no special diets. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed Centrally Stored Medication Records and found no issues. LPA reviewed sample staff files and found no issues. LPA reviewed sample amount of resident fils and found no issues. LPA conducted full care tools review. LPA noted one technical violation, of liability insurance pertaining to amount of aggregate, Administrator will address before 12/01/2023. No other violations, or citations were discovered during this annual inspection. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2023

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

The Village Pacific Management Group, LLC, licensed since 1999, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Luis Obispo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Luis Obispo County