This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Ebadat Residential Care Home #4

Small home·6 while this license was open·San Jose, California

Closed in state recordLicence #435202403
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 29, 2025 · not a current opening

Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 in San Jose held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2014. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Ebadat Residential Care Home #4

Is Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Care Management, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San Jose is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license.

Ebadat Residential Care Home #4 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EBADAT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME #4”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202403. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Care Management, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 4 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 6 INDIVIDUALS AGES 60 AND OVER. 2 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,600a month to start

Likely $2,950–$4,450

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,600a month

Likely $2,950–$4,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,600likely $2,950–$4,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,950–$4,650
$3,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,450–$7,900
$5,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,600–$4,200.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 243 Martinvale Ln., San Jose, CA 95119Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2014. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 16, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
12
Most recent visit
March 16, 2026
Occupied · December 29, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 4, 2023 to December 29, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025220202433020232302022220

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/16/2025, LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Staff Radito Murillo and Administrator Aileen Calicdan followed after. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, garage, and kitchen area and backyard. LPA observed a resident leaving for day program. 2 residents are in the facility. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 70 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 112 deg F. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Sharps and toxic materials were observed locked. Food supply was observed with an adequate two day perishable and seven day non-perishable food supply. Carbon monoxide/ smoke detectors, and fire extinguisher were present throughout the facility. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill is done every quarter. Five resident records and three staff records were reviewed. Centrally stored medication was locked and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. All medication logs are complete and updated. Administrator will send the Liability Insurance, LIC610D, LIC308 and LIC500 to LPA. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect by speaking inappropriately to a resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Rai met with Administrator, Aileen Calicdan and stated the purpose of today's visit. During visit, LPA Rai interviewed Administrator, Aileen Calicdan. LPA Rai obtained copies of the following documents of staff and resident roster. It was determined the resident pertaining to the allegation does not resident at the facility. It was determinded the staff pertaining to the allegation does not work at the facility. It was determined the incident on 12/23/2025 did not occur at this facility. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the Department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251224125627
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Santino Fortes conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Administrator (ADM) Aileen Calicdan. ADM stated facility has 3 staff and 4 clients. LPA toured the facility inside and out. There were 4 resident rooms (2 shared/ 2 single), NO staff rooms, living room, and Kitchen. LPA observed resident rooms each equipped with a chair, night stand, sufficient lighting and chest of drawers. Room temperature was 68* F. Hot water temperature was measured from resident bathroom at 110.8* F and kitchen 118.7* F. LPA observed the first aid kit to be complete. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, that functioned properly when tested. Fire extinguishers were serviced on 4/15/24. The facility conducted a fire drill on 12/23/24. Restrooms observed to have non-skid flooring. LPAs observed perishable food supply of at least two days and non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature was observed at 32 * F and Freezer temperature was 0*. LPA observed medication storage, and cleaning product storage locked and inaccessible to clients in care. The knives storage was unlocked but staff was next to the cabinet preparing lunch for clients. The front and back yards of the facility were inspected. Outdoor exits and walkways were unobstructed. Facility has no exterior storage sheds. The storage areas in the garage were observed to store diapers and other supplies. LPA observed Facility License and Resident Personal rights were posted. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff, 4 clients and observed to be complete. LPA reviewed 4 client’s medications, centrally stored medication records and observed to be complete. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was reviewed and a copy was provided to ADM for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed dehydration while in care. Resident developed pressure injuries while in care.

On 8/28/24, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced a complaint investigation visit and met with Care Staff Rad Murillo. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of resident (R1) developed dehydration while in care & developed pressure injuries while in care. Reporting party states that Client was dehydrated and had pressure wounds on the elbows, heels, and coccyx. RP did not know the stage level of the wounds and it was not indicated in the client's medical chart. LPA was able to interview two staff members. S1 mentioned that R1 is with the facility for 21 years and can take a few steps from living room to dining room. Staff observed R1s right leg swollen and there was no fall or bruise so S1 instructed staff to elevate the leg and do ROM (Range of Motion) on arm. page 1 of 2 Unsubstantiated S1 said they wanted to wait and see if the swelling will go down before sending to the hospital since vital signs were good. However, the following day, staff found R1 not as responsive when staff asked R1 for breakfast. S1 asked staff to check on vital signs and they were good but looked pale and weak so S1 instructed staff to call 911. Another staff member, S2 also mentioned that they have tried and elevated R1s leg but the following day R1 did have a change in condition as R1 looked pale and weak. S2 also shared that residents in the facility are always provided hydration every hour, even before going to bed. LPA tried to get in touch with RP but there was no response. Based on records review, facility sent an incident report indicating that they had called 911 for further checkup due to their observations of R1 being weak while being assisted getting up from bed, a swelling of left arm and an open wound on left elbow measuring about 3cm, swollen right leg and redness on buttocks and swollen ankle. Based on interviews & records review, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. page 2 of 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220404134358
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Hassan Ebadat (LCN). LPA toured the facility inside and out with LCN. 2 staff and 2 residents were observed in the facility. 3 residents went to day program. Facility license, Administrator Certificate and Personal Rights posters were observed in the facility. LPA reviewed 3 resident files and 3 staff files. LPA toured the facility to include the living room, dining room, kitchen, resident bedrooms, bathroom, garage, and backyard. All fire exit routes were free and clear of obstruction. All staff present are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Facility temperature maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Hot water temperature maintained at 106 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility's fire extinguisher last serviced on 04/6/2023. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet Knives closet, and cleaning product closet were observed locked. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Fire alarm and smoke detectors were tested by ADM. The fire alarm and smoke detectors were working fine. Flash lights and first aid box were observed in the facility. The last time the facility conducted the emergency and fire drill was 2/20/2024. Deficiencies noted today. See 809-D. Exit interview was conducted with LCN. The report was provided to LCN for signature. A copy of the report was provided to LCN.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually assaulted

On 07/28/23, the Department received a sexual abuse complaint that a resident (referred as R1) was sexually assaulted by a staff (S1). On 07/25/2023, at approximately 1140 hours, it was reported to law enforcement agency that a staff (referred as S1) gave R1 a goodnight kiss on the check and S1 grabbed R1’s head and kissed R1 on the lips. Based on interview with R1, R1 stated that the incident occurred on 7/16/23. R1 stated that he/she was in his/her bedroom when he/she kissed S1 on the cheek. R1 giving S1 a goodnight kiss. After R1 kissed S1, S1 grabbed R1 and kissed him/her on the lips R1 did admit to hugging and kissing the staff on the check. R1 usually gives good morning and goodnight kisses to the individuals that care for her/him. R1 stated that he/she did not give permission to S1 to kiss her/him, and he/she has not been in a relationship with S1. Unsubstantiated Based on interview with R1’s spouse (SP1), SP1 stated that R1 gives kisses of good morning and good afternoon. SP1 stated that R1 told him/her that he/she had given S1 a goodnight kiss and that S1 grabbed him/her by the neck and kissed him/her occurred on 7/16/23. Based on interview with Administrator (ADM) and Licensee (L), they were informed by R1’s spouse (SP1) that S1 grabbed and kissed R1. S1 stated the kiss was an “accident” and he/she accidentally turned his/her face and that they kissed. Facility staff informed SP1 that there have been multiple incidents where R1 had pinched them and touched their buttocks. Based on interview with S1, S1 stated that he/she with spouse stayed on the couch in the evening though he/she did not live in the facility full time. S1 denied allegation that he/she had ever kissed R1 including a good morning or good night kiss. S1 also denied kissing R1 in his/her bedroom. S1 stated that sometimes R1 would come to him/her and give him/her a kiss on the cheek to say goodnight. S1 stated that prior week at about 2100 or 2200 hours, S1 was sitting on the couch and R1 sat next to him/her. R2 said, “Thank you” and kissed S1 on the cheek. S1 got startled and he/she turned to face him/her. S1 turned towards R1’s face, S1 stated that corner of his/her mouth have touched his/her face and the contact was not intentional. S1 recalled that R1 kissed him/her on the cheek when R1 had a seizure to thank him/her. S1 described it as a fatherly gesture as a thank you for his/her care and comfort he/she provided to R1. S1 stated that R1 also kissed other staff members on the cheek as a thank you. On February 16, 2023, LPA interviewed 4 Out of 5 residents. 2 Out of 5 residents are non-verbal and could not respond to LPA's questions. 2 Out of 5 residents denied ever seeing staff touch or kiss residents in an inappropriate/sexual manner. 2 Out of 5 residents denied ever being touched or kissed by staff in an inappropriate/sexual manner. 1 Out of 5 residents was attending day program during LPA's visit. LPA interviewed staff 4 staff members (S2-S5). 4 Out of 4 staff interviewed stated staff do not touch/kiss residents. 4 Out of 4 staff stated they have not seen other staff members touch or kiss the residents. Based on investigation, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230728140606
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Santa Clara County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County